6052f2b396
I noticed that we're using a homegrown package for assertions. The functions are extremely similar to testify, but with enough slight differences to be confusing (for example, Equal takes its arguments in a different order). We already vendor testify, and it's used in a few places by tests. I also found some problems with pkg/testutil/assert. For example, the NotNil function seems to be broken. It checks the argument against "nil", which only works for an interface. If you pass in a nil map or slice, the equality check will fail. In the interest of avoiding NIH, I'm proposing replacing pkg/testutil/assert with testify. The test code looks almost the same, but we avoid the confusion of having two similar but slightly different assertion packages, and having to maintain our own package instead of using a commonly-used one. In the process, I found a few places where the tests should halt if an assertion fails, so I've made those cases (that I noticed) use "require" instead of "assert", and I've vendored the "require" package from testify alongside the already-present "assert" package. Signed-off-by: Aaron Lehmann <aaron.lehmann@docker.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
aaparser | ||
archive | ||
authorization | ||
broadcaster | ||
chrootarchive | ||
devicemapper | ||
directory | ||
discovery | ||
filenotify | ||
fileutils | ||
fsutils | ||
gitutils | ||
homedir | ||
httputils | ||
idtools | ||
ioutils | ||
jsonlog | ||
jsonmessage | ||
listeners | ||
locker | ||
longpath | ||
loopback | ||
mount | ||
namesgenerator | ||
parsers | ||
pidfile | ||
platform | ||
plugingetter | ||
plugins | ||
pools | ||
progress | ||
promise | ||
pubsub | ||
random | ||
reexec | ||
registrar | ||
signal | ||
stdcopy | ||
streamformatter | ||
stringid | ||
stringutils | ||
symlink | ||
sysinfo | ||
system | ||
tailfile | ||
tarsum | ||
templates | ||
term | ||
testutil | ||
tlsconfig | ||
truncindex | ||
urlutil | ||
useragent | ||
README.md |
README.md
pkg/ is a collection of utility packages used by the Docker project without being specific to its internals.
Utility packages are kept separate from the docker core codebase to keep it as small and concise as possible. If some utilities grow larger and their APIs stabilize, they may be moved to their own repository under the Docker organization, to facilitate re-use by other projects. However that is not the priority.
The directory pkg
is named after the same directory in the camlistore project. Since Brad is a core
Go maintainer, we thought it made sense to copy his methods for organizing Go code :) Thanks Brad!
Because utility packages are small and neatly separated from the rest of the codebase, they are a good place to start for aspiring maintainers and contributors. Get in touch if you want to help maintain them!