ca528cc501
Only x86 and Power7 use ASYM_PACKING. They use it differently. Power7 has cores of equal priority, but the SMT siblings of a core have different priorities. Parent scheduling domains do not need (nor have) the ASYM_PACKING flag. SHARED_CHILD is not needed. Using SHARED_PARENT would cause the topology debug code to complain. X86 has cores of different priority, but all the SMT siblings of the core have equal priority. It needs ASYM_PACKING at the MC level, but not at the SMT level (it also needs it at upper levels if they have scheduling groups of different priority). Removing ASYM_PACKING from the SMT domain causes the topology debug code to complain. Remove SHARED_CHILD for now. We still need a topology check that satisfies both architectures. Suggested-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230406203148.19182-10-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| affinity.h | ||
| autogroup.h | ||
| clock.h | ||
| cond_resched.h | ||
| coredump.h | ||
| cpufreq.h | ||
| cputime.h | ||
| deadline.h | ||
| debug.h | ||
| hotplug.h | ||
| idle.h | ||
| init.h | ||
| isolation.h | ||
| jobctl.h | ||
| loadavg.h | ||
| mm.h | ||
| nohz.h | ||
| numa_balancing.h | ||
| posix-timers.h | ||
| prio.h | ||
| rseq_api.h | ||
| rt.h | ||
| sd_flags.h | ||
| signal.h | ||
| smt.h | ||
| stat.h | ||
| sysctl.h | ||
| task.h | ||
| task_flags.h | ||
| task_stack.h | ||
| thread_info_api.h | ||
| topology.h | ||
| types.h | ||
| user.h | ||
| vhost_task.h | ||
| wake_q.h | ||
| xacct.h | ||