213 строки
5.1 KiB
C
213 строки
5.1 KiB
C
/*
|
||
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
|
||
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
|
||
* the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
|
||
* (at your option) any later version.
|
||
*
|
||
* Copyright (C) Jonathan Naylor G4KLX (g4klx@g4klx.demon.co.uk)
|
||
* Copyright (C) Joerg Reuter DL1BKE (jreuter@yaina.de)
|
||
*/
|
||
#include <linux/errno.h>
|
||
#include <linux/types.h>
|
||
#include <linux/socket.h>
|
||
#include <linux/in.h>
|
||
#include <linux/kernel.h>
|
||
#include <linux/sched.h>
|
||
#include <linux/timer.h>
|
||
#include <linux/string.h>
|
||
#include <linux/sockios.h>
|
||
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
|
||
#include <linux/net.h>
|
||
#include <net/ax25.h>
|
||
#include <linux/inet.h>
|
||
#include <linux/netdevice.h>
|
||
#include <linux/skbuff.h>
|
||
#include <net/sock.h>
|
||
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
|
||
#include <asm/system.h>
|
||
#include <linux/fcntl.h>
|
||
#include <linux/mm.h>
|
||
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
|
||
|
||
void ax25_ds_nr_error_recovery(ax25_cb *ax25)
|
||
{
|
||
ax25_ds_establish_data_link(ax25);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/*
|
||
* dl1bke 960114: transmit I frames on DAMA poll
|
||
*/
|
||
void ax25_ds_enquiry_response(ax25_cb *ax25)
|
||
{
|
||
ax25_cb *ax25o;
|
||
struct hlist_node *node;
|
||
|
||
/* Please note that neither DK4EG´s nor DG2FEF´s
|
||
* DAMA spec mention the following behaviour as seen
|
||
* with TheFirmware:
|
||
*
|
||
* DB0ACH->DL1BKE <RR C P R0> [DAMA]
|
||
* DL1BKE->DB0ACH <I NR=0 NS=0>
|
||
* DL1BKE-7->DB0PRA-6 DB0ACH <I C S3 R5>
|
||
* DL1BKE->DB0ACH <RR R F R0>
|
||
*
|
||
* The Flexnet DAMA Master implementation apparently
|
||
* insists on the "proper" AX.25 behaviour:
|
||
*
|
||
* DB0ACH->DL1BKE <RR C P R0> [DAMA]
|
||
* DL1BKE->DB0ACH <RR R F R0>
|
||
* DL1BKE->DB0ACH <I NR=0 NS=0>
|
||
* DL1BKE-7->DB0PRA-6 DB0ACH <I C S3 R5>
|
||
*
|
||
* Flexnet refuses to send us *any* I frame if we send
|
||
* a REJ in case AX25_COND_REJECT is set. It is superfluous in
|
||
* this mode anyway (a RR or RNR invokes the retransmission).
|
||
* Is this a Flexnet bug?
|
||
*/
|
||
|
||
ax25_std_enquiry_response(ax25);
|
||
|
||
if (!(ax25->condition & AX25_COND_PEER_RX_BUSY)) {
|
||
ax25_requeue_frames(ax25);
|
||
ax25_kick(ax25);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
if (ax25->state == AX25_STATE_1 || ax25->state == AX25_STATE_2 || skb_peek(&ax25->ack_queue) != NULL)
|
||
ax25_ds_t1_timeout(ax25);
|
||
else
|
||
ax25->n2count = 0;
|
||
|
||
ax25_start_t3timer(ax25);
|
||
ax25_ds_set_timer(ax25->ax25_dev);
|
||
|
||
spin_lock_bh(&ax25_list_lock);
|
||
ax25_for_each(ax25o, node, &ax25_list) {
|
||
if (ax25o == ax25)
|
||
continue;
|
||
|
||
if (ax25o->ax25_dev != ax25->ax25_dev)
|
||
continue;
|
||
|
||
if (ax25o->state == AX25_STATE_1 || ax25o->state == AX25_STATE_2) {
|
||
ax25_ds_t1_timeout(ax25o);
|
||
continue;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
if (!(ax25o->condition & AX25_COND_PEER_RX_BUSY) && ax25o->state == AX25_STATE_3) {
|
||
ax25_requeue_frames(ax25o);
|
||
ax25_kick(ax25o);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
if (ax25o->state == AX25_STATE_1 || ax25o->state == AX25_STATE_2 || skb_peek(&ax25o->ack_queue) != NULL)
|
||
ax25_ds_t1_timeout(ax25o);
|
||
|
||
/* do not start T3 for listening sockets (tnx DD8NE) */
|
||
|
||
if (ax25o->state != AX25_STATE_0)
|
||
ax25_start_t3timer(ax25o);
|
||
}
|
||
spin_unlock_bh(&ax25_list_lock);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
void ax25_ds_establish_data_link(ax25_cb *ax25)
|
||
{
|
||
ax25->condition &= AX25_COND_DAMA_MODE;
|
||
ax25->n2count = 0;
|
||
ax25_calculate_t1(ax25);
|
||
ax25_start_t1timer(ax25);
|
||
ax25_stop_t2timer(ax25);
|
||
ax25_start_t3timer(ax25);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/*
|
||
* :::FIXME:::
|
||
* This is a kludge. Not all drivers recognize kiss commands.
|
||
* We need a driver level request to switch duplex mode, that does
|
||
* either SCC changing, PI config or KISS as required. Currently
|
||
* this request isn't reliable.
|
||
*/
|
||
static void ax25_kiss_cmd(ax25_dev *ax25_dev, unsigned char cmd, unsigned char param)
|
||
{
|
||
struct sk_buff *skb;
|
||
unsigned char *p;
|
||
|
||
if (ax25_dev->dev == NULL)
|
||
return;
|
||
|
||
if ((skb = alloc_skb(2, GFP_ATOMIC)) == NULL)
|
||
return;
|
||
|
||
skb->nh.raw = skb->data;
|
||
p = skb_put(skb, 2);
|
||
|
||
*p++ = cmd;
|
||
*p++ = param;
|
||
|
||
skb->dev = ax25_dev->dev;
|
||
skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_AX25);
|
||
|
||
dev_queue_xmit(skb);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/*
|
||
* A nasty problem arises if we count the number of DAMA connections
|
||
* wrong, especially when connections on the device already existed
|
||
* and our network node (or the sysop) decides to turn on DAMA Master
|
||
* mode. We thus flag the 'real' slave connections with
|
||
* ax25->dama_slave=1 and look on every disconnect if still slave
|
||
* connections exist.
|
||
*/
|
||
static int ax25_check_dama_slave(ax25_dev *ax25_dev)
|
||
{
|
||
ax25_cb *ax25;
|
||
int res = 0;
|
||
struct hlist_node *node;
|
||
|
||
spin_lock_bh(&ax25_list_lock);
|
||
ax25_for_each(ax25, node, &ax25_list)
|
||
if (ax25->ax25_dev == ax25_dev && (ax25->condition & AX25_COND_DAMA_MODE) && ax25->state > AX25_STATE_1) {
|
||
res = 1;
|
||
break;
|
||
}
|
||
spin_unlock_bh(&ax25_list_lock);
|
||
|
||
return res;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
static void ax25_dev_dama_on(ax25_dev *ax25_dev)
|
||
{
|
||
if (ax25_dev == NULL)
|
||
return;
|
||
|
||
if (ax25_dev->dama.slave == 0)
|
||
ax25_kiss_cmd(ax25_dev, 5, 1);
|
||
|
||
ax25_dev->dama.slave = 1;
|
||
ax25_ds_set_timer(ax25_dev);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
void ax25_dev_dama_off(ax25_dev *ax25_dev)
|
||
{
|
||
if (ax25_dev == NULL)
|
||
return;
|
||
|
||
if (ax25_dev->dama.slave && !ax25_check_dama_slave(ax25_dev)) {
|
||
ax25_kiss_cmd(ax25_dev, 5, 0);
|
||
ax25_dev->dama.slave = 0;
|
||
ax25_ds_del_timer(ax25_dev);
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
void ax25_dama_on(ax25_cb *ax25)
|
||
{
|
||
ax25_dev_dama_on(ax25->ax25_dev);
|
||
ax25->condition |= AX25_COND_DAMA_MODE;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
void ax25_dama_off(ax25_cb *ax25)
|
||
{
|
||
ax25->condition &= ~AX25_COND_DAMA_MODE;
|
||
ax25_dev_dama_off(ax25->ax25_dev);
|
||
}
|
||
|