Currently we can hit following assert when running numa bench:
$ perf bench numa mem -p 3 -t 1 -P 512 -s 100 -zZ0cm --thp 1
perf: bench/numa.c:1577: __bench_numa: Assertion `!(!(((wait_stat) & 0x7f) == 0))' failed.
The assertion is correct, because we hit the SIGFPE in following line:
Thread 2.2 "thread 0/0" received signal SIGFPE, Arithmetic exception.
[Switching to Thread 0x7fffd28c6700 (LWP 11750)]
0x000.. in worker_thread (__tdata=0x7.. ) at bench/numa.c:1257
1257 td->speed_gbs = bytes_done / (td->runtime_ns / NSEC_PER_SEC) / 1e9;
We don't check if the runtime is actually bigger than 1 second,
and thus this might end up with zero division within FPU.
Adding the check to prevent this.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180620094036.17278-1-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
983107072b