WSL2-Linux-Kernel/arch/powerpc/tools
Alexey Kardashevskiy 151322c24e powerpc/64: Add UADDR64 relocation support
commit d799769188 upstream.

When ld detects unaligned relocations, it emits R_PPC64_UADDR64
relocations instead of R_PPC64_RELATIVE. Currently R_PPC64_UADDR64 are
detected by arch/powerpc/tools/relocs_check.sh and expected not to work.
Below is a simple chunk to trigger this behaviour (this disables
optimization for the demonstration purposes only, this also happens with
-O1/-O2 when CONFIG_PRINTK_INDEX=y, for example):

  \#pragma GCC push_options
  \#pragma GCC optimize ("O0")
  struct entry {
          const char *file;
          int line;
  } __attribute__((packed));
  static const struct entry e1 = { .file = __FILE__, .line = __LINE__ };
  static const struct entry e2 = { .file = __FILE__, .line = __LINE__ };
  ...
  prom_printf("e1=%s %lx %lx\n", e1.file, (unsigned long) e1.file, mfmsr());
  prom_printf("e2=%s %lx\n", e2.file, (unsigned long) e2.file);
  \#pragma GCC pop_options

This adds support for UADDR64 for 64bit. This reuses __dynamic_symtab
from the 32bit code which supports more relocation types already.

Because RELACOUNT includes only R_PPC64_RELATIVE, this replaces it with
RELASZ which is the size of all relocation records.

Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220309061822.168173-1-aik@ozlabs.ru
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-05-09 09:14:44 +02:00
..
checkpatch.sh powerpc/tools: Remove 90 line limit in checkpatch script 2020-09-08 22:57:11 +10:00
gcc-check-mprofile-kernel.sh powerpc/kbuild: move -mprofile-kernel check to Kconfig 2018-06-11 09:16:29 +09:00
head_check.sh powerpc/head_check: Fix shellcheck errors 2021-08-17 22:52:02 +10:00
relocs_check.sh powerpc/64: Add UADDR64 relocation support 2022-05-09 09:14:44 +02:00
unrel_branch_check.sh powerpc: unrel_branch_check.sh: enable the use of llvm-objdump v9, 10 or 11 2020-09-02 11:00:22 +10:00