Граф коммитов

17 Коммитов

Автор SHA1 Сообщение Дата
David S. Miller 2bbc078f81 Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next
Daniel Borkmann says:

====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2019-12-27

The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree.

We've added 127 non-merge commits during the last 17 day(s) which contain
a total of 110 files changed, 6901 insertions(+), 2721 deletions(-).

There are three merge conflicts. Conflicts and resolution looks as follows:

1) Merge conflict in net/bpf/test_run.c:

There was a tree-wide cleanup c593642c8b ("treewide: Use sizeof_field() macro")
which gets in the way with b590cb5f80 ("bpf: Switch to offsetofend in
BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN"):

  <<<<<<< HEAD
          if (!range_is_zero(__skb, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, priority) +
                             sizeof_field(struct __sk_buff, priority),
  =======
          if (!range_is_zero(__skb, offsetofend(struct __sk_buff, priority),
  >>>>>>> 7c8dce4b16

There are a few occasions that look similar to this. Always take the chunk with
offsetofend(). Note that there is one where the fields differ in here:

  <<<<<<< HEAD
          if (!range_is_zero(__skb, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tstamp) +
                             sizeof_field(struct __sk_buff, tstamp),
  =======
          if (!range_is_zero(__skb, offsetofend(struct __sk_buff, gso_segs),
  >>>>>>> 7c8dce4b16

Just take the one with offsetofend() /and/ gso_segs. Latter is correct due to
850a88cc40 ("bpf: Expose __sk_buff wire_len/gso_segs to BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN").

2) Merge conflict in arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:

(I'm keeping Bjorn in Cc here for a double-check in case I got it wrong.)

  <<<<<<< HEAD
          if (is_13b_check(off, insn))
                  return -1;
          emit(rv_blt(tcc, RV_REG_ZERO, off >> 1), ctx);
  =======
          emit_branch(BPF_JSLT, RV_REG_T1, RV_REG_ZERO, off, ctx);
  >>>>>>> 7c8dce4b16

Result should look like:

          emit_branch(BPF_JSLT, tcc, RV_REG_ZERO, off, ctx);

3) Merge conflict in arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h:

  <<<<<<< HEAD
  =======
  #define VMALLOC_SIZE     (KERN_VIRT_SIZE >> 1)
  #define VMALLOC_END      (PAGE_OFFSET - 1)
  #define VMALLOC_START    (PAGE_OFFSET - VMALLOC_SIZE)

  #define BPF_JIT_REGION_SIZE     (SZ_128M)
  #define BPF_JIT_REGION_START    (PAGE_OFFSET - BPF_JIT_REGION_SIZE)
  #define BPF_JIT_REGION_END      (VMALLOC_END)

  /*
   * Roughly size the vmemmap space to be large enough to fit enough
   * struct pages to map half the virtual address space. Then
   * position vmemmap directly below the VMALLOC region.
   */
  #define VMEMMAP_SHIFT \
          (CONFIG_VA_BITS - PAGE_SHIFT - 1 + STRUCT_PAGE_MAX_SHIFT)
  #define VMEMMAP_SIZE    BIT(VMEMMAP_SHIFT)
  #define VMEMMAP_END     (VMALLOC_START - 1)
  #define VMEMMAP_START   (VMALLOC_START - VMEMMAP_SIZE)

  #define vmemmap         ((struct page *)VMEMMAP_START)

  >>>>>>> 7c8dce4b16

Only take the BPF_* defines from there and move them higher up in the
same file. Remove the rest from the chunk. The VMALLOC_* etc defines
got moved via 01f52e16b8 ("riscv: define vmemmap before pfn_to_page
calls"). Result:

  [...]
  #define __S101  PAGE_READ_EXEC
  #define __S110  PAGE_SHARED_EXEC
  #define __S111  PAGE_SHARED_EXEC

  #define VMALLOC_SIZE     (KERN_VIRT_SIZE >> 1)
  #define VMALLOC_END      (PAGE_OFFSET - 1)
  #define VMALLOC_START    (PAGE_OFFSET - VMALLOC_SIZE)

  #define BPF_JIT_REGION_SIZE     (SZ_128M)
  #define BPF_JIT_REGION_START    (PAGE_OFFSET - BPF_JIT_REGION_SIZE)
  #define BPF_JIT_REGION_END      (VMALLOC_END)

  /*
   * Roughly size the vmemmap space to be large enough to fit enough
   * struct pages to map half the virtual address space. Then
   * position vmemmap directly below the VMALLOC region.
   */
  #define VMEMMAP_SHIFT \
          (CONFIG_VA_BITS - PAGE_SHIFT - 1 + STRUCT_PAGE_MAX_SHIFT)
  #define VMEMMAP_SIZE    BIT(VMEMMAP_SHIFT)
  #define VMEMMAP_END     (VMALLOC_START - 1)
  #define VMEMMAP_START   (VMALLOC_START - VMEMMAP_SIZE)

  [...]

Let me know if there are any other issues.

Anyway, the main changes are:

1) Extend bpftool to produce a struct (aka "skeleton") tailored and specific
   to a provided BPF object file. This provides an alternative, simplified API
   compared to standard libbpf interaction. Also, add libbpf extern variable
   resolution for .kconfig section to import Kconfig data, from Andrii Nakryiko.

2) Add BPF dispatcher for XDP which is a mechanism to avoid indirect calls by
   generating a branch funnel as discussed back in bpfconf'19 at LSF/MM. Also,
   add various BPF riscv JIT improvements, from Björn Töpel.

3) Extend bpftool to allow matching BPF programs and maps by name,
   from Paul Chaignon.

4) Support for replacing cgroup BPF programs attached with BPF_F_ALLOW_MULTI
   flag for allowing updates without service interruption, from Andrey Ignatov.

5) Cleanup and simplification of ring access functions for AF_XDP with a
   bonus of 0-5% performance improvement, from Magnus Karlsson.

6) Enable BPF JITs for x86-64 and arm64 by default. Also, final version of
   audit support for BPF, from Daniel Borkmann and latter with Jiri Olsa.

7) Move and extend test_select_reuseport into BPF program tests under
   BPF selftests, from Jakub Sitnicki.

8) Various BPF sample improvements for xdpsock for customizing parameters
   to set up and benchmark AF_XDP, from Jay Jayatheerthan.

9) Improve libbpf to provide a ulimit hint on permission denied errors.
   Also change XDP sample programs to attach in driver mode by default,
   from Toke Høiland-Jørgensen.

10) Extend BPF test infrastructure to allow changing skb mark from tc BPF
    programs, from Nikita V. Shirokov.

11) Optimize prologue code sequence in BPF arm32 JIT, from Russell King.

12) Fix xdp_redirect_cpu BPF sample to manually attach to tracepoints after
    libbpf conversion, from Jesper Dangaard Brouer.

13) Minor misc improvements from various others.
====================

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-12-27 14:20:10 -08:00
Björn Töpel e368b64f8b riscv, bpf: Optimize calls
Instead of using emit_imm() and emit_jalr() which can expand to six
instructions, start using jal or auipc+jalr.

Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191216091343.23260-8-bjorn.topel@gmail.com
2019-12-19 16:03:31 +01:00
Björn Töpel 7f3631e88e riscv, bpf: Provide RISC-V specific JIT image alloc/free
This commit makes sure that the JIT images is kept close to the kernel
text, so BPF calls can use relative calling with auipc/jalr or jal
instead of loading the full 64-bit address and jalr.

The BPF JIT image region is 128 MB before the kernel text.

Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191216091343.23260-7-bjorn.topel@gmail.com
2019-12-19 16:03:31 +01:00
Björn Töpel fe8322b866 riscv, bpf: Optimize BPF tail calls
Remove one addi, and instead use the offset part of jalr.

Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191216091343.23260-6-bjorn.topel@gmail.com
2019-12-19 16:03:31 +01:00
Björn Töpel 33203c02f2 riscv, bpf: Add support for far jumps and exits
This commit add support for far (offset > 21b) jumps and exits.

Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Luke Nelson <lukenels@cs.washington.edu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191216091343.23260-5-bjorn.topel@gmail.com
2019-12-19 16:03:30 +01:00
Björn Töpel 29d92edd9e riscv, bpf: Add support for far branching when emitting tail call
Start use the emit_branch() function in the tail call emitter in order
to support far branching.

Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191216091343.23260-4-bjorn.topel@gmail.com
2019-12-19 16:03:30 +01:00
Björn Töpel 7d1ef13fea riscv, bpf: Add support for far branching
This commit adds branch relaxation to the BPF JIT, and with that
support for far (offset greater than 12b) branching.

The branch relaxation requires more than two passes to converge. For
most programs it is three passes, but for larger programs it can be
more.

Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Luke Nelson <lukenels@cs.washington.edu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191216091343.23260-3-bjorn.topel@gmail.com
2019-12-19 16:03:30 +01:00
Björn Töpel f1003b787c riscv, bpf: Fix broken BPF tail calls
The BPF JIT incorrectly clobbered the a0 register, and did not flag
usage of s5 register when BPF stack was being used.

Fixes: 2353ecc6f9 ("bpf, riscv: add BPF JIT for RV64G")
Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191216091343.23260-2-bjorn.topel@gmail.com
2019-12-19 16:03:30 +01:00
Paul Chaignon 96bc4432f5 bpf, riscv: Limit to 33 tail calls
All BPF JIT compilers except RISC-V's and MIPS' enforce a 33-tail calls
limit at runtime.  In addition, a test was recently added, in tailcalls2,
to check this limit.

This patch updates the tail call limit in RISC-V's JIT compiler to allow
33 tail calls.  I tested it using the above selftest on an emulated
RISCV64.

Fixes: 2353ecc6f9 ("bpf, riscv: add BPF JIT for RV64G")
Reported-by: Mahshid Khezri <khezri.mahshid@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Chaignon <paul.chaignon@orange.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/966fe384383bf23a0ee1efe8d7291c78a3fb832b.1575916815.git.paul.chaignon@gmail.com
2019-12-11 13:57:17 +01:00
Luke Nelson 46dd3d7d28 bpf, riscv: Enable zext optimization for more RV64G ALU ops
Commit 66d0d5a854 ("riscv: bpf: eliminate zero extension code-gen")
added the new zero-extension optimization for some BPF ALU operations.

Since then, bugs in the JIT that have been fixed in the bpf tree require
this optimization to be added to other operations: commit 1e692f09e0
("bpf, riscv: clear high 32 bits for ALU32 add/sub/neg/lsh/rsh/arsh"),
and commit fe121ee531 ("bpf, riscv: clear target register high 32-bits
for and/or/xor on ALU32").

Now that these have been merged to bpf-next, the zext optimization can
be enabled for the fixed operations.

Signed-off-by: Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@gmail.com>
Cc: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Cc: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-07-05 23:55:41 +02:00
David S. Miller 13091aa305 Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net
Honestly all the conflicts were simple overlapping changes,
nothing really interesting to report.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-06-17 20:20:36 -07:00
David S. Miller 38e406f600 Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf
Daniel Borkmann says:

====================
pull-request: bpf 2019-06-07

The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net* tree.

The main changes are:

1) Fix several bugs in riscv64 JIT code emission which forgot to clear high
   32-bits for alu32 ops, from Björn and Luke with selftests covering all
   relevant BPF alu ops from Björn and Jiong.

2) Two fixes for UDP BPF reuseport that avoid calling the program in case of
   __udp6_lib_err and UDP GRO which broke reuseport_select_sock() assumption
   that skb->data is pointing to transport header, from Martin.

3) Two fixes for BPF sockmap: a use-after-free from sleep in psock's backlog
   workqueue, and a missing restore of sk_write_space when psock gets dropped,
   from Jakub and John.

4) Fix unconnected UDP sendmsg hook API which is insufficient as-is since it
   breaks standard applications like DNS if reverse NAT is not performed upon
   receive, from Daniel.

5) Fix an out-of-bounds read in __bpf_skc_lookup which in case of AF_INET6
   fails to verify that the length of the tuple is long enough, from Lorenz.

6) Fix libbpf's libbpf__probe_raw_btf to return an fd instead of 0/1 (for
   {un,}successful probe) as that is expected to be propagated as an fd to
   load_sk_storage_btf() and thus closing the wrong descriptor otherwise,
   from Michal.

7) Fix bpftool's JSON output for the case when a lookup fails, from Krzesimir.

8) Minor misc fixes in docs, samples and selftests, from various others.
====================

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-06-07 14:46:47 -07:00
Luke Nelson 1e692f09e0 bpf, riscv: clear high 32 bits for ALU32 add/sub/neg/lsh/rsh/arsh
In BPF, 32-bit ALU operations should zero-extend their results into
the 64-bit registers.

The current BPF JIT on RISC-V emits incorrect instructions that perform
sign extension only (e.g., addw, subw) on 32-bit add, sub, lsh, rsh,
arsh, and neg. This behavior diverges from the interpreter and JITs
for other architectures.

This patch fixes the bugs by performing zero extension on the destination
register of 32-bit ALU operations.

Fixes: 2353ecc6f9 ("bpf, riscv: add BPF JIT for RV64G")
Cc: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-05-31 17:08:53 -07:00
Jiong Wang 66d0d5a854 riscv: bpf: eliminate zero extension code-gen
Cc: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-05-24 18:58:38 -07:00
Björn Töpel fe121ee531 bpf, riscv: clear target register high 32-bits for and/or/xor on ALU32
When using 32-bit subregisters (ALU32), the RISC-V JIT would not clear
the high 32-bits of the target register and therefore generate
incorrect code.

E.g., in the following code:

  $ cat test.c
  unsigned int f(unsigned long long a,
  	       unsigned int b)
  {
  	return (unsigned int)a & b;
  }

  $ clang-9 -target bpf -O2 -emit-llvm -S test.c -o - | \
  	llc-9 -mattr=+alu32 -mcpu=v3
  	.text
  	.file	"test.c"
  	.globl	f
  	.p2align	3
  	.type	f,@function
  f:
  	r0 = r1
  	w0 &= w2
  	exit
  .Lfunc_end0:
  	.size	f, .Lfunc_end0-f

The JIT would not clear the high 32-bits of r0 after the
and-operation, which in this case might give an incorrect return
value.

After this patch, that is not the case, and the upper 32-bits are
cleared.

Reported-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Fixes: 2353ecc6f9 ("bpf, riscv: add BPF JIT for RV64G")
Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-05-23 15:53:55 +02:00
Thomas Gleixner ec8f24b7fa treewide: Add SPDX license identifier - Makefile/Kconfig
Add SPDX license identifiers to all Make/Kconfig files which:

 - Have no license information of any form

These files fall under the project license, GPL v2 only. The resulting SPDX
license identifier is:

  GPL-2.0-only

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-05-21 10:50:46 +02:00
Björn Töpel 2353ecc6f9 bpf, riscv: add BPF JIT for RV64G
This commit adds a BPF JIT for RV64G.

The JIT is a two-pass JIT, and has a dynamic prolog/epilogue (similar
to the MIPS64 BPF JIT) instead of static ones (e.g. x86_64).

At the moment the RISC-V Linux port does not support
CONFIG_HAVE_KPROBES, which means that CONFIG_BPF_EVENTS is not
supported. Thus, no tests involving BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT, BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE and
BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT passes.

The implementation does not support "far branching" (>4KiB).

Test results:
  # modprobe test_bpf
  test_bpf: Summary: 378 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [366/366 JIT'ed]

  # echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/unprivileged_bpf_disabled
  # ./test_verifier
  ...
  Summary: 761 PASSED, 507 SKIPPED, 2 FAILED

Note that "test_verifier" was run with one build with
CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS=y and one without, otherwise
many of the the tests that require unaligned access were skipped.

CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS=y:
  # echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/unprivileged_bpf_disabled
  # ./test_verifier | grep -c 'NOTE.*unknown align'
  0

No CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS:
  # echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/unprivileged_bpf_disabled
  # ./test_verifier | grep -c 'NOTE.*unknown align'
  59

The two failing test_verifier tests are:
  "ld_abs: vlan + abs, test 1"
  "ld_abs: jump around ld_abs"

This is due to that "far branching" involved in those tests.

All tests where done on QEMU (QEMU emulator version 3.1.50
(v3.1.0-688-g8ae951fbc106)).

Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-02-05 16:56:10 +01:00