Граф коммитов

8 Коммитов

Автор SHA1 Сообщение Дата
Dmitry Safonov ef19e11133 xfrm/compat: Cleanup WARN()s that can be user-triggered
Replace WARN_ONCE() that can be triggered from userspace with
pr_warn_once(). Those still give user a hint what's the issue.

I've left WARN()s that are not possible to trigger with current
code-base and that would mean that the code has issues:
- relying on current compat_msg_min[type] <= xfrm_msg_min[type]
- expected 4-byte padding size difference between
  compat_msg_min[type] and xfrm_msg_min[type]
- compat_policy[type].len <= xfrma_policy[type].len
(for every type)

Reported-by: syzbot+834ffd1afc7212eb8147@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 5f3eea6b7e ("xfrm/compat: Attach xfrm dumps to 64=>32 bit translator")
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
2021-03-30 07:29:09 +02:00
Dmitry Safonov ad37f77fd3 xfrm/compat: Don't allocate memory with __GFP_ZERO
32-bit to 64-bit messages translator zerofies needed paddings in the
translation, the rest is the actual payload.
Don't allocate zero pages as they are not needed.

Fixes: 5106f4a8ac ("xfrm/compat: Add 32=>64-bit messages translator")
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
2020-11-09 07:34:56 +01:00
Dmitry Safonov d1949d045f xfrm/compat: memset(0) 64-bit padding at right place
32-bit messages translated by xfrm_compat can have attributes attached.
For all, but XFRMA_SA, XFRMA_POLICY the size of payload is the same
in 32-bit UABI and 64-bit UABI. For XFRMA_SA (struct xfrm_usersa_info)
and XFRMA_POLICY (struct xfrm_userpolicy_info) it's only tail-padding
that is present in 64-bit payload, but not in 32-bit.
The proper size for destination nlattr is already calculated by
xfrm_user_rcv_calculate_len64() and allocated with kvmalloc().

xfrm_attr_cpy32() copies 32-bit copy_len into 64-bit attribute
translated payload, zero-filling possible padding for SA/POLICY.
Due to a typo, *pos already has 64-bit payload size, in a result next
memset(0) is called on the memory after the translated attribute, not on
the tail-padding of it.

Fixes: 5106f4a8ac ("xfrm/compat: Add 32=>64-bit messages translator")
Reported-by: syzbot+c43831072e7df506a646@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
2020-11-09 07:34:56 +01:00
Dmitry Safonov dbd7ae5154 xfrm/compat: Translate by copying XFRMA_UNSPEC attribute
xfrm_xlate32() translates 64-bit message provided by kernel to be sent
for 32-bit listener (acknowledge or monitor). Translator code doesn't
expect XFRMA_UNSPEC attribute as it doesn't know its payload.
Kernel never attaches such attribute, but a user can.

I've searched if any opensource does it and the answer is no.
Nothing on github and google finds only tfcproject that has such code
commented-out.

What will happen if a user sends a netlink message with XFRMA_UNSPEC
attribute? Ipsec code ignores this attribute. But if there is a
monitor-process or 32-bit user requested ack - kernel will try to
translate such message and will hit WARN_ONCE() in xfrm_xlate64_attr().

Deal with XFRMA_UNSPEC by copying the attribute payload with
xfrm_nla_cpy(). In result, the default switch-case in xfrm_xlate64_attr()
becomes an unused code. Leave those 3 lines in case a new xfrm attribute
will be added.

Fixes: 5461fc0c8d ("xfrm/compat: Add 64=>32-bit messages translator")
Reported-by: syzbot+a7e701c8385bd8543074@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
2020-11-09 07:34:56 +01:00
Dmitry Safonov 96392ee5a1 xfrm/compat: Translate 32-bit user_policy from sockptr
Provide compat_xfrm_userpolicy_info translation for xfrm setsocketopt().
Reallocate buffer and put the missing padding for 64-bit message.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
2020-09-24 08:53:04 +02:00
Dmitry Safonov 5106f4a8ac xfrm/compat: Add 32=>64-bit messages translator
Provide the user-to-kernel translator under XFRM_USER_COMPAT, that
creates for 32-bit xfrm-user message a 64-bit translation.
The translation is afterwards reused by xfrm_user code just as if
userspace had sent 64-bit message.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
2020-09-24 08:53:03 +02:00
Dmitry Safonov 5461fc0c8d xfrm/compat: Add 64=>32-bit messages translator
Provide the kernel-to-user translator under XFRM_USER_COMPAT, that
creates for 64-bit xfrm-user message a 32-bit translation and puts it
in skb's frag_list. net/compat.c layer provides MSG_CMSG_COMPAT to
decide if the message should be taken from skb or frag_list.
(used by wext-core which has also an ABI difference)

Kernel sends 64-bit xfrm messages to the userspace for:
- multicast (monitor events)
- netlink dumps

Wire up the translator to xfrm_nlmsg_multicast().

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
2020-09-24 08:53:03 +02:00
Dmitry Safonov c9e7c76d70 xfrm: Provide API to register translator module
Add a skeleton for xfrm_compat module and provide API to register it in
xfrm_state.ko. struct xfrm_translator will have function pointers to
translate messages received from 32-bit userspace or to be sent to it
from 64-bit kernel.
module_get()/module_put() are used instead of rcu_read_lock() as the
module will vmalloc() memory for translation.
The new API is registered with xfrm_state module, not with xfrm_user as
the former needs translator for user_policy set by setsockopt() and
xfrm_user already uses functions from xfrm_state.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
2020-09-24 08:53:03 +02:00