117 строки
5.3 KiB
ReStructuredText
117 строки
5.3 KiB
ReStructuredText
.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
|
|
|
|
=========================================
|
|
s390 (IBM Z) Ultravisor and Protected VMs
|
|
=========================================
|
|
|
|
Summary
|
|
-------
|
|
Protected virtual machines (PVM) are KVM VMs that do not allow KVM to
|
|
access VM state like guest memory or guest registers. Instead, the
|
|
PVMs are mostly managed by a new entity called Ultravisor (UV). The UV
|
|
provides an API that can be used by PVMs and KVM to request management
|
|
actions.
|
|
|
|
Each guest starts in non-protected mode and then may make a request to
|
|
transition into protected mode. On transition, KVM registers the guest
|
|
and its VCPUs with the Ultravisor and prepares everything for running
|
|
it.
|
|
|
|
The Ultravisor will secure and decrypt the guest's boot memory
|
|
(i.e. kernel/initrd). It will safeguard state changes like VCPU
|
|
starts/stops and injected interrupts while the guest is running.
|
|
|
|
As access to the guest's state, such as the SIE state description, is
|
|
normally needed to be able to run a VM, some changes have been made in
|
|
the behavior of the SIE instruction. A new format 4 state description
|
|
has been introduced, where some fields have different meanings for a
|
|
PVM. SIE exits are minimized as much as possible to improve speed and
|
|
reduce exposed guest state.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interrupt injection
|
|
-------------------
|
|
Interrupt injection is safeguarded by the Ultravisor. As KVM doesn't
|
|
have access to the VCPUs' lowcores, injection is handled via the
|
|
format 4 state description.
|
|
|
|
Machine check, external, IO and restart interruptions each can be
|
|
injected on SIE entry via a bit in the interrupt injection control
|
|
field (offset 0x54). If the guest cpu is not enabled for the interrupt
|
|
at the time of injection, a validity interception is recognized. The
|
|
format 4 state description contains fields in the interception data
|
|
block where data associated with the interrupt can be transported.
|
|
|
|
Program and Service Call exceptions have another layer of
|
|
safeguarding; they can only be injected for instructions that have
|
|
been intercepted into KVM. The exceptions need to be a valid outcome
|
|
of an instruction emulation by KVM, e.g. we can never inject a
|
|
addressing exception as they are reported by SIE since KVM has no
|
|
access to the guest memory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mask notification interceptions
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
KVM cannot intercept lctl(g) and lpsw(e) anymore in order to be
|
|
notified when a PVM enables a certain class of interrupt. As a
|
|
replacement, two new interception codes have been introduced: One
|
|
indicating that the contents of CRs 0, 6, or 14 have been changed,
|
|
indicating different interruption subclasses; and one indicating that
|
|
PSW bit 13 has been changed, indicating that a machine check
|
|
intervention was requested and those are now enabled.
|
|
|
|
Instruction emulation
|
|
---------------------
|
|
With the format 4 state description for PVMs, the SIE instruction already
|
|
interprets more instructions than it does with format 2. It is not able
|
|
to interpret every instruction, but needs to hand some tasks to KVM;
|
|
therefore, the SIE and the ultravisor safeguard emulation inputs and outputs.
|
|
|
|
The control structures associated with SIE provide the Secure
|
|
Instruction Data Area (SIDA), the Interception Parameters (IP) and the
|
|
Secure Interception General Register Save Area. Guest GRs and most of
|
|
the instruction data, such as I/O data structures, are filtered.
|
|
Instruction data is copied to and from the SIDA when needed. Guest
|
|
GRs are put into / retrieved from the Secure Interception General
|
|
Register Save Area.
|
|
|
|
Only GR values needed to emulate an instruction will be copied into this
|
|
save area and the real register numbers will be hidden.
|
|
|
|
The Interception Parameters state description field still contains
|
|
the bytes of the instruction text, but with pre-set register values
|
|
instead of the actual ones. I.e. each instruction always uses the same
|
|
instruction text, in order not to leak guest instruction text.
|
|
This also implies that the register content that a guest had in r<n>
|
|
may be in r<m> from the hypervisor's point of view.
|
|
|
|
The Secure Instruction Data Area contains instruction storage
|
|
data. Instruction data, i.e. data being referenced by an instruction
|
|
like the SCCB for sclp, is moved via the SIDA. When an instruction is
|
|
intercepted, the SIE will only allow data and program interrupts for
|
|
this instruction to be moved to the guest via the two data areas
|
|
discussed before. Other data is either ignored or results in validity
|
|
interceptions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instruction emulation interceptions
|
|
-----------------------------------
|
|
There are two types of SIE secure instruction intercepts: the normal
|
|
and the notification type. Normal secure instruction intercepts will
|
|
make the guest pending for instruction completion of the intercepted
|
|
instruction type, i.e. on SIE entry it is attempted to complete
|
|
emulation of the instruction with the data provided by KVM. That might
|
|
be a program exception or instruction completion.
|
|
|
|
The notification type intercepts inform KVM about guest environment
|
|
changes due to guest instruction interpretation. Such an interception
|
|
is recognized, for example, for the store prefix instruction to provide
|
|
the new lowcore location. On SIE reentry, any KVM data in the data areas
|
|
is ignored and execution continues as if the guest instruction had
|
|
completed. For that reason KVM is not allowed to inject a program
|
|
interrupt.
|
|
|
|
Links
|
|
-----
|
|
`KVM Forum 2019 presentation <https://static.sched.com/hosted_files/kvmforum2019/3b/ibm_protected_vms_s390x.pdf>`_
|