зеркало из https://github.com/microsoft/clang-1.git
Check that the access specifier of a member redeclaration is the same as the original declaration.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@67722 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
bbf462314b
Коммит
50713450f6
|
@ -234,6 +234,12 @@ def err_deleted_non_function : Error<
|
|||
def err_deleted_decl_not_first : Error<
|
||||
"deleted definition must be first declaration">;
|
||||
|
||||
// C++ access checking
|
||||
def err_class_redeclared_with_different_access : Error<
|
||||
"%0 redeclared with '%1' access">;
|
||||
def note_previous_access_declaration : Note<
|
||||
"previously declared '%1' here">;
|
||||
|
||||
// C++ name lookup
|
||||
def err_incomplete_nested_name_spec : Error<
|
||||
"incomplete type %0 named in nested name specifier">;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -3083,6 +3083,21 @@ TypedefDecl *Sema::ParseTypedefDecl(Scope *S, Declarator &D, QualType T,
|
|||
return NewTD;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static const char *getAccessName(AccessSpecifier AS) {
|
||||
switch (AS) {
|
||||
default:
|
||||
case AS_none:
|
||||
assert("Invalid access specifier!");
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
case AS_public:
|
||||
return "public";
|
||||
case AS_private:
|
||||
return "private";
|
||||
case AS_protected:
|
||||
return "protected";
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// ActOnTag - This is invoked when we see 'struct foo' or 'struct {'. In the
|
||||
/// former case, Name will be non-null. In the later case, Name will be null.
|
||||
/// TagSpec indicates what kind of tag this is. TK indicates whether this is a
|
||||
|
@ -3384,9 +3399,17 @@ CreateNewDecl:
|
|||
// lexical context will be different from the semantic context.
|
||||
New->setLexicalDeclContext(CurContext);
|
||||
|
||||
if (PrevDecl)
|
||||
New->setAccess(PrevDecl->getAccess());
|
||||
else
|
||||
if (PrevDecl) {
|
||||
// C++ [class.access.spec]p3: When a member is redeclared its access
|
||||
// specifier must be same as its initial declaration.
|
||||
if (AS != AS_none && AS != PrevDecl->getAccess()) {
|
||||
Diag(Loc, diag::err_class_redeclared_with_different_access)
|
||||
<< New << getAccessName(AS);
|
||||
Diag(PrevDecl->getLocation(), diag::note_previous_access_declaration)
|
||||
<< PrevDecl << getAccessName(PrevDecl->getAccess());
|
||||
} else
|
||||
New->setAccess(PrevDecl->getAccess());
|
||||
} else
|
||||
New->setAccess(AS);
|
||||
|
||||
if (TK == TK_Definition)
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
|
|||
// RUN: clang-cc -fsyntax-only -verify %s
|
||||
|
||||
class C {
|
||||
struct S; // expected-note {{previously declared 'private' here}}
|
||||
|
||||
public:
|
||||
struct S {}; // expected-error {{'S' redeclared with 'public' access}}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
struct S {
|
||||
class C; // expected-note {{previously declared 'public' here}}
|
||||
|
||||
private:
|
||||
class C { }; // expected-error {{'C' redeclared with 'private' access}}
|
||||
};
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче