Граф коммитов

9 Коммитов

Автор SHA1 Сообщение Дата
David Howells dca54a7bbb afs: Add tracing for cell refcount and active user count
Add a tracepoint to log the cell refcount and active user count and pass in
a reason code through various functions that manipulate these counters.

Additionally, a helper function, afs_see_cell(), is provided to log
interesting places that deal with a cell without actually doing any
accounting directly.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-10-16 14:39:21 +01:00
David Howells 88c853c3f5 afs: Fix cell refcounting by splitting the usage counter
Management of the lifetime of afs_cell struct has some problems due to the
usage counter being used to determine whether objects of that type are in
use in addition to whether anyone might be interested in the structure.

This is made trickier by cell objects being cached for a period of time in
case they're quickly reused as they hold the result of a setup process that
may be slow (DNS lookups, AFS RPC ops).

Problems include the cached root volume from alias resolution pinning its
parent cell record, rmmod occasionally hanging and occasionally producing
assertion failures.

Fix this by splitting the count of active users from the struct reference
count.  Things then work as follows:

 (1) The cell cache keeps +1 on the cell's activity count and this has to
     be dropped before the cell can be removed.  afs_manage_cell() tries to
     exchange the 1 to a 0 with the cells_lock write-locked, and if
     successful, the record is removed from the net->cells.

 (2) One struct ref is 'owned' by the activity count.  That is put when the
     active count is reduced to 0 (final_destruction label).

 (3) A ref can be held on a cell whilst it is queued for management on a
     work queue without confusing the active count.  afs_queue_cell() is
     added to wrap this.

 (4) The queue's ref is dropped at the end of the management.  This is
     split out into a separate function, afs_manage_cell_work().

 (5) The root volume record is put after a cell is removed (at the
     final_destruction label) rather then in the RCU destruction routine.

 (6) Volumes hold struct refs, but aren't active users.

 (7) Both counts are displayed in /proc/net/afs/cells.

There are some management function changes:

 (*) afs_put_cell() now just decrements the refcount and triggers the RCU
     destruction if it becomes 0.  It no longer sets a timer to have the
     manager do this.

 (*) afs_use_cell() and afs_unuse_cell() are added to increase and decrease
     the active count.  afs_unuse_cell() sets the management timer.

 (*) afs_queue_cell() is added to queue a cell with approprate refs.

There are also some other fixes:

 (*) Don't let /proc/net/afs/cells access a cell's vllist if it's NULL.

 (*) Make sure that candidate cells in lookups are properly destroyed
     rather than being simply kfree'd.  This ensures the bits it points to
     are destroyed also.

 (*) afs_dec_cells_outstanding() is now called in cell destruction rather
     than at "final_destruction".  This ensures that cell->net is still
     valid to the end of the destructor.

 (*) As a consequence of the previous two changes, move the increment of
     net->cells_outstanding that was at the point of insertion into the
     tree to the allocation routine to correctly balance things.

Fixes: 989782dcdc ("afs: Overhaul cell database management")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-10-16 14:38:22 +01:00
David Howells fed79fd783 afs: Fix debugging statements with %px to be %p
Fix a couple of %px to be %p in debugging statements.

Fixes: e49c7b2f6d ("afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept")
Fixes: 8a070a9648 ("afs: Detect cell aliases 1 - Cells with root volumes")
Reported-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2020-06-09 18:17:14 +01:00
David Howells 9ca0652596 afs: Fix use of BUG()
Fix afs_compare_addrs() to use WARN_ON(1) instead of BUG() and return 1
(ie. srx_a > srx_b).

There's no point trying to put actual error handling in as this should not
occur unless a new transport address type is allowed by AFS.  And even if
it does, in this particular case, it'll just never match unknown types of
addresses.  This BUG() was more of a 'you need to add a case here'
indicator.

Reported-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2020-06-09 17:21:03 +01:00
David Howells 20325960f8 afs: Reorganise volume and server trees to be rooted on the cell
Reorganise afs_volume objects such that they're in a tree keyed on volume
ID, rooted at on an afs_cell object rather than being in multiple trees,
each of which is rooted on an afs_server object.

afs_server structs become per-cell and acquire a pointer to the cell.

The process of breaking a callback then starts with finding the server by
its network address, following that to the cell and then looking up each
volume ID in the volume tree.

This is simpler than the afs_vol_interest/afs_cb_interest N:M mapping web
and allows those structs and the code for maintaining them to be simplified
or removed.

It does make a couple of things a bit more tricky, though:

 (1) Operations now start with a volume, not a server, so there can be more
     than one answer as to whether or not the server we'll end up using
     supports the FS.InlineBulkStatus RPC.

 (2) CB RPC operations that specify the server UUID.  There's still a tree
     of servers by UUID on the afs_net struct, but the UUIDs in it aren't
     guaranteed unique.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-06-04 15:37:57 +01:00
David Howells cca37d45d5 afs: Add a tracepoint to track the lifetime of the afs_volume struct
Add a tracepoint to track the lifetime of the afs_volume struct.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-06-04 15:37:57 +01:00
David Howells 6dfdf5369c afs: Detect cell aliases 3 - YFS Cells with a canonical cell name op
YFS Volume Location servers have an operation by which the cell name may be
queried.  Use this to find out what a YFS server thinks the canonical cell
name should be.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-06-04 15:37:57 +01:00
David Howells 6ef350b184 afs: Detect cell aliases 2 - Cells with no root volumes
Implement the second phase of cell alias detection.  This part handles
alias detection for cells that don't have root.cell volumes and so we have
to find some other volume or fileserver to query.

We take the first volume from each such cell and attempt to look it up in
the new cell.  If found, we compare the records, if they are the same, we
judge the cell names to be aliases.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-06-04 15:37:57 +01:00
David Howells 8a070a9648 afs: Detect cell aliases 1 - Cells with root volumes
Put in the first phase of cell alias detection.  This part handles alias
detection for cells that have root.cell volumes (which is expected to be
likely).

When a cell becomes newly active, it is probed for its root.cell volume,
and if it has one, this volume is compared against other root.cell volumes
to find out if the list of fileserver UUIDs have any in common - and if
that's the case, do the address lists of those fileservers have any
addresses in common.  If they do, the new cell is adjudged to be an alias
of the old cell and the old cell is used instead.

Comparing is aided by the server list in struct afs_server_list being
sorted in UUID order and the addresses in the fileserver address lists
being sorted in address order.

The cell then retains the afs_volume object for the root.cell volume, even
if it's not mounted for future alias checking.

This necessary because:

 (1) Whilst fileservers have UUIDs that are meant to be globally unique, in
     practice they are not because cells get cloned without changing the
     UUIDs - so afs_server records need to be per cell.

 (2) Sometimes the DNS is used to make cell aliases - but if we don't know
     they're the same, we may end up with multiple superblocks and multiple
     afs_server records for the same thing, impairing our ability to
     deliver callback notifications of third party changes

 (3) The fileserver RPC API doesn't contain the cell name, so it can't tell
     us which cell it's notifying and can't see that a change made to to
     one cell should notify the same client that's also accessed as the
     other cell.

Reported-by: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
2020-06-04 15:37:57 +01:00