The typos accumulate over time so once in a while time they get fixed in
a large patch.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Gelmini <andrea.gelmini@gelma.net>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
There are two members in struct btrfs_root which indicate root's
objectid: objectid and root_key.objectid.
They are both set to the same value in __setup_root():
static void __setup_root(struct btrfs_root *root,
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
u64 objectid)
{
...
root->objectid = objectid;
...
root->root_key.objectid = objecitd;
...
}
and not changed to other value after initialization.
grep in btrfs directory shows both are used in many places:
$ grep -rI "root->root_key.objectid" | wc -l
133
$ grep -rI "root->objectid" | wc -l
55
(4.17, inc. some noise)
It is confusing to have two similar variable names and it seems
that there is no rule about which should be used in a certain case.
Since ->root_key itself is needed for tree reloc tree, let's remove
'objecitd' member and unify code to use ->root_key.objectid in all places.
Signed-off-by: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Remove GPL boilerplate text (long, short, one-line) and keep the rest,
ie. personal, company or original source copyright statements. Add the
SPDX header.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We have several reports about node pointer points to incorrect child
tree blocks, which could have even wrong owner and level but still with
valid generation and checksum.
Although btrfs check could handle it and print error message like:
leaf parent key incorrect 60670574592
Kernel doesn't have enough check on this type of corruption correctly.
At least add such check to read_tree_block() and btrfs_read_buffer(),
where we need two new parameters @level and @first_key to verify the
child tree block.
The new @level check is mandatory and all call sites are already
modified to extract expected level from its call chain.
While @first_key is optional, the following call sites are skipping such
check:
1) Root node/leaf
As ROOT_ITEM doesn't contain the first key, skip @first_key check.
2) Direct backref
Only parent bytenr and level is known and we need to resolve the key
all by ourselves, skip @first_key check.
Another note of this verification is, it needs extra info from nodeptr
or ROOT_ITEM, so it can't fit into current tree-checker framework, which
is limited to node/leaf boundary.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
With gcc-4.1.2:
fs/btrfs/ref-verify.c: In function ‘btrfs_build_ref_tree’:
fs/btrfs/ref-verify.c:1017: warning: ‘root’ is used uninitialized in this function
The variable is indeed passed uninitialized, but it is never used by the
callee. However, not all versions of gcc are smart enough to notice.
Hence remove the unused parameter from walk_up_tree() to silence the
compiler warning.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We were having corruption issues that were tied back to problems with
the extent tree. In order to track them down I built this tool to try
and find the culprit, which was pretty successful. If you compile with
this tool on it will live verify every ref update that the fs makes and
make sure it is consistent and valid. I've run this through with
xfstests and haven't gotten any false positives. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ update error messages, add fixup from Dan Carpenter to handle errors
of read_tree_block ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Andrea Gelmini
Misono Tomohiro
David Sterba
Qu Wenruo
Geert Uytterhoeven
Josef Bacik