Граф коммитов

12 Коммитов

Автор SHA1 Сообщение Дата
Ricky Zhou d881d25cf5 samples/seccomp: Support programs with >256 instructions
Previously, the program size was incorrectly truncated to 8 bits,
resulting in broken labels in large programs. Also changes the jump
resolution loop to not rely on undefined behavior (making a pointer
point before the filter array).

Signed-off-by: Ricky Zhou <rickyz@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2016-11-01 08:58:17 -07:00
Ricky Zhou 1ff120504f samples/seccomp: Enable PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS in dropper
Either CAP_SYS_ADMIN or PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS is required to enable
seccomp. This allows samples/seccomp/dropper to be run without
CAP_SYS_ADMIN.

Signed-off-by: Ricky Zhou <rickyz@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2016-11-01 08:58:10 -07:00
Ricky Zhou 0af04ba564 samples/seccomp: Fix hostprogs variable
In f6041c1d, a separate SAMPLES_SECCOMP option was added. This changed
hostprogs-y to hostprogs-m, so adjust it.

Signed-off-by: Ricky Zhou <rickyz@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2016-11-01 08:57:42 -07:00
Olof Johansson f6041c1d8a samples/seccomp: Add standalone config option
Add a separate Kconfig option for SAMPLES_SECCOMP.

Main reason for this is that, just like other samples, it's forced to
be a module.

Without this, since the sample is a target only controlled by
CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER, the samples will be built before include files are
put in place properly. For example, from an arm64 allmodconfig built with
"make -sk -j 32" (without specific target), the following happens:

  samples/seccomp/bpf-fancy.c:13:27: fatal error: linux/seccomp.h: No such file or directory
  samples/seccomp/bpf-helper.h:20:50: fatal error: linux/seccomp.h: No such file or directory
  samples/seccomp/dropper.c:20:27: fatal error: linux/seccomp.h: No such file or directory
  samples/seccomp/bpf-direct.c:21:27: fatal error: linux/seccomp.h: No such file or directory

So, just stick to the same format as other samples.

Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2016-07-07 10:58:03 -07:00
Kees Cook 3a9af0bd34 samples/seccomp: improve label helper
Fixes a potential corruption with uninitialized stack memory in the
seccomp BPF sample program.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixlet]
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reported-by: Robert Swiecki <swiecki@google.com>
Tested-by: Robert Swiecki <swiecki@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-17 14:34:55 -08:00
Markos Chandras e9107f88c9 samples/seccomp/Makefile: do not build tests if cross-compiling for MIPS
The Makefile is designed to use the host toolchain so it may be unsafe
to build the tests if the kernel has been configured and built for
another architecture.  This fixes a build problem when the kernel has
been configured and built for the MIPS architecture but the host is not
MIPS (cross-compiled).  The MIPS syscalls are only defined if one of the
following is true:

 1) _MIPS_SIM == _MIPS_SIM_ABI64
 2) _MIPS_SIM == _MIPS_SIM_ABI32
 3) _MIPS_SIM == _MIPS_SIM_NABI32

Of course, none of these make sense on a non-MIPS toolchain and the
following build problem occurs when building on a non-MIPS host.

  linux/usr/include/linux/kexec.h:50: userspace cannot reference function or variable defined in the kernel
  samples/seccomp/bpf-direct.c: In function `emulator':
  samples/seccomp/bpf-direct.c:76:17: error: `__NR_write' undeclared (first use in this function)

Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
Reported-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-04-03 16:21:06 -07:00
Arnd Bergmann 275aaa6833 samples/seccomp: be less stupid about cross compiling
The seccomp filters are currently built for the build host, not for the
machine that they are going to run on, but they are also built for with
the -m32 flag if the kernel is built for a 32 bit machine, both of which
seems rather odd.

It broke allyesconfig on my machine, which is x86-64, but building for
32 bit ARM, with this error message:

  In file included from /usr/include/stdio.h:28:0,
                   from samples/seccomp/bpf-fancy.c:15:
  /usr/include/features.h:324:26: fatal error: bits/predefs.h: No such file or directory

because there are no 32 bit libc headers installed on this machine.  We
should really be building all the samples for the target machine rather
than the build host, but since the infrastructure for that appears to be
missing right now, let's be a little bit smarter and not pass the '-m32'
flag to the HOSTCC when cross- compiling.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-02-05 20:38:49 +11:00
Heiko Carstens b25b09ecf9 samples/seccomp: fix 31 bit build on s390
On s390 the flag to force 31 builds is -m31 instead of -m32 unlike
on all (?) other architectures.

Fixes this compile error:

  HOSTCC  samples/seccomp/bpf-direct.o
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-m32"
make[2]: *** [samples/seccomp/bpf-direct.o] Error 1

Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>
2012-09-12 12:55:31 +10:00
Heiko Carstens de4bb3b9c7 samples/seccomp: fix endianness bug in LO_ARG define
The LO_ARG define needs to consider endianness also for 32 bit builds.

The "bpf_fancy" test case didn't work on s390 in 32 bit and compat mode
because the LO_ARG define resulted in a BPF program which read the upper
halve of the 64 bit system call arguments instead of the lower halves.

Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>
2012-08-03 14:27:40 +10:00
Chad Williamson 8aec836acb samples: seccomp: add .gitignore for untracked executables
git status should be clean following make allmodconfig && make. Add
a .gitignore file to the samples/seccomp directory to ignore binaries
produced there.

Signed-off-by: Chad Williamson <chad@dahc.us>
Reviewed-By: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>
2012-06-29 00:54:17 +10:00
Will Drewry 561381a146 samples/seccomp: fix dependencies on arch macros
This change fixes the compilation error triggered here for
i386 allmodconfig in linux-next:
  http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/6123842/

Logic attempting to predict the host architecture has been
removed from the Makefile.  Instead, the bpf-direct sample
should now compile on any architecture, but if the architecture
is not supported, it will compile a minimal main() function.

This change also ensures the samples are not compiled when
there is no seccomp filter support.

(Note, I wasn't able to reproduce the error locally, but
 the existing approach was clearly flawed.  This tweak
 should resolve your issue and avoid other future weirdness.)

Reported-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Suggested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>
2012-04-19 13:44:06 +10:00
Will Drewry 8ac270d1e2 Documentation: prctl/seccomp_filter
Documents how system call filtering using Berkeley Packet
Filter programs works and how it may be used.
Includes an example for x86 and a semi-generic
example using a macro-based code generator.

Acked-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

v18: - added acked by
     - update no new privs numbers
v17: - remove @compat note and add Pitfalls section for arch checking
       (keescook@chromium.org)
v16: -
v15: -
v14: - rebase/nochanges
v13: - rebase on to 88ebdda615
v12: - comment on the ptrace_event use
     - update arch support comment
     - note the behavior of SECCOMP_RET_DATA when there are multiple filters
       (keescook@chromium.org)
     - lots of samples/ clean up incl 64-bit bpf-direct support
       (markus@chromium.org)
     - rebase to linux-next
v11: - overhaul return value language, updates (keescook@chromium.org)
     - comment on do_exit(SIGSYS)
v10: - update for SIGSYS
     - update for new seccomp_data layout
     - update for ptrace option use
v9: - updated bpf-direct.c for SIGILL
v8: - add PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS to the samples.
v7: - updated for all the new stuff in v7: TRAP, TRACE
    - only talk about PR_SET_SECCOMP now
    - fixed bad JLE32 check (coreyb@linux.vnet.ibm.com)
    - adds dropper.c: a simple system call disabler
v6: - tweak the language to note the requirement of
      PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS being called prior to use. (luto@mit.edu)
v5: - update sample to use system call arguments
    - adds a "fancy" example using a macro-based generator
    - cleaned up bpf in the sample
    - update docs to mention arguments
    - fix prctl value (eparis@redhat.com)
    - language cleanup (rdunlap@xenotime.net)
v4: - update for no_new_privs use
    - minor tweaks
v3: - call out BPF <-> Berkeley Packet Filter (rdunlap@xenotime.net)
    - document use of tentative always-unprivileged
    - guard sample compilation for i386 and x86_64
v2: - move code to samples (corbet@lwn.net)
Signed-off-by: James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>
2012-04-14 11:13:22 +10:00