a special member" diagnostic from warning to error, and fix the cases where it
produced diagnostics with incorrect wording.
We don't support this as an extension, and we ban it even in C++98 mode. This
breaks too much (for instance, the ABI-specified calling convention for a type
can change if it acquires a copy constructor through the addition of a default
argument).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@168769 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We don't support any C++11 attributes that appertain to declaration specifiers so reject
the attributes in parser until we support them; this also conforms to what g++ 4.8 is doing.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@167481 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This implementation doesn't warn on anything that GCC doesn't warn on with the
exception of templates specializations (GCC doesn't warn, Clang does). The
specific skipped cases (boolean, constant expressions, enums) are open for
debate/adjustment if anyone wants to demonstrate that GCC is being overly
conservative here. The only really obvious false positive I found was in the
Clang regression suite's MPI test - apparently MPI uses specific flag values in
pointer constants. (eg: #define FOO (void*)~0)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@166039 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
auto x((unknown));
int& y = x;
would crash because we were not flagging 'x' as an invalid declaration here.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@165675 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
an explicitly-defaulted default constructor would be constexpr. This is
necessary in weird (but well-formed) cases where a class has more than one copy
or move constructor.
Cleanup of now-unused parts of CXXRecordDecl to follow.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@158289 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
parser, and use it to emit better diagnostics in cases where an identifer
can't be looked up as a type name.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@156508 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
a constant expression' error into a DefaultError ExtWarn, so that it can be
disabled and is suppressed in system headers. libstdc++4.7 contains some such
functions which we currently can't evaluate as constant expressions.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@154115 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
being defined here: [] () -> struct S {} does not define struct S.
In passing, implement DR1318 (syntactic disambiguation of 'final').
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@152551 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
defined here, but not semantically, so
new struct S {};
is always ill-formed, even if there is a struct S in scope.
We also had a couple of bugs in ParseOptionalTypeSpecifier caused by it being
under-loved (due to it only being used in a few places) so merge it into
ParseDeclarationSpecifiers with a new DeclSpecContext. To avoid regressing, this
required improving ParseDeclarationSpecifiers' diagnostics in some cases. This
also required teaching ParseSpecifierQualifierList about constexpr... which
incidentally fixes an issue where we'd allow the constexpr specifier in other
bad places.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@152549 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
function call (or a comma expression with a function call on its right-hand
side), possibly parenthesized, then the return type is not required to be
complete and a temporary is not bound. Other subexpressions inside a decltype
expression do not get this treatment.
This is implemented by deferring the relevant checks for all calls immediately
within a decltype expression, then, when the expression is fully-parsed,
checking the relevant constraints and stripping off any top-level temporary
binding.
Deferring the completion of the return type exposed a bug in overload
resolution where completion of the argument types was not attempted, which
is also fixed by this change.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@151117 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
explicit specialization of a function template, mark the instantiation as
constexpr if the specialization is, rather than requiring them to match.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@151001 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* Fix bug when determining whether && / || are potential constant expressions
* Try harder when determining whether ?: is a potential constant expression
* Produce a diagnostic on sizeof(VLA) to provide a better source location
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@150657 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
1358, 1360, 1452 and 1453.
- Instantiations of constexpr functions are always constexpr. This removes the
need for separate declaration/definition checking, which is now gone.
- This makes it possible for a constexpr function to be virtual, if they are
only dependently virtual. Virtual calls to such functions are not constant
expressions.
- Likewise, it's now possible for a literal type to have virtual base classes.
A constexpr constructor for such a type cannot actually produce a constant
expression, though, so add a special-case diagnostic for a constructor call
to such a type rather than trying to evaluate it.
- Classes with trivial default constructors (for which value initialization can
produce a fully-initialized value) are considered literal types.
- Classes with volatile members are not literal types.
- constexpr constructors can be members of non-literal types. We do not yet use
static initialization for global objects constructed in this way.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@150359 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
[dcl.type.simple]p4, which treats all xvalues as returning T&&. We had
previously implemented a pre-standard variant of decltype() that
doesn't cope with, e.g., static_ast<T&&>(e) very well.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@150348 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
o Correct the handling of the restrictions on usage of cv-qualified and
ref-qualified function types.
o Fix a bug where such types were rejected in template type parameter default
arguments, due to such arguments not being treated as a template type arg
context.
o Remove the ExtWarn for usage of such types as template arguments; that was
a standard defect, not a GCC extension.
o Improve the wording and unify the code for diagnosing cv-qualifiers with the
code for diagnosing ref-qualifiers.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@150244 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
empty union. This still rejects anonymous member structs or unions which only
contain such empty class types, pending standard wording defining exactly what
an empty class type is.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@150157 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
can't produce a constant expression is not ill-formed (so long as some
instantiation of that function can produce a constant expression).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@149802 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* support the gcc __builtin_constant_p() ? ... : ... folding hack in C++11
* check for unspecified values in pointer comparisons and pointer subtractions
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@149578 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
function definition can produce a constant expression. This also provides the
last few checks for [dcl.constexpr]p3 and [dcl.constexpr]p4.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@149108 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Fix some review comments.
Add a test for deduction when std::initializer_list isn't available yet.
Fix redundant error messages. This fixes and outstanding FIXME too.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@148735 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
- reject definitions of enums within friend declarations
- require 'enum', not 'enum class', for non-declaring references to scoped
enumerations
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@147824 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
variable is initialized by a non-constant expression, and pass in the variable
being declared so that earlier-initialized fields' values can be used.
Rearrange VarDecl init evaluation to make this possible, and in so doing fix a
long-standing issue in our C++ constant expression handling, where we would
mishandle cases like:
extern const int a;
const int n = a;
const int a = 5;
int arr[n];
Here, n is not initialized by a constant expression, so can't be used in an ICE,
even though the initialization expression would be an ICE if it appeared later
in the TU. This requires computing whether the initializer is an ICE eagerly,
and saving that information in PCH files.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@146856 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diagnostic message are compared. If either is a substring of the other, then
no error is given. This gives rise to an unexpected case:
// expect-error{{candidate function has different number of parameters}}
will match the following error messages from Clang:
candidate function has different number of parameters (expected 1 but has 2)
candidate function has different number of parameters
It will also match these other error messages:
candidate function
function has different number of parameters
number of parameters
This patch will change so that the verification string must be a substring of
the diagnostic message before accepting. Also, all the failing tests from this
change have been corrected. Some stats from this cleanup:
87 - removed extra spaces around verification strings
70 - wording updates to diagnostics
40 - extra leading or trailing characters (typos, unmatched parens or quotes)
35 - diagnostic level was included (error:, warning:, or note:)
18 - flag name put in the warning (-Wprotocol)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@146619 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
or MemberExpr which refers to it. As a side-effect, MemberExprs which refer to
static member functions and static data members are now emitted as constant
expressions.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@144468 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
initializer; all other constexpr variables are merely required to be
initialized. In particular, a user-provided constexpr default constructor can be
used for such initialization.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@144028 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
valid C++98/03 code. However, add these warnings to -Wall, for those
who obviously already like clean code.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@142903 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
instead of silently discarding them.
As a side effect, this improves diagnostics for constexpr class
templates slightly.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@142755 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We'd also like for "C++11" or "c++11" to be used for the warning
groups, but without removing the old warning flags. Patches welcome;
I've run out of time to work on this today.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@141801 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
constexpr constructor templates. Such checking is optional, and currently hard
to get right since clang doesn't generate implicit member initializers until
instantiation (even for non-dependent members).
This is needed for clang to accept libstdc++ from g++4.6 in c++0x mode.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@141547 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
part on patches by Peter Collingbourne.
We diverge from the C++11 standard in a few areas, mostly related to checking
constexpr function declarations, and not just definitions. See WG21 paper
N3308=11-0078 for details.
Function invocation substitution is not available in this patch; constexpr
functions cannot yet be used from within constant expressions.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@140926 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We had an extension which allowed const static class members of floating-point type to have in-class initializers, 'as a C++0x extension'. However, C++0x does not allow this. The extension has been kept, and extended to all literal types in C++0x mode (with a fixit to add the 'constexpr' specifier).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@140801 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8