accurately states what the function is trying to do and how it is
different from Expr::isEvaluatable. Also get rid of a parameter that is both
unused and inaccurate.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@62951 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
designated initializers. This implementation should cover all of the
constraints in C99 6.7.8, including long, complex designations and
computing the size of incomplete array types initialized with a
designated initializer. Please see the new test-case and holler if you
find cases where this doesn't work.
There are still some wrinkles with GNU's anonymous structs and
anonymous unions (it isn't clear how these should work; we'll just
follow GCC's lead) and with designated initializers for the members of a
union. I'll tackle those very soon.
CodeGen is still nonexistent, and there's some leftover code in the
parser's representation of designators that I'll also need to clean up.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@62737 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
assigned to when it has user declared setter method
defined in the class implementation (but no declaration in
the class itself).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@62098 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
information for declarations that were referenced via a qualified-id,
e.g., N::C::value. We keep track of the location of the start of the
nested-name-specifier. Note that the difference between
QualifiedDeclRefExpr and DeclRefExpr does have an effect on the
semantics of function calls in two ways:
1) The use of a qualified-id instead of an unqualified-id suppresses
argument-dependent lookup
2) If the name refers to a virtual function, the qualified-id
version will call the function determined statically while the
unqualified-id version will call the function determined dynamically
(by looking up the appropriate function in the vtable).
Neither of these features is implemented yet, but we do print out
qualified names for QualifiedDeclRefExprs as part of the AST printing.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@61789 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Make C++ classes track the POD property (C++ [class]p4)
Track the existence of a copy assignment operator.
Implicitly declare the copy assignment operator if none is provided.
Implement most of the parsing job for the G++ type traits extension.
Fully implement the low-hanging fruit of the type traits:
__is_pod: Whether a type is a POD.
__is_class: Whether a type is a (non-union) class.
__is_union: Whether a type is a union.
__is_enum: Whether a type is an enum.
__is_polymorphic: Whether a type is polymorphic (C++ [class.virtual]p1).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@61746 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
- Overloading has to cope with having both static and non-static
member functions in the overload set.
- The call may or may not have an implicit object argument,
depending on the syntax (x.f() vs. f()) and the context (static
vs. non-static member function).
- We now generate MemberExprs for implicit member access expression.
- We now cope with mutable whenever we're building MemberExprs.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@61329 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
which can refer to static data members, enumerators, and member
functions as well as to non-static data members.
Implement correct lvalue computation for member references in C++.
Compute the result type of non-static data members of reference type properly.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@61294 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
processing: it allows arbitrary foldable constants as the operand of ?: when
builtin_constant_p is the condition.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@60954 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
and separates lexical name lookup from qualified name lookup. In
particular:
* Make DeclContext the central data structure for storing and
looking up declarations within existing declarations, e.g., members
of structs/unions/classes, enumerators in C++0x enums, members of
C++ namespaces, and (later) members of Objective-C
interfaces/implementations. DeclContext uses a lazily-constructed
data structure optimized for fast lookup (array for small contexts,
hash table for larger contexts).
* Implement C++ qualified name lookup in terms of lookup into
DeclContext.
* Implement C++ unqualified name lookup in terms of
qualified+unqualified name lookup (since unqualified lookup is not
purely lexical in C++!)
* Limit the use of the chains of declarations stored in
IdentifierInfo to those names declared lexically.
* Eliminate CXXFieldDecl, collapsing its behavior into
FieldDecl. (FieldDecl is now a ScopedDecl).
* Make RecordDecl into a DeclContext and eliminates its
Members/NumMembers fields (since one can just iterate through the
DeclContext to get the fields).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@60878 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
expressions, and value-dependent expressions. This permits us to parse
some template definitions.
This is not a complete solution; we're missing type- and
value-dependent computations for most of the expression types, and
we're missing checks for dependent types and type-dependent
expressions throughout Sema.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@60615 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
parameters, with some semantic analysis:
- Template parameters are introduced into template parameter scope
- Complain about template parameter shadowing (except in Microsoft mode)
Note that we leak template parameter declarations like crazy, a
problem we'll remedy once we actually create proper declarations for
templates.
Next up: dependent types and value-dependent/type-dependent
expressions.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@60597 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This version uses VLAs to represent arrays. I'll try an alternative way next, but I want this safe first.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@59835 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
from Sebastian to enforce that a literal string is passed in,
and use this to avoid having to call strlen on it.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@59706 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
built-in operator candidates. Test overloading of '&' and ','.
In C++, a comma expression is an lvalue if its right-hand
subexpression is an lvalue. Update Expr::isLvalue accordingly.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@59643 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
post-decrement, including support for generating all of the built-in
operator candidates for these operators.
C++ and C have different rules for the arguments to the builtin unary
'+' and '-'. Implemented both variants in Sema::ActOnUnaryOp.
In C++, pre-increment and pre-decrement return lvalues. Update
Expr::isLvalue accordingly.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@59638 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
are trying to use the old GCC "casts as lvalue" extension. We don't and
will hopefully never support this.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@59460 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
function call created in response to the use of operator syntax that
resolves to an overloaded operator in C++, e.g., "str1 +
str2" that resolves to std::operator+(str1, str2)". We now build a
CXXOperatorCallExpr in C++ when we pick an overloaded operator. (But
only for binary operators, where we actually implement overloading)
I decided *not* to refactor the current CallExpr to make it abstract
(with FunctionCallExpr and CXXOperatorCallExpr as derived
classes). Doing so would allow us to make CXXOperatorCallExpr a little
bit smaller, at the cost of making the argument and callee accessors
virtual. We won't know if this is going to be a win until we can parse
lots of C++ code to determine how much memory we'll save by making
this change vs. the performance penalty due to the extra virtual
calls.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@59306 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
some more bullet-proofing/enhancements for tryEvaluate. This shouldn't
cause any behavior changes except for handling cases where we were
crashing before and being able to evaluate a few more cases in tryEvaluate.
This should settle the minor mess surrounding r59196.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@59224 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
little rude; I figure it's cleaner to just back this out now so
it doesn't get forgotten or mixed up with other checkins.
The modification to isICE is simply wrong; I've added a test that the
change to isICE breaks.
I'm pretty sure the modification to tryEvaluate is also wrong.
At the very least, there's some serious miscommunication going on here,
as this is going in exactly the opposite direction of r59105. My
understanding is that tryEvaluate is not supposed to care about side
effects. That said, a lot of the clients to tryEvaluate are
expecting it to enforce a no-side-effects policy, so we probably need
another method that provides that guarantee.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@59212 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
- Evaluation of , operator used bogus assumption that LHS could be
evaluated as an integral expression even though its type is
unspecified.
This change is making isICE very permissive of the LHS in non-evaluated
contexts because it is not clear what predicate we would use to reject
code here. The standard didn't offer me any guidance; opinions?
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@59196 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
functions for built-in operators, e.g., the builtin
bool operator==(int const*, int const*)
can be used for the expression "x1 == x2" given:
struct X {
operator int const*();
} x1, x2;
The scheme for handling these built-in operators is relatively simple:
for each candidate required by the standard, create a special kind of
candidate function for the built-in. If overload resolution picks the
built-in operator, we perform the appropriate conversions on the
arguments and then let the normal built-in operator take care of it.
There may be some optimization opportunity left: if we can reduce the
number of built-in operator overloads we generate, overload resolution
for these cases will go faster. However, one must be careful when
doing this: GCC generates too few operator overloads in our little
test program, and fails to compile it because none of the overloads it
generates match.
Note that we only support operator overload for non-member binary
operators at the moment. The other operators will follow.
As part of this change, ImplicitCastExpr can now be an lvalue.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@59148 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
of copy initialization. Other pieces of the puzzle:
- Try/Perform-ImplicitConversion now handles implicit conversions
that don't involve references.
- Try/Perform-CopyInitialization uses
CheckSingleAssignmentConstraints for C. PerformCopyInitialization
is now used for all argument passing and returning values from a
function.
- Diagnose errors with declaring references and const values without
an initializer. (Uses a new Action callback, ActOnUninitializedDecl).
We do not yet have implicit conversion sequences for reference
binding, which means that we don't have any overloading support for
reference parameters yet.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@58353 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Eli Friedman
Douglas Gregor
Nate Begeman
Fariborz Jahanian
Sebastian Redl
Anders Carlsson
Chris Lattner
Daniel Dunbar