[ Upstream commit 0d098d83c5 ]
The hard call timeout is specified in the RXRPC_SET_CALL_TIMEOUT cmsg in
seconds, so fix the point at which sendmsg() applies it to the call to
convert to jiffies from seconds, not milliseconds.
Fixes: a158bdd324 ("rxrpc: Fix timeout of a call that hasn't yet been granted a channel")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 4feb2c4462 ]
One of the error paths in rxrpc_do_sendmsg() doesn't unlock the call mutex
before returning. Fix it to do this.
Note that this still doesn't get rid of the checker warning:
../net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c:617:5: warning: context imbalance in 'rxrpc_do_sendmsg' - wrong count at exit
I think the interplay between the socket lock and the call's user_mutex may
be too complicated for checker to analyse, especially as
rxrpc_new_client_call_for_sendmsg(), which it calls, returns with the
call's user_mutex if successful but unconditionally drops the socket lock.
Fixes: e754eba685 ("rxrpc: Provide a cmsg to specify the amount of Tx data for a call")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit b0f571ecd7 ]
Fix three bugs in the rxrpc's sendmsg implementation:
(1) rxrpc_new_client_call() should release the socket lock when returning
an error from rxrpc_get_call_slot().
(2) rxrpc_wait_for_tx_window_intr() will return without the call mutex
held in the event that we're interrupted by a signal whilst waiting
for tx space on the socket or relocking the call mutex afterwards.
Fix this by: (a) moving the unlock/lock of the call mutex up to
rxrpc_send_data() such that the lock is not held around all of
rxrpc_wait_for_tx_window*() and (b) indicating to higher callers
whether we're return with the lock dropped. Note that this means
recvmsg() will not block on this call whilst we're waiting.
(3) After dropping and regaining the call mutex, rxrpc_send_data() needs
to go and recheck the state of the tx_pending buffer and the
tx_total_len check in case we raced with another sendmsg() on the same
call.
Thinking on this some more, it might make sense to have different locks for
sendmsg() and recvmsg(). There's probably no need to make recvmsg() wait
for sendmsg(). It does mean that recvmsg() can return MSG_EOR indicating
that a call is dead before a sendmsg() to that call returns - but that can
currently happen anyway.
Without fix (2), something like the following can be induced:
WARNING: bad unlock balance detected!
5.16.0-rc6-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
-------------------------------------
syz-executor011/3597 is trying to release lock (&call->user_mutex) at:
[<ffffffff885163a3>] rxrpc_do_sendmsg+0xc13/0x1350 net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c:748
but there are no more locks to release!
other info that might help us debug this:
no locks held by syz-executor011/3597.
...
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 lib/dump_stack.c:106
print_unlock_imbalance_bug include/trace/events/lock.h:58 [inline]
__lock_release kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5306 [inline]
lock_release.cold+0x49/0x4e kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5657
__mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x99/0x5e0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:900
rxrpc_do_sendmsg+0xc13/0x1350 net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c:748
rxrpc_sendmsg+0x420/0x630 net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c:561
sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:704 [inline]
sock_sendmsg+0xcf/0x120 net/socket.c:724
____sys_sendmsg+0x6e8/0x810 net/socket.c:2409
___sys_sendmsg+0xf3/0x170 net/socket.c:2463
__sys_sendmsg+0xe5/0x1b0 net/socket.c:2492
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[Thanks to Hawkins Jiawei and Khalid Masum for their attempts to fix this]
Fixes: bc5e3a546d ("rxrpc: Use MSG_WAITALL to tell sendmsg() to temporarily ignore signals")
Reported-by: syzbot+7f0483225d0c94cb3441@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
Tested-by: syzbot+7f0483225d0c94cb3441@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
cc: Hawkins Jiawei <yin31149@gmail.com>
cc: Khalid Masum <khalid.masum.92@gmail.com>
cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/166135894583.600315.7170979436768124075.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 4ba68c5192 ]
If at the end of rxrpc sendmsg() or rxrpc_kernel_send_data() the call that
was being given data was aborted remotely or otherwise failed, return an
error rather than returning the amount of data buffered for transmission.
The call (presumably) did not complete, so there's not much point
continuing with it. AF_RXRPC considers it "complete" and so will be
unwilling to do anything else with it - and won't send a notification for
it, deeming the return from sendmsg sufficient.
Not returning an error causes afs to incorrectly handle a StoreData
operation that gets interrupted by a change of address due to NAT
reconfiguration.
This doesn't normally affect most operations since their request parameters
tend to fit into a single UDP packet and afs_make_call() returns before the
server responds; StoreData is different as it involves transmission of a
lot of data.
This can be triggered on a client by doing something like:
dd if=/dev/zero of=/afs/example.com/foo bs=1M count=512
at one prompt, and then changing the network address at another prompt,
e.g.:
ifconfig enp6s0 inet 192.168.6.2 && route add 192.168.6.1 dev enp6s0
Tracing packets on an Auristor fileserver looks something like:
192.168.6.1 -> 192.168.6.3 RX 107 ACK Idle Seq: 0 Call: 4 Source Port: 7000 Destination Port: 7001
192.168.6.3 -> 192.168.6.1 AFS (RX) 1482 FS Request: Unknown(64538) (64538)
192.168.6.3 -> 192.168.6.1 AFS (RX) 1482 FS Request: Unknown(64538) (64538)
192.168.6.1 -> 192.168.6.3 RX 107 ACK Idle Seq: 0 Call: 4 Source Port: 7000 Destination Port: 7001
<ARP exchange for 192.168.6.2>
192.168.6.2 -> 192.168.6.1 AFS (RX) 1482 FS Request: Unknown(0) (0)
192.168.6.2 -> 192.168.6.1 AFS (RX) 1482 FS Request: Unknown(0) (0)
192.168.6.1 -> 192.168.6.2 RX 107 ACK Exceeds Window Seq: 0 Call: 4 Source Port: 7000 Destination Port: 7001
192.168.6.1 -> 192.168.6.2 RX 74 ABORT Seq: 0 Call: 4 Source Port: 7000 Destination Port: 7001
192.168.6.1 -> 192.168.6.2 RX 74 ABORT Seq: 29321 Call: 4 Source Port: 7000 Destination Port: 7001
The Auristor fileserver logs code -453 (RXGEN_SS_UNMARSHAL), but the abort
code received by kafs is -5 (RX_PROTOCOL_ERROR) as the rx layer sees the
condition and generates an abort first and the unmarshal error is a
consequence of that at the application layer.
Reported-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
Link: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-afs/2021-December/004810.html # v1
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Ask the security class how much header and trailer space to allow for when
allocating a packet, given how much data is remaining.
This will allow the rxgk security class to stick both a trailer in as well
as a header as appropriate in the future.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Insert the security header into the skbuff representing a DATA packet to be
transmitted rather than using skb_reserve() when the packet is allocated.
This makes it easier to apply crypto that spans the security header and the
data, particularly in the upcoming RxGK class where we have a common
encrypt-and-checksum function that is used in a number of circumstances.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
When a new incoming call arrives at an userspace rxrpc socket on a new
connection that has a security class set, the code currently pushes it onto
the accept queue to hold a ref on it for the socket. This doesn't work,
however, as recvmsg() pops it off, notices that it's in the SERVER_SECURING
state and discards the ref. This means that the call runs out of refs too
early and the kernel oopses.
By contrast, a kernel rxrpc socket manually pre-charges the incoming call
pool with calls that already have user call IDs assigned, so they are ref'd
by the call tree on the socket.
Change the mode of operation for userspace rxrpc server sockets to work
like this too. Although this is a UAPI change, server sockets aren't
currently functional.
Fixes: 248f219cb8 ("rxrpc: Rewrite the data and ack handling code")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
There's a race between rxrpc_sendmsg setting up a call, but then failing to
send anything on it due to an error, and recvmsg() seeing the call
completion occur and trying to return the state to the user.
An assertion fails in rxrpc_recvmsg() because the call has already been
released from the socket and is about to be released again as recvmsg deals
with it. (The recvmsg_q queue on the socket holds a ref, so there's no
problem with use-after-free.)
We also have to be careful not to end up reporting an error twice, in such
a way that both returns indicate to userspace that the user ID supplied
with the call is no longer in use - which could cause the client to
malfunction if it recycles the user ID fast enough.
Fix this by the following means:
(1) When sendmsg() creates a call after the point that the call has been
successfully added to the socket, don't return any errors through
sendmsg(), but rather complete the call and let recvmsg() retrieve
them. Make sendmsg() return 0 at this point. Further calls to
sendmsg() for that call will fail with ESHUTDOWN.
Note that at this point, we haven't send any packets yet, so the
server doesn't yet know about the call.
(2) If sendmsg() returns an error when it was expected to create a new
call, it means that the user ID wasn't used.
(3) Mark the call disconnected before marking it completed to prevent an
oops in rxrpc_release_call().
(4) recvmsg() will then retrieve the error and set MSG_EOR to indicate
that the user ID is no longer known by the kernel.
An oops like the following is produced:
kernel BUG at net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c:605!
...
RIP: 0010:rxrpc_recvmsg+0x256/0x5ae
...
Call Trace:
? __init_waitqueue_head+0x2f/0x2f
____sys_recvmsg+0x8a/0x148
? import_iovec+0x69/0x9c
? copy_msghdr_from_user+0x5c/0x86
___sys_recvmsg+0x72/0xaa
? __fget_files+0x22/0x57
? __fget_light+0x46/0x51
? fdget+0x9/0x1b
do_recvmmsg+0x15e/0x232
? _raw_spin_unlock+0xa/0xb
? vtime_delta+0xf/0x25
__x64_sys_recvmmsg+0x2c/0x2f
do_syscall_64+0x4c/0x78
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
Fixes: 357f5ef646 ("rxrpc: Call rxrpc_release_call() on error in rxrpc_new_client_call()")
Reported-by: syzbot+b54969381df354936d96@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
rxrpc_sendmsg() returns EPIPE if there's an outstanding error, such as if
rxrpc_recvmsg() indicating ENODATA if there's nothing for it to read.
Change rxrpc_recvmsg() to return EAGAIN instead if there's nothing to read
as this particular error doesn't get stored in ->sk_err by the networking
core.
Also change rxrpc_sendmsg() so that it doesn't fail with delayed receive
errors (there's no way for it to report which call, if any, the error was
caused by).
Fixes: 17926a7932 ("[AF_RXRPC]: Provide secure RxRPC sockets for use by userspace and kernel both")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Under some circumstances, rxrpc will fail a transmit a packet through the
underlying UDP socket (ie. UDP sendmsg returns an error). This may result
in a call getting stuck.
In the instance being seen, where AFS tries to send a probe to the Volume
Location server, tracepoints show the UDP Tx failure (in this case returing
error 99 EADDRNOTAVAIL) and then nothing more:
afs_make_vl_call: c=0000015d VL.GetCapabilities
rxrpc_call: c=0000015d NWc u=1 sp=rxrpc_kernel_begin_call+0x106/0x170 [rxrpc] a=00000000dd89ee8a
rxrpc_call: c=0000015d Gus u=2 sp=rxrpc_new_client_call+0x14f/0x580 [rxrpc] a=00000000e20e4b08
rxrpc_call: c=0000015d SEE u=2 sp=rxrpc_activate_one_channel+0x7b/0x1c0 [rxrpc] a=00000000e20e4b08
rxrpc_call: c=0000015d CON u=2 sp=rxrpc_kernel_begin_call+0x106/0x170 [rxrpc] a=00000000e20e4b08
rxrpc_tx_fail: c=0000015d r=1 ret=-99 CallDataNofrag
The problem is that if the initial packet fails and the retransmission
timer hasn't been started, the call is set to completed and an error is
returned from rxrpc_send_data_packet() to rxrpc_queue_packet(). Though
rxrpc_instant_resend() is called, this does nothing because the call is
marked completed.
So rxrpc_notify_socket() isn't called and the error is passed back up to
rxrpc_send_data(), rxrpc_kernel_send_data() and thence to afs_make_call()
and afs_vl_get_capabilities() where it is simply ignored because it is
assumed that the result of a probe will be collected asynchronously.
Fileserver probing is similarly affected via afs_fs_get_capabilities().
Fix this by always issuing a notification in __rxrpc_set_call_completion()
if it shifts a call to the completed state, even if an error is also
returned to the caller through the function return value.
Also put in a little bit of optimisation to avoid taking the call
state_lock and disabling softirqs if the call is already in the completed
state and remove some now redundant rxrpc_notify_socket() calls.
Fixes: f5c17aaeb2 ("rxrpc: Calls should only have one terminal state")
Reported-by: Gerry Seidman <gerry@auristor.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
Move the handling of call completion out of line so that the next patch can
add more code in that area.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
rxrpc currently uses a fixed 4s retransmission timeout until the RTT is
sufficiently sampled. This can cause problems with some fileservers with
calls to the cache manager in the afs filesystem being dropped from the
fileserver because a packet goes missing and the retransmission timeout is
greater than the call expiry timeout.
Fix this by:
(1) Copying the RTT/RTO calculation code from Linux's TCP implementation
and altering it to fit rxrpc.
(2) Altering the various users of the RTT to make use of the new SRTT
value.
(3) Replacing the use of rxrpc_resend_timeout to use the calculated RTO
value instead (which is needed in jiffies), along with a backoff.
Notes:
(1) rxrpc provides RTT samples by matching the serial numbers on outgoing
DATA packets that have the RXRPC_REQUEST_ACK set and PING ACK packets
against the reference serial number in incoming REQUESTED ACK and
PING-RESPONSE ACK packets.
(2) Each packet that is transmitted on an rxrpc connection gets a new
per-connection serial number, even for retransmissions, so an ACK can
be cross-referenced to a specific trigger packet. This allows RTT
information to be drawn from retransmitted DATA packets also.
(3) rxrpc maintains the RTT/RTO state on the rxrpc_peer record rather than
on an rxrpc_call because many RPC calls won't live long enough to
generate more than one sample.
(4) The calculated SRTT value is in units of 8ths of a microsecond rather
than nanoseconds.
The (S)RTT and RTO values are displayed in /proc/net/rxrpc/peers.
Fixes: 17926a7932 ([AF_RXRPC]: Provide secure RxRPC sockets for use by userspace and kernel both"")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Fix the handling of sendmsg() with MSG_WAITALL for userspace to round the
timeout for when a signal occurs up to at least two jiffies as a 1 jiffy
timeout may end up being effectively 0 if jiffies wraps at the wrong time.
Fixes: bc5e3a546d ("rxrpc: Use MSG_WAITALL to tell sendmsg() to temporarily ignore signals")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Fix the interruptibility of kernel-initiated client calls so that they're
either only interruptible when they're waiting for a call slot to come
available or they're not interruptible at all. Either way, they're not
interruptible during transmission.
This should help prevent StoreData calls from being interrupted when
writeback is in progress. It doesn't, however, handle interruption during
the receive phase.
Userspace-initiated calls are still interruptable. After the signal has
been handled, sendmsg() will return the amount of data copied out of the
buffer and userspace can perform another sendmsg() call to continue
transmission.
Fixes: bc5e3a546d ("rxrpc: Use MSG_WAITALL to tell sendmsg() to temporarily ignore signals")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Abstract out the calculation of there being sufficient Tx buffer space.
This is reproduced several times in the rxrpc sendmsg code.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Fix the cleanup of the crypto state on a call after the call has been
disconnected. As the call has been disconnected, its connection ref has
been discarded and so we can't go through that to get to the security ops
table.
Fix this by caching the security ops pointer in the rxrpc_call struct and
using that when freeing the call security state. Also use this in other
places we're dealing with call-specific security.
The symptoms look like:
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rxrpc_release_call+0xb2d/0xb60
net/rxrpc/call_object.c:481
Read of size 8 at addr ffff888062ffeb50 by task syz-executor.5/4764
Fixes: 1db88c5343 ("rxrpc: Fix -Wframe-larger-than= warnings from on-stack crypto")
Reported-by: syzbot+eed305768ece6682bb7f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
When sendmsg() finds a call to continue on with, if the call is in an
inappropriate state, it doesn't release the ref it just got on that call
before returning an error.
This causes the following symptom to show up with kasan:
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rxrpc_send_keepalive+0x8a2/0x940
net/rxrpc/output.c:635
Read of size 8 at addr ffff888064219698 by task kworker/0:3/11077
where line 635 is:
whdr.epoch = htonl(peer->local->rxnet->epoch);
The local endpoint (which cannot be pinned by the call) has been released,
but not the peer (which is pinned by the call).
Fix this by releasing the call in the error path.
Fixes: 37411cad63 ("rxrpc: Fix potential NULL-pointer exception")
Reported-by: syzbot+d850c266e3df14da1d31@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Use the previously-added transmit-phase skbuff private flag to simplify the
socket buffer tracing a bit. Which phase the skbuff comes from can now be
divined from the skb rather than having to be guessed from the call state.
We can also reduce the number of rxrpc_skb_trace values by eliminating the
difference between Tx and Rx in the symbols.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Add a flag in the private data on an skbuff to indicate that this is a
transmission-phase buffer rather than a receive-phase buffer.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Fix the fact that a notification isn't sent to the recvmsg side to indicate
a call failed when sendmsg() fails to transmit a DATA packet with the error
ENETUNREACH, EHOSTUNREACH or ECONNREFUSED.
Without this notification, the afs client just sits there waiting for the
call to complete in some manner (which it's not now going to do), which
also pins the rxrpc call in place.
This can be seen if the client has a scope-level IPv6 address, but not a
global-level IPv6 address, and we try and transmit an operation to a
server's IPv6 address.
Looking in /proc/net/rxrpc/calls shows completed calls just sat there with
an abort code of RX_USER_ABORT and an error code of -ENETUNREACH.
Fixes: c54e43d752 ("rxrpc: Fix missing start of call timeout")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com>
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s):
this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public licence as published by
the free software foundation either version 2 of the licence or at
your option any later version
extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier
GPL-2.0-or-later
has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 114 file(s).
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>
Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190520170857.552531963@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Allow kernel services using AF_RXRPC to indicate that a call should be
non-interruptible. This allows kafs to make things like lock-extension and
writeback data storage calls non-interruptible.
If this is set, signals will be ignored for operations on that call where
possible - such as waiting to get a call channel on an rxrpc connection.
It doesn't prevent UDP sendmsg from being interrupted, but that will be
handled by packet retransmission.
rxrpc_kernel_recv_data() isn't affected by this since that never waits,
preferring instead to return -EAGAIN and leave the waiting to the caller.
Userspace initiated calls can't be set to be uninterruptible at this time.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Change rxrpc_queue_packet()'s signature so that it can return any error
code it may encounter when trying to send the packet.
This allows the caller to eventually do something in case of error - though
it should be noted that the packet has been queued and a resend is
scheduled.
Signed-off-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The changes introduced to allow rxrpc calls to be retried creates an issue
when it comes to refcounting afs_call structs. The problem is that when
rxrpc_send_data() queues the last packet for an asynchronous call, the
following sequence can occur:
(1) The notify_end_tx callback is invoked which causes the state in the
afs_call to be changed from AFS_CALL_CL_REQUESTING or
AFS_CALL_SV_REPLYING.
(2) afs_deliver_to_call() can then process event notifications from rxrpc
on the async_work queue.
(3) Delivery of events, such as an abort from the server, can cause the
afs_call state to be changed to AFS_CALL_COMPLETE on async_work.
(4) For an asynchronous call, afs_process_async_call() notes that the call
is complete and tried to clean up all the refs on async_work.
(5) rxrpc_send_data() might return the amount of data transferred
(success) or an error - which could in turn reflect a local error or a
received error.
Synchronising the clean up after rxrpc_kernel_send_data() returns an error
with the asynchronous cleanup is then tricky to get right.
Mostly revert commit c038a58ccf. The two API
functions the original commit added aren't currently used. This makes
rxrpc_kernel_send_data() always return successfully if it queued the data
it was given.
Note that this doesn't affect synchronous calls since their Rx notification
function merely pokes a wait queue and does not refcounting. The
asynchronous call notification function *has* to do refcounting and pass a
ref over the work item to avoid the need to sync the workqueue in call
cleanup.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The expect_rx_by call timeout is supposed to be set when a call is started
to indicate that we need to receive a packet by that point. This is
currently put back every time we receive a packet, but it isn't started
when we first send a packet. Without this, the call may wait forever if
the server doesn't deign to reply.
Fix this by setting the timeout upon a successful UDP sendmsg call for the
first DATA packet. The timeout is initiated only for initial transmission
and not for subsequent retries as we don't want the retry mechanism to
extend the timeout indefinitely.
Fixes: a158bdd324 ("rxrpc: Fix call timeouts")
Reported-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
When a new client call is requested, an rxrpc_conn_parameters struct object
is passed in with a bunch of parameters set, such as the local endpoint to
use. A pointer to the target peer record is also placed in there by
rxrpc_get_client_conn() - and this is removed if and only if a new
connection object is allocated. Thus it leaks if a new connection object
isn't allocated.
Fix this by putting any peer object attached to the rxrpc_conn_parameters
object in the function that allocated it.
Fixes: 19ffa01c9c ("rxrpc: Use structs to hold connection params and protocol info")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Fix various issues detected by checker.
Errors:
(*) rxrpc_discard_prealloc() should be using rcu_assign_pointer to set
call->socket.
Warnings:
(*) rxrpc_service_connection_reaper() should be passing NULL rather than 0 to
trace_rxrpc_conn() as the where argument.
(*) rxrpc_disconnect_client_call() should get its net pointer via the
call->conn rather than call->sock to avoid a warning about accessing
an RCU pointer without protection.
(*) Proc seq start/stop functions need annotation as they pass locks
between the functions.
False positives:
(*) Checker doesn't correctly handle of seq-retry lock context balance in
rxrpc_find_service_conn_rcu().
(*) Checker thinks execution may proceed past the BUG() in
rxrpc_publish_service_conn().
(*) Variable length array warnings from SKCIPHER_REQUEST_ON_STACK() in
rxkad.c.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
rxrpc calls have a ring of packets that are awaiting ACK or retransmission
and a parallel ring of annotations that tracks the state of those packets.
If the initial transmission of a packet on the underlying UDP socket fails
then the packet annotation is marked for resend - but the setting of this
mark accidentally erases the last-packet mark also stored in the same
annotation slot. If this happens, a call won't switch out of the Tx phase
when all the packets have been transmitted.
Fix this by retaining the last-packet mark and only altering the packet
state.
Fixes: 248f219cb8 ("rxrpc: Rewrite the data and ack handling code")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
In rxrpc and afs, use the debug_ids that are monotonically allocated to
various objects as they're allocated rather than pointers as kernel
pointers are now hashed making them less useful. Further, the debug ids
aren't reused anywhere nearly as quickly.
In addition, allow kernel services that use rxrpc, such as afs, to take
numbers from the rxrpc counter, assign them to their own call struct and
pass them in to rxrpc for both client and service calls so that the trace
lines for each will have the same ID tag.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Values assigned to both variable resend_at and ack_at are overwritten
before they can be used.
The correct fix here is to add 'now' to the previously computed value in
resend_at and ack_at.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1462262
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1462263
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1462264
Fixes: beb8e5e4f3 ("rxrpc: Express protocol timeouts in terms of RTT")
Link: https://marc.info/?i=17004.1511808959%40warthog.procyon.org.uk
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Add an extra timeout that is set/updated when we send a DATA packet that
has the request-ack flag set. This allows us to detect if we don't get an
ACK in response to the latest flagged packet.
The ACK packet is adjudged to have been lost if it doesn't turn up within
2*RTT of the transmission.
If the timeout occurs, we schedule the sending of a PING ACK to find out
the state of the other side. If a new DATA packet is ready to go sooner,
we cancel the sending of the ping and set the request-ack flag on that
instead.
If we get back a PING-RESPONSE ACK that indicates a lower tx_top than what
we had at the time of the ping transmission, we adjudge all the DATA
packets sent between the response tx_top and the ping-time tx_top to have
been lost and retransmit immediately.
Rather than sending a PING ACK, we could just pick a DATA packet and
speculatively retransmit that with request-ack set. It should result in
either a REQUESTED ACK or a DUPLICATE ACK which we can then use in lieu the
a PING-RESPONSE ACK mentioned above.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Express protocol timeouts for data retransmission and deferred ack
generation in terms on RTT rather than specified timeouts once we have
sufficient RTT samples.
For the moment, this requires just one RTT sample to be able to use this
for ack deferral and two for data retransmission.
The data retransmission timeout is set at RTT*1.5 and the ACK deferral
timeout is set at RTT.
Note that the calculated timeout is limited to a minimum of 4ns to make
sure it doesn't happen too quickly.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Fix the rxrpc call expiration timeouts and make them settable from
userspace. By analogy with other rx implementations, there should be three
timeouts:
(1) "Normal timeout"
This is set for all calls and is triggered if we haven't received any
packets from the peer in a while. It is measured from the last time
we received any packet on that call. This is not reset by any
connection packets (such as CHALLENGE/RESPONSE packets).
If a service operation takes a long time, the server should generate
PING ACKs at a duration that's substantially less than the normal
timeout so is to keep both sides alive. This is set at 1/6 of normal
timeout.
(2) "Idle timeout"
This is set only for a service call and is triggered if we stop
receiving the DATA packets that comprise the request data. It is
measured from the last time we received a DATA packet.
(3) "Hard timeout"
This can be set for a call and specified the maximum lifetime of that
call. It should not be specified by default. Some operations (such
as volume transfer) take a long time.
Allow userspace to set/change the timeouts on a call with sendmsg, using a
control message:
RXRPC_SET_CALL_TIMEOUTS
The data to the message is a number of 32-bit words, not all of which need
be given:
u32 hard_timeout; /* sec from first packet */
u32 idle_timeout; /* msec from packet Rx */
u32 normal_timeout; /* msec from data Rx */
This can be set in combination with any other sendmsg() that affects a
call.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
When rxrpc_sendmsg() parses the control message buffer, it places the
parameters extracted into a structure, but lumps together call parameters
(such as user call ID) with operation parameters (such as whether to send
data, send an abort or accept a call).
Split the call parameters out into their own structure, a copy of which is
then embedded in the operation parameters struct.
The call parameters struct is then passed down into the places that need it
instead of passing the individual parameters. This allows for extra call
parameters to be added.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Don't set upgrade by default when creating a call from sendmsg(). This is
a holdover from when I was testing the code.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
The caller of rxrpc_accept_call() must release the lock on call->user_mutex
returned by that function.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Make AF_RXRPC accept MSG_WAITALL as a flag to sendmsg() to tell it to
ignore signals whilst loading up the message queue, provided progress is
being made in emptying the queue at the other side.
Progress is defined as the base of the transmit window having being
advanced within 2 RTT periods. If the period is exceeded with no progress,
sendmsg() will return anyway, indicating how much data has been copied, if
any.
Once the supplied buffer is entirely decanted, the sendmsg() will return.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Allow a client call that failed on network error to be retried, provided
that the Tx queue still holds DATA packet 1. This allows an operation to
be submitted to another server or another address for the same server
without having to repackage and re-encrypt the data so far processed.
Two new functions are provided:
(1) rxrpc_kernel_check_call() - This is used to find out the completion
state of a call to guess whether it can be retried and whether it
should be retried.
(2) rxrpc_kernel_retry_call() - Disconnect the call from its current
connection, reset the state and submit it as a new client call to a
new address. The new address need not match the previous address.
A call may be retried even if all the data hasn't been loaded into it yet;
a partially constructed will be retained at the same point it was at when
an error condition was detected. msg_data_left() can be used to find out
how much data was packaged before the error occurred.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Add a callback to rxrpc_kernel_send_data() so that a kernel service can get
a notification that the AF_RXRPC call has transitioned out the Tx phase and
is now waiting for a reply or a final ACK.
This is called from AF_RXRPC with the call state lock held so the
notification is guaranteed to come before any reply is passed back.
Further, modify the AFS filesystem to make use of this so that we don't have
to change the afs_call state before sending the last bit of data.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
call->error is stored as 0 or a negative error code. Don't negate this
value (ie. make it positive) before returning it from a kernel function
(though it should still be negated before passing to userspace through a
control message).
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
There were many places that my previous spatch didn't find,
as pointed out by yuan linyu in various patches.
The following spatch found many more and also removes the
now unnecessary casts:
@@
identifier p, p2;
expression len;
expression skb;
type t, t2;
@@
(
-p = skb_put(skb, len);
+p = skb_put_zero(skb, len);
|
-p = (t)skb_put(skb, len);
+p = skb_put_zero(skb, len);
)
... when != p
(
p2 = (t2)p;
-memset(p2, 0, len);
|
-memset(p, 0, len);
)
@@
type t, t2;
identifier p, p2;
expression skb;
@@
t *p;
...
(
-p = skb_put(skb, sizeof(t));
+p = skb_put_zero(skb, sizeof(t));
|
-p = (t *)skb_put(skb, sizeof(t));
+p = skb_put_zero(skb, sizeof(t));
)
... when != p
(
p2 = (t2)p;
-memset(p2, 0, sizeof(*p));
|
-memset(p, 0, sizeof(*p));
)
@@
expression skb, len;
@@
-memset(skb_put(skb, len), 0, len);
+skb_put_zero(skb, len);
Apply it to the tree (with one manual fixup to keep the
comment in vxlan.c, which spatch removed.)
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Provide a control message that can be specified on the first sendmsg() of a
client call or the first sendmsg() of a service response to indicate the
total length of the data to be transmitted for that call.
Currently, because the length of the payload of an encrypted DATA packet is
encrypted in front of the data, the packet cannot be encrypted until we
know how much data it will hold.
By specifying the length at the beginning of the transmit phase, each DATA
packet length can be set before we start loading data from userspace (where
several sendmsg() calls may contribute to a particular packet).
An error will be returned if too little or too much data is presented in
the Tx phase.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Consolidate the sendmsg control message parameters into a struct rather
than passing them individually through the argument list of
rxrpc_sendmsg_cmsg(). This makes it easier to add more parameters.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Make it possible for a client to use AuriStor's service upgrade facility.
The client does this by adding an RXRPC_UPGRADE_SERVICE control message to
the first sendmsg() of a call. This takes no parameters.
When recvmsg() starts returning data from the call, the service ID field in
the returned msg_name will reflect the result of the upgrade attempt. If
the upgrade was ignored, srx_service will match what was set in the
sendmsg(); if the upgrade happened the srx_service will be altered to
indicate the service the server upgraded to.
Note that:
(1) The choice of upgrade service is up to the server
(2) Further client calls to the same server that would share a connection
are blocked if an upgrade probe is in progress.
(3) This should only be used to probe the service. Clients should then
use the returned service ID in all subsequent communications with that
server (and not set the upgrade). Note that the kernel will not
retain this information should the connection expire from its cache.
(4) If a server that supports upgrading is replaced by one that doesn't,
whilst a connection is live, and if the replacement is running, say,
OpenAFS 1.6.4 or older or an older IBM AFS, then the replacement
server will not respond to packets sent to the upgraded connection.
At this point, calls will time out and the server must be reprobed.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Add a tracepoint (rxrpc_rx_proto) to record protocol errors in received
packets. The following changes are made:
(1) Add a function, __rxrpc_abort_eproto(), to note a protocol error on a
call and mark the call aborted. This is wrapped by
rxrpc_abort_eproto() that makes the why string usable in trace.
(2) Add trace_rxrpc_rx_proto() or rxrpc_abort_eproto() to protocol error
generation points, replacing rxrpc_abort_call() with the latter.
(3) Only send an abort packet in rxkad_verify_packet*() if we actually
managed to abort the call.
Note that a trace event is also emitted if a kernel user (e.g. afs) tries
to send data through a call when it's not in the transmission phase, though
it's not technically a receive event.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Make rxrpc_kernel_abort_call() return an indication as to whether it
actually aborted the operation or not so that kafs can trace the failure of
the operation. Note that 'success' in this context means changing the
state of the call, not necessarily successfully transmitting an ABORT
packet.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Use negative error codes in struct rxrpc_call::error because that's what
the kernel normally deals with and to make the code consistent. We only
turn them positive when transcribing into a cmsg for userspace recvmsg.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
If rxrpc_kernel_send_data() is asked to send data through a call that has
already failed (due to a remote abort, received protocol error or network
error), then return the associated error code saved in the call rather than
ESHUTDOWN.
This allows the caller to work out whether to ask for the abort code or not
based on this.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
David Howells
Gustavo A. R. Silva
Thomas Gleixner
Marc Dionne
Gustavo A. R. Silva
Johannes Berg