commit b7adbf9ada upstream.
If we have one task trying to start the quota rescan worker while another
one is trying to disable quotas, we can end up hitting a race that results
in the quota rescan worker doing a NULL pointer dereference. The steps for
this are the following:
1) Quotas are enabled;
2) Task A calls the quota rescan ioctl and enters btrfs_qgroup_rescan().
It calls qgroup_rescan_init() which returns 0 (success) and then joins a
transaction and commits it;
3) Task B calls the quota disable ioctl and enters btrfs_quota_disable().
It clears the bit BTRFS_FS_QUOTA_ENABLED from fs_info->flags and calls
btrfs_qgroup_wait_for_completion(), which returns immediately since the
rescan worker is not yet running.
Then it starts a transaction and locks fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock;
4) Task A queues the rescan worker, by calling btrfs_queue_work();
5) The rescan worker starts, and calls rescan_should_stop() at the start
of its while loop, which results in 0 iterations of the loop, since
the flag BTRFS_FS_QUOTA_ENABLED was cleared from fs_info->flags by
task B at step 3);
6) Task B sets fs_info->quota_root to NULL;
7) The rescan worker tries to start a transaction and uses
fs_info->quota_root as the root argument for btrfs_start_transaction().
This results in a NULL pointer dereference down the call chain of
btrfs_start_transaction(). The stack trace is something like the one
reported in Link tag below:
general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000041: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN
KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000208-0x000000000000020f]
CPU: 1 PID: 34 Comm: kworker/u4:2 Not tainted 6.1.0-syzkaller-13872-gb6bb9676f216 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/26/2022
Workqueue: btrfs-qgroup-rescan btrfs_work_helper
RIP: 0010:start_transaction+0x48/0x10f0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:564
Code: 48 89 fb 48 (...)
RSP: 0018:ffffc90000ab7ab0 EFLAGS: 00010206
RAX: 0000000000000041 RBX: 0000000000000208 RCX: ffff88801779ba80
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000000000000
RBP: dffffc0000000000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: fffff52000156f5d
R10: fffff52000156f5d R11: 1ffff92000156f5c R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000003
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880b9900000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f2bea75b718 CR3: 000000001d0cc000 CR4: 00000000003506e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
<TASK>
btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker+0x3bb/0x6a0 fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:3402
btrfs_work_helper+0x312/0x850 fs/btrfs/async-thread.c:280
process_one_work+0x877/0xdb0 kernel/workqueue.c:2289
worker_thread+0xb14/0x1330 kernel/workqueue.c:2436
kthread+0x266/0x300 kernel/kthread.c:376
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:308
</TASK>
Modules linked in:
So fix this by having the rescan worker function not attempt to start a
transaction if it didn't do any rescan work.
Reported-by: syzbot+96977faa68092ad382c4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000e5454b05f065a803@google.com/
Fixes: e804861bd4 ("btrfs: fix deadlock between quota disable and qgroup rescan worker")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit db5df25412 ]
Instead of having 2 places that short circuit the qgroup leaf scan have
everything in the qgroup_rescan_leaf function. In addition to that, also
ensure that the inconsistent qgroup flag is set when rescan_should_stop
returns true. This both retains the old behavior when -EINTR was set in
the body of the loop and at the same time also extends this behavior
when scanning is interrupted due to remount or unmount operations.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Stable-dep-of: f7e942b5bb ("btrfs: qgroup: fix sleep from invalid context bug in btrfs_qgroup_inherit()")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 331cd94614 upstream.
When enabling quotas, at btrfs_quota_enable(), after committing the
transaction, we change fs_info->quota_root to point to the quota root we
created and set BTRFS_FS_QUOTA_ENABLED at fs_info->flags. Then we try
to start the qgroup rescan worker, first by initializing it with a call
to qgroup_rescan_init() - however if that fails we end up freeing the
quota root but we leave fs_info->quota_root still pointing to it, this
can later result in a use-after-free somewhere else.
We have previously set the flags BTRFS_FS_QUOTA_ENABLED and
BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_ON, so we can only fail with -EINPROGRESS at
btrfs_quota_enable(), which is possible if someone already called the
quota rescan ioctl, and therefore started the rescan worker.
So fix this by ignoring an -EINPROGRESS and asserting we can't get any
other error.
Reported-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20220823015931.421355-1-yebin10@huawei.com/
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 7a1636089a ]
When creating a subvolume, at ioctl.c:create_subvol(), if we fail to
insert the new root's root item into the root tree, we are freeing the
metadata extent we reserved for the new root to prevent a metadata
extent leak, as we don't abort the transaction at that point (since
there is nothing at that point that is irreversible).
However we allocated the metadata extent for the new root which we are
creating for the new subvolume, so its delayed reference refers to the
ID of this new root. But when we free the metadata extent we pass the
root of the subvolume where the new subvolume is located to
btrfs_free_tree_block() - this is incorrect because this will generate
a delayed reference that refers to the ID of the parent subvolume's root,
and not to ID of the new root.
This results in a failure when running delayed references that leads to
a transaction abort and a trace like the following:
[3868.738042] RIP: 0010:__btrfs_free_extent+0x709/0x950 [btrfs]
[3868.739857] Code: 68 0f 85 e6 fb ff (...)
[3868.742963] RSP: 0018:ffffb0e9045cf910 EFLAGS: 00010246
[3868.743908] RAX: 00000000fffffffe RBX: 00000000fffffffe RCX: 0000000000000002
[3868.745312] RDX: 00000000fffffffe RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: ffff90b0cd793b88
[3868.746643] RBP: 000000000e5d8000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff90b0cd793b88
[3868.747979] R10: 0000000000000002 R11: 00014ded97944d68 R12: 0000000000000000
[3868.749373] R13: ffff90b09afe4a28 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff90b0cd793b88
[3868.750725] FS: 00007f281c4a8b80(0000) GS:ffff90b3ada00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[3868.752275] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[3868.753515] CR2: 00007f281c6a5000 CR3: 0000000108a42006 CR4: 0000000000370ee0
[3868.754869] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[3868.756228] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[3868.757803] Call Trace:
[3868.758281] <TASK>
[3868.758655] ? btrfs_merge_delayed_refs+0x178/0x1c0 [btrfs]
[3868.759827] __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x2b1/0x1250 [btrfs]
[3868.761047] btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x86/0x210 [btrfs]
[3868.762069] ? lock_acquired+0x19f/0x420
[3868.762829] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x69/0xb20 [btrfs]
[3868.763860] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x40
[3868.764614] ? btrfs_block_rsv_release+0x1c2/0x1e0 [btrfs]
[3868.765870] create_subvol+0x1d8/0x9a0 [btrfs]
[3868.766766] btrfs_mksubvol+0x447/0x4c0 [btrfs]
[3868.767669] ? preempt_count_add+0x49/0xa0
[3868.768444] __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x123/0x190 [btrfs]
[3868.769639] ? _copy_from_user+0x66/0xa0
[3868.770391] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xbb/0x140 [btrfs]
[3868.771495] btrfs_ioctl+0xd1e/0x35c0 [btrfs]
[3868.772364] ? __slab_free+0x10a/0x360
[3868.773198] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x60
[3868.774121] ? lock_release+0x223/0x4a0
[3868.774863] ? lock_acquired+0x19f/0x420
[3868.775634] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x60
[3868.776530] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1b/0xe0
[3868.777373] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3e/0x60
[3868.778280] ? kmem_cache_free+0x321/0x3c0
[3868.779011] ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
[3868.779718] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
[3868.780387] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0
[3868.781059] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[3868.781953] RIP: 0033:0x7f281c59e957
[3868.782585] Code: 3c 1c 48 f7 d8 4c (...)
[3868.785867] RSP: 002b:00007ffe1f83e2b8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
[3868.787198] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f281c59e957
[3868.788450] RDX: 00007ffe1f83e2c0 RSI: 0000000050009418 RDI: 0000000000000003
[3868.789748] RBP: 00007ffe1f83f300 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007ffe1f83fe36
[3868.791214] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000003
[3868.792468] R13: 0000000000000003 R14: 00007ffe1f83e2c0 R15: 00000000000003cc
[3868.793765] </TASK>
[3868.794037] irq event stamp: 0
[3868.794548] hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
[3868.795670] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffff98294214>] copy_process+0x934/0x2040
[3868.797086] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffff98294214>] copy_process+0x934/0x2040
[3868.798309] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
[3868.799284] ---[ end trace be24c7002fe27747 ]---
[3868.799928] BTRFS info (device dm-0): leaf 241188864 gen 1268 total ptrs 214 free space 469 owner 2
[3868.801133] BTRFS info (device dm-0): refs 2 lock_owner 225627 current 225627
[3868.802056] item 0 key (237436928 169 0) itemoff 16250 itemsize 33
[3868.802863] extent refs 1 gen 1265 flags 2
[3868.803447] ref#0: tree block backref root 1610
(...)
[3869.064354] item 114 key (241008640 169 0) itemoff 12488 itemsize 33
[3869.065421] extent refs 1 gen 1268 flags 2
[3869.066115] ref#0: tree block backref root 1689
(...)
[3869.403834] BTRFS error (device dm-0): unable to find ref byte nr 241008640 parent 0 root 1622 owner 0 offset 0
[3869.405641] BTRFS: error (device dm-0) in __btrfs_free_extent:3076: errno=-2 No such entry
[3869.407138] BTRFS: error (device dm-0) in btrfs_run_delayed_refs:2159: errno=-2 No such entry
Fix this by passing the new subvolume's root ID to btrfs_free_tree_block().
This requires changing the root argument of btrfs_free_tree_block() from
struct btrfs_root * to a u64, since at this point during the subvolume
creation we have not yet created the struct btrfs_root for the new
subvolume, and btrfs_free_tree_block() only needs a root ID and nothing
else from a struct btrfs_root.
This was triggered by test case generic/475 from fstests.
Fixes: 67addf2900 ("btrfs: fix metadata extent leak after failure to create subvolume")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit d4aef1e122 upstream.
The commit e804861bd4 ("btrfs: fix deadlock between quota disable and
qgroup rescan worker") by Kawasaki resolves deadlock between quota
disable and qgroup rescan worker. But also there is a deadlock case like
it. It's about enabling or disabling quota and creating or removing
qgroup. It can be reproduced in simple script below.
for i in {1..100}
do
btrfs quota enable /mnt &
btrfs qgroup create 1/0 /mnt &
btrfs qgroup destroy 1/0 /mnt &
btrfs quota disable /mnt &
done
Here's why the deadlock happens:
1) The quota rescan task is running.
2) Task A calls btrfs_quota_disable(), locks the qgroup_ioctl_lock
mutex, and then calls btrfs_qgroup_wait_for_completion(), to wait for
the quota rescan task to complete.
3) Task B calls btrfs_remove_qgroup() and it blocks when trying to lock
the qgroup_ioctl_lock mutex, because it's being held by task A. At that
point task B is holding a transaction handle for the current transaction.
4) The quota rescan task calls btrfs_commit_transaction(). This results
in it waiting for all other tasks to release their handles on the
transaction, but task B is blocked on the qgroup_ioctl_lock mutex
while holding a handle on the transaction, and that mutex is being held
by task A, which is waiting for the quota rescan task to complete,
resulting in a deadlock between these 3 tasks.
To resolve this issue, the thread disabling quota should unlock
qgroup_ioctl_lock before waiting rescan completion. Move
btrfs_qgroup_wait_for_completion() after unlock of qgroup_ioctl_lock.
Fixes: e804861bd4 ("btrfs: fix deadlock between quota disable and qgroup rescan worker")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Sidong Yang <realwakka@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 232796df8c upstream.
When enabling quotas, we attempt to commit a transaction while holding the
mutex fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock. This can result on a deadlock with other
quota operations such as:
- qgroup creation and deletion, ioctl BTRFS_IOC_QGROUP_CREATE;
- adding and removing qgroup relations, ioctl BTRFS_IOC_QGROUP_ASSIGN.
This is because these operations join a transaction and after that they
attempt to lock the mutex fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock. Acquiring that mutex
after joining or starting a transaction is a pattern followed everywhere
in qgroups, so the quota enablement operation is the one at fault here,
and should not commit a transaction while holding that mutex.
Fix this by making the transaction commit while not holding the mutex.
We are safe from two concurrent tasks trying to enable quotas because
we are serialized by the rw semaphore fs_info->subvol_sem at
btrfs_ioctl_quota_ctl(), which is the only call site for enabling
quotas.
When this deadlock happens, it produces a trace like the following:
INFO: task syz-executor:25604 blocked for more than 143 seconds.
Not tainted 5.15.0-rc6 #4
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
task:syz-executor state:D stack:24800 pid:25604 ppid: 24873 flags:0x00004004
Call Trace:
context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline]
__schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287
schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366
btrfs_commit_transaction+0x994/0x2e90 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2201
btrfs_quota_enable+0x95c/0x1790 fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:1120
btrfs_ioctl_quota_ctl fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4229 [inline]
btrfs_ioctl+0x637e/0x7b70 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:5010
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:860 [inline]
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:860
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f86920b2c4d
RSP: 002b:00007f868f61ac58 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f86921d90a0 RCX: 00007f86920b2c4d
RDX: 0000000020005e40 RSI: 00000000c0109428 RDI: 0000000000000008
RBP: 00007f869212bd80 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f86921d90a0
R13: 00007fff6d233e4f R14: 00007fff6d233ff0 R15: 00007f868f61adc0
INFO: task syz-executor:25628 blocked for more than 143 seconds.
Not tainted 5.15.0-rc6 #4
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
task:syz-executor state:D stack:29080 pid:25628 ppid: 24873 flags:0x00004004
Call Trace:
context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline]
__schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287
schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366
schedule_preempt_disabled+0xf/0x20 kernel/sched/core.c:6425
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:669 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0xc96/0x1680 kernel/locking/mutex.c:729
btrfs_remove_qgroup+0xb7/0x7d0 fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:1548
btrfs_ioctl_qgroup_create fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4333 [inline]
btrfs_ioctl+0x683c/0x7b70 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:5014
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:860 [inline]
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:860
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CACkBjsZQF19bQ1C6=yetF3BvL10OSORpFUcWXTP6HErshDB4dQ@mail.gmail.com/
Fixes: 340f1aa27f ("btrfs: qgroups: Move transaction management inside btrfs_quota_enable/disable")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Currently all the callers of btrfs_find_all_roots() pass a value of false
for its ignore_offset argument. This makes the argument pointless and we
can remove it and make btrfs_find_all_roots() always pass false as the
ignore_offset argument for btrfs_find_all_roots_safe(). So just do that.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
At btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post() we call btrfs_find_all_roots() with a
NULL value as the transaction handle argument, which makes that function
take the commit_root_sem semaphore, which is necessary when we don't hold
a transaction handle or any other mechanism to prevent a transaction
commit from wiping out commit roots.
However btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post() can be called in a context where
we are holding a write lock on an extent buffer from a subvolume tree,
namely from btrfs_truncate_inode_items(), called either during truncate
or unlink operations. In this case we end up with a lock inversion problem
because the commit_root_sem is a higher level lock, always supposed to be
acquired before locking any extent buffer.
Lockdep detects this lock inversion problem since we switched the extent
buffer locks from custom locks to semaphores, and when running btrfs/158
from fstests, it reported the following trace:
[ 9057.626435] ======================================================
[ 9057.627541] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 9057.628334] 5.14.0-rc2-btrfs-next-93 #1 Not tainted
[ 9057.628961] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 9057.629867] kworker/u16:4/30781 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 9057.630824] ffff8e2590f58760 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs]
[ 9057.632542]
but task is already holding lock:
[ 9057.633551] ffff8e25582d4b70 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: iterate_extent_inodes+0x10b/0x280 [btrfs]
[ 9057.635255]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 9057.636292]
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 9057.637240]
-> #1 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}:
[ 9057.638138] down_read+0x46/0x140
[ 9057.638648] btrfs_find_all_roots+0x41/0x80 [btrfs]
[ 9057.639398] btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post+0x37/0x70 [btrfs]
[ 9057.640283] btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x418/0x490 [btrfs]
[ 9057.641114] btrfs_free_extent+0x35/0xb0 [btrfs]
[ 9057.641819] btrfs_truncate_inode_items+0x424/0xf70 [btrfs]
[ 9057.642643] btrfs_evict_inode+0x454/0x4f0 [btrfs]
[ 9057.643418] evict+0xcf/0x1d0
[ 9057.643895] do_unlinkat+0x1e9/0x300
[ 9057.644525] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0
[ 9057.645110] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[ 9057.645835]
-> #0 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}:
[ 9057.646600] __lock_acquire+0x130e/0x2210
[ 9057.647248] lock_acquire+0xd7/0x310
[ 9057.647773] down_read_nested+0x4b/0x140
[ 9057.648350] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs]
[ 9057.649175] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x31/0x40 [btrfs]
[ 9057.650010] btrfs_search_slot+0x537/0xc00 [btrfs]
[ 9057.650849] scrub_print_warning_inode+0x89/0x370 [btrfs]
[ 9057.651733] iterate_extent_inodes+0x1e3/0x280 [btrfs]
[ 9057.652501] scrub_print_warning+0x15d/0x2f0 [btrfs]
[ 9057.653264] scrub_handle_errored_block.isra.0+0x135f/0x1640 [btrfs]
[ 9057.654295] scrub_bio_end_io_worker+0x101/0x2e0 [btrfs]
[ 9057.655111] btrfs_work_helper+0xf8/0x400 [btrfs]
[ 9057.655831] process_one_work+0x247/0x5a0
[ 9057.656425] worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0
[ 9057.656993] kthread+0x155/0x180
[ 9057.657494] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
[ 9057.658030]
other info that might help us debug this:
[ 9057.659064] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 9057.659824] CPU0 CPU1
[ 9057.660402] ---- ----
[ 9057.660988] lock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem);
[ 9057.661581] lock(btrfs-tree-00);
[ 9057.662348] lock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem);
[ 9057.663254] lock(btrfs-tree-00);
[ 9057.663690]
*** DEADLOCK ***
[ 9057.664437] 4 locks held by kworker/u16:4/30781:
[ 9057.665023] #0: ffff8e25922a1148 ((wq_completion)btrfs-scrub){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1c7/0x5a0
[ 9057.666260] #1: ffffabb3451ffe70 ((work_completion)(&work->normal_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1c7/0x5a0
[ 9057.667639] #2: ffff8e25922da198 (&ret->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: scrub_handle_errored_block.isra.0+0x5d2/0x1640 [btrfs]
[ 9057.669017] #3: ffff8e25582d4b70 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: iterate_extent_inodes+0x10b/0x280 [btrfs]
[ 9057.670408]
stack backtrace:
[ 9057.670976] CPU: 7 PID: 30781 Comm: kworker/u16:4 Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2-btrfs-next-93 #1
[ 9057.672030] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[ 9057.673492] Workqueue: btrfs-scrub btrfs_work_helper [btrfs]
[ 9057.674258] Call Trace:
[ 9057.674588] dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72
[ 9057.675083] check_noncircular+0xf3/0x110
[ 9057.675611] __lock_acquire+0x130e/0x2210
[ 9057.676132] lock_acquire+0xd7/0x310
[ 9057.676605] ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs]
[ 9057.677313] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe8/0x140
[ 9057.677849] down_read_nested+0x4b/0x140
[ 9057.678349] ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs]
[ 9057.679068] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs]
[ 9057.679760] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x31/0x40 [btrfs]
[ 9057.680458] btrfs_search_slot+0x537/0xc00 [btrfs]
[ 9057.681083] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x40
[ 9057.681594] ? btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0x11f/0x140 [btrfs]
[ 9057.682336] scrub_print_warning_inode+0x89/0x370 [btrfs]
[ 9057.683058] ? btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0x11f/0x140 [btrfs]
[ 9057.683834] ? scrub_write_block_to_dev_replace+0xb0/0xb0 [btrfs]
[ 9057.684632] iterate_extent_inodes+0x1e3/0x280 [btrfs]
[ 9057.685316] scrub_print_warning+0x15d/0x2f0 [btrfs]
[ 9057.685977] ? ___ratelimit+0xa4/0x110
[ 9057.686460] scrub_handle_errored_block.isra.0+0x135f/0x1640 [btrfs]
[ 9057.687316] scrub_bio_end_io_worker+0x101/0x2e0 [btrfs]
[ 9057.688021] btrfs_work_helper+0xf8/0x400 [btrfs]
[ 9057.688649] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe8/0x140
[ 9057.689180] process_one_work+0x247/0x5a0
[ 9057.689696] worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0
[ 9057.690175] ? process_one_work+0x5a0/0x5a0
[ 9057.690731] kthread+0x155/0x180
[ 9057.691158] ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40
[ 9057.691697] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
Fix this by making btrfs_find_all_roots() never attempt to lock the
commit_root_sem when it is called from btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post().
We can't just pass a non-NULL transaction handle to btrfs_find_all_roots()
from btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post(), because that would make backref
lookup not use commit roots and acquire read locks on extent buffers, and
therefore could deadlock when btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post() is called
from the btrfs_truncate_inode_items() code path which has acquired a write
lock on an extent buffer of the subvolume btree.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When doing a send we don't expect the task to ever start a transaction
after the initial check that verifies if commit roots match the regular
roots. This is because after that we set current->journal_info with a
stub (special value) that signals we are in send context, so that we take
a read lock on an extent buffer when reading it from disk and verifying
it is valid (its generation matches the generation stored in the parent).
This stub was introduced in 2014 by commit a26e8c9f75 ("Btrfs: don't
clear uptodate if the eb is under IO") in order to fix a concurrency issue
between send and balance.
However there is one particular exception where we end up needing to start
a transaction and when this happens it results in a crash with a stack
trace like the following:
[60015.902283] kernel: WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 58159 at arch/x86/include/asm/kfence.h:44 kfence_protect_page+0x21/0x80
[60015.902292] kernel: Modules linked in: uinput rfcomm snd_seq_dummy (...)
[60015.902384] kernel: CPU: 3 PID: 58159 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.12.9-300.fc34.x86_64 #1
[60015.902387] kernel: Hardware name: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. To be filled by O.E.M./F2A88XN-WIFI, BIOS F6 12/24/2015
[60015.902389] kernel: RIP: 0010:kfence_protect_page+0x21/0x80
[60015.902393] kernel: Code: ff 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 55 48 89 fd (...)
[60015.902396] kernel: RSP: 0018:ffff9fb583453220 EFLAGS: 00010246
[60015.902399] kernel: RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff9fb583453224
[60015.902401] kernel: RDX: ffff9fb583453224 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
[60015.902402] kernel: RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
[60015.902404] kernel: R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000002
[60015.902406] kernel: R13: ffff9fb583453348 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000001
[60015.902408] kernel: FS: 00007f158e62d8c0(0000) GS:ffff93bd37580000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[60015.902410] kernel: CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[60015.902412] kernel: CR2: 0000000000000039 CR3: 00000001256d2000 CR4: 00000000000506e0
[60015.902414] kernel: Call Trace:
[60015.902419] kernel: kfence_unprotect+0x13/0x30
[60015.902423] kernel: page_fault_oops+0x89/0x270
[60015.902427] kernel: ? search_module_extables+0xf/0x40
[60015.902431] kernel: ? search_bpf_extables+0x57/0x70
[60015.902435] kernel: kernelmode_fixup_or_oops+0xd6/0xf0
[60015.902437] kernel: __bad_area_nosemaphore+0x142/0x180
[60015.902440] kernel: exc_page_fault+0x67/0x150
[60015.902445] kernel: asm_exc_page_fault+0x1e/0x30
[60015.902450] kernel: RIP: 0010:start_transaction+0x71/0x580
[60015.902454] kernel: Code: d3 0f 84 92 00 00 00 80 e7 06 0f 85 63 (...)
[60015.902456] kernel: RSP: 0018:ffff9fb5834533f8 EFLAGS: 00010246
[60015.902458] kernel: RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 0000000000000000
[60015.902460] kernel: RDX: 0000000000000801 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000039
[60015.902462] kernel: RBP: ffff93bc0a7eb800 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
[60015.902463] kernel: R10: 0000000000098a00 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000001
[60015.902464] kernel: R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff93bc0c92b000 R15: ffff93bc0c92b000
[60015.902468] kernel: btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x5d/0x120
[60015.902473] kernel: btrfs_evict_inode+0x2c5/0x3f0
[60015.902476] kernel: evict+0xd1/0x180
[60015.902480] kernel: inode_lru_isolate+0xe7/0x180
[60015.902483] kernel: __list_lru_walk_one+0x77/0x150
[60015.902487] kernel: ? iput+0x1a0/0x1a0
[60015.902489] kernel: ? iput+0x1a0/0x1a0
[60015.902491] kernel: list_lru_walk_one+0x47/0x70
[60015.902495] kernel: prune_icache_sb+0x39/0x50
[60015.902497] kernel: super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1f0
[60015.902501] kernel: do_shrink_slab+0x142/0x240
[60015.902505] kernel: shrink_slab+0x164/0x280
[60015.902509] kernel: shrink_node+0x2c8/0x6e0
[60015.902512] kernel: do_try_to_free_pages+0xcb/0x4b0
[60015.902514] kernel: try_to_free_pages+0xda/0x190
[60015.902516] kernel: __alloc_pages_slowpath.constprop.0+0x373/0xcc0
[60015.902521] kernel: ? __memcg_kmem_charge_page+0xc2/0x1e0
[60015.902525] kernel: __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x30a/0x340
[60015.902528] kernel: pipe_write+0x30b/0x5c0
[60015.902531] kernel: ? set_next_entity+0xad/0x1e0
[60015.902534] kernel: ? switch_mm_irqs_off+0x58/0x440
[60015.902538] kernel: __kernel_write+0x13a/0x2b0
[60015.902541] kernel: kernel_write+0x73/0x150
[60015.902543] kernel: send_cmd+0x7b/0xd0
[60015.902545] kernel: send_extent_data+0x5a3/0x6b0
[60015.902549] kernel: process_extent+0x19b/0xed0
[60015.902551] kernel: btrfs_ioctl_send+0x1434/0x17e0
[60015.902554] kernel: ? _btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe1/0x100
[60015.902557] kernel: _btrfs_ioctl_send+0xbf/0x100
[60015.902559] kernel: ? enqueue_entity+0x18c/0x7b0
[60015.902562] kernel: btrfs_ioctl+0x185f/0x2f80
[60015.902564] kernel: ? psi_task_change+0x84/0xc0
[60015.902569] kernel: ? _flat_send_IPI_mask+0x21/0x40
[60015.902572] kernel: ? check_preempt_curr+0x2f/0x70
[60015.902576] kernel: ? selinux_file_ioctl+0x137/0x1e0
[60015.902579] kernel: ? expand_files+0x1cb/0x1d0
[60015.902582] kernel: ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x82/0xb0
[60015.902585] kernel: __x64_sys_ioctl+0x82/0xb0
[60015.902588] kernel: do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
[60015.902591] kernel: entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[60015.902595] kernel: RIP: 0033:0x7f158e38f0ab
[60015.902599] kernel: Code: ff ff ff 85 c0 79 9b (...)
[60015.902602] kernel: RSP: 002b:00007ffcb2519bf8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
[60015.902605] kernel: RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffcb251ae00 RCX: 00007f158e38f0ab
[60015.902607] kernel: RDX: 00007ffcb2519cf0 RSI: 0000000040489426 RDI: 0000000000000004
[60015.902608] kernel: RBP: 0000000000000004 R08: 00007f158e297640 R09: 00007f158e297640
[60015.902610] kernel: R10: 0000000000000008 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
[60015.902612] kernel: R13: 0000000000000002 R14: 00007ffcb251aee0 R15: 0000558c1a83e2a0
[60015.902615] kernel: ---[ end trace 7bbc33e23bb887ae ]---
This happens because when writing to the pipe, by calling kernel_write(),
we end up doing page allocations using GFP_HIGHUSER | __GFP_ACCOUNT as the
gfp flags, which allow reclaim to happen if there is memory pressure. This
allocation happens at fs/pipe.c:pipe_write().
If the reclaim is triggered, inode eviction can be triggered and that in
turn can result in starting a transaction if the inode has a link count
of 0. The transaction start happens early on during eviction, when we call
btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode() at btrfs_evict_inode(). This happens if
there is currently an open file descriptor for an inode with a link count
of 0 and the reclaim task gets a reference on the inode before that
descriptor is closed, in which case the reclaim task ends up doing the
final iput that triggers the inode eviction.
When we have assertions enabled (CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT=y), this triggers
the following assertion at transaction.c:start_transaction():
/* Send isn't supposed to start transactions. */
ASSERT(current->journal_info != BTRFS_SEND_TRANS_STUB);
And when assertions are not enabled, it triggers a crash since after that
assertion we cast current->journal_info into a transaction handle pointer
and then dereference it:
if (current->journal_info) {
WARN_ON(type & TRANS_EXTWRITERS);
h = current->journal_info;
refcount_inc(&h->use_count);
(...)
Which obviously results in a crash due to an invalid memory access.
The same type of issue can happen during other memory allocations we
do directly in the send code with kmalloc (and friends) as they use
GFP_KERNEL and therefore may trigger reclaim too, which started to
happen since 2016 after commit e780b0d1c1 ("btrfs: send: use
GFP_KERNEL everywhere").
The issue could be solved by setting up a NOFS context for the entire
send operation so that reclaim could not be triggered when allocating
memory or pages through kernel_write(). However that is not very friendly
and we can in fact get rid of the send stub because:
1) The stub was introduced way back in 2014 by commit a26e8c9f75
("Btrfs: don't clear uptodate if the eb is under IO") to solve an
issue exclusive to when send and balance are running in parallel,
however there were other problems between balance and send and we do
not allow anymore to have balance and send run concurrently since
commit 9e967495e0 ("Btrfs: prevent send failures and crashes due
to concurrent relocation"). More generically the issues are between
send and relocation, and that last commit eliminated only the
possibility of having send and balance run concurrently, but shrinking
a device also can trigger relocation, and on zoned filesystems we have
relocation of partially used block groups triggered automatically as
well. The previous patch that has a subject of:
"btrfs: ensure relocation never runs while we have send operations running"
Addresses all the remaining cases that can trigger relocation.
2) We can actually allow starting and even committing transactions while
in a send context if needed because send is not holding any locks that
would block the start or the commit of a transaction.
So get rid of all the logic added by commit a26e8c9f75 ("Btrfs: don't
clear uptodate if the eb is under IO"). We can now always call
clear_extent_buffer_uptodate() at verify_parent_transid() since send is
the only case that uses commit roots without having a transaction open or
without holding the commit_root_sem.
Reported-by: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAJCQCtRQ57=qXo3kygwpwEBOU_CA_eKvdmjP52sU=eFvuVOEGw@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
There are a few exceptional cases where cloning an inline extent needs to
copy the inline extent data into a page of the destination inode.
When this happens, we end up starting a transaction while having a dirty
page for the destination inode and while having the range locked in the
destination's inode iotree too. Because when reserving metadata space
for a transaction we may need to flush existing delalloc in case there is
not enough free space, we have a mechanism in place to prevent a deadlock,
which was introduced in commit 3d45f221ce ("btrfs: fix deadlock when
cloning inline extent and low on free metadata space").
However when using qgroups, a transaction also reserves metadata qgroup
space, which can also result in flushing delalloc in case there is not
enough available space at the moment. When this happens we deadlock, since
flushing delalloc requires locking the file range in the inode's iotree
and the range was already locked at the very beginning of the clone
operation, before attempting to start the transaction.
When this issue happens, stack traces like the following are reported:
[72747.556262] task:kworker/u81:9 state:D stack: 0 pid: 225 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000
[72747.556268] Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-btrfs-1142)
[72747.556271] Call Trace:
[72747.556273] __schedule+0x296/0x760
[72747.556277] schedule+0x3c/0xa0
[72747.556279] io_schedule+0x12/0x40
[72747.556284] __lock_page+0x13c/0x280
[72747.556287] ? generic_file_readonly_mmap+0x70/0x70
[72747.556325] extent_write_cache_pages+0x22a/0x440 [btrfs]
[72747.556331] ? __set_page_dirty_nobuffers+0xe7/0x160
[72747.556358] ? set_extent_buffer_dirty+0x5e/0x80 [btrfs]
[72747.556362] ? update_group_capacity+0x25/0x210
[72747.556366] ? cpumask_next_and+0x1a/0x20
[72747.556391] extent_writepages+0x44/0xa0 [btrfs]
[72747.556394] do_writepages+0x41/0xd0
[72747.556398] __writeback_single_inode+0x39/0x2a0
[72747.556403] writeback_sb_inodes+0x1ea/0x440
[72747.556407] __writeback_inodes_wb+0x5f/0xc0
[72747.556410] wb_writeback+0x235/0x2b0
[72747.556414] ? get_nr_inodes+0x35/0x50
[72747.556417] wb_workfn+0x354/0x490
[72747.556420] ? newidle_balance+0x2c5/0x3e0
[72747.556424] process_one_work+0x1aa/0x340
[72747.556426] worker_thread+0x30/0x390
[72747.556429] ? create_worker+0x1a0/0x1a0
[72747.556432] kthread+0x116/0x130
[72747.556435] ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80
[72747.556438] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
[72747.566958] Workqueue: btrfs-flush_delalloc btrfs_work_helper [btrfs]
[72747.566961] Call Trace:
[72747.566964] __schedule+0x296/0x760
[72747.566968] ? finish_wait+0x80/0x80
[72747.566970] schedule+0x3c/0xa0
[72747.566995] wait_extent_bit.constprop.68+0x13b/0x1c0 [btrfs]
[72747.566999] ? finish_wait+0x80/0x80
[72747.567024] lock_extent_bits+0x37/0x90 [btrfs]
[72747.567047] btrfs_invalidatepage+0x299/0x2c0 [btrfs]
[72747.567051] ? find_get_pages_range_tag+0x2cd/0x380
[72747.567076] __extent_writepage+0x203/0x320 [btrfs]
[72747.567102] extent_write_cache_pages+0x2bb/0x440 [btrfs]
[72747.567106] ? update_load_avg+0x7e/0x5f0
[72747.567109] ? enqueue_entity+0xf4/0x6f0
[72747.567134] extent_writepages+0x44/0xa0 [btrfs]
[72747.567137] ? enqueue_task_fair+0x93/0x6f0
[72747.567140] do_writepages+0x41/0xd0
[72747.567144] __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0xc7/0x100
[72747.567167] btrfs_run_delalloc_work+0x17/0x40 [btrfs]
[72747.567195] btrfs_work_helper+0xc2/0x300 [btrfs]
[72747.567200] process_one_work+0x1aa/0x340
[72747.567202] worker_thread+0x30/0x390
[72747.567205] ? create_worker+0x1a0/0x1a0
[72747.567208] kthread+0x116/0x130
[72747.567211] ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80
[72747.567214] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
[72747.569686] task:fsstress state:D stack: 0 pid:841421 ppid:841417 flags:0x00000000
[72747.569689] Call Trace:
[72747.569691] __schedule+0x296/0x760
[72747.569694] schedule+0x3c/0xa0
[72747.569721] try_flush_qgroup+0x95/0x140 [btrfs]
[72747.569725] ? finish_wait+0x80/0x80
[72747.569753] btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data+0x34/0x50 [btrfs]
[72747.569781] btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x5f/0xa0 [btrfs]
[72747.569804] btrfs_buffered_write+0x1f7/0x7f0 [btrfs]
[72747.569810] ? path_lookupat.isra.48+0x97/0x140
[72747.569833] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x81/0x410 [btrfs]
[72747.569836] ? __kmalloc+0x16a/0x2c0
[72747.569839] do_iter_readv_writev+0x160/0x1c0
[72747.569843] do_iter_write+0x80/0x1b0
[72747.569847] vfs_writev+0x84/0x140
[72747.569869] ? btrfs_file_llseek+0x38/0x270 [btrfs]
[72747.569873] do_writev+0x65/0x100
[72747.569876] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
[72747.569879] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
[72747.569899] task:fsstress state:D stack: 0 pid:841424 ppid:841417 flags:0x00004000
[72747.569903] Call Trace:
[72747.569906] __schedule+0x296/0x760
[72747.569909] schedule+0x3c/0xa0
[72747.569936] try_flush_qgroup+0x95/0x140 [btrfs]
[72747.569940] ? finish_wait+0x80/0x80
[72747.569967] __btrfs_qgroup_reserve_meta+0x36/0x50 [btrfs]
[72747.569989] start_transaction+0x279/0x580 [btrfs]
[72747.570014] clone_copy_inline_extent+0x332/0x490 [btrfs]
[72747.570041] btrfs_clone+0x5b7/0x7a0 [btrfs]
[72747.570068] ? lock_extent_bits+0x64/0x90 [btrfs]
[72747.570095] btrfs_clone_files+0xfc/0x150 [btrfs]
[72747.570122] btrfs_remap_file_range+0x3d8/0x4a0 [btrfs]
[72747.570126] do_clone_file_range+0xed/0x200
[72747.570131] vfs_clone_file_range+0x37/0x110
[72747.570134] ioctl_file_clone+0x7d/0xb0
[72747.570137] do_vfs_ioctl+0x138/0x630
[72747.570140] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x62/0xc0
[72747.570143] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
[72747.570146] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
So fix this by skipping the flush of delalloc for an inode that is
flagged with BTRFS_INODE_NO_DELALLOC_FLUSH, meaning it is currently under
such a special case of cloning an inline extent, when flushing delalloc
during qgroup metadata reservation.
The special cases for cloning inline extents were added in kernel 5.7 by
by commit 05a5a7621c ("Btrfs: implement full reflink support for
inline extents"), while having qgroup metadata space reservation flushing
delalloc when low on space was added in kernel 5.9 by commit
c53e965360 ("btrfs: qgroup: try to flush qgroup space when we get
-EDQUOT"). So use a "Fixes:" tag for the later commit to ease stable
kernel backports.
Reported-by: Wang Yugui <wangyugui@e16-tech.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20210421083137.31E3.409509F4@e16-tech.com/
Fixes: c53e965360 ("btrfs: qgroup: try to flush qgroup space when we get -EDQUOT")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.9+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
At qgroup.c:try_flush_qgroup() we are asserting that current->journal_info
is either NULL or has the value BTRFS_SEND_TRANS_STUB.
However allowing for BTRFS_SEND_TRANS_STUB makes no sense because:
1) It is misleading, because send operations are read-only and do not
ever need to reserve qgroup space;
2) We already assert that current->journal_info != BTRFS_SEND_TRANS_STUB
at transaction.c:start_transaction();
3) On a kernel without CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT=y set, it would result in
a crash if try_flush_qgroup() is ever called in a send context, because
at transaction.c:start_transaction we cast current->journal_info into
a struct btrfs_trans_handle pointer and then dereference it.
So just do allow a send context at try_flush_qgroup() and update the
comment about it.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The tree modification log, which records modifications done to btrees, is
quite large and currently spread all over ctree.c, which is a huge file
already.
To make things better organized, move all that code into its own separate
source and header files. Functions and definitions that are used outside
of the module (mostly by ctree.c) are renamed so that they start with a
"btrfs_" prefix. Everything else remains unchanged.
This makes it easier to go over the tree modification log code every
time I need to go read it to fix a bug.
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ minor comment updates ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It's no longer expected to call this function with an open transaction
so all the workarounds concerning this can be removed. In fact it'll
constitute a bug to call this function with a transaction already held
so WARN in this case.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
There is a chance of racing for qgroup flushing which may lead to
deadlock:
Thread A | Thread B
(not holding trans handle) | (holding a trans handle)
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
__btrfs_qgroup_reserve_meta() | __btrfs_qgroup_reserve_meta()
|- try_flush_qgroup() | |- try_flush_qgroup()
|- QGROUP_FLUSHING bit set | |
| | |- test_and_set_bit()
| | |- wait_event()
|- btrfs_join_transaction() |
|- btrfs_commit_transaction()|
!!! DEAD LOCK !!!
Since thread A wants to commit transaction, but thread B is holding a
transaction handle, blocking the commit.
At the same time, thread B is waiting for thread A to finish its commit.
This is just a hot fix, and would lead to more EDQUOT when we're near
the qgroup limit.
The proper fix would be to make all metadata/data reservations happen
without holding a transaction handle.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.9+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
In order to properly set the lockdep class of a newly allocated block we
need to know the owner of the block. For non-refcounted trees this is
straightforward, we always know in advance what tree we're reading from.
For refcounted trees we don't necessarily know, however all refcounted
trees share the same lockdep class name, tree-<level>.
Fix all the callers of read_tree_block() to pass in the root objectid
we're using. In places like relocation and backref we could probably
unconditionally use 0, but just in case use the root when we have it,
otherwise use 0 in the cases we don't have the root as it's going to be
a refcounted tree anyway.
This is a preparation patch for further changes.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We're open-coding btrfs_read_node_slot() here, replace with the helper.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We're open-coding btrfs_read_node_slot() here, replace with the helper.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We're open-coding btrfs_read_node_slot() here, replace with the helper.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We no longer distinguish between blocking and spinning, so rip out all
this code.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Now that we're using a rw_semaphore we no longer need to indicate if a
lock is blocking or not, nor do we need to flip the entire path from
blocking to spinning. Remove these helpers and all the places they are
called.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When adding or removing a qgroup relation we are doing a GFP_KERNEL
allocation which is not safe because we are holding a transaction
handle open and that can make us deadlock if the allocator needs to
recurse into the filesystem. So just surround those calls with a
nofs context.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[BUG]
When running the following script, btrfs will trigger an ASSERT():
#/bin/bash
mkfs.btrfs -f $dev
mount $dev $mnt
xfs_io -f -c "pwrite 0 1G" $mnt/file
sync
btrfs quota enable $mnt
btrfs quota rescan -w $mnt
# Manually set the limit below current usage
btrfs qgroup limit 512M $mnt $mnt
# Crash happens
touch $mnt/file
The dmesg looks like this:
assertion failed: refcount_read(&trans->use_count) == 1, in fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2022
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.h:3230!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
RIP: 0010:assertfail.constprop.0+0x18/0x1a [btrfs]
btrfs_commit_transaction.cold+0x11/0x5d [btrfs]
try_flush_qgroup+0x67/0x100 [btrfs]
__btrfs_qgroup_reserve_meta+0x3a/0x60 [btrfs]
btrfs_delayed_update_inode+0xaa/0x350 [btrfs]
btrfs_update_inode+0x9d/0x110 [btrfs]
btrfs_dirty_inode+0x5d/0xd0 [btrfs]
touch_atime+0xb5/0x100
iterate_dir+0xf1/0x1b0
__x64_sys_getdents64+0x78/0x110
do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
RIP: 0033:0x7fb5afe588db
[CAUSE]
In try_flush_qgroup(), we assume we don't hold a transaction handle at
all. This is true for data reservation and mostly true for metadata.
Since data space reservation always happens before we start a
transaction, and for most metadata operation we reserve space in
start_transaction().
But there is an exception, btrfs_delayed_inode_reserve_metadata().
It holds a transaction handle, while still trying to reserve extra
metadata space.
When we hit EDQUOT inside btrfs_delayed_inode_reserve_metadata(), we
will join current transaction and commit, while we still have
transaction handle from qgroup code.
[FIX]
Let's check current->journal before we join the transaction.
If current->journal is unset or BTRFS_SEND_TRANS_STUB, it means
we are not holding a transaction, thus are able to join and then commit
transaction.
If current->journal is a valid transaction handle, we avoid committing
transaction and just end it
This is less effective than committing current transaction, as it won't
free metadata reserved space, but we may still free some data space
before new data writes.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178634
Fixes: c53e965360 ("btrfs: qgroup: try to flush qgroup space when we get -EDQUOT")
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Smatch complains that this code dereferences "entry" before checking
whether it's NULL on the next line. Fortunately, rb_entry() will never
return NULL so it doesn't cause a problem. We can clean up the NULL
checking a bit to silence the warning and make the code more clear.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When enabling qgroups we walk the tree_root and then add a qgroup item
for every root that we have. This creates a lock dependency on the
tree_root and qgroup_root, which results in the following lockdep splat
(with tree locks using rwsem), eg. in tests btrfs/017 or btrfs/022:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.9.0-default+ #1299 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
btrfs/24552 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff9142dfc5f630 (btrfs-quota-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs]
but task is already holding lock:
ffff9142dfc5d0b0 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}:
__lock_acquire+0x3fb/0x730
lock_acquire.part.0+0x6a/0x130
down_read_nested+0x46/0x130
__btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs]
__btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [btrfs]
btrfs_search_slot_get_root+0x11d/0x290 [btrfs]
btrfs_search_slot+0xc3/0x9f0 [btrfs]
btrfs_insert_item+0x6e/0x140 [btrfs]
btrfs_create_tree+0x1cb/0x240 [btrfs]
btrfs_quota_enable+0xcd/0x790 [btrfs]
btrfs_ioctl_quota_ctl+0xc9/0xe0 [btrfs]
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xa0
do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
-> #0 (btrfs-quota-00){++++}-{3:3}:
check_prev_add+0x91/0xc30
validate_chain+0x491/0x750
__lock_acquire+0x3fb/0x730
lock_acquire.part.0+0x6a/0x130
down_read_nested+0x46/0x130
__btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs]
__btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [btrfs]
btrfs_search_slot_get_root+0x11d/0x290 [btrfs]
btrfs_search_slot+0xc3/0x9f0 [btrfs]
btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x58/0xa0 [btrfs]
add_qgroup_item.part.0+0x72/0x210 [btrfs]
btrfs_quota_enable+0x3bb/0x790 [btrfs]
btrfs_ioctl_quota_ctl+0xc9/0xe0 [btrfs]
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xa0
do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(btrfs-root-00);
lock(btrfs-quota-00);
lock(btrfs-root-00);
lock(btrfs-quota-00);
*** DEADLOCK ***
5 locks held by btrfs/24552:
#0: ffff9142df431478 (sb_writers#10){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write_file+0x22/0xa0
#1: ffff9142f9b10cc0 (&fs_info->subvol_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_ioctl_quota_ctl+0x7b/0xe0 [btrfs]
#2: ffff9142f9b11a08 (&fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_quota_enable+0x3b/0x790 [btrfs]
#3: ffff9142df431698 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x406/0x510 [btrfs]
#4: ffff9142dfc5d0b0 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs]
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 24552 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.9.0-default+ #1299
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba527-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x77/0x97
check_noncircular+0xf3/0x110
check_prev_add+0x91/0xc30
validate_chain+0x491/0x750
__lock_acquire+0x3fb/0x730
lock_acquire.part.0+0x6a/0x130
? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs]
? lock_acquire+0xc4/0x140
? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs]
down_read_nested+0x46/0x130
? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs]
__btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs]
? btrfs_root_node+0xd9/0x200 [btrfs]
__btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [btrfs]
btrfs_search_slot_get_root+0x11d/0x290 [btrfs]
btrfs_search_slot+0xc3/0x9f0 [btrfs]
btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x58/0xa0 [btrfs]
add_qgroup_item.part.0+0x72/0x210 [btrfs]
btrfs_quota_enable+0x3bb/0x790 [btrfs]
btrfs_ioctl_quota_ctl+0xc9/0xe0 [btrfs]
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xa0
do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
Fix this by dropping the path whenever we find a root item, add the
qgroup item, and then re-lookup the root item we found and continue
processing roots.
Reported-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Delete repeated words in fs/btrfs/.
{to, the, a, and old}
and change "into 2 part" to "into 2 parts".
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
commit a514d63882 ("btrfs: qgroup: Commit transaction in advance to
reduce early EDQUOT") tries to reduce the early EDQUOT problems by
checking the qgroup free against threshold and tries to wake up commit
kthread to free some space.
The problem of that mechanism is, it can only free qgroup per-trans
metadata space, can't do anything to data, nor prealloc qgroup space.
Now since we have the ability to flush qgroup space, and implemented
retry-after-EDQUOT behavior, such mechanism can be completely replaced.
So this patch will cleanup such mechanism in favor of
retry-after-EDQUOT.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[PROBLEM]
There are known problem related to how btrfs handles qgroup reserved
space. One of the most obvious case is the the test case btrfs/153,
which do fallocate, then write into the preallocated range.
btrfs/153 1s ... - output mismatch (see xfstests-dev/results//btrfs/153.out.bad)
--- tests/btrfs/153.out 2019-10-22 15:18:14.068965341 +0800
+++ xfstests-dev/results//btrfs/153.out.bad 2020-07-01 20:24:40.730000089 +0800
@@ -1,2 +1,5 @@
QA output created by 153
+pwrite: Disk quota exceeded
+/mnt/scratch/testfile2: Disk quota exceeded
+/mnt/scratch/testfile2: Disk quota exceeded
Silence is golden
...
(Run 'diff -u xfstests-dev/tests/btrfs/153.out xfstests-dev/results//btrfs/153.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
[CAUSE]
Since commit c6887cd111 ("Btrfs: don't do nocow check unless we have to"),
we always reserve space no matter if it's COW or not.
Such behavior change is mostly for performance, and reverting it is not
a good idea anyway.
For preallcoated extent, we reserve qgroup data space for it already,
and since we also reserve data space for qgroup at buffered write time,
it needs twice the space for us to write into preallocated space.
This leads to the -EDQUOT in buffered write routine.
And we can't follow the same solution, unlike data/meta space check,
qgroup reserved space is shared between data/metadata.
The EDQUOT can happen at the metadata reservation, so doing NODATACOW
check after qgroup reservation failure is not a solution.
[FIX]
To solve the problem, we don't return -EDQUOT directly, but every time
we got a -EDQUOT, we try to flush qgroup space:
- Flush all inodes of the root
NODATACOW writes will free the qgroup reserved at run_dealloc_range().
However we don't have the infrastructure to only flush NODATACOW
inodes, here we flush all inodes anyway.
- Wait for ordered extents
This would convert the preallocated metadata space into per-trans
metadata, which can be freed in later transaction commit.
- Commit transaction
This will free all per-trans metadata space.
Also we don't want to trigger flush multiple times, so here we introduce
a per-root wait list and a new root status, to ensure only one thread
starts the flushing.
Fixes: c6887cd111 ("Btrfs: don't do nocow check unless we have to")
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[PROBLEM]
Before this patch, when btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data() fails, we free all
reserved space of the changeset.
For example:
ret = btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data(inode, changeset, 0, SZ_1M);
ret = btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data(inode, changeset, SZ_1M, SZ_1M);
ret = btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data(inode, changeset, SZ_2M, SZ_1M);
If the last btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data() failed, it will release the
entire [0, 3M) range.
This behavior is kind of OK for now, as when we hit -EDQUOT, we normally
go error handling and need to release all reserved ranges anyway.
But this also means the following call is not possible:
ret = btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data();
if (ret == -EDQUOT) {
/* Do something to free some qgroup space */
ret = btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data();
}
As if the first btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data() fails, it will free all
reserved qgroup space.
[CAUSE]
This is because we release all reserved ranges when
btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data() fails.
[FIX]
This patch will implement a new function, qgroup_unreserve_range(), to
iterate through the ulist nodes, to find any nodes in the failure range,
and remove the EXTENT_QGROUP_RESERVED bits from the io_tree, and
decrease the extent_changeset::bytes_changed, so that we can revert to
previous state.
This allows later patches to retry btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data() if EDQUOT
happens.
Suggested-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This patch will add the following sysfs interface:
/sys/fs/btrfs/<UUID>/qgroups/<qgroup_id>/referenced
/sys/fs/btrfs/<UUID>/qgroups/<qgroup_id>/exclusive
/sys/fs/btrfs/<UUID>/qgroups/<qgroup_id>/max_referenced
/sys/fs/btrfs/<UUID>/qgroups/<qgroup_id>/max_exclusive
/sys/fs/btrfs/<UUID>/qgroups/<qgroup_id>/limit_flags
Which is also available in output of "btrfs qgroup show".
/sys/fs/btrfs/<UUID>/qgroups/<qgroup_id>/rsv_data
/sys/fs/btrfs/<UUID>/qgroups/<qgroup_id>/rsv_meta_pertrans
/sys/fs/btrfs/<UUID>/qgroups/<qgroup_id>/rsv_meta_prealloc
The last 3 rsv related members are not visible to users, but can be very
useful to debug qgroup limit related bugs.
Also, to avoid '/' used in <qgroup_id>, the separator between qgroup
level and qgroup id is changed to '_'.
The interface is not hidden behind 'debug' as we want this interface to
be included into production build and to provide another way to read the
qgroup information besides the ioctls.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The qgroup level is limited to u16, so no need to use u64 for it.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
vfs_inode is used only for the inode number everything else requires
btrfs_inode.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ use btrfs_ino ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
There's only a single use of vfs_inode in a tracepoint so let's take
btrfs_inode directly.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It just forwards its argument to __btrfs_qgroup_release_data.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It passes btrfs_inode to its callee so change the interface.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It uses vfs_inode only for a tracepoint so convert its interface to take
btrfs_inode directly.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It only uses btrfs_inode so can just as easily take it as an argument.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Before this patch, qgroup completely relies on per-inode extent io tree
to detect reserved data space leak.
However previous bug has already shown how release page before
btrfs_finish_ordered_io() could lead to leak, and since it's
QGROUP_RESERVED bit cleared without triggering qgroup rsv, it can't be
detected by per-inode extent io tree.
So this patch adds another (and hopefully the final) safety net to catch
qgroup data reserved space leak. At least the new safety net catches
all the leaks during development, so it should be pretty useful in the
real world.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[BUG]
For the following operation, qgroup is guaranteed to be screwed up due
to snapshot adding to a new qgroup:
# mkfs.btrfs -f $dev
# mount $dev $mnt
# btrfs qgroup en $mnt
# btrfs subv create $mnt/src
# xfs_io -f -c "pwrite 0 1m" $mnt/src/file
# sync
# btrfs qgroup create 1/0 $mnt/src
# btrfs subv snapshot -i 1/0 $mnt/src $mnt/snapshot
# btrfs qgroup show -prce $mnt/src
qgroupid rfer excl max_rfer max_excl parent child
-------- ---- ---- -------- -------- ------ -----
0/5 16.00KiB 16.00KiB none none --- ---
0/257 1.02MiB 16.00KiB none none --- ---
0/258 1.02MiB 16.00KiB none none 1/0 ---
1/0 0.00B 0.00B none none --- 0/258
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[CAUSE]
The problem is in btrfs_qgroup_inherit(), we don't have good enough
check to determine if the new relation would break the existing
accounting.
Unlike btrfs_add_qgroup_relation(), which has proper check to determine
if we can do quick update without a rescan, in btrfs_qgroup_inherit() we
can even assign a snapshot to multiple qgroups.
[FIX]
Fix it by manually marking qgroup inconsistent for snapshot inheritance.
For subvolume creation, since all its extents are exclusively owned, we
don't need to rescan.
In theory, we should call relation check like quick_update_accounting()
when doing qgroup inheritance and inform user about qgroup accounting
inconsistency.
But we don't have good mechanism to relay that back to the user in the
snapshot creation context, thus we can only silently mark the qgroup
inconsistent.
Anyway, user shouldn't use qgroup inheritance during snapshot creation,
and should add qgroup relationship after snapshot creation by 'btrfs
qgroup assign', which has a much better UI to inform user about qgroup
inconsistent and kick in rescan automatically.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
There are a few different ways to free roots, either you allocated them
yourself and you just do
free_extent_buffer(root->node);
free_extent_buffer(root->commit_node);
btrfs_put_root(root);
Which is the pattern for log roots. Or for snapshots/subvolumes that
are being dropped you simply call btrfs_free_fs_root() which does all
the cleanup for you.
Unify this all into btrfs_put_root(), so that we don't free up things
associated with the root until the last reference is dropped. This
makes the root freeing code much more significant.
The only caveat is at close_ctree() time we have to free the extent
buffers for all of our main roots (extent_root, chunk_root, etc) because
we have to drop the btree_inode and we'll run into issues if we hold
onto those nodes until ->kill_sb() time. This will be addressed in the
future when we kill the btree_inode.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
After the previous patch, qgroup_rescan_running is protected by
btrfs_fs_info::qgroup_rescan_lock, thus no need for the extra spinlock.
Suggested-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Filipe Manana
ChenXiaoSong
Nikolay Borisov
Sidong Yang
Shin'ichiro Kawasaki
David Sterba
Qu Wenruo
Josef Bacik
Dan Carpenter
Randy Dunlap