Граф коммитов

842 Коммитов

Автор SHA1 Сообщение Дата
Thomas Gleixner 2156ac1934 rtmutex: Remove unused argument from rt_mutex_proxy_unlock()
Nothing uses the argument. Remove it as preparation to use
pi_state_update_owner().

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
2021-01-26 15:10:58 +01:00
Peter Zijlstra 77ca93a6b1 locking/lockdep: Avoid noinstr warning for DEBUG_LOCKDEP
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: lock_is_held_type()+0x60: call to check_flags.part.0() leaves .noinstr.text section

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210106144017.652218215@infradead.org
2021-01-12 21:10:59 +01:00
Peter Zijlstra 0afda3a888 locking/lockdep: Cure noinstr fail
When the compiler doesn't feel like inlining, it causes a noinstr
fail:

  vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: lock_is_held_type()+0xb: call to lockdep_enabled() leaves .noinstr.text section

Fixes: 4d004099a6 ("lockdep: Fix lockdep recursion")
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210106144017.592595176@infradead.org
2021-01-12 21:10:59 +01:00
Linus Torvalds e857b6fcc5 A moderate set of locking updates:
- A few extensions to the rwsem API and support for opportunistic
     spinning and lock stealing
 
   - lockdep selftest improvements
 
   - Documentation updates
 
   - Cleanups and small fixes all over the place
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQJHBAABCgAxFiEEQp8+kY+LLUocC4bMphj1TA10mKEFAl/XvCgTHHRnbHhAbGlu
 dXRyb25peC5kZQAKCRCmGPVMDXSYodbkD/9kmXCablxzCG+IGdRU0KfSvbalHkoS
 hUW7sJ8qYdoysOVMdvImPwqxLDy/P6D8Nk6z+hdaPmfWvIDQQECd7Mg/UhZLkRzI
 BGNgpatnzX4PK5sm/IFExCisPCkkbkjprocnk//TGjdwTiMMDxrndsEpwVwcucDp
 TwOjPPxoAbfWHUmnv2SUOD7mWMqMH/ISTQlKUaz+UCQicPNuHumdsQKvZx3eu7Cv
 KvucTso5Qjmyy0HwpmJO/IEyZs7Ibrb5Ocw5wds3yo2PFTjYTvo3JlJ16g8IvaZW
 ckk+o+3QKp29oFAPQ+dFGEG10w4JQI3AZkDVouFR4BDD0sbOm7BvWCsVq/J8vk3i
 xnmaHT3zB5F4T97O+osBj2KS4zLliOHohWzDNv1+JVBCfniYbPo5hqa/n7OO2oot
 M3xXY3ddgfTEUOtvOPPfZwfG5XmPrgwj8iiyywlTQU4BR5rWYj2ehvhWOwugQJ6x
 g56nQzuf3KmyoI2S+1GZoxtgWSLwoXbUAPL8p4lyvy6jKKFV84BOJeVac803BBUo
 yLFBSvTfZ95iNc84XHjJOJ/MGE8e2hOGa2KEdxuh1qE5FPazBg5e2cQh2j125PLz
 uyhelQn7SgAHSKSXSAOPq0JFsrmxRmkzIgG9zLSEqo+6g6uKdWgGYVCbEzOB+9gB
 2tNEgP6Mfh+ARg==
 =uqcN
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'locking-core-2020-12-14' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

Pull locking updates from Thomas Gleixner:
 "A moderate set of locking updates:

   - A few extensions to the rwsem API and support for opportunistic
     spinning and lock stealing

   - lockdep selftest improvements

   - Documentation updates

   - Cleanups and small fixes all over the place"

* tag 'locking-core-2020-12-14' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (21 commits)
  seqlock: kernel-doc: Specify when preemption is automatically altered
  seqlock: Prefix internal seqcount_t-only macros with a "do_"
  Documentation: seqlock: s/LOCKTYPE/LOCKNAME/g
  locking/rwsem: Remove reader optimistic spinning
  locking/rwsem: Enable reader optimistic lock stealing
  locking/rwsem: Prevent potential lock starvation
  locking/rwsem: Pass the current atomic count to rwsem_down_read_slowpath()
  locking/rwsem: Fold __down_{read,write}*()
  locking/rwsem: Introduce rwsem_write_trylock()
  locking/rwsem: Better collate rwsem_read_trylock()
  rwsem: Implement down_read_interruptible
  rwsem: Implement down_read_killable_nested
  refcount: Fix a kernel-doc markup
  completion: Drop init_completion define
  atomic: Update MAINTAINERS
  atomic: Delete obsolete documentation
  seqlock: Rename __seqprop() users
  lockdep/selftest: Add spin_nest_lock test
  lockdep/selftests: Fix PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING
  seqlock: avoid -Wshadow warnings
  ...
2020-12-14 17:27:47 -08:00
Linus Torvalds 8c1dccc803 RCU, LKMM and KCSAN updates collected by Paul McKenney:
RCU:
 
     - Avoid cpuinfo-induced IPI pileups and idle-CPU IPIs.
 
     - Lockdep-RCU updates reducing the need for __maybe_unused.
 
     - Tasks-RCU updates.
 
     - Miscellaneous fixes.
 
     - Documentation updates.
 
     - Torture-test updates.
 
   KCSAN:
 
     - updates for selftests, avoiding setting watchpoints on NULL pointers
 
     - fix to watchpoint encoding
 
   LKMM:
 
     - updates for documentation along with some updates to example-code
       litmus tests
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQJHBAABCgAxFiEEQp8+kY+LLUocC4bMphj1TA10mKEFAl/Xon4THHRnbHhAbGlu
 dXRyb25peC5kZQAKCRCmGPVMDXSYobXUD/92LJTI/TMgK6Z6EEQBiJZO/2mNKjK8
 FEKc6AqTNMlZNsWCfQ5UgqtHpn+MkBZsX1x4u22gehE1qaCB8gnQ5wXgbXon8tQm
 exxVk6vvQZjseeqCMqrsUYQlD7dNgHnf1qAmWXJvji4sA/1Opo6n2M74tqfE2ueV
 S5hpQwSuK/6Zu2Hrr62HD8+Fx0in6ZuKRZxHGp1392l++DGbniJM3dzntRXB+JbZ
 w3PDHFCQuGzTytyeKuQV48ot9IK+2YzmjIp/+4tHL6mvU38xeSu6gcYtqKPcfYWw
 D6HXvDa965h5IrFdSA2JWSzjJ+VYgZVElk2HyXDNIae0fM/8GidgoIDQipT1WAur
 sxW/Ke4U6Jm5MMqXqV8iMNduktkGD1/h6G/iB1Yis29xFdthorNpbHVAP+8cKXgf
 1cR6RorOuBYv6XpyzygHtE7qfLY5ST352pJ4+UqNzboujOcuEnGaygttt0F/F8sA
 ZH8NT5dyUfbGeqepdZWkbj116Hjeg3fyV3CZeyBhDeqpjf1Nn3nbJ1xRksPLfa3i
 IKvN7HSzEg+vKnsJNnQeFlAmQ/W3n2bedzRqfaCg77pNhKI6jPuavY5f2YGFUj0y
 yx0UzOYoI1Cln0keBMmynbyUKgJ7zstLkrt/JenjhtD3B+0df5BmYjkL+nqkP6ax
 +XTCu7Xg+B061g==
 =N/iO
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'core-rcu-2020-12-14' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

Pull RCU updates from Thomas Gleixner:
 "RCU, LKMM and KCSAN updates collected by Paul McKenney.

  RCU:
   - Avoid cpuinfo-induced IPI pileups and idle-CPU IPIs

   - Lockdep-RCU updates reducing the need for __maybe_unused

   - Tasks-RCU updates

   - Miscellaneous fixes

   - Documentation updates

   - Torture-test updates

  KCSAN:
   - updates for selftests, avoiding setting watchpoints on NULL pointers

   - fix to watchpoint encoding

  LKMM:
   - updates for documentation along with some updates to example-code
     litmus tests"

* tag 'core-rcu-2020-12-14' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (72 commits)
  srcu: Take early exit on memory-allocation failure
  rcu/tree: Defer kvfree_rcu() allocation to a clean context
  rcu: Do not report strict GPs for outgoing CPUs
  rcu: Fix a typo in rcu_blocking_is_gp() header comment
  rcu: Prevent lockdep-RCU splats on lock acquisition/release
  rcu/tree: nocb: Avoid raising softirq for offloaded ready-to-execute CBs
  rcu,ftrace: Fix ftrace recursion
  rcu/tree: Make struct kernel_param_ops definitions const
  rcu/tree: Add a warning if CPU being onlined did not report QS already
  rcu: Clarify nocb kthreads naming in RCU_NOCB_CPU config
  rcu: Fix single-CPU check in rcu_blocking_is_gp()
  rcu: Implement rcu_segcblist_is_offloaded() config dependent
  list.h: Update comment to explicitly note circular lists
  rcu: Panic after fixed number of stalls
  x86/smpboot:  Move rcu_cpu_starting() earlier
  rcu: Allow rcu_irq_enter_check_tick() from NMI
  tools/memory-model: Label MP tests' producers and consumers
  tools/memory-model: Use "buf" and "flag" for message-passing tests
  tools/memory-model: Add types to litmus tests
  tools/memory-model: Add a glossary of LKMM terms
  ...
2020-12-14 17:21:16 -08:00
Waiman Long 617f3ef951 locking/rwsem: Remove reader optimistic spinning
Reader optimistic spinning is helpful when the reader critical section
is short and there aren't that many readers around. It also improves
the chance that a reader can get the lock as writer optimistic spinning
disproportionally favors writers much more than readers.

Since commit d3681e269f ("locking/rwsem: Wake up almost all readers
in wait queue"), all the waiting readers are woken up so that they can
all get the read lock and run in parallel. When the number of contending
readers is large, allowing reader optimistic spinning will likely cause
reader fragmentation where multiple smaller groups of readers can get
the read lock in a sequential manner separated by writers. That reduces
reader parallelism.

One possible way to address that drawback is to limit the number of
readers (preferably one) that can do optimistic spinning. These readers
act as representatives of all the waiting readers in the wait queue as
they will wake up all those waiting readers once they get the lock.

Alternatively, as reader optimistic lock stealing has already enhanced
fairness to readers, it may be easier to just remove reader optimistic
spinning and simplifying the optimistic spinning code as a result.

Performance measurements (locking throughput kops/s) using a locking
microbenchmark with 50/50 reader/writer distribution and turbo-boost
disabled was done on a 2-socket Cascade Lake system (48-core 96-thread)
to see the impacts of these changes:

  1) Vanilla     - 5.10-rc3 kernel
  2) Before      - 5.10-rc3 kernel with previous patches in this series
  2) limit-rspin - 5.10-rc3 kernel with limited reader spinning patch
  3) no-rspin    - 5.10-rc3 kernel with reader spinning disabled

  # of threads  CS Load   Vanilla  Before   limit-rspin   no-rspin
  ------------  -------   -------  ------   -----------   --------
       2            1      5,185    5,662      5,214       5,077
       4            1      5,107    4,983      5,188       4,760
       8            1      4,782    4,564      4,720       4,628
      16            1      4,680    4,053      4,567       3,402
      32            1      4,299    1,115      1,118       1,098
      64            1      3,218      983      1,001         957
      96            1      1,938      944        957         930

       2           20      2,008    2,128      2,264       1,665
       4           20      1,390    1,033      1,046       1,101
       8           20      1,472    1,155      1,098       1,213
      16           20      1,332    1,077      1,089       1,122
      32           20        967      914        917         980
      64           20        787      874        891         858
      96           20        730      836        847         844

       2          100        372      356        360         355
       4          100        492      425        434         392
       8          100        533      537        529         538
      16          100        548      572        568         598
      32          100        499      520        527         537
      64          100        466      517        526         512
      96          100        406      497        506         509

The column "CS Load" represents the number of pause instructions issued
in the locking critical section. A CS load of 1 is extremely short and
is not likey in real situations. A load of 20 (moderate) and 100 (long)
are more realistic.

It can be seen that the previous patches in this series have reduced
performance in general except in highly contended cases with moderate
or long critical sections that performance improves a bit. This change
is mostly caused by the "Prevent potential lock starvation" patch that
reduce reader optimistic spinning and hence reduce reader fragmentation.

The patch that further limit reader optimistic spinning doesn't seem to
have too much impact on overall performance as shown in the benchmark
data.

The patch that disables reader optimistic spinning shows reduced
performance at lightly loaded cases, but comparable or slightly better
performance on with heavier contention.

This patch just removes reader optimistic spinning for now. As readers
are not going to do optimistic spinning anymore, we don't need to
consider if the OSQ is empty or not when doing lock stealing.

Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201121041416.12285-6-longman@redhat.com
2020-12-09 17:08:48 +01:00
Waiman Long 1a728dff85 locking/rwsem: Enable reader optimistic lock stealing
If the optimistic spinning queue is empty and the rwsem does not have
the handoff or write-lock bits set, it is actually not necessary to
call rwsem_optimistic_spin() to spin on it. Instead, it can steal the
lock directly as its reader bias is in the count already.  If it is
the first reader in this state, it will try to wake up other readers
in the wait queue.

With this patch applied, the following were the lock event counts
after rebooting a 2-socket system and a "make -j96" kernel rebuild.

  rwsem_opt_rlock=4437
  rwsem_rlock=29
  rwsem_rlock_steal=19

So lock stealing represents about 0.4% of all the read locks acquired
in the slow path.

Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201121041416.12285-4-longman@redhat.com
2020-12-09 17:08:48 +01:00
Waiman Long 2f06f70292 locking/rwsem: Prevent potential lock starvation
The lock handoff bit is added in commit 4f23dbc1e6 ("locking/rwsem:
Implement lock handoff to prevent lock starvation") to avoid lock
starvation. However, allowing readers to do optimistic spinning does
introduce an unlikely scenario where lock starvation can happen.

The lock handoff bit may only be set when a waiter is being woken up.
In the case of reader unlock, wakeup happens only when the reader count
reaches 0. If there is a continuous stream of incoming readers acquiring
read lock via optimistic spinning, it is possible that the reader count
may never reach 0 and so the handoff bit will never be asserted.

One way to prevent this scenario from happening is to disallow optimistic
spinning if the rwsem is currently owned by readers. If the previous
or current owner is a writer, optimistic spinning will be allowed.

If the previous owner is a reader but the reader count has reached 0
before, a wakeup should have been issued. So the handoff mechanism
will be kicked in to prevent lock starvation. As a result, it should
be OK to do optimistic spinning in this case.

This patch may have some impact on reader performance as it reduces
reader optimistic spinning especially if the lock critical sections
are short the number of contending readers are small.

Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201121041416.12285-3-longman@redhat.com
2020-12-09 17:08:48 +01:00
Waiman Long c8fe8b0564 locking/rwsem: Pass the current atomic count to rwsem_down_read_slowpath()
The atomic count value right after reader count increment can be useful
to determine the rwsem state at trylock time. So the count value is
passed down to rwsem_down_read_slowpath() to be used when appropriate.

Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201121041416.12285-2-longman@redhat.com
2020-12-09 17:08:47 +01:00
Peter Zijlstra c995e638cc locking/rwsem: Fold __down_{read,write}*()
There's a lot needless duplication in __down_{read,write}*(), cure
that with a helper.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201207090243.GE3040@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
2020-12-09 17:08:47 +01:00
Peter Zijlstra 285c61aedf locking/rwsem: Introduce rwsem_write_trylock()
One copy of this logic is better than three.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201207090243.GE3040@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
2020-12-09 17:08:47 +01:00
Peter Zijlstra 3379116a0c locking/rwsem: Better collate rwsem_read_trylock()
All users of rwsem_read_trylock() do rwsem_set_reader_owned(sem) on
success, move it into rwsem_read_trylock() proper.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201207090243.GE3040@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
2020-12-09 17:08:47 +01:00
Eric W. Biederman 31784cff7e rwsem: Implement down_read_interruptible
In preparation for converting exec_update_mutex to a rwsem so that
multiple readers can execute in parallel and not deadlock, add
down_read_interruptible.  This is needed for perf_event_open to be
converted (with no semantic changes) from working on a mutex to
wroking on a rwsem.

Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87k0tybqfy.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org
2020-12-09 17:08:42 +01:00
Eric W. Biederman 0f9368b5bf rwsem: Implement down_read_killable_nested
In preparation for converting exec_update_mutex to a rwsem so that
multiple readers can execute in parallel and not deadlock, add
down_read_killable_nested.  This is needed so that kcmp_lock
can be converted from working on a mutexes to working on rw_semaphores.

Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87o8jabqh3.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org
2020-12-09 17:08:41 +01:00
Boqun Feng 43be4388e9 lockdep: Put graph lock/unlock under lock_recursion protection
A warning was hit when running xfstests/generic/068 in a Hyper-V guest:

[...] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[...] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lockdep_hardirqs_enabled())
[...] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1350 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5280 check_flags.part.0+0x165/0x170
[...] ...
[...] Workqueue: events pwq_unbound_release_workfn
[...] RIP: 0010:check_flags.part.0+0x165/0x170
[...] ...
[...] Call Trace:
[...]  lock_is_held_type+0x72/0x150
[...]  ? lock_acquire+0x16e/0x4a0
[...]  rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x80
[...]  __send_ipi_one+0x14d/0x1b0
[...]  hv_send_ipi+0x12/0x30
[...]  __pv_queued_spin_unlock_slowpath+0xd1/0x110
[...]  __raw_callee_save___pv_queued_spin_unlock_slowpath+0x11/0x20
[...]  .slowpath+0x9/0xe
[...]  lockdep_unregister_key+0x128/0x180
[...]  pwq_unbound_release_workfn+0xbb/0xf0
[...]  process_one_work+0x227/0x5c0
[...]  worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0
[...]  ? process_one_work+0x5c0/0x5c0
[...]  kthread+0x153/0x170
[...]  ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x60/0x60
[...]  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

The cause of the problem is we have call chain lockdep_unregister_key()
-> <irq disabled by raw_local_irq_save()> lockdep_unlock() ->
arch_spin_unlock() -> __pv_queued_spin_unlock_slowpath() -> pv_kick() ->
__send_ipi_one() -> trace_hyperv_send_ipi_one().

Although this particular warning is triggered because Hyper-V has a
trace point in ipi sending, but in general arch_spin_unlock() may call
another function having a trace point in it, so put the arch_spin_lock()
and arch_spin_unlock() after lock_recursion protection to fix this
problem and avoid similiar problems.

Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201113110512.1056501-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com
2020-11-17 13:15:35 +01:00
Boqun Feng d61fc96a37 lockdep: Avoid to modify chain keys in validate_chain()
Chris Wilson reported a problem spotted by check_chain_key(): a chain
key got changed in validate_chain() because we modify the ->read in
validate_chain() to skip checks for dependency adding, and ->read is
taken into calculation for chain key since commit f611e8cf98
("lockdep: Take read/write status in consideration when generate
chainkey").

Fix this by avoiding to modify ->read in validate_chain() based on two
facts: a) since we now support recursive read lock detection, there is
no need to skip checks for dependency adding for recursive readers, b)
since we have a), there is only one case left (nest_lock) where we want
to skip checks in validate_chain(), we simply remove the modification
for ->read and rely on the return value of check_deadlock() to skip the
dependency adding.

Reported-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201102053743.450459-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com
2020-11-10 18:38:38 +01:00
Hou Tao 0d7202876b locktorture: Invoke percpu_free_rwsem() to do percpu-rwsem cleanup
When executing the LOCK06 locktorture scenario featuring percpu-rwsem,
the RCU callback rcu_sync_func() may still be pending after locktorture
module is removed.  This can in turn lead to the following Oops:

  BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffffc00eb920
  #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
  #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
  PGD 6500a067 P4D 6500a067 PUD 6500c067 PMD 13a36c067 PTE 800000013691c163
  Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
  CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc5+ #4
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)
  RIP: 0010:rcu_cblist_dequeue+0x12/0x30
  Call Trace:
   <IRQ>
   rcu_core+0x1b1/0x860
   __do_softirq+0xfe/0x326
   asm_call_on_stack+0x12/0x20
   </IRQ>
   do_softirq_own_stack+0x5f/0x80
   irq_exit_rcu+0xaf/0xc0
   sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x2e/0xb0
   asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x12/0x20

This commit avoids tis problem by adding an exit hook in lock_torture_ops
and using it to call percpu_free_rwsem() for percpu rwsem torture during
the module-cleanup function, thus ensuring that rcu_sync_func() completes
before module exits.

It is also necessary to call the exit hook if lock_torture_init()
fails half-way, so this commit also adds an ->init_called field in
lock_torture_cxt to indicate that exit hook, if present, must be called.

Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-11-06 17:13:56 -08:00
Paul E. McKenney 6b74fa0a77 locktorture: Prevent hangs for invalid arguments
If an locktorture torture-test run is given a bad kvm.sh argument, the
test will complain to the console, which is good.  What is bad is that
from the user's perspective, it will just hang for the time specified
by the --duration argument.  This commit therefore forces an immediate
kernel shutdown if a lock_torture_init()-time error occurs, thus avoiding
the appearance of a hang.  It also forces a console splat in this case
to clearly indicate the presence of an error.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-11-06 17:13:53 -08:00
Hou Tao e5ace37d83 locktorture: Ignore nreaders_stress if no readlock support
Exclusive locks do not have readlock support, which means that a
locktorture run with the following module parameters will do nothing:

 torture_type=mutex_lock nwriters_stress=0 nreaders_stress=1

This commit therefore rejects this combination for exclusive locks by
returning -EINVAL during module init.

Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-11-06 17:13:52 -08:00
Paul E. McKenney 3480d6774f locktorture: Track time of last ->writeunlock()
This commit adds a last_lock_release variable that tracks the time of
the last ->writeunlock() call, which allows easier diagnosing of lock
hangs when using a kernel debugger.

Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-11-06 17:13:29 -08:00
Linus Torvalds 8d99084efc A couple of locking fixes:
- Fix incorrect failure injection handling on the fuxtex code
 
  - Prevent a preemption warning in lockdep when tracking local_irq_enable()
    and interrupts are already enabled
 
  - Remove more raw_cpu_read() usage from lockdep which causes state
    corruption on !X86 architectures.
 
  - Make the nr_unused_locks accounting in lockdep correct again.
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQJHBAABCgAxFiEEQp8+kY+LLUocC4bMphj1TA10mKEFAl+evEUTHHRnbHhAbGlu
 dXRyb25peC5kZQAKCRCmGPVMDXSYod93EADG90GmRBYQxn6y2eQUKE/9f5SMiMFJ
 KdvuqNBqHOhYm3iUPbZJcb0P/JZi1NHP0fBFMishdESGi96tD96K7T04WD0gmjtm
 ArWFroe8uzEYtY9atlEwM0Nrvq0w8ZBLv9x1adXzJ59vB8/8Uq+wzYioSWn9yMcv
 ye3jfVyAlM7ouFHDQAA36s/nhvZfxms4C0t+6S3gjVTIp/6riGuYh5t7dbXUMlnu
 nGLiIJFjU+ekurweVDGpqD/nAxYfqf3UxebWnrosf7iu6suwYwaPFZGZ/kxlbr5e
 qWx0B1RuhjAoefVJlPTkHmuhd0SnH/Gm/tTNkQ3LidJhPTIhLJlb7zffwyZlc510
 VdaUipfZ6bNqDD6/dK6fKJtdKSE4w/z3pT53954NUD5zw/jIcHlgnaQieh72DH+F
 1EKqmsNrwHAxYfMndQxLGdIoBScUAFzHzDnzsY9KKS2cfhChljzLa2nDIfMsDfKQ
 aROugzEbZPQEb1iWUEOF3XopcuZzZQCaPlLDLvAnsBeYEPm0gdmbKFPFsDjOyBVX
 /Qc41O7DyHKcoiLX2zM2c7CxnV5J6YEZz3jQSZLFlpH9Ih7jwAl9/6VirggNUNvV
 YVsgM/myhYQtJBqHHojNppZFFW3KdgfxWuY7+qt7Ox5w/ck5qYQwRnoB4FROwVHV
 pzcYTBE5qkQnIw==
 =S01o
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'locking-urgent-2020-11-01' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

Pull locking fixes from Thomas Gleixner:
 "A couple of locking fixes:

   - Fix incorrect failure injection handling in the fuxtex code

   - Prevent a preemption warning in lockdep when tracking
     local_irq_enable() and interrupts are already enabled

   - Remove more raw_cpu_read() usage from lockdep which causes state
     corruption on !X86 architectures.

   - Make the nr_unused_locks accounting in lockdep correct again"

* tag 'locking-urgent-2020-11-01' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
  lockdep: Fix nr_unused_locks accounting
  locking/lockdep: Remove more raw_cpu_read() usage
  futex: Fix incorrect should_fail_futex() handling
  lockdep: Fix preemption WARN for spurious IRQ-enable
2020-11-01 11:08:17 -08:00
Peter Zijlstra 1a39340865 lockdep: Fix nr_unused_locks accounting
Chris reported that commit 24d5a3bffef1 ("lockdep: Fix
usage_traceoverflow") breaks the nr_unused_locks validation code
triggered by /proc/lockdep_stats.

By fully splitting LOCK_USED and LOCK_USED_READ it becomes a bad
indicator for accounting nr_unused_locks; simplyfy by using any first
bit.

Fixes: 24d5a3bffef1 ("lockdep: Fix usage_traceoverflow")
Reported-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201027124834.GL2628@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
2020-10-30 17:07:18 +01:00
Peter Zijlstra d48e385003 locking/lockdep: Remove more raw_cpu_read() usage
I initially thought raw_cpu_read() was OK, since if it is !0 we have
IRQs disabled and can't get migrated, so if we get migrated both CPUs
must have 0 and it doesn't matter which 0 we read.

And while that is true; it isn't the whole store, on pretty much all
architectures (except x86) this can result in computing the address for
one CPU, getting migrated, the old CPU continuing execution with another
task (possibly setting recursion) and then the new CPU reading the value
of the old CPU, which is no longer 0.

Similer to:

  baffd723e4 ("lockdep: Revert "lockdep: Use raw_cpu_*() for per-cpu variables"")

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201026152256.GB2651@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
2020-10-30 17:07:18 +01:00
Peter Zijlstra f8e48a3dca lockdep: Fix preemption WARN for spurious IRQ-enable
It is valid (albeit uncommon) to call local_irq_enable() without first
having called local_irq_disable(). In this case we enter
lockdep_hardirqs_on*() with IRQs enabled and trip a preemption warning
for using __this_cpu_read().

Use this_cpu_read() instead to avoid the warning.

Fixes: 4d004099a6 ("lockdep: Fix lockdep recursion")
Reported-by: syzbot+53f8ce8bbc07924b6417@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
2020-10-22 12:37:22 +02:00
Linus Torvalds 41eea65e2a Merge tag 'core-rcu-2020-10-12' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull RCU changes from Ingo Molnar:

 - Debugging for smp_call_function()

 - RT raw/non-raw lock ordering fixes

 - Strict grace periods for KASAN

 - New smp_call_function() torture test

 - Torture-test updates

 - Documentation updates

 - Miscellaneous fixes

[ This doesn't actually pull the tag - I've dropped the last merge from
  the RCU branch due to questions about the series.   - Linus ]

* tag 'core-rcu-2020-10-12' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (77 commits)
  smp: Make symbol 'csd_bug_count' static
  kernel/smp: Provide CSD lock timeout diagnostics
  smp: Add source and destination CPUs to __call_single_data
  rcu: Shrink each possible cpu krcp
  rcu/segcblist: Prevent useless GP start if no CBs to accelerate
  torture: Add gdb support
  rcutorture: Allow pointer leaks to test diagnostic code
  rcutorture: Hoist OOM registry up one level
  refperf: Avoid null pointer dereference when buf fails to allocate
  rcutorture: Properly synchronize with OOM notifier
  rcutorture: Properly set rcu_fwds for OOM handling
  torture: Add kvm.sh --help and update help message
  rcutorture: Add CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST to TREE05
  torture: Update initrd documentation
  rcutorture: Replace HTTP links with HTTPS ones
  locktorture: Make function torture_percpu_rwsem_init() static
  torture: document --allcpus argument added to the kvm.sh script
  rcutorture: Output number of elapsed grace periods
  rcutorture: Remove KCSAN stubs
  rcu: Remove unused "cpu" parameter from rcu_report_qs_rdp()
  ...
2020-10-18 14:34:50 -07:00
Ingo Molnar e705d39796 Merge branch 'locking/urgent' into locking/core, to pick up fixes
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2020-10-09 08:55:17 +02:00
Peter Zijlstra 4d004099a6 lockdep: Fix lockdep recursion
Steve reported that lockdep_assert*irq*(), when nested inside lockdep
itself, will trigger a false-positive.

One example is the stack-trace code, as called from inside lockdep,
triggering tracing, which in turn calls RCU, which then uses
lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled().

Fixes: a21ee6055c ("lockdep: Change hardirq{s_enabled,_context} to per-cpu variables")
Reported-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2020-10-09 08:53:30 +02:00
Peter Zijlstra 2bb8945bcc lockdep: Fix usage_traceoverflow
Basically print_lock_class_header()'s for loop is out of sync with the
the size of of ->usage_traces[].

Also clean things up a bit while at it, to avoid such mishaps in the future.

Fixes: 23870f1227 ("locking/lockdep: Fix "USED" <- "IN-NMI" inversions")
Reported-by: Qian Cai <cai@redhat.com>
Debugged-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Qian Cai <cai@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200930094937.GE2651@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
2020-10-09 08:53:08 +02:00
Ingo Molnar b36c830f8c Merge branch 'for-mingo' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu into core/rcu
Pull v5.10 RCU changes from Paul E. McKenney:

- Debugging for smp_call_function().

- Strict grace periods for KASAN.  The point of this series is to find
  RCU-usage bugs, so the corresponding new RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD
  Kconfig option depends on both DEBUG_KERNEL and RCU_EXPERT, and is
  further disabled by dfefault.  Finally, the help text includes
  a goodly list of scary caveats.

- New smp_call_function() torture test.

- Torture-test updates.

- Documentation updates.

- Miscellaneous fixes.

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2020-10-09 08:21:56 +02:00
Boqun Feng 6d1823ccc4 lockdep: Optimize the memory usage of circular queue
Qian Cai reported a BFS_EQUEUEFULL warning [1] after read recursive
deadlock detection merged into tip tree recently. Unlike the previous
lockep graph searching, which iterate every lock class (every node in
the graph) exactly once, the graph searching for read recurisve deadlock
detection needs to iterate every lock dependency (every edge in the
graph) once, as a result, the maximum memory cost of the circular queue
changes from O(V), where V is the number of lock classes (nodes or
vertices) in the graph, to O(E), where E is the number of lock
dependencies (edges), because every lock class or dependency gets
enqueued once in the BFS. Therefore we hit the BFS_EQUEUEFULL case.

However, actually we don't need to enqueue all dependencies for the BFS,
because every time we enqueue a dependency, we almostly enqueue all
other dependencies in the same dependency list ("almostly" is because
we currently check before enqueue, so if a dependency doesn't pass the
check stage we won't enqueue it, however, we can always do in reverse
ordering), based on this, we can only enqueue the first dependency from
a dependency list and every time we want to fetch a new dependency to
work, we can either:

  1)	fetch the dependency next to the current dependency in the
	dependency list
or

  2)	if the dependency in 1) doesn't exist, fetch the dependency from
	the queue.

With this approach, the "max bfs queue depth" for a x86_64_defconfig +
lockdep and selftest config kernel can get descreased from:

        max bfs queue depth:                   201

to (after apply this patch)

        max bfs queue depth:                   61

While I'm at it, clean up the code logic a little (e.g. directly return
other than set a "ret" value and goto the "exit" label).

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/17343f6f7f2438fc376125384133c5ba70c2a681.camel@redhat.com/

Reported-by: Qian Cai <cai@redhat.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+62ebe501c1ce9a91f68c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200917080210.108095-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com
2020-09-29 09:56:59 +02:00
Hou Tao e6b1a44ecc locking/percpu-rwsem: Use this_cpu_{inc,dec}() for read_count
The __this_cpu*() accessors are (in general) IRQ-unsafe which, given
that percpu-rwsem is a blocking primitive, should be just fine.

However, file_end_write() is used from IRQ context and will cause
load-store issues on architectures where the per-cpu accessors are not
natively irq-safe.

Fix it by using the IRQ-safe this_cpu_*() for operations on
read_count. This will generate more expensive code on a number of
platforms, which might cause a performance regression for some of the
other percpu-rwsem users.

If any such is reported, we can consider alternative solutions.

Fixes: 70fe2f4815 ("aio: fix freeze protection of aio writes")
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200915140750.137881-1-houtao1@huawei.com
2020-09-16 16:26:56 +02:00
peterz@infradead.org 23870f1227 locking/lockdep: Fix "USED" <- "IN-NMI" inversions
During the LPC RCU BoF Paul asked how come the "USED" <- "IN-NMI"
detector doesn't trip over rcu_read_lock()'s lockdep annotation.

Looking into this I found a very embarrasing typo in
verify_lock_unused():

	-	if (!(class->usage_mask & LOCK_USED))
	+	if (!(class->usage_mask & LOCKF_USED))

fixing that will indeed cause rcu_read_lock() to insta-splat :/

The above typo means that instead of testing for: 0x100 (1 <<
LOCK_USED), we test for 8 (LOCK_USED), which corresponds to (1 <<
LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQ).

So instead of testing for _any_ used lock, it will only match any lock
used with interrupts enabled.

The rcu_read_lock() annotation uses .check=0, which means it will not
set any of the interrupt bits and will thus never match.

In order to properly fix the situation and allow rcu_read_lock() to
correctly work, split LOCK_USED into LOCK_USED and LOCK_USED_READ and by
having .read users set USED_READ and test USED, pure read-recursive
locks are permitted.

Fixes: f6f48e1804 ("lockdep: Teach lockdep about "USED" <- "IN-NMI" inversions")
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200902160323.GK1362448@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
2020-09-03 11:19:42 +02:00
Boqun Feng f611e8cf98 lockdep: Take read/write status in consideration when generate chainkey
Currently, the chainkey of a lock chain is a hash sum of the class_idx
of all the held locks, the read/write status are not taken in to
consideration while generating the chainkey. This could result into a
problem, if we have:

	P1()
	{
		read_lock(B);
		lock(A);
	}

	P2()
	{
		lock(A);
		read_lock(B);
	}

	P3()
	{
		lock(A);
		write_lock(B);
	}

, and P1(), P2(), P3() run one by one. And when running P2(), lockdep
detects such a lock chain A -> B is not a deadlock, then it's added in
the chain cache, and then when running P3(), even if it's a deadlock, we
could miss it because of the hit of chain cache. This could be confirmed
by self testcase "chain cached mixed R-L/L-W ".

To resolve this, we use concept "hlock_id" to generate the chainkey, the
hlock_id is a tuple (hlock->class_idx, hlock->read), which fits in a u16
type. With this, the chainkeys are different is the lock sequences have
the same locks but different read/write status.

Besides, since we use "hlock_id" to generate chainkeys, the chain_hlocks
array now store the "hlock_id"s rather than lock_class indexes.

Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-15-boqun.feng@gmail.com
2020-08-26 12:42:06 +02:00
Boqun Feng 621c9dac0e lockdep: Add recursive read locks into dependency graph
Since we have all the fundamental to handle recursive read locks, we now
add them into the dependency graph.

Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-13-boqun.feng@gmail.com
2020-08-26 12:42:06 +02:00
Boqun Feng f08e388857 lockdep: Fix recursive read lock related safe->unsafe detection
Currently, in safe->unsafe detection, lockdep misses the fact that a
LOCK_ENABLED_IRQ_*_READ usage and a LOCK_USED_IN_IRQ_*_READ usage may
cause deadlock too, for example:

	P1                          P2
	<irq disabled>
	write_lock(l1);             <irq enabled>
				    read_lock(l2);
	write_lock(l2);
				    <in irq>
				    read_lock(l1);

Actually, all of the following cases may cause deadlocks:

	LOCK_USED_IN_IRQ_* -> LOCK_ENABLED_IRQ_*
	LOCK_USED_IN_IRQ_*_READ -> LOCK_ENABLED_IRQ_*
	LOCK_USED_IN_IRQ_* -> LOCK_ENABLED_IRQ_*_READ
	LOCK_USED_IN_IRQ_*_READ -> LOCK_ENABLED_IRQ_*_READ

To fix this, we need to 1) change the calculation of exclusive_mask() so
that READ bits are not dropped and 2) always call usage() in
mark_lock_irq() to check usage deadlocks, even when the new usage of the
lock is READ.

Besides, adjust usage_match() and usage_acculumate() to recursive read
lock changes.

Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-12-boqun.feng@gmail.com
2020-08-26 12:42:05 +02:00
Boqun Feng 68e3056785 lockdep: Adjust check_redundant() for recursive read change
check_redundant() will report redundancy if it finds a path could
replace the about-to-add dependency in the BFS search. With recursive
read lock changes, we certainly need to change the match function for
the check_redundant(), because the path needs to match not only the lock
class but also the dependency kinds. For example, if the about-to-add
dependency @prev -> @next is A -(SN)-> B, and we find a path A -(S*)->
.. -(*R)->B in the dependency graph with __bfs() (for simplicity, we can
also say we find an -(SR)-> path from A to B), we can not replace the
dependency with that path in the BFS search. Because the -(SN)->
dependency can make a strong path with a following -(S*)-> dependency,
however an -(SR)-> path cannot.

Further, we can replace an -(SN)-> dependency with a -(EN)-> path, that
means if we find a path which is stronger than or equal to the
about-to-add dependency, we can report the redundancy. By "stronger", it
means both the start and the end of the path are not weaker than the
start and the end of the dependency (E is "stronger" than S and N is
"stronger" than R), so that we can replace the dependency with that
path.

To make sure we find a path whose start point is not weaker than the
about-to-add dependency, we use a trick: the ->only_xr of the root
(start point) of __bfs() is initialized as @prev-> == 0, therefore if
@prev is E, __bfs() will pick only -(E*)-> for the first dependency,
otherwise, __bfs() can pick -(E*)-> or -(S*)-> for the first dependency.

To make sure we find a path whose end point is not weaker than the
about-to-add dependency, we replace the match function for __bfs()
check_redundant(), we check for the case that either @next is R
(anything is not weaker than it) or the end point of the path is N
(which is not weaker than anything).

Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-11-boqun.feng@gmail.com
2020-08-26 12:42:05 +02:00
Boqun Feng 9de0c9bbce lockdep: Support deadlock detection for recursive read locks in check_noncircular()
Currently, lockdep only has limit support for deadlock detection for
recursive read locks.

This patch support deadlock detection for recursive read locks. The
basic idea is:

We are about to add dependency B -> A in to the dependency graph, we use
check_noncircular() to find whether we have a strong dependency path
A -> .. -> B so that we have a strong dependency circle (a closed strong
dependency path):

	 A -> .. -> B -> A

, which doesn't have two adjacent dependencies as -(*R)-> L -(S*)->.

Since A -> .. -> B is already a strong dependency path, so if either
B -> A is -(E*)-> or A -> .. -> B is -(*N)->, the circle A -> .. -> B ->
A is strong, otherwise not. So we introduce a new match function
hlock_conflict() to replace the class_equal() for the deadlock check in
check_noncircular().

Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-10-boqun.feng@gmail.com
2020-08-26 12:42:05 +02:00
Boqun Feng 61775ed243 lockdep: Make __bfs(.match) return bool
The "match" parameter of __bfs() is used for checking whether we hit a
match in the search, therefore it should return a boolean value rather
than an integer for better readability.

This patch then changes the return type of the function parameter and the
match functions to bool.

Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-9-boqun.feng@gmail.com
2020-08-26 12:42:05 +02:00
Boqun Feng 6971c0f345 lockdep: Extend __bfs() to work with multiple types of dependencies
Now we have four types of dependencies in the dependency graph, and not
all the pathes carry real dependencies (the dependencies that may cause
a deadlock), for example:

	Given lock A and B, if we have:

	CPU1			CPU2
	=============		==============
	write_lock(A);		read_lock(B);
	read_lock(B);		write_lock(A);

	(assuming read_lock(B) is a recursive reader)

	then we have dependencies A -(ER)-> B, and B -(SN)-> A, and a
	dependency path A -(ER)-> B -(SN)-> A.

	In lockdep w/o recursive locks, a dependency path from A to A
	means a deadlock. However, the above case is obviously not a
	deadlock, because no one holds B exclusively, therefore no one
	waits for the other to release B, so who get A first in CPU1 and
	CPU2 will run non-blockingly.

	As a result, dependency path A -(ER)-> B -(SN)-> A is not a
	real/strong dependency that could cause a deadlock.

From the observation above, we know that for a dependency path to be
real/strong, no two adjacent dependencies can be as -(*R)-> -(S*)->.

Now our mission is to make __bfs() traverse only the strong dependency
paths, which is simple: we record whether we only have -(*R)-> for the
previous lock_list of the path in lock_list::only_xr, and when we pick a
dependency in the traverse, we 1) filter out -(S*)-> dependency if the
previous lock_list only has -(*R)-> dependency (i.e. ->only_xr is true)
and 2) set the next lock_list::only_xr to true if we only have -(*R)->
left after we filter out dependencies based on 1), otherwise, set it to
false.

With this extension for __bfs(), we now need to initialize the root of
__bfs() properly (with a correct ->only_xr), to do so, we introduce some
helper functions, which also cleans up a little bit for the __bfs() root
initialization code.

Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-8-boqun.feng@gmail.com
2020-08-26 12:42:04 +02:00
Boqun Feng 3454a36d6a lockdep: Introduce lock_list::dep
To add recursive read locks into the dependency graph, we need to store
the types of dependencies for the BFS later. There are four types of
dependencies:

*	Exclusive -> Non-recursive dependencies: EN
	e.g. write_lock(prev) held and try to acquire write_lock(next)
	or non-recursive read_lock(next), which can be represented as
	"prev -(EN)-> next"

*	Shared -> Non-recursive dependencies: SN
	e.g. read_lock(prev) held and try to acquire write_lock(next) or
	non-recursive read_lock(next), which can be represented as
	"prev -(SN)-> next"

*	Exclusive -> Recursive dependencies: ER
	e.g. write_lock(prev) held and try to acquire recursive
	read_lock(next), which can be represented as "prev -(ER)-> next"

*	Shared -> Recursive dependencies: SR
	e.g. read_lock(prev) held and try to acquire recursive
	read_lock(next), which can be represented as "prev -(SR)-> next"

So we use 4 bits for the presence of each type in lock_list::dep. Helper
functions and macros are also introduced to convert a pair of locks into
lock_list::dep bit and maintain the addition of different types of
dependencies.

Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-7-boqun.feng@gmail.com
2020-08-26 12:42:04 +02:00
Boqun Feng bd76eca10d lockdep: Reduce the size of lock_list::distance
lock_list::distance is always not greater than MAX_LOCK_DEPTH (which
is 48 right now), so a u16 will fit. This patch reduces the size of
lock_list::distance to save space, so that we can introduce other fields
to help detect recursive read lock deadlocks without increasing the size
of lock_list structure.

Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-6-boqun.feng@gmail.com
2020-08-26 12:42:04 +02:00
Boqun Feng d563bc6ead lockdep: Make __bfs() visit every dependency until a match
Currently, __bfs() will do a breadth-first search in the dependency
graph and visit each lock class in the graph exactly once, so for
example, in the following graph:

	A ---------> B
	|            ^
	|            |
	+----------> C

a __bfs() call starts at A, will visit B through dependency A -> B and
visit C through dependency A -> C and that's it, IOW, __bfs() will not
visit dependency C -> B.

This is OK for now, as we only have strong dependencies in the
dependency graph, so whenever there is a traverse path from A to B in
__bfs(), it means A has strong dependencies to B (IOW, B depends on A
strongly). So no need to visit all dependencies in the graph.

However, as we are going to add recursive-read lock into the dependency
graph, as a result, not all the paths mean strong dependencies, in the
same example above, dependency A -> B may be a weak dependency and
traverse A -> C -> B may be a strong dependency path. And with the old
way of __bfs() (i.e. visiting every lock class exactly once), we will
miss the strong dependency path, which will result into failing to find
a deadlock. To cure this for the future, we need to find a way for
__bfs() to visit each dependency, rather than each class, exactly once
in the search until we find a match.

The solution is simple:

We used to mark lock_class::lockdep_dependency_gen_id to indicate a
class has been visited in __bfs(), now we change the semantics a little
bit: we now mark lock_class::lockdep_dependency_gen_id to indicate _all
the dependencies_ in its lock_{after,before} have been visited in the
__bfs() (note we only take one direction in a __bfs() search). In this
way, every dependency is guaranteed to be visited until we find a match.

Note: the checks in mark_lock_accessed() and lock_accessed() are
removed, because after this modification, we may call these two
functions on @source_entry of __bfs(), which may not be the entry in
"list_entries"

Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-5-boqun.feng@gmail.com
2020-08-26 12:42:03 +02:00
Boqun Feng b11be024de lockdep: Demagic the return value of BFS
__bfs() could return four magic numbers:

	1: search succeeds, but none match.
	0: search succeeds, find one match.
	-1: search fails because of the cq is full.
	-2: search fails because a invalid node is found.

This patch cleans things up by using a enum type for the return value
of __bfs() and its friends, this improves the code readability of the
code, and further, could help if we want to extend the BFS.

Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-4-boqun.feng@gmail.com
2020-08-26 12:42:03 +02:00
Boqun Feng e918188611 locking: More accurate annotations for read_lock()
On the archs using QUEUED_RWLOCKS, read_lock() is not always a recursive
read lock, actually it's only recursive if in_interrupt() is true. So
change the annotation accordingly to catch more deadlocks.

Note we used to treat read_lock() as pure recursive read locks in
lib/locking-seftest.c, and this is useful, especially for the lockdep
development selftest, so we keep this via a variable to force switching
lock annotation for read_lock().

Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200807074238.1632519-2-boqun.feng@gmail.com
2020-08-26 12:42:02 +02:00
Peter Zijlstra eb1f00237a lockdep,trace: Expose tracepoints
The lockdep tracepoints are under the lockdep recursion counter, this
has a bunch of nasty side effects:

 - TRACE_IRQFLAGS doesn't work across the entire tracepoint

 - RCU-lockdep doesn't see the tracepoints either, hiding numerous
   "suspicious RCU usage" warnings.

Pull the trace_lock_*() tracepoints completely out from under the
lockdep recursion handling and completely rely on the trace level
recusion handling -- also, tracing *SHOULD* not be taking locks in any
case.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200821085348.782688941@infradead.org
2020-08-26 12:41:56 +02:00
Peter Zijlstra fddf9055a6 lockdep: Use raw_cpu_*() for per-cpu variables
Sven reported that commit a21ee6055c ("lockdep: Change
hardirq{s_enabled,_context} to per-cpu variables") caused trouble on
s390 because their this_cpu_*() primitives disable preemption which
then lands back tracing.

On the one hand, per-cpu ops should use preempt_*able_notrace() and
raw_local_irq_*(), on the other hand, we can trivialy use raw_cpu_*()
ops for this.

Fixes: a21ee6055c ("lockdep: Change hardirq{s_enabled,_context} to per-cpu variables")
Reported-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200821085348.192346882@infradead.org
2020-08-26 12:41:53 +02:00
Wei Yongjun d49bed9abc locktorture: Make function torture_percpu_rwsem_init() static
The sparse tool complains as follows:

kernel/locking/locktorture.c:569:6: warning:
 symbol 'torture_percpu_rwsem_init' was not declared. Should it be static?

And this function is not used outside of locktorture.c,
so this commit marks it static.

Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-08-24 18:45:32 -07:00
Linus Torvalds 97d052ea3f A set of locking fixes and updates:
- Untangle the header spaghetti which causes build failures in various
     situations caused by the lockdep additions to seqcount to validate that
     the write side critical sections are non-preemptible.
 
   - The seqcount associated lock debug addons which were blocked by the
     above fallout.
 
     seqcount writers contrary to seqlock writers must be externally
     serialized, which usually happens via locking - except for strict per
     CPU seqcounts. As the lock is not part of the seqcount, lockdep cannot
     validate that the lock is held.
 
     This new debug mechanism adds the concept of associated locks.
     sequence count has now lock type variants and corresponding
     initializers which take a pointer to the associated lock used for
     writer serialization. If lockdep is enabled the pointer is stored and
     write_seqcount_begin() has a lockdep assertion to validate that the
     lock is held.
 
     Aside of the type and the initializer no other code changes are
     required at the seqcount usage sites. The rest of the seqcount API is
     unchanged and determines the type at compile time with the help of
     _Generic which is possible now that the minimal GCC version has been
     moved up.
 
     Adding this lockdep coverage unearthed a handful of seqcount bugs which
     have been addressed already independent of this.
 
     While generaly useful this comes with a Trojan Horse twist: On RT
     kernels the write side critical section can become preemtible if the
     writers are serialized by an associated lock, which leads to the well
     known reader preempts writer livelock. RT prevents this by storing the
     associated lock pointer independent of lockdep in the seqcount and
     changing the reader side to block on the lock when a reader detects
     that a writer is in the write side critical section.
 
  - Conversion of seqcount usage sites to associated types and initializers.
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQJHBAABCgAxFiEEQp8+kY+LLUocC4bMphj1TA10mKEFAl8xmPYTHHRnbHhAbGlu
 dXRyb25peC5kZQAKCRCmGPVMDXSYoTuQEACyzQCjU8PgehPp9oMqWzaX2fcVyuZO
 QU2yw6gmz2oTz3ZHUNwdW8UnzGh2OWosK3kDruoD9FtSS51lER1/ISfSPCGfyqxC
 KTjOcB1Kvxwq/3LcCx7Zi3ZxWApat74qs3EhYhKtEiQ2Y9xv9rLq8VV1UWAwyxq0
 eHpjlIJ6b6rbt+ARslaB7drnccOsdK+W/roNj4kfyt+gezjBfojGRdMGQNMFcpnv
 shuTC+vYurAVIiVA/0IuizgHfwZiXOtVpjVoEWaxg6bBH6HNuYMYzdSa/YrlDkZs
 n/aBI/Xkvx+Eacu8b1Zwmbzs5EnikUK/2dMqbzXKUZK61eV4hX5c2xrnr1yGWKTs
 F/juh69Squ7X6VZyKVgJ9RIccVueqwR2EprXWgH3+RMice5kjnXH4zURp0GHALxa
 DFPfB6fawcH3Ps87kcRFvjgm6FBo0hJ1AxmsW1dY4ACFB9azFa2euW+AARDzHOy2
 VRsUdhL9CGwtPjXcZ/9Rhej6fZLGBXKr8uq5QiMuvttp4b6+j9FEfBgD4S6h8csl
 AT2c2I9LcbWqyUM9P4S7zY/YgOZw88vHRuDH7tEBdIeoiHfrbSBU7EQ9jlAKq/59
 f+Htu2Io281c005g7DEeuCYvpzSYnJnAitj5Lmp/kzk2Wn3utY1uIAVszqwf95Ul
 81ppn2KlvzUK8g==
 =7Gj+
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'locking-urgent-2020-08-10' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

Pull locking updates from Thomas Gleixner:
 "A set of locking fixes and updates:

   - Untangle the header spaghetti which causes build failures in
     various situations caused by the lockdep additions to seqcount to
     validate that the write side critical sections are non-preemptible.

   - The seqcount associated lock debug addons which were blocked by the
     above fallout.

     seqcount writers contrary to seqlock writers must be externally
     serialized, which usually happens via locking - except for strict
     per CPU seqcounts. As the lock is not part of the seqcount, lockdep
     cannot validate that the lock is held.

     This new debug mechanism adds the concept of associated locks.
     sequence count has now lock type variants and corresponding
     initializers which take a pointer to the associated lock used for
     writer serialization. If lockdep is enabled the pointer is stored
     and write_seqcount_begin() has a lockdep assertion to validate that
     the lock is held.

     Aside of the type and the initializer no other code changes are
     required at the seqcount usage sites. The rest of the seqcount API
     is unchanged and determines the type at compile time with the help
     of _Generic which is possible now that the minimal GCC version has
     been moved up.

     Adding this lockdep coverage unearthed a handful of seqcount bugs
     which have been addressed already independent of this.

     While generally useful this comes with a Trojan Horse twist: On RT
     kernels the write side critical section can become preemtible if
     the writers are serialized by an associated lock, which leads to
     the well known reader preempts writer livelock. RT prevents this by
     storing the associated lock pointer independent of lockdep in the
     seqcount and changing the reader side to block on the lock when a
     reader detects that a writer is in the write side critical section.

   - Conversion of seqcount usage sites to associated types and
     initializers"

* tag 'locking-urgent-2020-08-10' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (25 commits)
  locking/seqlock, headers: Untangle the spaghetti monster
  locking, arch/ia64: Reduce <asm/smp.h> header dependencies by moving XTP bits into the new <asm/xtp.h> header
  x86/headers: Remove APIC headers from <asm/smp.h>
  seqcount: More consistent seqprop names
  seqcount: Compress SEQCNT_LOCKNAME_ZERO()
  seqlock: Fold seqcount_LOCKNAME_init() definition
  seqlock: Fold seqcount_LOCKNAME_t definition
  seqlock: s/__SEQ_LOCKDEP/__SEQ_LOCK/g
  hrtimer: Use sequence counter with associated raw spinlock
  kvm/eventfd: Use sequence counter with associated spinlock
  userfaultfd: Use sequence counter with associated spinlock
  NFSv4: Use sequence counter with associated spinlock
  iocost: Use sequence counter with associated spinlock
  raid5: Use sequence counter with associated spinlock
  vfs: Use sequence counter with associated spinlock
  timekeeping: Use sequence counter with associated raw spinlock
  xfrm: policy: Use sequence counters with associated lock
  netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: Use sequence counter with associated rwlock
  netfilter: conntrack: Use sequence counter with associated spinlock
  sched: tasks: Use sequence counter with associated spinlock
  ...
2020-08-10 19:07:44 -07:00
Linus Torvalds 921d2597ab s390: implement diag318
x86:
 * Report last CPU for debugging
 * Emulate smaller MAXPHYADDR in the guest than in the host
 * .noinstr and tracing fixes from Thomas
 * nested SVM page table switching optimization and fixes
 
 Generic:
 * Unify shadow MMU cache data structures across architectures
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQFIBAABCAAyFiEE8TM4V0tmI4mGbHaCv/vSX3jHroMFAl8pC+oUHHBib256aW5p
 QHJlZGhhdC5jb20ACgkQv/vSX3jHroNcOwgAjomqtEqQNlp7DdZT7VyyklzbxX1/
 ud7v+oOJ8K4sFlf64lSthjPo3N9rzZCcw+yOXmuyuITngXOGc3tzIwXpCzpLtuQ1
 WO1Ql3B/2dCi3lP5OMmsO1UAZqy9pKLg1dfeYUPk48P5+p7d/NPmk+Em5kIYzKm5
 JsaHfCp2EEXomwmljNJ8PQ1vTjIQSSzlgYUBZxmCkaaX7zbEUMtxAQCStHmt8B84
 33LczwXBm3viSWrzsoBV37I70+tseugiSGsCfUyupXOvq55d6D9FCqtCb45Hn4Vh
 Ik8ggKdalsk/reiGEwNw1/3nr6mRMkHSbl+Mhc4waOIFf9dn0urgQgOaDg==
 =YVx0
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm

Pull KVM updates from Paolo Bonzini:
 "s390:
   - implement diag318

  x86:
   - Report last CPU for debugging
   - Emulate smaller MAXPHYADDR in the guest than in the host
   - .noinstr and tracing fixes from Thomas
   - nested SVM page table switching optimization and fixes

  Generic:
   - Unify shadow MMU cache data structures across architectures"

* tag 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm: (127 commits)
  KVM: SVM: Fix sev_pin_memory() error handling
  KVM: LAPIC: Set the TDCR settable bits
  KVM: x86: Specify max TDP level via kvm_configure_mmu()
  KVM: x86/mmu: Rename max_page_level to max_huge_page_level
  KVM: x86: Dynamically calculate TDP level from max level and MAXPHYADDR
  KVM: VXM: Remove temporary WARN on expected vs. actual EPTP level mismatch
  KVM: x86: Pull the PGD's level from the MMU instead of recalculating it
  KVM: VMX: Make vmx_load_mmu_pgd() static
  KVM: x86/mmu: Add separate helper for shadow NPT root page role calc
  KVM: VMX: Drop a duplicate declaration of construct_eptp()
  KVM: nSVM: Correctly set the shadow NPT root level in its MMU role
  KVM: Using macros instead of magic values
  MIPS: KVM: Fix build error caused by 'kvm_run' cleanup
  KVM: nSVM: remove nonsensical EXITINFO1 adjustment on nested NPF
  KVM: x86: Add a capability for GUEST_MAXPHYADDR < HOST_MAXPHYADDR support
  KVM: VMX: optimize #PF injection when MAXPHYADDR does not match
  KVM: VMX: Add guest physical address check in EPT violation and misconfig
  KVM: VMX: introduce vmx_need_pf_intercept
  KVM: x86: update exception bitmap on CPUID changes
  KVM: x86: rename update_bp_intercept to update_exception_bitmap
  ...
2020-08-06 12:59:31 -07:00
Linus Torvalds 6d2b84a4e5 This tree adds the sched_set_fifo*() encapsulation APIs to remove
static priority level knowledge from non-scheduler code.
 
 The three APIs for non-scheduler code to set SCHED_FIFO are:
 
  - sched_set_fifo()
  - sched_set_fifo_low()
  - sched_set_normal()
 
 These are two FIFO priority levels: default (high), and a 'low' priority level,
 plus sched_set_normal() to set the policy back to non-SCHED_FIFO.
 
 Since the changes affect a lot of non-scheduler code, we kept this in a separate
 tree.
 
 When merging to the latest upstream tree there's a conflict in drivers/spi/spi.c,
 which can be resolved via:
 
 	sched_set_fifo(ctlr->kworker_task);
 
 Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQJFBAABCgAvFiEEBpT5eoXrXCwVQwEKEnMQ0APhK1gFAl8pPQIRHG1pbmdvQGtl
 cm5lbC5vcmcACgkQEnMQ0APhK1j0Jw/+LlSyX6gD2ATy3cizGL7DFPZogD5MVKTb
 IXbhXH/ACpuPQlBe1+haRLbJj6XfXqbOlAleVKt7eh+jZ1jYjC972RCSTO4566mJ
 0v8Iy9kkEeb2TDbYx1H3bnk78lf85t0CB+sCzyKUYFuTrXU04eRj7MtN3vAQyRQU
 xJg83x/sT5DGdDTP50sL7lpbwk3INWkD0aDCJEaO/a9yHElMsTZiZBKoXxN/s30o
 FsfzW56jqtng771H2bo8ERN7+abwJg10crQU5mIaLhacNMETuz0NZ/f8fY/fydCL
 Ju8HAdNKNXyphWkAOmixQuyYtWKe2/GfbHg8hld0jmpwxkOSTgZjY+pFcv7/w306
 g2l1TPOt8e1n5jbfnY3eig+9Kr8y0qHkXPfLfgRqKwMMaOqTTYixEzj+NdxEIRX9
 Kr7oFAv6VEFfXGSpb5L1qyjIGVgQ5/JE/p3OC3GHEsw5VKiy5yjhNLoSmSGzdS61
 1YurVvypSEUAn3DqTXgeGX76f0HH365fIKqmbFrUWxliF+YyflMhtrj2JFtejGzH
 Md3RgAzxusE9S6k3gw1ev4byh167bPBbY8jz0w3Gd7IBRKy9vo92h6ZRYIl6xeoC
 BU2To1IhCAydIr6hNsIiCSDTgiLbsYQzPuVVovUxNh+l1ZvKV2X+csEHhs8oW4pr
 4BRU7dKL2NE=
 =/7JH
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'sched-fifo-2020-08-04' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

Pull sched/fifo updates from Ingo Molnar:
 "This adds the sched_set_fifo*() encapsulation APIs to remove static
  priority level knowledge from non-scheduler code.

  The three APIs for non-scheduler code to set SCHED_FIFO are:

   - sched_set_fifo()
   - sched_set_fifo_low()
   - sched_set_normal()

  These are two FIFO priority levels: default (high), and a 'low'
  priority level, plus sched_set_normal() to set the policy back to
  non-SCHED_FIFO.

  Since the changes affect a lot of non-scheduler code, we kept this in
  a separate tree"

* tag 'sched-fifo-2020-08-04' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (24 commits)
  sched,tracing: Convert to sched_set_fifo()
  sched: Remove sched_set_*() return value
  sched: Remove sched_setscheduler*() EXPORTs
  sched,psi: Convert to sched_set_fifo_low()
  sched,rcutorture: Convert to sched_set_fifo_low()
  sched,rcuperf: Convert to sched_set_fifo_low()
  sched,locktorture: Convert to sched_set_fifo()
  sched,irq: Convert to sched_set_fifo()
  sched,watchdog: Convert to sched_set_fifo()
  sched,serial: Convert to sched_set_fifo()
  sched,powerclamp: Convert to sched_set_fifo()
  sched,ion: Convert to sched_set_normal()
  sched,powercap: Convert to sched_set_fifo*()
  sched,spi: Convert to sched_set_fifo*()
  sched,mmc: Convert to sched_set_fifo*()
  sched,ivtv: Convert to sched_set_fifo*()
  sched,drm/scheduler: Convert to sched_set_fifo*()
  sched,msm: Convert to sched_set_fifo*()
  sched,psci: Convert to sched_set_fifo*()
  sched,drbd: Convert to sched_set_fifo*()
  ...
2020-08-06 11:55:43 -07:00