commit 9e4fa80ab7 upstream.
Fix the name of the aoclk81 clock. Apparently name aoclk81 as used by
the vendor driver was changed when mainlining the g12a clock driver.
Fixes: f41efceb46 ("pwm: meson: Add clock source configuration for Meson G12A")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit eb411c0cf5 upstream.
This fix is basically the same as 9bce02ef0d ("pwm: meson: Fix the
G12A AO clock parents order"). Vendor driver referenced there has
xtal as first parent also for axg ao. In addition fix the name
of the aoclk81 clock. Apparently name aoclk81 as used by the vendor
driver was changed when mainlining the axg clock driver.
Fixes: bccaa3f917 ("pwm: meson: Add clock source configuration for Meson-AXG")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 8caa81eb95 upstream.
The driver only supports normal polarity. Complete the implementation of
.get_state() by setting .polarity accordingly.
This fixes a regression that was possible since commit c73a310762
("pwm: Handle .get_state() failures") which stopped to zero-initialize
the state passed to the .get_state() callback. This was reported at
https://forum.odroid.com/viewtopic.php?f=177&t=46360 . While this was an
unintended side effect, the real issue is the driver's callback not
setting the polarity.
There is a complicating fact, that the .apply() callback fakes support
for inversed polarity. This is not (and cannot) be matched by
.get_state(). As fixing this isn't easy, only point it out in a comment
to prevent authors of other drivers from copying that approach.
Fixes: c375bcbaab ("pwm: meson: Read the full hardware state in meson_pwm_get_state()")
Reported-by: Munehisa Kamata <kamatam@amazon.com>
Acked-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230310191405.2606296-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 3066bc2d58 ]
The ARR (auto reload register) and CMP (compare) registers are
successively written. The status bits to check the update of these
registers are polled together with regmap_read_poll_timeout().
The condition to end the loop may become true, even if one of the
register isn't correctly updated.
So ensure both status bits are set before clearing them.
Fixes: e70a540b4e ("pwm: Add STM32 LPTimer PWM driver")
Signed-off-by: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@foss.st.com>
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 334c7b13d3 ]
Commit 2cfe9bbec5 added support for the
RGB and green PWM controlled LEDs on the HiFive Unmatched board
managed by the leds-pwm-multicolor and leds-pwm drivers respectively.
All three colours of the RGB LED and the green LED run from different
lines of the same PWM, but with the same period so this works fine when
the LED drivers are loaded one after the other.
Unfortunately it does expose a race in the PWM driver when both LED
drivers are loaded at roughly the same time. Here is an example:
| Thread A | Thread B |
| led_pwm_mc_probe | led_pwm_probe |
| devm_fwnode_pwm_get | |
| pwm_sifive_request | |
| ddata->user_count++ | |
| | devm_fwnode_pwm_get |
| | pwm_sifive_request |
| | ddata->user_count++ |
| ... | ... |
| pwm_state_apply | pwm_state_apply |
| pwm_sifive_apply | pwm_sifive_apply |
Now both calls to pwm_sifive_apply will see that ddata->approx_period,
initially 0, is different from the requested period and the clock needs
to be updated. But since ddata->user_count >= 2 both calls will fail
with -EBUSY, which will then cause both LED drivers to fail to probe.
Fix it by letting the first call to pwm_sifive_apply update the clock
even when ddata->user_count != 1.
Fixes: 9e37a53eb0 ("pwm: sifive: Add a driver for SiFive SoC PWM")
Signed-off-by: Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 0f02f491b7 ]
The lock is only to serialize access and update to user_count and
approx_period between different PWMs served by the same pwm_chip.
So the lock needs only to be taken during the check if the (chip global)
period can and/or needs to be changed.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Tested-by: Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Stable-dep-of: 334c7b13d3 ("pwm: sifive: Always let the first pwm_apply_state succeed")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit dd1f1da4ad ]
The value of NSEC_PER_SEC << PWM_DUTY_WIDTH doesn't fix within a 32 bit
integer causing a build warning/error (and the value truncated):
drivers/pwm/pwm-tegra.c: In function ‘tegra_pwm_config’:
drivers/pwm/pwm-tegra.c:148:53: error: result of ‘1000000000 << 8’ requires 39 bits to represent, but ‘long int’ only has 32 bits [-Werror=shift-overflow=]
148 | required_clk_rate = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(NSEC_PER_SEC << PWM_DUTY_WIDTH,
| ^~
Explicitly cast to a u64 to ensure the correct result.
Fixes: cfcb68817fb3 ("pwm: tegra: Improve required rate calculation")
Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit aa3c668f2f ]
According to MT7622 Reference Manual for Development Board v1.0 the PWM
unit found in the MT7622 SoC also comes with the PWM_CK_26M_SEL register
at offset 0x210 just like other modern MediaTek ARM64 SoCs.
And also MT7622 sets that register to 0x00000001 on reset which is
described as 'Select 26M fix CLK as BCLK' in the datasheet.
Hence set has_ck_26m_sel to true also for MT7622 which results in the
driver writing 0 to the PWM_CK_26M_SEL register which is described as
'Select bus CLK as BCLK'.
Fixes: 0c0ead7623 ("pwm: mediatek: Always use bus clock")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/Y1iF2slvSblf6bYK@makrotopia.org
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 0b5ef3429d ]
In the original mtk_disp_pwm_get_state() function wrongly uses bit 0 of
CON0 to judge if the PWM is enabled.
However that is indicated by a bit (at a machine dependent position) in
the DISP_PWM_EN register. Fix this accordingly.
Fixes: 3f2b167349 ("pwm: mtk-disp: Implement atomic API .get_state()")
Signed-off-by: xinlei lee <xinlei.lee@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1666172538-11652-1-git-send-email-xinlei.lee@mediatek.com
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 45558b3abb ]
As was documented in commit 0f02f491b7 ("pwm: sifive: Reduce time the
controller lock is held") a caller of pwm_sifive_update_clock() must
hold the mutex. So fix pwm_sifive_clock_notifier() to grab the lock.
While this necessity was only documented later, the race exists since
the driver was introduced.
Fixes: 9e37a53eb0 ("pwm: sifive: Add a driver for SiFive SoC PWM")
Reported-by: Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@canonical.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018061656.1428111-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit f271946117 ]
For the case where dev_pm_opp_set_rate() is called to set the PWM clock
rate, the requested rate is calculated as ...
required_clk_rate = (NSEC_PER_SEC / period_ns) << PWM_DUTY_WIDTH;
The above calculation may lead to rounding errors because the
NSEC_PER_SEC is divided by 'period_ns' before applying the
PWM_DUTY_WIDTH multiplication factor. For example, if the period is
45334ns, the above calculation yields a rate of 5646848Hz instead of
5646976Hz. Fix this by applying the multiplication factor before
dividing and using the DIV_ROUND_UP macro which yields the expected
result of 5646976Hz.
Fixes: 1d7796bdb6 ("pwm: tegra: Support dynamic clock frequency configuration")
Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 8933d30c5f ]
The calculation:
val = (u64)NSEC_PER_SEC * LPC18XX_PWM_TIMER_MAX;
do_div(val, lpc18xx_pwm->clk_rate);
lpc18xx_pwm->max_period_ns = val;
is bogus because with NSEC_PER_SEC = 1000000000,
LPC18XX_PWM_TIMER_MAX = 0xffffffff and clk_rate < NSEC_PER_SEC this
overflows the (on lpc18xx (i.e. ARM32) 32 bit wide) unsigned int
.max_period_ns. This results (dependant of the actual clk rate) in an
arbitrary limitation of the maximal period. E.g. for clkrate =
333333333 (Hz) we get max_period_ns = 9 instead of 12884901897.
So make .max_period_ns an u64 and pass period and duty as u64 to not
discard relevant digits. And also make use of mul_u64_u64_div_u64()
which prevents all overflows assuming clk_rate < NSEC_PER_SEC.
Fixes: 841e6f90bb ("pwm: NXP LPC18xx PWM/SCT driver")
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 9136a39e6c ]
The per-channel data is available directly in the driver data struct. So
use it without making use of pwm_[gs]et_chip_data().
The relevant change introduced by this patch to lpc18xx_pwm_disable() at
the assembler level (for an arm lpc18xx_defconfig build) is:
push {r3, r4, r5, lr}
mov r4, r0
mov r0, r1
mov r5, r1
bl 0 <pwm_get_chip_data>
ldr r3, [r0, #0]
changes to
ldr r3, [r1, #8]
push {r4, lr}
add.w r3, r0, r3, lsl #2
ldr r3, [r3, #92] ; 0x5c
So this reduces stack usage, has an improved runtime behavior because of
better pipeline usage, doesn't branch to an external function and the
generated code is a bit smaller occupying less memory.
The codesize of lpc18xx_pwm_probe() is reduced by 32 bytes.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 20d9de9c4d ]
Each devm allocations has an overhead of 24 bytes to store the related
struct devres_node additionally to the fragmentation of the allocator.
So allocating 16 struct lpc18xx_pwm_data (which only hold a single int)
adds quite some overhead. Instead put the per-channel data into the
driver data struct and allocate it in one go.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 2375e964d5 ]
The PWMs are expected to be functional until pwmchip_remove() is called.
So disable the clks only afterwards.
Fixes: 9e37a53eb0 ("pwm: sifive: Add a driver for SiFive SoC PWM")
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Tested-by: Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit ace41d7564 ]
.apply() assumes the clk to be for a given PWM iff the PWM is enabled.
So make sure this is the case when .probe() completes. And in .remove()
disable the according number of times.
This fixes a clk enable/disable imbalance, if some PWMs are already running
at probe time.
Fixes: 9e37a53eb0 (pwm: sifive: Add a driver for SiFive SoC PWM)
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Tested-by: Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 20550a6188 ]
Instead of explicitly using PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCMP0 + pwm->hwpwm *
PWM_SIFIVE_SIZE_PWMCMP for each access to one of the PWMCMP registers,
introduce a macro that takes the hwpwm id as parameter.
For the register definition using a plain 4 instead of the cpp constant
PWM_SIFIVE_SIZE_PWMCMP is easier to read, so define the offset macro
without the constant. The latter can then be dropped as there are no
users left.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Tested-by: Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 09f688f071 ]
The reg member of struct raspberrypi_pwm_prop is a little endian 32 bit
quantity. Explicitly convert the (native endian) value to little endian
on assignment as is already done in raspberrypi_pwm_set_property().
This fixes the following sparse warning:
drivers/pwm/pwm-raspberrypi-poe.c:69:24: warning: incorrect type in initializer (different base types)
drivers/pwm/pwm-raspberrypi-poe.c:69:24: expected restricted __le32 [usertype] reg
drivers/pwm/pwm-raspberrypi-poe.c:69:24: got unsigned int [usertype] reg
Fixes: 79caa362ea ("pwm: Add Raspberry Pi Firmware based PWM bus")
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 5e3b07ca5c ]
The hardware only supports periods <= 1.6 ms and if a bigger period is
requested it is clamped to 1.6 ms. In this case duty_cycle might be bigger
than 1.6 ms and then the duty cycle register is written with a value
bigger than LP3943_MAX_DUTY. So clamp duty_cycle accordingly.
Fixes: af66b3c093 ("pwm: Add LP3943 PWM driver")
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 0401f24cd2 ]
When a driver calls pwmchip_add() it has to be prepared to immediately
get its callbacks called. So move allocation of driver data and hardware
initialization before the call to pwmchip_add().
This fixes a potential NULL pointer exception and a race condition on
register writes.
Fixes: 841e6f90bb ("pwm: NXP LPC18xx PWM/SCT driver")
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Switch the driver to support the .get_state() method.
Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>
[thierry.reding@gmail.com: add missing linux/bitfield.h include]
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Current calculation for period and high_width may have 64-bit overflow.
state->period and rate are u64. rate * state->period will overflow.
clk_div = div_u64(rate * state->period, NSEC_PER_SEC)
period = div64_u64(rate * state->period, div);
high_width = div64_u64(rate * state->duty_cycle, div);
This patch is to resolve it by using mul_u64_u64_div_u64().
Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Switch the driver to support the .apply() method.
Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
The clks "main" and "mm" are prepared in .probe() (and unprepared in
.remove()). This results in the clocks being on during suspend which
results in unnecessarily increased power consumption.
Remove the clock operations from .probe() and .remove(). Add the
clk_prepare_enable() in .enable() and the clk_disable_unprepare() in
.disable().
Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>
[thierry.reding@gmail.com: squashed in fixup patch]
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Since some time pwmchip_remove() always returns 0 so the return value
isn't usefull. Now that all callers are converted to ignore its value
the function can be changed to return void.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
pwmchip_remove() returns always 0. Don't use the value to make it
possible to eventually change the function to return void. Also the
driver core ignores the return value of sun4i_pwm_remove()
and considers the device removed anyhow. So returning early results
in a resource leak.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
pwmchip_remove() returns always 0. Don't use the value to make it
possible to eventually change the function to return void. Also the
driver core ignores the return value of pwm_sifive_remove().
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
pwmchip_remove() returns always 0. Don't use the value to make it
possible to eventually change the function to return void. Also the
driver core ignores the return value of pwm_samsung_remove()
and considers the device removed anyhow. So returning early results
in a resource leak.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
pwmchip_remove() returns always 0. Don't use the value to make it
possible to eventually change the function to return void. Also the
driver core ignores the return value of tpu_remove().
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
pwmchip_remove() returns always 0. Don't use the value to make it
possible to eventually change the function to return void. Also the
driver core ignores the return value of rcar_pwm_remove().
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
pwmchip_remove() returns always 0. Don't use the value to make it
possible to eventually change the function to return void. Also the
driver core ignores the return value of pca9685_pwm_remove()
and considers the device removed anyhow. So returning early results
in a resource leak.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
pwmchip_remove() returns always 0. Don't use the value to make it
possible to eventually change the function to return void. Also the
driver core ignores the return value of pwm_omap_dmtimer_remove()
and considers the device removed anyhow. So returning early results
in a resource leak.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
pwmchip_remove() returns always 0. Don't use the value to make it
possible to eventually change the function to return void. Also the
driver core ignores the return value of mtk_disp_pwm_remove().
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
pwmchip_remove() returns always 0. Don't use the value to make it
possible to eventually change the function to return void. Also the
driver core ignores the return value of pwm_imx_tpm_remove().
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
pwmchip_remove() returns always 0. Don't use the value to make it
possible to eventually change the function to return void. Also the
driver core ignores the return value of pwm_imx_tpm_remove().
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
pwmchip_remove() returns always 0. Don't use the value to make it
possible to eventually change the function to return void. Also the
driver core ignores the return value of cros_ec_pwm_remove().
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
pwmchip_remove() returns always 0. Don't use the value to make it
possible to eventually change the function to return void. Also the
driver core ignores the return value of brcmstb_pwm_remove().
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
pwmchip_remove() returns always 0. Don't use the value to make it
possible to eventually change the function to return void. Also the
driver core ignores the return value of atmel_tcb_pwm_remove()
and considers the device removed anyhow. So returning early results in a
resource leak.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
pwmchip_remove() returns always 0. Don't use the value to make it
possible to eventually change the function to return void. Also the
driver core ignores the return value of atmel_hlcdc_pwm_remove()
and considers the device removed anyhow.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
This allows to drop the platform_driver's remove function. This is the
only user of driver data so this can go away, too.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
This allows to drop the platform_driver's remove function. This is the
only user of driver data so this can go away, too.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
With devm_pwmchip_add() there is no need to explicitly call
pwmchip_remove(), so this call can be dropped from the remove callback.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
This allows to drop the platform_driver's remove function.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
This allows to drop the platform_driver's remove function. This is the
only user of driver data so this can go away, too.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
This allows to drop the platform_driver's remove function. This is the
only user of driver data so this can go away, too.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
This allows to drop the platform_driver's remove function. This is the
only user of driver data so this can go away, too.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>