microsoft
/
clang-1
зеркало из https://github.com/microsoft/clang-1.git
1
0
Форкнуть 0
Код Задачи Пакеты Проекты Релизы Вики Активность

-getLang().C99 is true in C++ too, remove the use of the C99orCXX variable. 

-Scoping in C99 works good for C++ too, remove the C++-specific comments.

If someone thinks that the C++-specific comments are necessary for clarification, let me know and I'll put them back on.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@56078 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
Argyrios Kyrtzidis 2008-09-10 23:46:08 +00:00
Родитель 4c0f56b999
Коммит fe7e4f08fe
1 изменённых файлов: 12 добавлений и 91 удалений
Показать статистику Скачать Patch файл Скачать Diff файл Показать все файлы Свернуть все файлы

103
lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp
Просмотреть файл

@ -430,17 +430,9 @@ Parser::StmtResult Parser::ParseIfStatement() {
return true;
}
bool C99orCXX = getLang().C99 || getLang().CPlusPlus;
// C99 6.8.4p3 - In C99, the if statement is a block. This is not
// the case for C90.
//
// C++ 6.4p3:
// A name introduced by a declaration in a condition is in scope from its
// point of declaration until the end of the substatements controlled by the
// condition.
//
if (C99orCXX)
if (getLang().C99)
EnterScope(Scope::DeclScope | Scope::ControlScope);
// Parse the condition.
@ -455,7 +447,7 @@ Parser::StmtResult Parser::ParseIfStatement() {
if (CondExp.isInvalid) {
SkipUntil(tok::semi);
if (C99orCXX)
if (getLang().C99)
ExitScope();
return true;
}
@ -463,22 +455,7 @@ Parser::StmtResult Parser::ParseIfStatement() {
// C99 6.8.4p3 - In C99, the body of the if statement is a scope, even if
// there is no compound stmt. C90 does not have this clause. We only do this
// if the body isn't a compound statement to avoid push/pop in common cases.
//
// C++ 6.4p1:
// The substatement in a selection-statement (each substatement, in the else
// form of the if statement) implicitly defines a local scope.
//
// For C++ we create a scope for the condition and a new scope for
// substatements because:
// -When the 'then' scope exits, we want the condition declaration to still be
// active for the 'else' scope too.
// -Sema will detect name clashes by considering declarations of a
// 'ControlScope' as part of its direct subscope.
// -If we wanted the condition and substatement to be in the same scope, we
// would have to notify ParseStatement not to create a new scope. It's
// simpler to let it create a new scope.
//
bool NeedsInnerScope = C99orCXX && Tok.isNot(tok::l_brace);
bool NeedsInnerScope = getLang().C99 && Tok.isNot(tok::l_brace);
if (NeedsInnerScope) EnterScope(Scope::DeclScope);
// Read the 'then' stmt.
@ -500,12 +477,7 @@ Parser::StmtResult Parser::ParseIfStatement() {
// there is no compound stmt. C90 does not have this clause. We only do
// this if the body isn't a compound statement to avoid push/pop in common
// cases.
//
// C++ 6.4p1:
// The substatement in a selection-statement (each substatement, in the else
// form of the if statement) implicitly defines a local scope.
//
NeedsInnerScope = C99orCXX && Tok.isNot(tok::l_brace);
NeedsInnerScope = getLang().C99 && Tok.isNot(tok::l_brace);
if (NeedsInnerScope) EnterScope(Scope::DeclScope);
ElseStmtLoc = Tok.getLocation();
@ -515,7 +487,7 @@ Parser::StmtResult Parser::ParseIfStatement() {
if (NeedsInnerScope) ExitScope();
}
if (C99orCXX)
if (getLang().C99)
ExitScope();
// If the then or else stmt is invalid and the other is valid (and present),
@ -554,17 +526,9 @@ Parser::StmtResult Parser::ParseSwitchStatement() {
return true;
}
bool C99orCXX = getLang().C99 || getLang().CPlusPlus;
// C99 6.8.4p3 - In C99, the switch statement is a block. This is
// not the case for C90. Start the switch scope.
//
// C++ 6.4p3:
// A name introduced by a declaration in a condition is in scope from its
// point of declaration until the end of the substatements controlled by the
// condition.
//
if (C99orCXX)
if (getLang().C99)
EnterScope(Scope::BreakScope | Scope::DeclScope | Scope::ControlScope);
else
EnterScope(Scope::BreakScope);
@ -589,15 +553,7 @@ Parser::StmtResult Parser::ParseSwitchStatement() {
// C99 6.8.4p3 - In C99, the body of the switch statement is a scope, even if
// there is no compound stmt. C90 does not have this clause. We only do this
// if the body isn't a compound statement to avoid push/pop in common cases.
//
// C++ 6.4p1:
// The substatement in a selection-statement (each substatement, in the else
// form of the if statement) implicitly defines a local scope.
//
// See comments in ParseIfStatement for why we create a scope for the
// condition and a new scope for substatement in C++.
//
bool NeedsInnerScope = C99orCXX && Tok.isNot(tok::l_brace);
bool NeedsInnerScope = getLang().C99 && Tok.isNot(tok::l_brace);
if (NeedsInnerScope) EnterScope(Scope::DeclScope);
// Read the body statement.
@ -631,17 +587,9 @@ Parser::StmtResult Parser::ParseWhileStatement() {
return true;
}
bool C99orCXX = getLang().C99 || getLang().CPlusPlus;
// C99 6.8.5p5 - In C99, the while statement is a block. This is not
// the case for C90. Start the loop scope.
//
// C++ 6.4p3:
// A name introduced by a declaration in a condition is in scope from its
// point of declaration until the end of the substatements controlled by the
// condition.
//
if (C99orCXX)
if (getLang().C99)
EnterScope(Scope::BreakScope | Scope::ContinueScope |
Scope::DeclScope | Scope::ControlScope);
else
@ -660,15 +608,7 @@ Parser::StmtResult Parser::ParseWhileStatement() {
// C99 6.8.5p5 - In C99, the body of the if statement is a scope, even if
// there is no compound stmt. C90 does not have this clause. We only do this
// if the body isn't a compound statement to avoid push/pop in common cases.
//
// C++ 6.5p2:
// The substatement in an iteration-statement implicitly defines a local scope
// which is entered and exited each time through the loop.
//
// See comments in ParseIfStatement for why we create a scope for the
// condition and a new scope for substatement in C++.
//
bool NeedsInnerScope = C99orCXX && Tok.isNot(tok::l_brace);
bool NeedsInnerScope = getLang().C99 && Tok.isNot(tok::l_brace);
if (NeedsInnerScope) EnterScope(Scope::DeclScope);
// Read the body statement.
@ -760,20 +700,9 @@ Parser::StmtResult Parser::ParseForStatement() {
return true;
}
bool C99orCXX = getLang().C99 || getLang().CPlusPlus;
// C99 6.8.5p5 - In C99, the for statement is a block. This is not
// the case for C90. Start the loop scope.
//
// C++ 6.4p3:
// A name introduced by a declaration in a condition is in scope from its
// point of declaration until the end of the substatements controlled by the
// condition.
// C++ 6.5.3p1:
// Names declared in the for-init-statement are in the same declarative-region
// as those declared in the condition.
//
if (C99orCXX)
if (getLang().C99)
EnterScope(Scope::BreakScope | Scope::ContinueScope |
Scope::DeclScope | Scope::ControlScope);
else
@ -793,7 +722,7 @@ Parser::StmtResult Parser::ParseForStatement() {
ConsumeToken();
} else if (isDeclarationSpecifier()) { // for (int X = 4;
// Parse declaration, which eats the ';'.
if (!C99orCXX) // Use of C99-style for loops in C90 mode?
if (!getLang().C99) // Use of C99-style for loops in C90 mode?
Diag(Tok, diag::ext_c99_variable_decl_in_for_loop);
SourceLocation DeclStart = Tok.getLocation();
@ -871,15 +800,7 @@ Parser::StmtResult Parser::ParseForStatement() {
// C99 6.8.5p5 - In C99, the body of the if statement is a scope, even if
// there is no compound stmt. C90 does not have this clause. We only do this
// if the body isn't a compound statement to avoid push/pop in common cases.
//
// C++ 6.5p2:
// The substatement in an iteration-statement implicitly defines a local scope
// which is entered and exited each time through the loop.
//
// See comments in ParseIfStatement for why we create a scope for
// for-init-statement/condition and a new scope for substatement in C++.
//
bool NeedsInnerScope = C99orCXX && Tok.isNot(tok::l_brace);
bool NeedsInnerScope = getLang().C99 && Tok.isNot(tok::l_brace);
if (NeedsInnerScope) EnterScope(Scope::DeclScope);
// Read the body statement.