the RC RX packet is defined as:
struct dib0700_rc_response {
...
u8 not_system;
u8 system;
...
u8 data;
u8 not_data;
The NEC protocol transmits in the order:
system
not_system
data
not_data
Note that the code defines the NEC extended scancode as:
scancode = be16_to_cpu(poll_reply->system16) << 8 | poll_reply->data;
i.e.
scancode = poll_reply->not_system << 16 |
poll_reply->system << 8 |
poll_reply->data;
Which, if the order *is* reversed, would mean that the scancode that
gets defined is in reality:
scancode = poll_reply->system << 16 |
poll_reply->not_system << 8 |
poll_reply->data;
Which is the same as the order used in drivers/media/rc/ir-nec-decoder.c.
This patch changes the code to match my assumption (the generated scancode
should, however, not change).
[m.chehab@samsung.com: rebased and fixed the decoding error message]
Signed-off-by: David Härdeman <david@hardeman.nu>
CC: Patrick Boettcher <pboettcher@kernellabs.com>
Tested-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
af3a4a9bbe