information about types. We often print diagnostics where we say
"foo_t" is bad, but the user doesn't know how foo_t is declared
(because it is a typedef). Fix this by expanding sugar when present
in a diagnostic (and not one of a few special cases, like vectors).
Before:
t.m:5:2: error: invalid operands to binary expression ('typeof(P)' and 'typeof(F)')
MAX(P, F);
^~~~~~~~~
t.m:1:78: note: instantiated from:
#define MAX(A,B) ({ __typeof__(A) __a = (A); __typeof__(B) __b = (B); __a < __b ? __b : __a; })
^
After:
t.m:5:2: error: invalid operands to binary expression ('typeof(P)' (aka 'struct mystruct') and 'typeof(F)' (aka 'float'))
MAX(P, F);
^~~~~~~~~
t.m:1:78: note: instantiated from:
#define MAX(A,B) ({ __typeof__(A) __a = (A); __typeof__(B) __b = (B); __a < __b ? __b : __a; })
^
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@65081 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
warning: statement was disambiguated as declaration
because it is currently firing in cases where the declaration would
not actually parse as a statement. We'd love to bring this warning
back if we can make it more accurate.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@61137 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Argyrios Kyrtzidis
Daniel Dunbar
Chris Lattner
Sebastian Redl
Douglas Gregor