Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c:123: warning: Function parameter or member 'dev' not described in 'iwl_acpi_get_dsm_object'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c:123: warning: Function parameter or member 'rev' not described in 'iwl_acpi_get_dsm_object'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c:123: warning: Function parameter or member 'func' not described in 'iwl_acpi_get_dsm_object'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c:123: warning: Function parameter or member 'args' not described in 'iwl_acpi_get_dsm_object'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c:142: warning: Function parameter or member 'dev' not described in 'iwl_acpi_get_dsm_u8'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c:142: warning: Function parameter or member 'rev' not described in 'iwl_acpi_get_dsm_u8'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c:142: warning: Function parameter or member 'func' not described in 'iwl_acpi_get_dsm_u8'
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Cc: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@intel.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201126133152.3211309-17-lee.jones@linaro.org
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/dbg.c:1932: warning: Function parameter or member 'reg_data' not described in 'iwl_dump_ini_mem'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/dbg.c:1932: warning: Excess function parameter 'reg' description in 'iwl_dump_ini_mem'
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Cc: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@intel.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Shahar S Matityahu <shahar.s.matityahu@intel.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201126133152.3211309-15-lee.jones@linaro.org
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-phy-db.c:97: warning: Function parameter or member 'trans' not described in 'iwl_phy_db'
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Cc: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@intel.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201126133152.3211309-14-lee.jones@linaro.org
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-eeprom-parse.c:340: warning: cannot understand function prototype: 'struct iwl_eeprom_enhanced_txpwr '
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Cc: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@intel.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201126133152.3211309-9-lee.jones@linaro.org
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-eeprom-read.c:347: warning: Function parameter or member 'trans' not described in 'iwl_read_eeprom'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-eeprom-read.c:347: warning: Function parameter or member 'eeprom' not described in 'iwl_read_eeprom'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-eeprom-read.c:347: warning: Function parameter or member 'eeprom_size' not described in 'iwl_read_eeprom'
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Cc: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@intel.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201126133152.3211309-8-lee.jones@linaro.org
Also add documentation for 'mvm'.
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:400: warning: cannot understand function prototype: 'const u16 expected_tpt_legacy[IWL_RATE_COUNT] = '
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:684: warning: Function parameter or member 'mvm' not described in '_rs_collect_tx_data'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:684: warning: Function parameter or member 'tbl' not described in '_rs_collect_tx_data'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:684: warning: Function parameter or member 'scale_index' not described in '_rs_collect_tx_data'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:684: warning: Function parameter or member 'attempts' not described in '_rs_collect_tx_data'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:684: warning: Function parameter or member 'successes' not described in '_rs_collect_tx_data'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:684: warning: Function parameter or member 'window' not described in '_rs_collect_tx_data'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:2677: warning: duplicate section name 'NOTE'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:2682: warning: Function parameter or member 'mvm' not described in 'rs_initialize_lq'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:2682: warning: Function parameter or member 'sta' not described in 'rs_initialize_lq'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:2682: warning: Function parameter or member 'lq_sta' not described in 'rs_initialize_lq'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:2682: warning: Function parameter or member 'band' not described in 'rs_initialize_lq'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:3761: warning: Function parameter or member 'mvm' not described in 'rs_program_fix_rate'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:3761: warning: Function parameter or member 'lq_sta' not described in 'rs_program_fix_rate'
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:4213: warning: Function parameter or member 'mvm' not described in 'iwl_mvm_tx_protection'
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Cc: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@intel.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201126133152.3211309-3-lee.jones@linaro.org
In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a
warning by replacing a /* fall through */ comment with the new
pseudo-keyword macro fallthrough; instead of letting the code fall
through to the next case.
Notice that Clang doesn't recognize /* fall through */ comments as
implicit fall-through markings.
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/edd98d194bfc98b4be93a9bdc303630b719c0e66.1605896060.git.gustavoars@kernel.org
In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix multiple
warnings by explicitly using the fallthrough pseudo-keyword as a
replacement for a number of "fall through" markings.
Notice that Clang doesn't recognize "fall through" comments as
implicit fall-through.
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201117155904.GA14551@embeddedor
In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix multiple
warnings by explicitly using the fallthrough pseudo-keyword as a
replacement for a number of "fall through" markings.
Notice that Clang doesn't recognize "fall through" comments as
implicit fall-through.
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201117135053.GA13248@embeddedor
When waiting for a notification and then processing it,
we also need to check the size of the data before we use
it. Most places do that already, but fix the remaining
ones to do it as well.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.b29573bcba39.I4b7e72824d06dc0719a40021d933e29edfc14713@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
The range response notification has several versions. Check the
notification size according to the expected notification version.
Notifications with incorrect size will be ignored.
Signed-off-by: Avraham Stern <avraham.stern@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.ee57c3214d05.I810d7de33fb08001ef1a2e24714d5b68932e088e@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Previously, we added checks that the contained MPDU size is long
enough, but really we should also check that the notification
itself fits into the data. Add some checks for that.
Also add unlikely() annotations on the previously added checks.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.51cc04cf1e3e.I7bfd6809f8f5feb75f79397646e6656e95688a0e@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
If the channel switch delay that we would incur after the channel
switch actually happens is longer than the quiet time we're willing
to tolerate, disconnect as well.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.3bc3449922da.Ib0255deb67b2fc21317e274adcacb545bb1dc669@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
There are some races in the hardware that can possibly lead to
a bus lockup later during a restart when we manage to kill the
firmware at a bad time (while it's accessing the bus).
To work around this, add support for a new handshake between
firmware and driver to ensure that the firmware is in a well-
known state before we kill it.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.7756fcc9865c.I13de65e0ffcb4186dd4c1a465f66df2e98c9a947@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
When we get a channel switch with a very long quiet period, we schedule
a work to disconnect after a while. This work runs in background. In the
meanwhile, we keep getting beacons and sending FW modify command for each.
This has a potential race, where we modify the CSA after we aborted it.
Protect the flow by setting csa_failed to true in case we abort, and check
it before sending the modify command.
This required a modification to the way we treat csa_failed in
iwl_mvm_post_channel_switch:
1. The variable isn't being reset anymore, so we can still look at it in
iwl_mvm_channel_switch_rx_beacon. This is fine, since we reset it when
starting a new CSA.
2. There is no more early return in case of csa_failed. This is fine,
since before this patch csa_failed was set only for GO, and for GO the
function is only resetting the power settings, which we want to restore
even in case of failure.
Signed-off-by: Sara Sharon <sara.sharon@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.b023856bdf39.I4ed0149e0018fe5e1ae3c2a1cbc614954016063f@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
We send some data to the firmware and expect to get it back,
but we shouldn't really trust the firmware on this. Check the
size of all the data we send down to avoid using bad or just
uninitialized data when the firmware doesn't respond right.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.a5a8173f16c7.I4fa68bb2b1c7dcc52ddd381c4042722d27c4a34d@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
We don't need the sequence/index/cmd_index unless we're doing
reclaim, they're not even valid in the other cases. Move the
variables and their assignments into the right if statement
and combine the two if statements into a single one as well.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.6207fdcc91a9.Ia71e766ead7560262f4bc6ad3da6f1117c498cd6@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
There's a bug in the lengths - the 'old length' needs to be calculated
using the 'old' pointer, of course, likely a copy/paste mistake. Fix
this.
Reported-by: Daniel Gabay <daniel.gabay@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Fixes: cf29c5b66b ("iwlwifi: dbg_ini: implement time point handling")
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.c0105ddffa74.I1ddb243053ff763c91b663748b6a593ecc3b5634@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
We set this here, but don't really use it until we've
enabled interrupts. But when enabling interrupts we
always overwrite this value anyway, so remove setting
it here, mostly in order not to have some additional
code duplicated later.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.135d96297aca.Id2d26fff60b6c31202bb0a36e46948bda6a39d33@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
This is actually wrong, the bit used here by the image loader
is BIT(1), not BIT(2). The latter will be reused by the new
reset flow soon.
However, as we never had any complaints about not printing
the IML status or not handling the IML error interrupt (and
I suspect the code handling it was incorrectly anyway) just
remove the code for it.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.9a323f4a3493.Ic7aee4dbbf4be42287c338c2fa1b111473724116@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
We keep the scan status per UID in scan_uid_status field when the
iwl_mvm_build_scan_cmd() function is called. If we error out after
this, e.g. due to FW restart being in progress, we're not cleaning
up properly, and can run into warnings later.
Clean up internal variables when starting fails after calling the
iwl_mvm_build_scan_cmd() function.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.970421a2f753.Id62b2da8a0ccccbb114407db82ca485d07749d39@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
We're currently doing accounting on the queue sync with an
atomic variable that counts down the number of remaining
notifications that we still need.
As we've been hitting issues in this area, modify this to
track a bitmap of queues, not just the number of queues,
and print out the remaining bitmap in the warning.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.0a3fa177cd6b.I7c69ff999419368266279ec27dd618eb450908b3@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
For triggering an NMI in the firmware, we should only set BIT(24)
in the corresponding register, not the entire mask that's usable
by the driver.
This currently doesn't matter because the firmware only enables
BIT(24), but we'll start using BIT(25) for other purposes with an
upcoming API change.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.2f982365d085.Id09daabfd331ba9e120abcbbedd2ad6448902ed0@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
If 12k A-MSDU size is requested, we will actually allocate 16k
due to page allocation. Thus, change it to actually mean 16k,
which is useful for certain sniffer use cases.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.84ae405829d4.I31184f4be31f7c3feb9a29aef3a111e70d15c64a@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
The argument type to iwl_mvm_notify_rx_queue() is currently just
a u8 *, but that's misleading because we actually need the inner
data to be of type struct iwl_mvm_internal_rxq_notif, because we
interpret it when we get it back from the device (to check the
sync bool and possibly the cookie.)
Therefore, clear up any potential confusion and require that the
data passed is of type struct iwl_mvm_internal_rxq_notif *.
Also, while at it, rename the "count" to "notif_size" as "count"
doesn't really clearly say what it's counting.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.d28e14682bdc.I9ac366aa97db045be4daa4ba263267a3ac6a6a2f@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
The MPDU contained in a notification shouldn't be larger than the
notification size itself is, validate this.
Reported-by: Haggai Abramovsky <haggai.abramovsky@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.7c721ad37014.Id5746874ecfa208b60baa62691b2d9dc5dd4d89c@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Similarly to what I did to iwl_run_init_mvm_ucode, there is no
need to pass the read_nvm parameter. Either we have an NVM
and we don't need to read it, or we don't and we need to read it.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.1b764faecfee.I2da0ada577fc16268125a4a15b5e725c18c643ee@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Curretly we only mark HW error state "after" trying to collect HW data,
but if any HW error happens while colleting HW data we go into endless
loop. avoid this by setting HW error state "before" collecting HW data.
Signed-off-by: Mordechay Goodstein <mordechay.goodstein@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.4c7e5a87da15.Ic35b2f28ff08f7ac23143c80f224d52eb97a0454@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Add support to the 6GHz band (aka. Ultra High Band or UHB). This
allows us to scan and connect to channels in that band, including all
the relevant features, such as preferred scan channels, colocated
channels etc.
Co-developed-by: Haim Dreyfuss <haim.dreyfuss@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Haim Dreyfuss <haim.dreyfuss@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Ilan Peer <ilan.peer@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilan Peer <ilan.peer@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Tova Mussai <tova.mussai@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tova Mussai <tova.mussai@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Andrei Otcheretianski <andrei.otcheretianski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Otcheretianski <andrei.otcheretianski@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Tali Levi Rovinsky <Tali.Levi-rovinsky@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tali Levi Rovinsky <Tali.Levi-rovinsky@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Avraham Stern <avraham.stern@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Avraham Stern <avraham.stern@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Ayala Beker <ayala.beker@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ayala Beker <ayala.beker@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201210000657.0fdbfc3d7352.Idb648536faf21716e2ab2c6d6890d3e49f719cd3@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
This data is not necessarily the same across devices as we may
modify it due to the number of antennas and for overrides (though
in practice overrides are likely to be identical), so modifying
the global data is wrong.
Make a copy of it in the NVM data and modify it there instead.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.6b4ee30c59e4.I0c30ef78b3bf727fe80b16a19c7588016d6b04bf@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
We no longer need code that was introduced to differentiate
between two early versions of 8260.
We can remove this convoluted way to get the hardware version
that was needed because of a bug in the register's
configuration.
Moreover, since we no longer need to access the PRPH
registers, we no longer need to wake up the device,
request ownership, etc...
Remove all that.
This allows us to get the rid of the obsolete comment
about the AUX bus MISC address space which should have
been moved when this code was moved away from here.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.4a5665ccd8a6.Iff3879405c15758ba661c430e77dc2160ddada1c@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
This command should be used only when there's a real client station.
Currently it works, but since soon the driver will stop actually having
an auxiliary station by default, and this command requires _some_ valid
station, it needs to be removed from this flow.
Signed-off-by: Naftali Goldstein <naftali.goldstein@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.81b2acfe292b.I8c7372e6f72279e22966a2d0a9066521f9d2f1a0@changeid
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Lee Jones
Gustavo A. R. Silva
Johannes Berg
Emmanuel Grumbach
Mordechay Goodstein
Avraham Stern
Matti Gottlieb
Sara Sharon
Luca Coelho
Naftali Goldstein