git/t/t0070-fundamental.sh

111 строки
3.4 KiB
Bash
Исходник Постоянная ссылка Обычный вид История

#!/bin/sh
test_description='check that the most basic functions work
Verify wrappers and compatibility functions.
'
TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true
. ./test-lib.sh
test_expect_success 'mktemp to nonexistent directory prints filename' '
test_must_fail test-tool mktemp doesnotexist/testXXXXXX 2>err &&
grep "doesnotexist/test" err
'
test_expect_success POSIXPERM,SANITY 'mktemp to unwritable directory prints filename' '
mkdir cannotwrite &&
test_when_finished "chmod +w cannotwrite" &&
chmod -w cannotwrite &&
test_must_fail test-tool mktemp cannotwrite/testXXXXXX 2>err &&
grep "cannotwrite/test" err
'
test_expect_success 'git_mkstemps_mode does not fail if fd 0 is not open' '
git commit --allow-empty -m message <&-
'
test_expect_success 'check for a bug in the regex routines' '
# if this test fails, re-build git with NO_REGEX=1
test-tool regex --bug
'
sideband: avoid reporting incomplete sideband messages In 2b695ecd74d (t5500: count objects through stderr, not trace, 2020-05-06) we tried to ensure that the "Total 3" message could be grepped in Git's output, even if it sometimes got chopped up into multiple lines in the trace machinery. However, the first instance where this mattered now goes through the sideband machinery, where it is _still_ possible for messages to get chopped up: it *is* possible for the standard error stream to be sent byte-for-byte and hence it can be easily interrupted. Meaning: it is possible for the single line that we're looking for to be chopped up into multiple sideband packets, with a primary packet being delivered between them. This seems to happen occasionally in the `vs-test` part of our CI builds, i.e. with binaries built using Visual C, but not when building with GCC or clang; The symptom is that t5500.43 fails to find a line matching `remote: Total 3` in the `log` file, which ends in something along these lines: remote: Tota remote: l 3 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0 This should not happen, though: we have code in `demultiplex_sideband()` _specifically_ to stitch back together lines that were delivered in separate sideband packets. However, this stitching was broken in a subtle way in fbd76cd450 (sideband: reverse its dependency on pkt-line, 2019-01-16): before that change, incomplete sideband lines would not be flushed upon receiving a primary packet, but after that patch, they would be. The subtleness of this bug comes from the fact that it is easy to get confused by the ambiguous meaning of the `break` keyword: after writing the primary packet contents, the `break;` in the original version of `recv_sideband()` does _not_ break out of the `while` loop, but instead only ends the `switch` case: while (!retval) { [...] switch (band) { [...] case 1: /* Write the contents of the primary packet */ write_or_die(out, buf + 1, len); /* Here, we do *not* break out of the loop, `retval` is unchanged */ break; [...] } if (outbuf.len) { /* Write any remaining sideband messages lacking a trailing LF */ strbuf_addch(&outbuf, '\n'); xwrite(2, outbuf.buf, outbuf.len); } In contrast, after fbd76cd450 (sideband: reverse its dependency on pkt-line, 2019-01-16), the body of the `while` loop was extracted into `demultiplex_sideband()`, crucially _including_ the logic to write incomplete sideband messages: switch (band) { [...] case 1: *sideband_type = SIDEBAND_PRIMARY; /* This does not break out of the loop: the loop is in the caller */ break; [...] } cleanup: [...] /* This logic is now no longer _outside_ the loop but _inside_ */ if (scratch->len) { strbuf_addch(scratch, '\n'); xwrite(2, scratch->buf, scratch->len); } The correct way to fix this is to return from `demultiplex_sideband()` early. The caller will then write out the contents of the primary packet and continue looping. The `scratch` buffer for incomplete sideband messages is owned by that caller, and will continue to accumulate the remainder(s) of those messages. The loop will only end once `demultiplex_sideband()` returned non-zero _and_ did not indicate a primary packet, which is the case only when we hit the `cleanup:` path, in which we take care of flushing any unfinished sideband messages and release the `scratch` buffer. To ensure that this does not get broken again, we introduce a pair of subcommands of the `pkt-line` test helper that specifically chop up the sideband message and squeeze a primary packet into the middle. Final note: The other test case touched by 2b695ecd74d (t5500: count objects through stderr, not trace, 2020-05-06) is not affected by this issue because the sideband machinery is not involved there. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-10-19 22:35:40 +03:00
test_expect_success 'incomplete sideband messages are reassembled' '
test-tool pkt-line send-split-sideband >split-sideband &&
test-tool pkt-line receive-sideband <split-sideband 2>err &&
grep "Hello, world" err
'
sideband: diagnose more sideband anomalies In demultiplex_sideband(), there are two oddities when we check an incoming packet: - if it has zero length, then we assume it's a flush packet. This means we fail to notice the difference between a real flush and a true zero-length packet that's missing its sideband designator. It's not a huge problem in practice because we'd never send a zero-length data packet (even our keepalives are otherwise-empty sideband-1 packets). But it would be nice to detect and report the error, since it's likely to cause other confusion (we think the other side flushed, but they do not). - we try to detect packets missing their designator by checking for "if (len < 1)". But this will never trigger for "len == 0"; we've already detected that and left the function before then. It _could_ detect a negative "len" parameter. But in that case, the error message is wrong. The issue is not "no sideband" but rather "eof while reading the packet". However, this can't actually be triggered in practice, because neither of the two callers uses pkt_read's GENTLE_ON_EOF flag. Which means they'd die with "the remote end hung up unexpectedly" before we even get here. So this truly is dead code. We can improve these cases by passing in a pkt-line status to the demultiplexer, and by having recv_sideband() use GENTLE_ON_EOF. This gives us two improvements: - we can now reliably detect flush packets, and will report a normal packet missing its sideband designator as an error - we'll report an eof with a more detailed "protocol error: eof while reading sideband packet", rather than the generic "the remote end hung up unexpectedly" - when we see an eof, we'll flush the sideband scratch buffer, which may provide some hints from the remote about why they hung up (though note we already flush on newlines, so it's likely that most such messages already made it through) In some sense this patch goes against fbd76cd450 (sideband: reverse its dependency on pkt-line, 2019-01-16), which caused the sideband code not to depend on the pkt-line code. But that commit was really just trying to deal with the circular header dependency. The two modules are conceptually interlinked, and it was just trying to keep things compiling. And indeed, there's a sticking point in this patch: because pkt-line.h includes sideband.h, we can't add the reverse include we need for the sideband code to have an "enum packet_read_status" parameter. Nor can we forward declare it, because you can't forward declare an enum in C. However, C does guarantee that enums fit in an int, so we can just use that type. One alternative would be for the callers to check themselves that they got something sane from the pkt-line code. But besides duplicating logic, this gets quite tricky. Any error condition requires flushing the sideband #2 scratch buffer, which only demultiplex_sideband() knows how to do. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-10-28 12:33:24 +03:00
test_expect_success 'eof on sideband message is reported' '
printf 1234 >input &&
test-tool pkt-line receive-sideband <input 2>err &&
test_grep "unexpected disconnect" err
sideband: diagnose more sideband anomalies In demultiplex_sideband(), there are two oddities when we check an incoming packet: - if it has zero length, then we assume it's a flush packet. This means we fail to notice the difference between a real flush and a true zero-length packet that's missing its sideband designator. It's not a huge problem in practice because we'd never send a zero-length data packet (even our keepalives are otherwise-empty sideband-1 packets). But it would be nice to detect and report the error, since it's likely to cause other confusion (we think the other side flushed, but they do not). - we try to detect packets missing their designator by checking for "if (len < 1)". But this will never trigger for "len == 0"; we've already detected that and left the function before then. It _could_ detect a negative "len" parameter. But in that case, the error message is wrong. The issue is not "no sideband" but rather "eof while reading the packet". However, this can't actually be triggered in practice, because neither of the two callers uses pkt_read's GENTLE_ON_EOF flag. Which means they'd die with "the remote end hung up unexpectedly" before we even get here. So this truly is dead code. We can improve these cases by passing in a pkt-line status to the demultiplexer, and by having recv_sideband() use GENTLE_ON_EOF. This gives us two improvements: - we can now reliably detect flush packets, and will report a normal packet missing its sideband designator as an error - we'll report an eof with a more detailed "protocol error: eof while reading sideband packet", rather than the generic "the remote end hung up unexpectedly" - when we see an eof, we'll flush the sideband scratch buffer, which may provide some hints from the remote about why they hung up (though note we already flush on newlines, so it's likely that most such messages already made it through) In some sense this patch goes against fbd76cd450 (sideband: reverse its dependency on pkt-line, 2019-01-16), which caused the sideband code not to depend on the pkt-line code. But that commit was really just trying to deal with the circular header dependency. The two modules are conceptually interlinked, and it was just trying to keep things compiling. And indeed, there's a sticking point in this patch: because pkt-line.h includes sideband.h, we can't add the reverse include we need for the sideband code to have an "enum packet_read_status" parameter. Nor can we forward declare it, because you can't forward declare an enum in C. However, C does guarantee that enums fit in an int, so we can just use that type. One alternative would be for the callers to check themselves that they got something sane from the pkt-line code. But besides duplicating logic, this gets quite tricky. Any error condition requires flushing the sideband #2 scratch buffer, which only demultiplex_sideband() knows how to do. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-10-28 12:33:24 +03:00
'
test_expect_success 'missing sideband designator is reported' '
printf 0004 >input &&
test-tool pkt-line receive-sideband <input 2>err &&
test_grep "missing sideband" err
sideband: diagnose more sideband anomalies In demultiplex_sideband(), there are two oddities when we check an incoming packet: - if it has zero length, then we assume it's a flush packet. This means we fail to notice the difference between a real flush and a true zero-length packet that's missing its sideband designator. It's not a huge problem in practice because we'd never send a zero-length data packet (even our keepalives are otherwise-empty sideband-1 packets). But it would be nice to detect and report the error, since it's likely to cause other confusion (we think the other side flushed, but they do not). - we try to detect packets missing their designator by checking for "if (len < 1)". But this will never trigger for "len == 0"; we've already detected that and left the function before then. It _could_ detect a negative "len" parameter. But in that case, the error message is wrong. The issue is not "no sideband" but rather "eof while reading the packet". However, this can't actually be triggered in practice, because neither of the two callers uses pkt_read's GENTLE_ON_EOF flag. Which means they'd die with "the remote end hung up unexpectedly" before we even get here. So this truly is dead code. We can improve these cases by passing in a pkt-line status to the demultiplexer, and by having recv_sideband() use GENTLE_ON_EOF. This gives us two improvements: - we can now reliably detect flush packets, and will report a normal packet missing its sideband designator as an error - we'll report an eof with a more detailed "protocol error: eof while reading sideband packet", rather than the generic "the remote end hung up unexpectedly" - when we see an eof, we'll flush the sideband scratch buffer, which may provide some hints from the remote about why they hung up (though note we already flush on newlines, so it's likely that most such messages already made it through) In some sense this patch goes against fbd76cd450 (sideband: reverse its dependency on pkt-line, 2019-01-16), which caused the sideband code not to depend on the pkt-line code. But that commit was really just trying to deal with the circular header dependency. The two modules are conceptually interlinked, and it was just trying to keep things compiling. And indeed, there's a sticking point in this patch: because pkt-line.h includes sideband.h, we can't add the reverse include we need for the sideband code to have an "enum packet_read_status" parameter. Nor can we forward declare it, because you can't forward declare an enum in C. However, C does guarantee that enums fit in an int, so we can just use that type. One alternative would be for the callers to check themselves that they got something sane from the pkt-line code. But besides duplicating logic, this gets quite tricky. Any error condition requires flushing the sideband #2 scratch buffer, which only demultiplex_sideband() knows how to do. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-10-28 12:33:24 +03:00
'
test-pkt-line: add option parser for unpack-sideband We can use the test helper program "test-tool pkt-line" to test pkt-line related functions. E.g.: * Use "test-tool pkt-line send-split-sideband" to generate sideband messages. * Pipe these generated sideband messages to command "test-tool pkt-line unpack-sideband" to test packet_reader_read() function. In order to make a complete test of the packet_reader_read() function, add option parser for command "test-tool pkt-line unpack-sideband". * To remove newlines in sideband messages, we can use: $ test-tool pkt-line unpack-sideband --chomp-newline * To preserve newlines in sideband messages, we can use: $ test-tool pkt-line unpack-sideband --no-chomp-newline * To parse sideband messages using "demultiplex_sideband()" inside the function "packet_reader_read()", we can use: $ test-tool pkt-line unpack-sideband --reader-use-sideband We also add new example sideband packets in send_split_sideband() and add several new test cases in t0070. Among these test cases, we pipe output of the "send-split-sideband" subcommand to the "unpack-sideband" subcommand. We found two issues: 1. The two splitted sideband messages "Hello," and " world!\n" should be concatenated together. But when we turn on use_sideband field of reader to parse sideband messages, the first part of the splitted message ("Hello,") is lost. 2. The newline characters in sideband 2 (progress info) and sideband 3 (error message) should be preserved, but they are both trimmed. Will fix the above two issues in subsequent commits. Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <zhiyou.jx@alibaba-inc.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-12-17 17:41:36 +03:00
test_expect_success 'unpack-sideband: --no-chomp-newline' '
test_when_finished "rm -f expect-out expect-err" &&
test-tool pkt-line send-split-sideband >split-sideband &&
test-tool pkt-line unpack-sideband \
--no-chomp-newline <split-sideband >out 2>err &&
cat >expect-out <<-EOF &&
primary: regular output
EOF
cat >expect-err <<-EOF &&
Foo.
Bar.
Hello, world!
EOF
test_cmp expect-out out &&
test_cmp expect-err err
'
test_expect_success 'unpack-sideband: --chomp-newline (default)' '
test_when_finished "rm -f expect-out expect-err" &&
test-tool pkt-line send-split-sideband >split-sideband &&
test-tool pkt-line unpack-sideband \
--chomp-newline <split-sideband >out 2>err &&
printf "primary: regular output" >expect-out &&
printf "Foo.Bar.Hello, world!" >expect-err &&
test_cmp expect-out out &&
test_cmp expect-err err
'
test_expect_success 'unpack-sideband: packet_reader_read() consumes sideband, no chomp payload' '
test-pkt-line: add option parser for unpack-sideband We can use the test helper program "test-tool pkt-line" to test pkt-line related functions. E.g.: * Use "test-tool pkt-line send-split-sideband" to generate sideband messages. * Pipe these generated sideband messages to command "test-tool pkt-line unpack-sideband" to test packet_reader_read() function. In order to make a complete test of the packet_reader_read() function, add option parser for command "test-tool pkt-line unpack-sideband". * To remove newlines in sideband messages, we can use: $ test-tool pkt-line unpack-sideband --chomp-newline * To preserve newlines in sideband messages, we can use: $ test-tool pkt-line unpack-sideband --no-chomp-newline * To parse sideband messages using "demultiplex_sideband()" inside the function "packet_reader_read()", we can use: $ test-tool pkt-line unpack-sideband --reader-use-sideband We also add new example sideband packets in send_split_sideband() and add several new test cases in t0070. Among these test cases, we pipe output of the "send-split-sideband" subcommand to the "unpack-sideband" subcommand. We found two issues: 1. The two splitted sideband messages "Hello," and " world!\n" should be concatenated together. But when we turn on use_sideband field of reader to parse sideband messages, the first part of the splitted message ("Hello,") is lost. 2. The newline characters in sideband 2 (progress info) and sideband 3 (error message) should be preserved, but they are both trimmed. Will fix the above two issues in subsequent commits. Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <zhiyou.jx@alibaba-inc.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-12-17 17:41:36 +03:00
test_when_finished "rm -f expect-out expect-err" &&
test-tool pkt-line send-split-sideband >split-sideband &&
test-tool pkt-line unpack-sideband \
--reader-use-sideband \
--no-chomp-newline <split-sideband >out 2>err &&
cat >expect-out <<-EOF &&
primary: regular output
EOF
printf "remote: Foo. \n" >expect-err &&
printf "remote: Bar. \n" >>expect-err &&
printf "remote: Hello, world! \n" >>expect-err &&
test_cmp expect-out out &&
test_cmp expect-err err
'
test_expect_success 'unpack-sideband: packet_reader_read() consumes sideband, chomp payload' '
test-pkt-line: add option parser for unpack-sideband We can use the test helper program "test-tool pkt-line" to test pkt-line related functions. E.g.: * Use "test-tool pkt-line send-split-sideband" to generate sideband messages. * Pipe these generated sideband messages to command "test-tool pkt-line unpack-sideband" to test packet_reader_read() function. In order to make a complete test of the packet_reader_read() function, add option parser for command "test-tool pkt-line unpack-sideband". * To remove newlines in sideband messages, we can use: $ test-tool pkt-line unpack-sideband --chomp-newline * To preserve newlines in sideband messages, we can use: $ test-tool pkt-line unpack-sideband --no-chomp-newline * To parse sideband messages using "demultiplex_sideband()" inside the function "packet_reader_read()", we can use: $ test-tool pkt-line unpack-sideband --reader-use-sideband We also add new example sideband packets in send_split_sideband() and add several new test cases in t0070. Among these test cases, we pipe output of the "send-split-sideband" subcommand to the "unpack-sideband" subcommand. We found two issues: 1. The two splitted sideband messages "Hello," and " world!\n" should be concatenated together. But when we turn on use_sideband field of reader to parse sideband messages, the first part of the splitted message ("Hello,") is lost. 2. The newline characters in sideband 2 (progress info) and sideband 3 (error message) should be preserved, but they are both trimmed. Will fix the above two issues in subsequent commits. Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <zhiyou.jx@alibaba-inc.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-12-17 17:41:36 +03:00
test_when_finished "rm -f expect-out expect-err" &&
test-tool pkt-line send-split-sideband >split-sideband &&
test-tool pkt-line unpack-sideband \
--reader-use-sideband \
--chomp-newline <split-sideband >out 2>err &&
printf "primary: regular output" >expect-out &&
printf "remote: Foo. \n" >expect-err &&
printf "remote: Bar. \n" >>expect-err &&
printf "remote: Hello, world! \n" >>expect-err &&
test_cmp expect-out out &&
test_cmp expect-err err
'
test_done