1a3f2fd7fc
Lock(&iommu->lock) without disabling irq causes lockdep warnings. [ 12.703950] ======================================================== [ 12.703962] WARNING: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected [ 12.703975] 5.9.0-rc6+ #659 Not tainted [ 12.703983] -------------------------------------------------------- [ 12.703995] systemd-udevd/284 just changed the state of lock: [ 12.704007] ffffffffbd6ff4d8 (device_domain_lock){..-.}-{2:2}, at: iommu_flush_dev_iotlb.part.57+0x2e/0x90 [ 12.704031] but this lock took another, SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock in the past: [ 12.704043] (&iommu->lock){+.+.}-{2:2} [ 12.704045] and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them. [ 12.704073] other info that might help us debug this: [ 12.704085] Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: [ 12.704097] CPU0 CPU1 [ 12.704106] ---- ---- [ 12.704115] lock(&iommu->lock); [ 12.704123] local_irq_disable(); [ 12.704134] lock(device_domain_lock); [ 12.704146] lock(&iommu->lock); [ 12.704158] <Interrupt> [ 12.704164] lock(device_domain_lock); [ 12.704174] *** DEADLOCK *** Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200927062428.13713-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| Kconfig | ||
| Makefile | ||
| debugfs.c | ||
| dmar.c | ||
| iommu.c | ||
| irq_remapping.c | ||
| pasid.c | ||
| pasid.h | ||
| svm.c | ||
| trace.c | ||