250 строки
9.5 KiB
Plaintext
250 строки
9.5 KiB
Plaintext
Supporting PMUs on RISC-V platforms
|
|
==========================================
|
|
Alan Kao <alankao@andestech.com>, Mar 2018
|
|
|
|
Introduction
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
As of this writing, perf_event-related features mentioned in The RISC-V ISA
|
|
Privileged Version 1.10 are as follows:
|
|
(please check the manual for more details)
|
|
|
|
* [m|s]counteren
|
|
* mcycle[h], cycle[h]
|
|
* minstret[h], instret[h]
|
|
* mhpeventx, mhpcounterx[h]
|
|
|
|
With such function set only, porting perf would require a lot of work, due to
|
|
the lack of the following general architectural performance monitoring features:
|
|
|
|
* Enabling/Disabling counters
|
|
Counters are just free-running all the time in our case.
|
|
* Interrupt caused by counter overflow
|
|
No such feature in the spec.
|
|
* Interrupt indicator
|
|
It is not possible to have many interrupt ports for all counters, so an
|
|
interrupt indicator is required for software to tell which counter has
|
|
just overflowed.
|
|
* Writing to counters
|
|
There will be an SBI to support this since the kernel cannot modify the
|
|
counters [1]. Alternatively, some vendor considers to implement
|
|
hardware-extension for M-S-U model machines to write counters directly.
|
|
|
|
This document aims to provide developers a quick guide on supporting their
|
|
PMUs in the kernel. The following sections briefly explain perf' mechanism
|
|
and todos.
|
|
|
|
You may check previous discussions here [1][2]. Also, it might be helpful
|
|
to check the appendix for related kernel structures.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Initialization
|
|
-----------------
|
|
|
|
*riscv_pmu* is a global pointer of type *struct riscv_pmu*, which contains
|
|
various methods according to perf's internal convention and PMU-specific
|
|
parameters. One should declare such instance to represent the PMU. By default,
|
|
*riscv_pmu* points to a constant structure *riscv_base_pmu*, which has very
|
|
basic support to a baseline QEMU model.
|
|
|
|
Then he/she can either assign the instance's pointer to *riscv_pmu* so that
|
|
the minimal and already-implemented logic can be leveraged, or invent his/her
|
|
own *riscv_init_platform_pmu* implementation.
|
|
|
|
In other words, existing sources of *riscv_base_pmu* merely provide a
|
|
reference implementation. Developers can flexibly decide how many parts they
|
|
can leverage, and in the most extreme case, they can customize every function
|
|
according to their needs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Event Initialization
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
When a user launches a perf command to monitor some events, it is first
|
|
interpreted by the userspace perf tool into multiple *perf_event_open*
|
|
system calls, and then each of them calls to the body of *event_init*
|
|
member function that was assigned in the previous step. In *riscv_base_pmu*'s
|
|
case, it is *riscv_event_init*.
|
|
|
|
The main purpose of this function is to translate the event provided by user
|
|
into bitmap, so that HW-related control registers or counters can directly be
|
|
manipulated. The translation is based on the mappings and methods provided in
|
|
*riscv_pmu*.
|
|
|
|
Note that some features can be done in this stage as well:
|
|
|
|
(1) interrupt setting, which is stated in the next section;
|
|
(2) privilege level setting (user space only, kernel space only, both);
|
|
(3) destructor setting. Normally it is sufficient to apply *riscv_destroy_event*;
|
|
(4) tweaks for non-sampling events, which will be utilized by functions such as
|
|
*perf_adjust_period*, usually something like the follows:
|
|
|
|
if (!is_sampling_event(event)) {
|
|
hwc->sample_period = x86_pmu.max_period;
|
|
hwc->last_period = hwc->sample_period;
|
|
local64_set(&hwc->period_left, hwc->sample_period);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
In the case of *riscv_base_pmu*, only (3) is provided for now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Interrupt
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
3.1. Interrupt Initialization
|
|
|
|
This often occurs at the beginning of the *event_init* method. In common
|
|
practice, this should be a code segment like
|
|
|
|
int x86_reserve_hardware(void)
|
|
{
|
|
int err = 0;
|
|
|
|
if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&pmc_refcount)) {
|
|
mutex_lock(&pmc_reserve_mutex);
|
|
if (atomic_read(&pmc_refcount) == 0) {
|
|
if (!reserve_pmc_hardware())
|
|
err = -EBUSY;
|
|
else
|
|
reserve_ds_buffers();
|
|
}
|
|
if (!err)
|
|
atomic_inc(&pmc_refcount);
|
|
mutex_unlock(&pmc_reserve_mutex);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return err;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
And the magic is in *reserve_pmc_hardware*, which usually does atomic
|
|
operations to make implemented IRQ accessible from some global function pointer.
|
|
*release_pmc_hardware* serves the opposite purpose, and it is used in event
|
|
destructors mentioned in previous section.
|
|
|
|
(Note: From the implementations in all the architectures, the *reserve/release*
|
|
pair are always IRQ settings, so the *pmc_hardware* seems somehow misleading.
|
|
It does NOT deal with the binding between an event and a physical counter,
|
|
which will be introduced in the next section.)
|
|
|
|
3.2. IRQ Structure
|
|
|
|
Basically, a IRQ runs the following pseudo code:
|
|
|
|
for each hardware counter that triggered this overflow
|
|
|
|
get the event of this counter
|
|
|
|
// following two steps are defined as *read()*,
|
|
// check the section Reading/Writing Counters for details.
|
|
count the delta value since previous interrupt
|
|
update the event->count (# event occurs) by adding delta, and
|
|
event->hw.period_left by subtracting delta
|
|
|
|
if the event overflows
|
|
sample data
|
|
set the counter appropriately for the next overflow
|
|
|
|
if the event overflows again
|
|
too frequently, throttle this event
|
|
fi
|
|
fi
|
|
|
|
end for
|
|
|
|
However as of this writing, none of the RISC-V implementations have designed an
|
|
interrupt for perf, so the details are to be completed in the future.
|
|
|
|
4. Reading/Writing Counters
|
|
---------------------------
|
|
|
|
They seem symmetric but perf treats them quite differently. For reading, there
|
|
is a *read* interface in *struct pmu*, but it serves more than just reading.
|
|
According to the context, the *read* function not only reads the content of the
|
|
counter (event->count), but also updates the left period to the next interrupt
|
|
(event->hw.period_left).
|
|
|
|
But the core of perf does not need direct write to counters. Writing counters
|
|
is hidden behind the abstraction of 1) *pmu->start*, literally start counting so one
|
|
has to set the counter to a good value for the next interrupt; 2) inside the IRQ
|
|
it should set the counter to the same resonable value.
|
|
|
|
Reading is not a problem in RISC-V but writing would need some effort, since
|
|
counters are not allowed to be written by S-mode.
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. add()/del()/start()/stop()
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
|
|
Basic idea: add()/del() adds/deletes events to/from a PMU, and start()/stop()
|
|
starts/stop the counter of some event in the PMU. All of them take the same
|
|
arguments: *struct perf_event *event* and *int flag*.
|
|
|
|
Consider perf as a state machine, then you will find that these functions serve
|
|
as the state transition process between those states.
|
|
Three states (event->hw.state) are defined:
|
|
|
|
* PERF_HES_STOPPED: the counter is stopped
|
|
* PERF_HES_UPTODATE: the event->count is up-to-date
|
|
* PERF_HES_ARCH: arch-dependent usage ... we don't need this for now
|
|
|
|
A normal flow of these state transitions are as follows:
|
|
|
|
* A user launches a perf event, resulting in calling to *event_init*.
|
|
* When being context-switched in, *add* is called by the perf core, with a flag
|
|
PERF_EF_START, which means that the event should be started after it is added.
|
|
At this stage, a general event is bound to a physical counter, if any.
|
|
The state changes to PERF_HES_STOPPED and PERF_HES_UPTODATE, because it is now
|
|
stopped, and the (software) event count does not need updating.
|
|
** *start* is then called, and the counter is enabled.
|
|
With flag PERF_EF_RELOAD, it writes an appropriate value to the counter (check
|
|
previous section for detail).
|
|
Nothing is written if the flag does not contain PERF_EF_RELOAD.
|
|
The state now is reset to none, because it is neither stopped nor updated
|
|
(the counting already started)
|
|
* When being context-switched out, *del* is called. It then checks out all the
|
|
events in the PMU and calls *stop* to update their counts.
|
|
** *stop* is called by *del*
|
|
and the perf core with flag PERF_EF_UPDATE, and it often shares the same
|
|
subroutine as *read* with the same logic.
|
|
The state changes to PERF_HES_STOPPED and PERF_HES_UPTODATE, again.
|
|
|
|
** Life cycle of these two pairs: *add* and *del* are called repeatedly as
|
|
tasks switch in-and-out; *start* and *stop* is also called when the perf core
|
|
needs a quick stop-and-start, for instance, when the interrupt period is being
|
|
adjusted.
|
|
|
|
Current implementation is sufficient for now and can be easily extended to
|
|
features in the future.
|
|
|
|
A. Related Structures
|
|
---------------------
|
|
|
|
* struct pmu: include/linux/perf_event.h
|
|
* struct riscv_pmu: arch/riscv/include/asm/perf_event.h
|
|
|
|
Both structures are designed to be read-only.
|
|
|
|
*struct pmu* defines some function pointer interfaces, and most of them take
|
|
*struct perf_event* as a main argument, dealing with perf events according to
|
|
perf's internal state machine (check kernel/events/core.c for details).
|
|
|
|
*struct riscv_pmu* defines PMU-specific parameters. The naming follows the
|
|
convention of all other architectures.
|
|
|
|
* struct perf_event: include/linux/perf_event.h
|
|
* struct hw_perf_event
|
|
|
|
The generic structure that represents perf events, and the hardware-related
|
|
details.
|
|
|
|
* struct riscv_hw_events: arch/riscv/include/asm/perf_event.h
|
|
|
|
The structure that holds the status of events, has two fixed members:
|
|
the number of events and the array of the events.
|
|
|
|
References
|
|
----------
|
|
|
|
[1] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-linux/pull/124
|
|
[2] https://groups.google.com/a/groups.riscv.org/forum/#!topic/sw-dev/f19TmCNP6yA
|