Check the return values of the br_mrp_switchdev function.
In case of:
- BR_MRP_NONE, return the error to userspace,
- BR_MRP_SW, continue with SW implementation,
- BR_MRP_HW, continue without SW implementation,
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The function br_mrp_port_switchdev_set_state was called both with MRP
port state and STP port state, which is an issue because they don't
match exactly.
Therefore, update the function to be used only with STP port state and
use the id SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_STP_STATE.
The choice of using STP over MRP is that the drivers already implement
SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_STP_STATE and already in SW we update the port
STP state.
Fixes: 9a9f26e8f7 ("bridge: mrp: Connect MRP API with the switchdev API")
Fixes: fadd409136 ("bridge: switchdev: mrp: Implement MRP API for switchdev")
Fixes: 2f1a11ae11 ("bridge: mrp: Add MRP interface.")
Reported-by: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Extend MRP to support LC mode(link check) for the interconnect port.
This applies only to the interconnect ring.
Opposite to RC mode(ring check) the LC mode is using CFM frames to
detect when the link goes up or down and based on that the userspace
will need to react.
One advantage of the LC mode over RC mode is that there will be fewer
frames in the normal rings. Because RC mode generates InTest on all
ports while LC mode sends CFM frame only on the interconnect port.
All 4 nodes part of the interconnect ring needs to have the same mode.
And it is not possible to have running LC and RC mode at the same time
on a node.
Whenever the MIM starts it needs to detect the status of the other 3
nodes in the interconnect ring so it would send a frame called
InLinkStatus, on which the clients needs to reply with their link
status.
This patch adds InLinkStatus frame type and extends existing rules on
how to forward this frame.
Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201124082525.273820-1-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Replace list_head with hlist_head for MRP list under the bridge.
There is no need for a circular list when a linear list will work.
This will also decrease the size of 'struct net_bridge'.
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201106215049.1448185-1-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
This patch extends the processing of frames in the bridge. Currently MRP
frames needs special processing and the current implementation doesn't
allow a nice way to process different frame types. Therefore try to
improve this by adding a list that contains frame types that need
special processing. This list is iterated for each input frame and if
there is a match based on frame type then these functions will be called
and decide what to do with the frame. It can process the frame then the
bridge doesn't need to do anything or don't process so then the bridge
will do normal forwarding.
Signed-off-by: Henrik Bjoernlund <henrik.bjoernlund@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Thie patch adds support for MRP Interconnect. Similar with the MRP ring,
if the HW can't generate MRP_InTest frames, then the SW will try to
generate them. And if also the SW fails to generate the frames then an
error is return to userspace.
The forwarding/termination of MRP_In frames is happening in the kernel
and is done by MRP instances.
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This patch renames the function br_mrp_port_open to
br_mrp_ring_port_open. In this way is more clear that a ring port lost
the continuity because there will be also a br_mrp_in_port_open.
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This patch adds specific checks for primary(0x0) and secondary(0x1) when
setting the port role. For any other value the function
'br_mrp_set_port_role' will return -EINVAL.
Fixes: 20f6a05ef6 ("bridge: mrp: Rework the MRP netlink interface")
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
A node that has the MRA role, it can behave as MRM or MRC.
Initially it starts as MRM and sends MRP_Test frames on both ring ports.
If it detects that there are MRP_Test send by another MRM, then it
checks if these frames have a lower priority than itself. In this case
it would send MRP_Nack frames to notify the other node that it needs to
stop sending MRP_Test frames.
If it receives a MRP_Nack frame then it stops sending MRP_Test frames
and starts to behave as a MRC but it would continue to monitor the
MRP_Test frames send by MRM. If at a point the MRM stops to send
MRP_Test frames it would get the MRM role and start to send MRP_Test
frames.
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Each MRP instance has a priority, a lower value means a higher priority.
The priority of MRP instance is stored in MRP_Test frame in this way
all the MRP nodes in the ring can see other nodes priority.
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This patch reworks the MRP netlink interface. Before, each attribute
represented a binary structure which made it hard to be extended.
Therefore update the MRP netlink interface such that each existing
attribute to be a nested attribute which contains the fields of the
binary structures.
In this way the MRP netlink interface can be extended without breaking
the backwards compatibility. It is also using strict checking for
attributes under the MRP top attribute.
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
When a MRP instance is deleted, then restore the port according to the
bridge state. If the bridge is up then the ports will be in forwarding
state otherwise will be in disabled state.
Fixes: 9a9f26e8f7 ("bridge: mrp: Connect MRP API with the switchdev API")
Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
It is not allow to have the same net bridge port part of multiple MRP
rings. Therefore add a check if the port is used already in a different
MRP. In that case return failure.
Fixes: 9a9f26e8f7 ("bridge: mrp: Connect MRP API with the switchdev API")
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Implement the MRP API.
In case the HW can't generate MRP Test frames then the SW will try to generate
the frames. In case that also the SW will fail in generating the frames then a
error is return to the userspace. The userspace is responsible to generate all
the other MRP frames regardless if the test frames are generated by HW or SW.
The forwarding/termination of MRP frames is happening in the kernel and is done
by the MRP instance. The userspace application doesn't do the forwarding.
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Horatiu Vultur
David S. Miller
Menglong Dong
Henrik Bjoernlund