Handle the implicit 'this' parameter for format attributes.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@79987 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
Anders Carlsson 2009-08-25 14:12:34 +00:00
Родитель 5653ca5088
Коммит 4fb77202ce
2 изменённых файлов: 20 добавлений и 3 удалений

Просмотреть файл

@ -1222,9 +1222,6 @@ static void HandleFormatAttr(Decl *d, const AttributeList &Attr, Sema &S) {
return;
}
// FIXME: in C++ the implicit 'this' function parameter also counts. this is
// needed in order to be compatible with GCC the index must start in 1 and the
// limit is numargs+1
unsigned NumArgs = getFunctionOrMethodNumArgs(d);
unsigned FirstIdx = 1;
@ -1271,6 +1268,16 @@ static void HandleFormatAttr(Decl *d, const AttributeList &Attr, Sema &S) {
return;
}
// FIXME: We should handle the implicit 'this' parameter in a more generic
// way that can be used for other arguments.
bool HasImplicitThisParam = false;
if (CXXMethodDecl *MD = dyn_cast<CXXMethodDecl>(d)) {
if (MD->isInstance()) {
HasImplicitThisParam = true;
NumArgs++;
}
}
if (Idx.getZExtValue() < FirstIdx || Idx.getZExtValue() > NumArgs) {
S.Diag(Attr.getLoc(), diag::err_attribute_argument_out_of_bounds)
<< "format" << 2 << IdxExpr->getSourceRange();
@ -1280,6 +1287,8 @@ static void HandleFormatAttr(Decl *d, const AttributeList &Attr, Sema &S) {
// FIXME: Do we need to bounds check?
unsigned ArgIdx = Idx.getZExtValue() - 1;
if (HasImplicitThisParam) ArgIdx--;
// make sure the format string is really a string
QualType Ty = getFunctionOrMethodArgType(d, ArgIdx);

Просмотреть файл

@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
// RUN: clang-cc -fsyntax-only -verify %s
struct S {
static void f(const char*, ...) __attribute__((format(printf, 1, 2)));
// GCC has a hidden 'this' argument in member functions which is why
// the format argument is argument 2 here.
void g(const char*, ...) __attribute__((format(printf, 2, 3)));
};