38c54ee8d5
=================================
[ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
---------------------------------
inconsistent {in-hardirq-W} -> {hardirq-on-W} usage.
swapper/0 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes:
(&adapter->fsf_req_list_lock){++..}, at: [<0000000000274486>] zfcp_qdio_reqid_check+0x46/0x178
{in-hardirq-W} state was registered at:
[<000000000005fb0c>] __lock_acquire+0xad8/0xed0
[<00000000000604ae>] lock_acquire+0x9a/0xc8
[<000000000035a326>] _spin_lock+0x4e/0x68
[<0000000000274486>] zfcp_qdio_reqid_check+0x46/0x178
[<000000000027469e>] zfcp_qdio_response_handler+0xe6/0x430
[<0000000000219dd4>] tiqdio_thinint_handler+0xd20/0x213c
[<000000000020229a>] do_adapter_IO+0xb2/0xc0
[<0000000000206f32>] do_IRQ+0x136/0x16c
[<0000000000020462>] io_no_vtime+0x16/0x1c
[<0000000000019432>] cpu_idle+0x222/0x250
irq event stamp: 129220
hardirqs last enabled at (129220): [<00000000000411e6>] tasklet_hi_action+0x5a/0x19c
hardirqs last disabled at (129219): [<00000000000411c0>] tasklet_hi_action+0x34/0x19c
softirqs last enabled at (129212): [<0000000000040b62>] __do_softirq+0x13a/0x180
softirqs last disabled at (129217): [<000000000001fd58>] do_softirq+0xec/0xf0
other info that might help us debug this:
no locks held by swapper/0.
stack backtrace:
00000000012bb670 0000000000000002 0000000000000000 00000000012bb780
00000000012bb6e8 0000000000399122 0000000000399122 0000000000016b0a
0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000000004660e8
0000000000000000 000000000000000d 00000000012bb6e0 00000000012bb758
0000000000368b90 0000000000016b0a 00000000012bb6e0 00000000012bb730
Call Trace:
([<0000000000016a26>] show_trace+0x76/0xdc)
[<0000000000016b2c>] show_stack+0xa0/0xd0
[<0000000000016b8a>] dump_stack+0x2e/0x3c
[<000000000005e3da>] print_usage_bug+0x27e/0x290
[<000000000005ea9c>] mark_lock+0x6b0/0x6c0
[<000000000005f33e>] __lock_acquire+0x30a/0xed0
[<00000000000604ae>] lock_acquire+0x9a/0xc8
[<000000000035a326>] _spin_lock+0x4e/0x68
[<0000000000274486>] zfcp_qdio_reqid_check+0x46/0x178
[<000000000027469e>] zfcp_qdio_response_handler+0xe6/0x430
[<0000000000217bd2>] tiqdio_tl+0xd02/0x2120
[<000000000004123a>] tasklet_hi_action+0xae/0x19c
[<0000000000040ae4>] __do_softirq+0xbc/0x180
[<000000000001fd58>] do_softirq+0xec/0xf0
[<0000000000040c38>] irq_exit+0x90/0xa8
[<0000000000206f40>] do_IRQ+0x144/0x16c
[<0000000000020462>] io_no_vtime+0x16/0x1c
[<0000000000019432>] cpu_idle+0x222/0x250
([<0000000000019416>] cpu_idle+0x206/0x250)
[<000000000001405a>] rest_init+0x5a/0x68
[<0000000000536998>] start_kernel+0x39c/0x3dc
[<0000000000013046>] _stext+0x46/0x1000
Fix incorrect usage of fsf_req_list_lock. It's used in tasklet context
(irqs on) as well as in irq context. Therefore use the spin_lock_irqsave
variant to avoid deadlocks.
Acked-by: Andreas Herrmann <aherrman@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| block | ||
| char | ||
| cio | ||
| crypto | ||
| net | ||
| scsi | ||
| Kconfig | ||
| Makefile | ||
| ebcdic.c | ||
| s390_rdev.c | ||
| s390mach.c | ||
| s390mach.h | ||
| sysinfo.c | ||