2019-10-11 14:22:24 +03:00
|
|
|
# Git for Windows Code of Conduct
|
add a Code of Conduct document
We've never had a formally written Code of Conduct document. Though it
has been discussed off and on over the years, for the most part the
behavior on the mailing list has been good enough that nobody felt the
need to push one forward.
However, even if there aren't specific problems now, it's a good idea to
have a document:
- it puts everybody on the same page with respect to expectations.
This might avoid poor behavior, but also makes it easier to handle
it if it does happen.
- it publicly advertises that good conduct is important to us and will
be enforced, which may make some people more comfortable with
joining our community
- it may be a good time to cement our expectations when things are
quiet, since it gives everybody some distance rather than focusing
on a current contentious issue
This patch adapts the Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct. As opposed
to writing our own from scratch, this uses common and well-accepted
language, and strikes a good balance between illustrating expectations
and avoiding a laundry list of behaviors. It's also the same document
used by the Git for Windows project.
The text is taken mostly verbatim from:
https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4/code-of-conduct.html
I also stole a very nice introductory paragraph from the Git for Windows
version of the file.
There are a few subtle points, though:
- the document refers to "the project maintainers". For the code, we
generally only consider there to be one maintainer: Junio C Hamano.
But for dealing with community issues, it makes sense to involve
more people to spread the responsibility. I've listed the project
committee address of git@sfconservancy.org as the contact point.
- the document mentions banning from the community, both in the intro
paragraph and in "Our Responsibilities". The exact mechanism here is
left vague. I can imagine it might start with social enforcement
(not accepting patches, ignoring emails) and could escalate to
technical measures if necessary (asking vger admins to block an
address). It probably make sense _not_ to get too specific at this
point, and deal with specifics as they come up.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Acked-by: CB Bailey <cb@hashpling.org>
Acked-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Acked-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
Acked-by: Garima Singh <garimasigit@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Acked-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Acked-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com>
Acked-by: William Baker <williamtbakeremail@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-09-24 09:44:54 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This code of conduct outlines our expectations for participants within
|
2019-10-11 14:22:24 +03:00
|
|
|
the **Git for Windows** community, as well as steps for reporting unacceptable
|
|
|
|
|
behavior. We are committed to providing a welcoming and inspiring community
|
|
|
|
|
for all and expect our code of conduct to be honored. Anyone who violates
|
add a Code of Conduct document
We've never had a formally written Code of Conduct document. Though it
has been discussed off and on over the years, for the most part the
behavior on the mailing list has been good enough that nobody felt the
need to push one forward.
However, even if there aren't specific problems now, it's a good idea to
have a document:
- it puts everybody on the same page with respect to expectations.
This might avoid poor behavior, but also makes it easier to handle
it if it does happen.
- it publicly advertises that good conduct is important to us and will
be enforced, which may make some people more comfortable with
joining our community
- it may be a good time to cement our expectations when things are
quiet, since it gives everybody some distance rather than focusing
on a current contentious issue
This patch adapts the Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct. As opposed
to writing our own from scratch, this uses common and well-accepted
language, and strikes a good balance between illustrating expectations
and avoiding a laundry list of behaviors. It's also the same document
used by the Git for Windows project.
The text is taken mostly verbatim from:
https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4/code-of-conduct.html
I also stole a very nice introductory paragraph from the Git for Windows
version of the file.
There are a few subtle points, though:
- the document refers to "the project maintainers". For the code, we
generally only consider there to be one maintainer: Junio C Hamano.
But for dealing with community issues, it makes sense to involve
more people to spread the responsibility. I've listed the project
committee address of git@sfconservancy.org as the contact point.
- the document mentions banning from the community, both in the intro
paragraph and in "Our Responsibilities". The exact mechanism here is
left vague. I can imagine it might start with social enforcement
(not accepting patches, ignoring emails) and could escalate to
technical measures if necessary (asking vger admins to block an
address). It probably make sense _not_ to get too specific at this
point, and deal with specifics as they come up.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Acked-by: CB Bailey <cb@hashpling.org>
Acked-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Acked-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
Acked-by: Garima Singh <garimasigit@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Acked-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Acked-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com>
Acked-by: William Baker <williamtbakeremail@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-09-24 09:44:54 +03:00
|
|
|
this code of conduct may be banned from the community.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Our Pledge
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-12-28 20:17:34 +03:00
|
|
|
We as members, contributors, and leaders pledge to make participation in our
|
|
|
|
|
community a harassment-free experience for everyone, regardless of age, body
|
|
|
|
|
size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender
|
|
|
|
|
identity and expression, level of experience, education, socio-economic status,
|
|
|
|
|
nationality, personal appearance, race, religion, or sexual identity
|
|
|
|
|
and orientation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We pledge to act and interact in ways that contribute to an open, welcoming,
|
|
|
|
|
diverse, inclusive, and healthy community.
|
add a Code of Conduct document
We've never had a formally written Code of Conduct document. Though it
has been discussed off and on over the years, for the most part the
behavior on the mailing list has been good enough that nobody felt the
need to push one forward.
However, even if there aren't specific problems now, it's a good idea to
have a document:
- it puts everybody on the same page with respect to expectations.
This might avoid poor behavior, but also makes it easier to handle
it if it does happen.
- it publicly advertises that good conduct is important to us and will
be enforced, which may make some people more comfortable with
joining our community
- it may be a good time to cement our expectations when things are
quiet, since it gives everybody some distance rather than focusing
on a current contentious issue
This patch adapts the Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct. As opposed
to writing our own from scratch, this uses common and well-accepted
language, and strikes a good balance between illustrating expectations
and avoiding a laundry list of behaviors. It's also the same document
used by the Git for Windows project.
The text is taken mostly verbatim from:
https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4/code-of-conduct.html
I also stole a very nice introductory paragraph from the Git for Windows
version of the file.
There are a few subtle points, though:
- the document refers to "the project maintainers". For the code, we
generally only consider there to be one maintainer: Junio C Hamano.
But for dealing with community issues, it makes sense to involve
more people to spread the responsibility. I've listed the project
committee address of git@sfconservancy.org as the contact point.
- the document mentions banning from the community, both in the intro
paragraph and in "Our Responsibilities". The exact mechanism here is
left vague. I can imagine it might start with social enforcement
(not accepting patches, ignoring emails) and could escalate to
technical measures if necessary (asking vger admins to block an
address). It probably make sense _not_ to get too specific at this
point, and deal with specifics as they come up.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Acked-by: CB Bailey <cb@hashpling.org>
Acked-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Acked-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
Acked-by: Garima Singh <garimasigit@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Acked-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Acked-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com>
Acked-by: William Baker <williamtbakeremail@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-09-24 09:44:54 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Our Standards
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-12-28 20:17:34 +03:00
|
|
|
Examples of behavior that contributes to a positive environment for our
|
|
|
|
|
community include:
|
add a Code of Conduct document
We've never had a formally written Code of Conduct document. Though it
has been discussed off and on over the years, for the most part the
behavior on the mailing list has been good enough that nobody felt the
need to push one forward.
However, even if there aren't specific problems now, it's a good idea to
have a document:
- it puts everybody on the same page with respect to expectations.
This might avoid poor behavior, but also makes it easier to handle
it if it does happen.
- it publicly advertises that good conduct is important to us and will
be enforced, which may make some people more comfortable with
joining our community
- it may be a good time to cement our expectations when things are
quiet, since it gives everybody some distance rather than focusing
on a current contentious issue
This patch adapts the Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct. As opposed
to writing our own from scratch, this uses common and well-accepted
language, and strikes a good balance between illustrating expectations
and avoiding a laundry list of behaviors. It's also the same document
used by the Git for Windows project.
The text is taken mostly verbatim from:
https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4/code-of-conduct.html
I also stole a very nice introductory paragraph from the Git for Windows
version of the file.
There are a few subtle points, though:
- the document refers to "the project maintainers". For the code, we
generally only consider there to be one maintainer: Junio C Hamano.
But for dealing with community issues, it makes sense to involve
more people to spread the responsibility. I've listed the project
committee address of git@sfconservancy.org as the contact point.
- the document mentions banning from the community, both in the intro
paragraph and in "Our Responsibilities". The exact mechanism here is
left vague. I can imagine it might start with social enforcement
(not accepting patches, ignoring emails) and could escalate to
technical measures if necessary (asking vger admins to block an
address). It probably make sense _not_ to get too specific at this
point, and deal with specifics as they come up.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Acked-by: CB Bailey <cb@hashpling.org>
Acked-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Acked-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
Acked-by: Garima Singh <garimasigit@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Acked-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Acked-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com>
Acked-by: William Baker <williamtbakeremail@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-09-24 09:44:54 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2020-12-28 20:17:34 +03:00
|
|
|
* Demonstrating empathy and kindness toward other people
|
|
|
|
|
* Being respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences
|
|
|
|
|
* Giving and gracefully accepting constructive feedback
|
|
|
|
|
* Accepting responsibility and apologizing to those affected by our mistakes,
|
|
|
|
|
and learning from the experience
|
|
|
|
|
* Focusing on what is best not just for us as individuals, but for the
|
|
|
|
|
overall community
|
add a Code of Conduct document
We've never had a formally written Code of Conduct document. Though it
has been discussed off and on over the years, for the most part the
behavior on the mailing list has been good enough that nobody felt the
need to push one forward.
However, even if there aren't specific problems now, it's a good idea to
have a document:
- it puts everybody on the same page with respect to expectations.
This might avoid poor behavior, but also makes it easier to handle
it if it does happen.
- it publicly advertises that good conduct is important to us and will
be enforced, which may make some people more comfortable with
joining our community
- it may be a good time to cement our expectations when things are
quiet, since it gives everybody some distance rather than focusing
on a current contentious issue
This patch adapts the Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct. As opposed
to writing our own from scratch, this uses common and well-accepted
language, and strikes a good balance between illustrating expectations
and avoiding a laundry list of behaviors. It's also the same document
used by the Git for Windows project.
The text is taken mostly verbatim from:
https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4/code-of-conduct.html
I also stole a very nice introductory paragraph from the Git for Windows
version of the file.
There are a few subtle points, though:
- the document refers to "the project maintainers". For the code, we
generally only consider there to be one maintainer: Junio C Hamano.
But for dealing with community issues, it makes sense to involve
more people to spread the responsibility. I've listed the project
committee address of git@sfconservancy.org as the contact point.
- the document mentions banning from the community, both in the intro
paragraph and in "Our Responsibilities". The exact mechanism here is
left vague. I can imagine it might start with social enforcement
(not accepting patches, ignoring emails) and could escalate to
technical measures if necessary (asking vger admins to block an
address). It probably make sense _not_ to get too specific at this
point, and deal with specifics as they come up.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Acked-by: CB Bailey <cb@hashpling.org>
Acked-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Acked-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
Acked-by: Garima Singh <garimasigit@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Acked-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Acked-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com>
Acked-by: William Baker <williamtbakeremail@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-09-24 09:44:54 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2020-12-28 20:17:34 +03:00
|
|
|
Examples of unacceptable behavior include:
|
add a Code of Conduct document
We've never had a formally written Code of Conduct document. Though it
has been discussed off and on over the years, for the most part the
behavior on the mailing list has been good enough that nobody felt the
need to push one forward.
However, even if there aren't specific problems now, it's a good idea to
have a document:
- it puts everybody on the same page with respect to expectations.
This might avoid poor behavior, but also makes it easier to handle
it if it does happen.
- it publicly advertises that good conduct is important to us and will
be enforced, which may make some people more comfortable with
joining our community
- it may be a good time to cement our expectations when things are
quiet, since it gives everybody some distance rather than focusing
on a current contentious issue
This patch adapts the Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct. As opposed
to writing our own from scratch, this uses common and well-accepted
language, and strikes a good balance between illustrating expectations
and avoiding a laundry list of behaviors. It's also the same document
used by the Git for Windows project.
The text is taken mostly verbatim from:
https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4/code-of-conduct.html
I also stole a very nice introductory paragraph from the Git for Windows
version of the file.
There are a few subtle points, though:
- the document refers to "the project maintainers". For the code, we
generally only consider there to be one maintainer: Junio C Hamano.
But for dealing with community issues, it makes sense to involve
more people to spread the responsibility. I've listed the project
committee address of git@sfconservancy.org as the contact point.
- the document mentions banning from the community, both in the intro
paragraph and in "Our Responsibilities". The exact mechanism here is
left vague. I can imagine it might start with social enforcement
(not accepting patches, ignoring emails) and could escalate to
technical measures if necessary (asking vger admins to block an
address). It probably make sense _not_ to get too specific at this
point, and deal with specifics as they come up.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Acked-by: CB Bailey <cb@hashpling.org>
Acked-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Acked-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
Acked-by: Garima Singh <garimasigit@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Acked-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Acked-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com>
Acked-by: William Baker <williamtbakeremail@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-09-24 09:44:54 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2020-12-28 20:17:34 +03:00
|
|
|
* The use of sexualized language or imagery, and sexual attention or
|
|
|
|
|
advances of any kind
|
|
|
|
|
* Trolling, insulting or derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks
|
add a Code of Conduct document
We've never had a formally written Code of Conduct document. Though it
has been discussed off and on over the years, for the most part the
behavior on the mailing list has been good enough that nobody felt the
need to push one forward.
However, even if there aren't specific problems now, it's a good idea to
have a document:
- it puts everybody on the same page with respect to expectations.
This might avoid poor behavior, but also makes it easier to handle
it if it does happen.
- it publicly advertises that good conduct is important to us and will
be enforced, which may make some people more comfortable with
joining our community
- it may be a good time to cement our expectations when things are
quiet, since it gives everybody some distance rather than focusing
on a current contentious issue
This patch adapts the Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct. As opposed
to writing our own from scratch, this uses common and well-accepted
language, and strikes a good balance between illustrating expectations
and avoiding a laundry list of behaviors. It's also the same document
used by the Git for Windows project.
The text is taken mostly verbatim from:
https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4/code-of-conduct.html
I also stole a very nice introductory paragraph from the Git for Windows
version of the file.
There are a few subtle points, though:
- the document refers to "the project maintainers". For the code, we
generally only consider there to be one maintainer: Junio C Hamano.
But for dealing with community issues, it makes sense to involve
more people to spread the responsibility. I've listed the project
committee address of git@sfconservancy.org as the contact point.
- the document mentions banning from the community, both in the intro
paragraph and in "Our Responsibilities". The exact mechanism here is
left vague. I can imagine it might start with social enforcement
(not accepting patches, ignoring emails) and could escalate to
technical measures if necessary (asking vger admins to block an
address). It probably make sense _not_ to get too specific at this
point, and deal with specifics as they come up.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Acked-by: CB Bailey <cb@hashpling.org>
Acked-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Acked-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
Acked-by: Garima Singh <garimasigit@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Acked-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Acked-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com>
Acked-by: William Baker <williamtbakeremail@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-09-24 09:44:54 +03:00
|
|
|
* Public or private harassment
|
2020-12-28 20:17:34 +03:00
|
|
|
* Publishing others' private information, such as a physical or email
|
|
|
|
|
address, without their explicit permission
|
add a Code of Conduct document
We've never had a formally written Code of Conduct document. Though it
has been discussed off and on over the years, for the most part the
behavior on the mailing list has been good enough that nobody felt the
need to push one forward.
However, even if there aren't specific problems now, it's a good idea to
have a document:
- it puts everybody on the same page with respect to expectations.
This might avoid poor behavior, but also makes it easier to handle
it if it does happen.
- it publicly advertises that good conduct is important to us and will
be enforced, which may make some people more comfortable with
joining our community
- it may be a good time to cement our expectations when things are
quiet, since it gives everybody some distance rather than focusing
on a current contentious issue
This patch adapts the Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct. As opposed
to writing our own from scratch, this uses common and well-accepted
language, and strikes a good balance between illustrating expectations
and avoiding a laundry list of behaviors. It's also the same document
used by the Git for Windows project.
The text is taken mostly verbatim from:
https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4/code-of-conduct.html
I also stole a very nice introductory paragraph from the Git for Windows
version of the file.
There are a few subtle points, though:
- the document refers to "the project maintainers". For the code, we
generally only consider there to be one maintainer: Junio C Hamano.
But for dealing with community issues, it makes sense to involve
more people to spread the responsibility. I've listed the project
committee address of git@sfconservancy.org as the contact point.
- the document mentions banning from the community, both in the intro
paragraph and in "Our Responsibilities". The exact mechanism here is
left vague. I can imagine it might start with social enforcement
(not accepting patches, ignoring emails) and could escalate to
technical measures if necessary (asking vger admins to block an
address). It probably make sense _not_ to get too specific at this
point, and deal with specifics as they come up.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Acked-by: CB Bailey <cb@hashpling.org>
Acked-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Acked-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
Acked-by: Garima Singh <garimasigit@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Acked-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Acked-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com>
Acked-by: William Baker <williamtbakeremail@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-09-24 09:44:54 +03:00
|
|
|
* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a
|
|
|
|
|
professional setting
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-12-28 20:17:34 +03:00
|
|
|
## Enforcement Responsibilities
|
add a Code of Conduct document
We've never had a formally written Code of Conduct document. Though it
has been discussed off and on over the years, for the most part the
behavior on the mailing list has been good enough that nobody felt the
need to push one forward.
However, even if there aren't specific problems now, it's a good idea to
have a document:
- it puts everybody on the same page with respect to expectations.
This might avoid poor behavior, but also makes it easier to handle
it if it does happen.
- it publicly advertises that good conduct is important to us and will
be enforced, which may make some people more comfortable with
joining our community
- it may be a good time to cement our expectations when things are
quiet, since it gives everybody some distance rather than focusing
on a current contentious issue
This patch adapts the Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct. As opposed
to writing our own from scratch, this uses common and well-accepted
language, and strikes a good balance between illustrating expectations
and avoiding a laundry list of behaviors. It's also the same document
used by the Git for Windows project.
The text is taken mostly verbatim from:
https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4/code-of-conduct.html
I also stole a very nice introductory paragraph from the Git for Windows
version of the file.
There are a few subtle points, though:
- the document refers to "the project maintainers". For the code, we
generally only consider there to be one maintainer: Junio C Hamano.
But for dealing with community issues, it makes sense to involve
more people to spread the responsibility. I've listed the project
committee address of git@sfconservancy.org as the contact point.
- the document mentions banning from the community, both in the intro
paragraph and in "Our Responsibilities". The exact mechanism here is
left vague. I can imagine it might start with social enforcement
(not accepting patches, ignoring emails) and could escalate to
technical measures if necessary (asking vger admins to block an
address). It probably make sense _not_ to get too specific at this
point, and deal with specifics as they come up.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Acked-by: CB Bailey <cb@hashpling.org>
Acked-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Acked-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
Acked-by: Garima Singh <garimasigit@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Acked-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Acked-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com>
Acked-by: William Baker <williamtbakeremail@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-09-24 09:44:54 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2020-12-28 20:17:34 +03:00
|
|
|
Community leaders are responsible for clarifying and enforcing our standards of
|
|
|
|
|
acceptable behavior and will take appropriate and fair corrective action in
|
|
|
|
|
response to any behavior that they deem inappropriate, threatening, offensive,
|
|
|
|
|
or harmful.
|
add a Code of Conduct document
We've never had a formally written Code of Conduct document. Though it
has been discussed off and on over the years, for the most part the
behavior on the mailing list has been good enough that nobody felt the
need to push one forward.
However, even if there aren't specific problems now, it's a good idea to
have a document:
- it puts everybody on the same page with respect to expectations.
This might avoid poor behavior, but also makes it easier to handle
it if it does happen.
- it publicly advertises that good conduct is important to us and will
be enforced, which may make some people more comfortable with
joining our community
- it may be a good time to cement our expectations when things are
quiet, since it gives everybody some distance rather than focusing
on a current contentious issue
This patch adapts the Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct. As opposed
to writing our own from scratch, this uses common and well-accepted
language, and strikes a good balance between illustrating expectations
and avoiding a laundry list of behaviors. It's also the same document
used by the Git for Windows project.
The text is taken mostly verbatim from:
https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4/code-of-conduct.html
I also stole a very nice introductory paragraph from the Git for Windows
version of the file.
There are a few subtle points, though:
- the document refers to "the project maintainers". For the code, we
generally only consider there to be one maintainer: Junio C Hamano.
But for dealing with community issues, it makes sense to involve
more people to spread the responsibility. I've listed the project
committee address of git@sfconservancy.org as the contact point.
- the document mentions banning from the community, both in the intro
paragraph and in "Our Responsibilities". The exact mechanism here is
left vague. I can imagine it might start with social enforcement
(not accepting patches, ignoring emails) and could escalate to
technical measures if necessary (asking vger admins to block an
address). It probably make sense _not_ to get too specific at this
point, and deal with specifics as they come up.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Acked-by: CB Bailey <cb@hashpling.org>
Acked-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Acked-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
Acked-by: Garima Singh <garimasigit@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Acked-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Acked-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com>
Acked-by: William Baker <williamtbakeremail@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-09-24 09:44:54 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2020-12-28 20:17:34 +03:00
|
|
|
Community leaders have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or reject
|
|
|
|
|
comments, commits, code, wiki edits, issues, and other contributions that are
|
|
|
|
|
not aligned to this Code of Conduct, and will communicate reasons for moderation
|
|
|
|
|
decisions when appropriate.
|
add a Code of Conduct document
We've never had a formally written Code of Conduct document. Though it
has been discussed off and on over the years, for the most part the
behavior on the mailing list has been good enough that nobody felt the
need to push one forward.
However, even if there aren't specific problems now, it's a good idea to
have a document:
- it puts everybody on the same page with respect to expectations.
This might avoid poor behavior, but also makes it easier to handle
it if it does happen.
- it publicly advertises that good conduct is important to us and will
be enforced, which may make some people more comfortable with
joining our community
- it may be a good time to cement our expectations when things are
quiet, since it gives everybody some distance rather than focusing
on a current contentious issue
This patch adapts the Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct. As opposed
to writing our own from scratch, this uses common and well-accepted
language, and strikes a good balance between illustrating expectations
and avoiding a laundry list of behaviors. It's also the same document
used by the Git for Windows project.
The text is taken mostly verbatim from:
https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4/code-of-conduct.html
I also stole a very nice introductory paragraph from the Git for Windows
version of the file.
There are a few subtle points, though:
- the document refers to "the project maintainers". For the code, we
generally only consider there to be one maintainer: Junio C Hamano.
But for dealing with community issues, it makes sense to involve
more people to spread the responsibility. I've listed the project
committee address of git@sfconservancy.org as the contact point.
- the document mentions banning from the community, both in the intro
paragraph and in "Our Responsibilities". The exact mechanism here is
left vague. I can imagine it might start with social enforcement
(not accepting patches, ignoring emails) and could escalate to
technical measures if necessary (asking vger admins to block an
address). It probably make sense _not_ to get too specific at this
point, and deal with specifics as they come up.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Acked-by: CB Bailey <cb@hashpling.org>
Acked-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Acked-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
Acked-by: Garima Singh <garimasigit@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Acked-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Acked-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com>
Acked-by: William Baker <williamtbakeremail@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-09-24 09:44:54 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Scope
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-12-28 20:17:34 +03:00
|
|
|
This Code of Conduct applies within all community spaces, and also applies when
|
|
|
|
|
an individual is officially representing the community in public spaces.
|
|
|
|
|
Examples of representing our community include using an official e-mail address,
|
|
|
|
|
posting via an official social media account, or acting as an appointed
|
|
|
|
|
representative at an online or offline event.
|
add a Code of Conduct document
We've never had a formally written Code of Conduct document. Though it
has been discussed off and on over the years, for the most part the
behavior on the mailing list has been good enough that nobody felt the
need to push one forward.
However, even if there aren't specific problems now, it's a good idea to
have a document:
- it puts everybody on the same page with respect to expectations.
This might avoid poor behavior, but also makes it easier to handle
it if it does happen.
- it publicly advertises that good conduct is important to us and will
be enforced, which may make some people more comfortable with
joining our community
- it may be a good time to cement our expectations when things are
quiet, since it gives everybody some distance rather than focusing
on a current contentious issue
This patch adapts the Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct. As opposed
to writing our own from scratch, this uses common and well-accepted
language, and strikes a good balance between illustrating expectations
and avoiding a laundry list of behaviors. It's also the same document
used by the Git for Windows project.
The text is taken mostly verbatim from:
https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4/code-of-conduct.html
I also stole a very nice introductory paragraph from the Git for Windows
version of the file.
There are a few subtle points, though:
- the document refers to "the project maintainers". For the code, we
generally only consider there to be one maintainer: Junio C Hamano.
But for dealing with community issues, it makes sense to involve
more people to spread the responsibility. I've listed the project
committee address of git@sfconservancy.org as the contact point.
- the document mentions banning from the community, both in the intro
paragraph and in "Our Responsibilities". The exact mechanism here is
left vague. I can imagine it might start with social enforcement
(not accepting patches, ignoring emails) and could escalate to
technical measures if necessary (asking vger admins to block an
address). It probably make sense _not_ to get too specific at this
point, and deal with specifics as they come up.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Acked-by: CB Bailey <cb@hashpling.org>
Acked-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Acked-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
Acked-by: Garima Singh <garimasigit@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Acked-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Acked-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com>
Acked-by: William Baker <williamtbakeremail@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-09-24 09:44:54 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Enforcement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
|
2019-10-11 14:22:24 +03:00
|
|
|
reported by contacting the Git for Windows maintainer or the community leaders
|
|
|
|
|
responsible for enforcement at git@sfconservancy.org, or individually:
|
2019-09-26 10:20:46 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
- Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
- Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
2022-02-18 22:07:50 +03:00
|
|
|
- Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
|
2019-09-26 10:20:46 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2020-12-28 20:17:34 +03:00
|
|
|
All complaints will be reviewed and investigated promptly and fairly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All community leaders are obligated to respect the privacy and security of the
|
|
|
|
|
reporter of any incident.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Enforcement Guidelines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community leaders will follow these Community Impact Guidelines in determining
|
|
|
|
|
the consequences for any action they deem in violation of this Code of Conduct:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 1. Correction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Community Impact**: Use of inappropriate language or other behavior deemed
|
|
|
|
|
unprofessional or unwelcome in the community.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Consequence**: A private, written warning from community leaders, providing
|
|
|
|
|
clarity around the nature of the violation and an explanation of why the
|
|
|
|
|
behavior was inappropriate. A public apology may be requested.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 2. Warning
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Community Impact**: A violation through a single incident or series
|
|
|
|
|
of actions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Consequence**: A warning with consequences for continued behavior. No
|
|
|
|
|
interaction with the people involved, including unsolicited interaction with
|
|
|
|
|
those enforcing the Code of Conduct, for a specified period of time. This
|
|
|
|
|
includes avoiding interactions in community spaces as well as external channels
|
|
|
|
|
like social media. Violating these terms may lead to a temporary or
|
|
|
|
|
permanent ban.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 3. Temporary Ban
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Community Impact**: A serious violation of community standards, including
|
|
|
|
|
sustained inappropriate behavior.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Consequence**: A temporary ban from any sort of interaction or public
|
|
|
|
|
communication with the community for a specified period of time. No public or
|
|
|
|
|
private interaction with the people involved, including unsolicited interaction
|
|
|
|
|
with those enforcing the Code of Conduct, is allowed during this period.
|
|
|
|
|
Violating these terms may lead to a permanent ban.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 4. Permanent Ban
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Community Impact**: Demonstrating a pattern of violation of community
|
|
|
|
|
standards, including sustained inappropriate behavior, harassment of an
|
|
|
|
|
individual, or aggression toward or disparagement of classes of individuals.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Consequence**: A permanent ban from any sort of public interaction within
|
|
|
|
|
the community.
|
|
|
|
|
|
add a Code of Conduct document
We've never had a formally written Code of Conduct document. Though it
has been discussed off and on over the years, for the most part the
behavior on the mailing list has been good enough that nobody felt the
need to push one forward.
However, even if there aren't specific problems now, it's a good idea to
have a document:
- it puts everybody on the same page with respect to expectations.
This might avoid poor behavior, but also makes it easier to handle
it if it does happen.
- it publicly advertises that good conduct is important to us and will
be enforced, which may make some people more comfortable with
joining our community
- it may be a good time to cement our expectations when things are
quiet, since it gives everybody some distance rather than focusing
on a current contentious issue
This patch adapts the Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct. As opposed
to writing our own from scratch, this uses common and well-accepted
language, and strikes a good balance between illustrating expectations
and avoiding a laundry list of behaviors. It's also the same document
used by the Git for Windows project.
The text is taken mostly verbatim from:
https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4/code-of-conduct.html
I also stole a very nice introductory paragraph from the Git for Windows
version of the file.
There are a few subtle points, though:
- the document refers to "the project maintainers". For the code, we
generally only consider there to be one maintainer: Junio C Hamano.
But for dealing with community issues, it makes sense to involve
more people to spread the responsibility. I've listed the project
committee address of git@sfconservancy.org as the contact point.
- the document mentions banning from the community, both in the intro
paragraph and in "Our Responsibilities". The exact mechanism here is
left vague. I can imagine it might start with social enforcement
(not accepting patches, ignoring emails) and could escalate to
technical measures if necessary (asking vger admins to block an
address). It probably make sense _not_ to get too specific at this
point, and deal with specifics as they come up.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Acked-by: CB Bailey <cb@hashpling.org>
Acked-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Acked-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
Acked-by: Garima Singh <garimasigit@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Acked-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Acked-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com>
Acked-by: William Baker <williamtbakeremail@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-09-24 09:44:54 +03:00
|
|
|
## Attribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-12-28 20:17:34 +03:00
|
|
|
This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage],
|
|
|
|
|
version 2.0, available at
|
|
|
|
|
[https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/2/0/code_of_conduct.html][v2.0].
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community Impact Guidelines were inspired by
|
|
|
|
|
[Mozilla's code of conduct enforcement ladder][Mozilla CoC].
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For answers to common questions about this code of conduct, see the FAQ at
|
|
|
|
|
[https://www.contributor-covenant.org/faq][FAQ]. Translations are available
|
|
|
|
|
at [https://www.contributor-covenant.org/translations][translations].
|
add a Code of Conduct document
We've never had a formally written Code of Conduct document. Though it
has been discussed off and on over the years, for the most part the
behavior on the mailing list has been good enough that nobody felt the
need to push one forward.
However, even if there aren't specific problems now, it's a good idea to
have a document:
- it puts everybody on the same page with respect to expectations.
This might avoid poor behavior, but also makes it easier to handle
it if it does happen.
- it publicly advertises that good conduct is important to us and will
be enforced, which may make some people more comfortable with
joining our community
- it may be a good time to cement our expectations when things are
quiet, since it gives everybody some distance rather than focusing
on a current contentious issue
This patch adapts the Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct. As opposed
to writing our own from scratch, this uses common and well-accepted
language, and strikes a good balance between illustrating expectations
and avoiding a laundry list of behaviors. It's also the same document
used by the Git for Windows project.
The text is taken mostly verbatim from:
https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4/code-of-conduct.html
I also stole a very nice introductory paragraph from the Git for Windows
version of the file.
There are a few subtle points, though:
- the document refers to "the project maintainers". For the code, we
generally only consider there to be one maintainer: Junio C Hamano.
But for dealing with community issues, it makes sense to involve
more people to spread the responsibility. I've listed the project
committee address of git@sfconservancy.org as the contact point.
- the document mentions banning from the community, both in the intro
paragraph and in "Our Responsibilities". The exact mechanism here is
left vague. I can imagine it might start with social enforcement
(not accepting patches, ignoring emails) and could escalate to
technical measures if necessary (asking vger admins to block an
address). It probably make sense _not_ to get too specific at this
point, and deal with specifics as they come up.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Acked-by: CB Bailey <cb@hashpling.org>
Acked-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Acked-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
Acked-by: Garima Singh <garimasigit@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Acked-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Acked-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com>
Acked-by: William Baker <williamtbakeremail@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-09-24 09:44:54 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[homepage]: https://www.contributor-covenant.org
|
2020-12-28 20:17:34 +03:00
|
|
|
[v2.0]: https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/2/0/code_of_conduct.html
|
|
|
|
|
[Mozilla CoC]: https://github.com/mozilla/diversity
|
|
|
|
|
[FAQ]: https://www.contributor-covenant.org/faq
|
|
|
|
|
[translations]: https://www.contributor-covenant.org/translations
|
add a Code of Conduct document
We've never had a formally written Code of Conduct document. Though it
has been discussed off and on over the years, for the most part the
behavior on the mailing list has been good enough that nobody felt the
need to push one forward.
However, even if there aren't specific problems now, it's a good idea to
have a document:
- it puts everybody on the same page with respect to expectations.
This might avoid poor behavior, but also makes it easier to handle
it if it does happen.
- it publicly advertises that good conduct is important to us and will
be enforced, which may make some people more comfortable with
joining our community
- it may be a good time to cement our expectations when things are
quiet, since it gives everybody some distance rather than focusing
on a current contentious issue
This patch adapts the Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct. As opposed
to writing our own from scratch, this uses common and well-accepted
language, and strikes a good balance between illustrating expectations
and avoiding a laundry list of behaviors. It's also the same document
used by the Git for Windows project.
The text is taken mostly verbatim from:
https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4/code-of-conduct.html
I also stole a very nice introductory paragraph from the Git for Windows
version of the file.
There are a few subtle points, though:
- the document refers to "the project maintainers". For the code, we
generally only consider there to be one maintainer: Junio C Hamano.
But for dealing with community issues, it makes sense to involve
more people to spread the responsibility. I've listed the project
committee address of git@sfconservancy.org as the contact point.
- the document mentions banning from the community, both in the intro
paragraph and in "Our Responsibilities". The exact mechanism here is
left vague. I can imagine it might start with social enforcement
(not accepting patches, ignoring emails) and could escalate to
technical measures if necessary (asking vger admins to block an
address). It probably make sense _not_ to get too specific at this
point, and deal with specifics as they come up.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Acked-by: CB Bailey <cb@hashpling.org>
Acked-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Acked-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
Acked-by: Garima Singh <garimasigit@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Acked-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Acked-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com>
Acked-by: William Baker <williamtbakeremail@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-09-24 09:44:54 +03:00
|
|
|
|
