git/builtin/tag.c

573 строки
15 KiB
C
Исходник Обычный вид История

/*
* Builtin "git tag"
*
* Copyright (c) 2007 Kristian Høgsberg <krh@redhat.com>,
* Carlos Rica <jasampler@gmail.com>
* Based on git-tag.sh and mktag.c by Linus Torvalds.
*/
#include "cache.h"
#include "config.h"
#include "builtin.h"
#include "refs.h"
#include "object-store.h"
#include "tag.h"
#include "run-command.h"
#include "parse-options.h"
#include "diff.h"
#include "revision.h"
#include "gpg-interface.h"
#include "sha1-array.h"
#include "column.h"
#include "ref-filter.h"
static const char * const git_tag_usage[] = {
N_("git tag [-a | -s | -u <key-id>] [-f] [-m <msg> | -F <file>] <tagname> [<head>]"),
N_("git tag -d <tagname>..."),
ref-filter: add --no-contains option to tag/branch/for-each-ref Change the tag, branch & for-each-ref commands to have a --no-contains option in addition to their longstanding --contains options. This allows for finding the last-good rollout tag given a known-bad <commit>. Given a hypothetically bad commit cf5c7253e0, the git version to revert to can be found with this hacky two-liner: (git tag -l 'v[0-9]*'; git tag -l --contains cf5c7253e0 'v[0-9]*') | sort | uniq -c | grep -E '^ *1 ' | awk '{print $2}' | tail -n 10 With this new --no-contains option the same can be achieved with: git tag -l --no-contains cf5c7253e0 'v[0-9]*' | sort | tail -n 10 As the filtering machinery is shared between the tag, branch & for-each-ref commands, implement this for those commands too. A practical use for this with "branch" is e.g. finding branches which were branched off between v2.8.0 and v2.10.0: git branch --contains v2.8.0 --no-contains v2.10.0 The "describe" command also has a --contains option, but its semantics are unrelated to what tag/branch/for-each-ref use --contains for. A --no-contains option for "describe" wouldn't make any sense, other than being exactly equivalent to not supplying --contains at all, which would be confusing at best. Add a --without option to "tag" as an alias for --no-contains, for consistency with --with and --contains. The --with option is undocumented, and possibly the only user of it is Junio (<xmqqefy71iej.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>). But it's trivial to support, so let's do that. The additions to the the test suite are inverse copies of the corresponding --contains tests. With this change --no-contains for tag, branch & for-each-ref is just as well tested as the existing --contains option. In addition to those tests, add a test for "tag" which asserts that --no-contains won't find tree/blob tags, which is slightly unintuitive, but consistent with how --contains works & is documented. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-03-24 21:40:57 +03:00
N_("git tag -l [-n[<num>]] [--contains <commit>] [--no-contains <commit>] [--points-at <object>]"
"\n\t\t[--format=<format>] [--[no-]merged [<commit>]] [<pattern>...]"),
N_("git tag -v [--format=<format>] <tagname>..."),
NULL
};
static unsigned int colopts;
static int force_sign_annotate;
static int list_tags(struct ref_filter *filter, struct ref_sorting *sorting,
struct ref_format *format)
{
struct ref_array array;
char *to_free = NULL;
int i;
memset(&array, 0, sizeof(array));
if (filter->lines == -1)
filter->lines = 0;
if (!format->format) {
if (filter->lines) {
to_free = xstrfmt("%s %%(contents:lines=%d)",
"%(align:15)%(refname:lstrip=2)%(end)",
filter->lines);
format->format = to_free;
} else
format->format = "%(refname:lstrip=2)";
}
if (verify_ref_format(format))
die(_("unable to parse format string"));
filter->with_commit_tag_algo = 1;
filter_refs(&array, filter, FILTER_REFS_TAGS);
ref_array_sort(sorting, &array);
for (i = 0; i < array.nr; i++)
show_ref_array_item(array.items[i], format);
ref_array_clear(&array);
free(to_free);
return 0;
}
typedef int (*each_tag_name_fn)(const char *name, const char *ref,
const struct object_id *oid, const void *cb_data);
static int for_each_tag_name(const char **argv, each_tag_name_fn fn,
const void *cb_data)
{
const char **p;
struct strbuf ref = STRBUF_INIT;
int had_error = 0;
struct object_id oid;
for (p = argv; *p; p++) {
strbuf_reset(&ref);
strbuf_addf(&ref, "refs/tags/%s", *p);
if (read_ref(ref.buf, &oid)) {
error(_("tag '%s' not found."), *p);
had_error = 1;
continue;
}
if (fn(*p, ref.buf, &oid, cb_data))
had_error = 1;
}
strbuf_release(&ref);
return had_error;
}
static int delete_tag(const char *name, const char *ref,
const struct object_id *oid, const void *cb_data)
{
if (delete_ref(NULL, ref, oid, 0))
return 1;
printf(_("Deleted tag '%s' (was %s)\n"), name,
find_unique_abbrev(oid, DEFAULT_ABBREV));
return 0;
}
static int verify_tag(const char *name, const char *ref,
const struct object_id *oid, const void *cb_data)
{
int flags;
const struct ref_format *format = cb_data;
flags = GPG_VERIFY_VERBOSE;
if (format->format)
flags = GPG_VERIFY_OMIT_STATUS;
if (gpg_verify_tag(oid, name, flags))
return -1;
if (format->format)
pretty_print_ref(name, oid, format);
return 0;
}
static int do_sign(struct strbuf *buffer)
{
return sign_buffer(buffer, buffer, get_signing_key());
}
static const char tag_template[] =
N_("\nWrite a message for tag:\n %s\n"
"Lines starting with '%c' will be ignored.\n");
static const char tag_template_nocleanup[] =
N_("\nWrite a message for tag:\n %s\n"
"Lines starting with '%c' will be kept; you may remove them"
" yourself if you want to.\n");
static int git_tag_config(const char *var, const char *value, void *cb)
{
int status;
struct ref_sorting **sorting_tail = (struct ref_sorting **)cb;
if (!strcmp(var, "tag.sort")) {
if (!value)
return config_error_nonbool(var);
parse_ref_sorting(sorting_tail, value);
return 0;
}
status = git_gpg_config(var, value, cb);
if (status)
return status;
if (!strcmp(var, "tag.forcesignannotated")) {
force_sign_annotate = git_config_bool(var, value);
return 0;
}
if (starts_with(var, "column."))
return git_column_config(var, value, "tag", &colopts);
return git_color_default_config(var, value, cb);
}
static void write_tag_body(int fd, const struct object_id *oid)
{
unsigned long size;
enum object_type type;
char *buf, *sp;
buf = read_object_file(oid, &type, &size);
if (!buf)
return;
/* skip header */
sp = strstr(buf, "\n\n");
if (!sp || !size || type != OBJ_TAG) {
free(buf);
return;
}
sp += 2; /* skip the 2 LFs */
write_or_die(fd, sp, parse_signature(sp, buf + size - sp));
free(buf);
}
static int build_tag_object(struct strbuf *buf, int sign, struct object_id *result)
{
if (sign && do_sign(buf) < 0)
return error(_("unable to sign the tag"));
if (write_object_file(buf->buf, buf->len, tag_type, result) < 0)
return error(_("unable to write tag file"));
return 0;
}
struct create_tag_options {
unsigned int message_given:1;
unsigned int use_editor:1;
unsigned int sign;
enum {
CLEANUP_NONE,
CLEANUP_SPACE,
CLEANUP_ALL
} cleanup_mode;
};
static void create_tag(const struct object_id *object, const char *tag,
struct strbuf *buf, struct create_tag_options *opt,
struct object_id *prev, struct object_id *result)
{
enum object_type type;
struct strbuf header = STRBUF_INIT;
char *path = NULL;
type = oid_object_info(the_repository, object, NULL);
if (type <= OBJ_NONE)
die(_("bad object type."));
strbuf_addf(&header,
"object %s\n"
"type %s\n"
"tag %s\n"
"tagger %s\n\n",
oid_to_hex(object),
type_name(type),
tag,
git_committer_info(IDENT_STRICT));
if (!opt->message_given || opt->use_editor) {
int fd;
/* write the template message before editing: */
path = git_pathdup("TAG_EDITMSG");
fd = open(path, O_CREAT | O_TRUNC | O_WRONLY, 0600);
if (fd < 0)
die_errno(_("could not create file '%s'"), path);
if (opt->message_given) {
write_or_die(fd, buf->buf, buf->len);
strbuf_reset(buf);
} else if (!is_null_oid(prev)) {
write_tag_body(fd, prev);
} else {
struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
strbuf_addch(&buf, '\n');
if (opt->cleanup_mode == CLEANUP_ALL)
strbuf_commented_addf(&buf, _(tag_template), tag, comment_line_char);
else
strbuf_commented_addf(&buf, _(tag_template_nocleanup), tag, comment_line_char);
write_or_die(fd, buf.buf, buf.len);
strbuf_release(&buf);
}
close(fd);
if (launch_editor(path, buf, NULL)) {
fprintf(stderr,
_("Please supply the message using either -m or -F option.\n"));
exit(1);
}
}
if (opt->cleanup_mode != CLEANUP_NONE)
strbuf_stripspace(buf, opt->cleanup_mode == CLEANUP_ALL);
if (!opt->message_given && !buf->len)
die(_("no tag message?"));
strbuf_insert(buf, 0, header.buf, header.len);
strbuf_release(&header);
if (build_tag_object(buf, opt->sign, result) < 0) {
if (path)
fprintf(stderr, _("The tag message has been left in %s\n"),
path);
exit(128);
}
if (path) {
unlink_or_warn(path);
free(path);
}
}
static void create_reflog_msg(const struct object_id *oid, struct strbuf *sb)
{
enum object_type type;
struct commit *c;
char *buf;
unsigned long size;
int subject_len = 0;
const char *subject_start;
char *rla = getenv("GIT_REFLOG_ACTION");
if (rla) {
strbuf_addstr(sb, rla);
} else {
strbuf_addstr(sb, "tag: tagging ");
strbuf_add_unique_abbrev(sb, oid, DEFAULT_ABBREV);
}
strbuf_addstr(sb, " (");
type = oid_object_info(the_repository, oid, NULL);
switch (type) {
default:
strbuf_addstr(sb, "object of unknown type");
break;
case OBJ_COMMIT:
if ((buf = read_object_file(oid, &type, &size)) != NULL) {
subject_len = find_commit_subject(buf, &subject_start);
strbuf_insert(sb, sb->len, subject_start, subject_len);
} else {
strbuf_addstr(sb, "commit object");
}
free(buf);
if ((c = lookup_commit_reference(the_repository, oid)) != NULL)
strbuf_addf(sb, ", %s", show_date(c->date, 0, DATE_MODE(SHORT)));
break;
case OBJ_TREE:
strbuf_addstr(sb, "tree object");
break;
case OBJ_BLOB:
strbuf_addstr(sb, "blob object");
break;
case OBJ_TAG:
strbuf_addstr(sb, "other tag object");
break;
}
strbuf_addch(sb, ')');
}
struct msg_arg {
int given;
struct strbuf buf;
};
static int parse_msg_arg(const struct option *opt, const char *arg, int unset)
{
struct msg_arg *msg = opt->value;
if (!arg)
return -1;
if (msg->buf.len)
strbuf_addstr(&(msg->buf), "\n\n");
strbuf_addstr(&(msg->buf), arg);
msg->given = 1;
return 0;
}
static int strbuf_check_tag_ref(struct strbuf *sb, const char *name)
{
if (name[0] == '-')
return -1;
strbuf_reset(sb);
strbuf_addf(sb, "refs/tags/%s", name);
return check_refname_format(sb->buf, 0);
}
int cmd_tag(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
{
struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
struct strbuf ref = STRBUF_INIT;
struct strbuf reflog_msg = STRBUF_INIT;
struct object_id object, prev;
const char *object_ref, *tag;
struct create_tag_options opt;
char *cleanup_arg = NULL;
int create_reflog = 0;
int annotate = 0, force = 0;
int cmdmode = 0, create_tag_object = 0;
const char *msgfile = NULL, *keyid = NULL;
struct msg_arg msg = { 0, STRBUF_INIT };
struct ref_transaction *transaction;
struct strbuf err = STRBUF_INIT;
struct ref_filter filter;
static struct ref_sorting *sorting = NULL, **sorting_tail = &sorting;
struct ref_format format = REF_FORMAT_INIT;
int icase = 0;
int edit_flag = 0;
struct option options[] = {
OPT_CMDMODE('l', "list", &cmdmode, N_("list tag names"), 'l'),
{ OPTION_INTEGER, 'n', NULL, &filter.lines, N_("n"),
N_("print <n> lines of each tag message"),
PARSE_OPT_OPTARG, NULL, 1 },
OPT_CMDMODE('d', "delete", &cmdmode, N_("delete tags"), 'd'),
OPT_CMDMODE('v', "verify", &cmdmode, N_("verify tags"), 'v'),
OPT_GROUP(N_("Tag creation options")),
OPT_BOOL('a', "annotate", &annotate,
N_("annotated tag, needs a message")),
{ OPTION_CALLBACK, 'm', "message", &msg, N_("message"),
N_("tag message"), PARSE_OPT_NONEG, parse_msg_arg },
OPT_FILENAME('F', "file", &msgfile, N_("read message from file")),
OPT_BOOL('e', "edit", &edit_flag, N_("force edit of tag message")),
OPT_BOOL('s', "sign", &opt.sign, N_("annotated and GPG-signed tag")),
OPT_STRING(0, "cleanup", &cleanup_arg, N_("mode"),
N_("how to strip spaces and #comments from message")),
OPT_STRING('u', "local-user", &keyid, N_("key-id"),
N_("use another key to sign the tag")),
OPT__FORCE(&force, N_("replace the tag if exists"), 0),
OPT_BOOL(0, "create-reflog", &create_reflog, N_("create a reflog")),
OPT_GROUP(N_("Tag listing options")),
OPT_COLUMN(0, "column", &colopts, N_("show tag list in columns")),
OPT_CONTAINS(&filter.with_commit, N_("print only tags that contain the commit")),
ref-filter: add --no-contains option to tag/branch/for-each-ref Change the tag, branch & for-each-ref commands to have a --no-contains option in addition to their longstanding --contains options. This allows for finding the last-good rollout tag given a known-bad <commit>. Given a hypothetically bad commit cf5c7253e0, the git version to revert to can be found with this hacky two-liner: (git tag -l 'v[0-9]*'; git tag -l --contains cf5c7253e0 'v[0-9]*') | sort | uniq -c | grep -E '^ *1 ' | awk '{print $2}' | tail -n 10 With this new --no-contains option the same can be achieved with: git tag -l --no-contains cf5c7253e0 'v[0-9]*' | sort | tail -n 10 As the filtering machinery is shared between the tag, branch & for-each-ref commands, implement this for those commands too. A practical use for this with "branch" is e.g. finding branches which were branched off between v2.8.0 and v2.10.0: git branch --contains v2.8.0 --no-contains v2.10.0 The "describe" command also has a --contains option, but its semantics are unrelated to what tag/branch/for-each-ref use --contains for. A --no-contains option for "describe" wouldn't make any sense, other than being exactly equivalent to not supplying --contains at all, which would be confusing at best. Add a --without option to "tag" as an alias for --no-contains, for consistency with --with and --contains. The --with option is undocumented, and possibly the only user of it is Junio (<xmqqefy71iej.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>). But it's trivial to support, so let's do that. The additions to the the test suite are inverse copies of the corresponding --contains tests. With this change --no-contains for tag, branch & for-each-ref is just as well tested as the existing --contains option. In addition to those tests, add a test for "tag" which asserts that --no-contains won't find tree/blob tags, which is slightly unintuitive, but consistent with how --contains works & is documented. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-03-24 21:40:57 +03:00
OPT_NO_CONTAINS(&filter.no_commit, N_("print only tags that don't contain the commit")),
OPT_WITH(&filter.with_commit, N_("print only tags that contain the commit")),
ref-filter: add --no-contains option to tag/branch/for-each-ref Change the tag, branch & for-each-ref commands to have a --no-contains option in addition to their longstanding --contains options. This allows for finding the last-good rollout tag given a known-bad <commit>. Given a hypothetically bad commit cf5c7253e0, the git version to revert to can be found with this hacky two-liner: (git tag -l 'v[0-9]*'; git tag -l --contains cf5c7253e0 'v[0-9]*') | sort | uniq -c | grep -E '^ *1 ' | awk '{print $2}' | tail -n 10 With this new --no-contains option the same can be achieved with: git tag -l --no-contains cf5c7253e0 'v[0-9]*' | sort | tail -n 10 As the filtering machinery is shared between the tag, branch & for-each-ref commands, implement this for those commands too. A practical use for this with "branch" is e.g. finding branches which were branched off between v2.8.0 and v2.10.0: git branch --contains v2.8.0 --no-contains v2.10.0 The "describe" command also has a --contains option, but its semantics are unrelated to what tag/branch/for-each-ref use --contains for. A --no-contains option for "describe" wouldn't make any sense, other than being exactly equivalent to not supplying --contains at all, which would be confusing at best. Add a --without option to "tag" as an alias for --no-contains, for consistency with --with and --contains. The --with option is undocumented, and possibly the only user of it is Junio (<xmqqefy71iej.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>). But it's trivial to support, so let's do that. The additions to the the test suite are inverse copies of the corresponding --contains tests. With this change --no-contains for tag, branch & for-each-ref is just as well tested as the existing --contains option. In addition to those tests, add a test for "tag" which asserts that --no-contains won't find tree/blob tags, which is slightly unintuitive, but consistent with how --contains works & is documented. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-03-24 21:40:57 +03:00
OPT_WITHOUT(&filter.no_commit, N_("print only tags that don't contain the commit")),
OPT_MERGED(&filter, N_("print only tags that are merged")),
OPT_NO_MERGED(&filter, N_("print only tags that are not merged")),
OPT_CALLBACK(0 , "sort", sorting_tail, N_("key"),
N_("field name to sort on"), &parse_opt_ref_sorting),
{
OPTION_CALLBACK, 0, "points-at", &filter.points_at, N_("object"),
N_("print only tags of the object"), PARSE_OPT_LASTARG_DEFAULT,
parse_opt_object_name, (intptr_t) "HEAD"
},
OPT_STRING( 0 , "format", &format.format, N_("format"),
N_("format to use for the output")),
OPT__COLOR(&format.use_color, N_("respect format colors")),
OPT_BOOL('i', "ignore-case", &icase, N_("sorting and filtering are case insensitive")),
OPT_END()
};
setup_ref_filter_porcelain_msg();
git_config(git_tag_config, sorting_tail);
memset(&opt, 0, sizeof(opt));
memset(&filter, 0, sizeof(filter));
filter.lines = -1;
argc = parse_options(argc, argv, prefix, options, git_tag_usage, 0);
if (keyid) {
opt.sign = 1;
set_signing_key(keyid);
}
create_tag_object = (opt.sign || annotate || msg.given || msgfile);
tag: implicitly supply --list given another list-like option Change the "tag" command to implicitly turn on its --list mode when provided with a list-like option such as --contains, --points-at etc. This is for consistency with how "branch" works. When "branch" is given a list-like option, such as --contains, it implicitly provides --list. Before this change "tag" would error out on those sorts of invocations. I.e. while both of these worked for "branch": git branch --contains v2.8.0 <pattern> git branch --list --contains v2.8.0 <pattern> Only the latter form worked for "tag": git tag --contains v2.8.0 '*rc*' git tag --list --contains v2.8.0 '*rc*' Now "tag", like "branch", will implicitly supply --list when a list-like option is provided, and no other conflicting non-list options (such as -d) are present on the command-line. Spelunking through the history via: git log --reverse -p -G'only allowed with' -- '*builtin*tag*c' Reveals that there was no good reason for not allowing this in the first place. The --contains option added in 32c35cfb1e ("git-tag: Add --contains option", 2009-01-26) made this an error. All the other subsequent list-like options that were added copied its pattern of making this usage an error. The only tests that break as a result of this change are tests that were explicitly checking that this "branch-like" usage wasn't permitted. Change those failing tests to check that this invocation mode is permitted, add extra tests for the list-like options we weren't testing, and tests to ensure that e.g. we don't toggle the list mode in the presence of other conflicting non-list options. With this change errors messages such as "--contains option is only allowed with -l" don't make sense anymore, since options like --contain turn on -l. Instead we error out when list-like options such as --contain are used in conjunction with conflicting options such as -d or -v. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-03-24 21:40:55 +03:00
if (!cmdmode) {
if (argc == 0)
cmdmode = 'l';
ref-filter: add --no-contains option to tag/branch/for-each-ref Change the tag, branch & for-each-ref commands to have a --no-contains option in addition to their longstanding --contains options. This allows for finding the last-good rollout tag given a known-bad <commit>. Given a hypothetically bad commit cf5c7253e0, the git version to revert to can be found with this hacky two-liner: (git tag -l 'v[0-9]*'; git tag -l --contains cf5c7253e0 'v[0-9]*') | sort | uniq -c | grep -E '^ *1 ' | awk '{print $2}' | tail -n 10 With this new --no-contains option the same can be achieved with: git tag -l --no-contains cf5c7253e0 'v[0-9]*' | sort | tail -n 10 As the filtering machinery is shared between the tag, branch & for-each-ref commands, implement this for those commands too. A practical use for this with "branch" is e.g. finding branches which were branched off between v2.8.0 and v2.10.0: git branch --contains v2.8.0 --no-contains v2.10.0 The "describe" command also has a --contains option, but its semantics are unrelated to what tag/branch/for-each-ref use --contains for. A --no-contains option for "describe" wouldn't make any sense, other than being exactly equivalent to not supplying --contains at all, which would be confusing at best. Add a --without option to "tag" as an alias for --no-contains, for consistency with --with and --contains. The --with option is undocumented, and possibly the only user of it is Junio (<xmqqefy71iej.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>). But it's trivial to support, so let's do that. The additions to the the test suite are inverse copies of the corresponding --contains tests. With this change --no-contains for tag, branch & for-each-ref is just as well tested as the existing --contains option. In addition to those tests, add a test for "tag" which asserts that --no-contains won't find tree/blob tags, which is slightly unintuitive, but consistent with how --contains works & is documented. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-03-24 21:40:57 +03:00
else if (filter.with_commit || filter.no_commit ||
tag: implicitly supply --list given another list-like option Change the "tag" command to implicitly turn on its --list mode when provided with a list-like option such as --contains, --points-at etc. This is for consistency with how "branch" works. When "branch" is given a list-like option, such as --contains, it implicitly provides --list. Before this change "tag" would error out on those sorts of invocations. I.e. while both of these worked for "branch": git branch --contains v2.8.0 <pattern> git branch --list --contains v2.8.0 <pattern> Only the latter form worked for "tag": git tag --contains v2.8.0 '*rc*' git tag --list --contains v2.8.0 '*rc*' Now "tag", like "branch", will implicitly supply --list when a list-like option is provided, and no other conflicting non-list options (such as -d) are present on the command-line. Spelunking through the history via: git log --reverse -p -G'only allowed with' -- '*builtin*tag*c' Reveals that there was no good reason for not allowing this in the first place. The --contains option added in 32c35cfb1e ("git-tag: Add --contains option", 2009-01-26) made this an error. All the other subsequent list-like options that were added copied its pattern of making this usage an error. The only tests that break as a result of this change are tests that were explicitly checking that this "branch-like" usage wasn't permitted. Change those failing tests to check that this invocation mode is permitted, add extra tests for the list-like options we weren't testing, and tests to ensure that e.g. we don't toggle the list mode in the presence of other conflicting non-list options. With this change errors messages such as "--contains option is only allowed with -l" don't make sense anymore, since options like --contain turn on -l. Instead we error out when list-like options such as --contain are used in conjunction with conflicting options such as -d or -v. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-03-24 21:40:55 +03:00
filter.points_at.nr || filter.merge_commit ||
filter.lines != -1)
cmdmode = 'l';
}
if (cmdmode == 'l')
setup_auto_pager("tag", 1);
if ((create_tag_object || force) && (cmdmode != 0))
usage_with_options(git_tag_usage, options);
finalize_colopts(&colopts, -1);
if (cmdmode == 'l' && filter.lines != -1) {
if (explicitly_enable_column(colopts))
die(_("--column and -n are incompatible"));
colopts = 0;
}
if (!sorting)
sorting = ref_default_sorting();
sorting->ignore_case = icase;
filter.ignore_case = icase;
if (cmdmode == 'l') {
int ret;
if (column_active(colopts)) {
struct column_options copts;
memset(&copts, 0, sizeof(copts));
copts.padding = 2;
run_column_filter(colopts, &copts);
}
filter.name_patterns = argv;
ret = list_tags(&filter, sorting, &format);
if (column_active(colopts))
stop_column_filter();
return ret;
}
if (filter.lines != -1)
tag: implicitly supply --list given another list-like option Change the "tag" command to implicitly turn on its --list mode when provided with a list-like option such as --contains, --points-at etc. This is for consistency with how "branch" works. When "branch" is given a list-like option, such as --contains, it implicitly provides --list. Before this change "tag" would error out on those sorts of invocations. I.e. while both of these worked for "branch": git branch --contains v2.8.0 <pattern> git branch --list --contains v2.8.0 <pattern> Only the latter form worked for "tag": git tag --contains v2.8.0 '*rc*' git tag --list --contains v2.8.0 '*rc*' Now "tag", like "branch", will implicitly supply --list when a list-like option is provided, and no other conflicting non-list options (such as -d) are present on the command-line. Spelunking through the history via: git log --reverse -p -G'only allowed with' -- '*builtin*tag*c' Reveals that there was no good reason for not allowing this in the first place. The --contains option added in 32c35cfb1e ("git-tag: Add --contains option", 2009-01-26) made this an error. All the other subsequent list-like options that were added copied its pattern of making this usage an error. The only tests that break as a result of this change are tests that were explicitly checking that this "branch-like" usage wasn't permitted. Change those failing tests to check that this invocation mode is permitted, add extra tests for the list-like options we weren't testing, and tests to ensure that e.g. we don't toggle the list mode in the presence of other conflicting non-list options. With this change errors messages such as "--contains option is only allowed with -l" don't make sense anymore, since options like --contain turn on -l. Instead we error out when list-like options such as --contain are used in conjunction with conflicting options such as -d or -v. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-03-24 21:40:55 +03:00
die(_("-n option is only allowed in list mode"));
if (filter.with_commit)
tag: implicitly supply --list given another list-like option Change the "tag" command to implicitly turn on its --list mode when provided with a list-like option such as --contains, --points-at etc. This is for consistency with how "branch" works. When "branch" is given a list-like option, such as --contains, it implicitly provides --list. Before this change "tag" would error out on those sorts of invocations. I.e. while both of these worked for "branch": git branch --contains v2.8.0 <pattern> git branch --list --contains v2.8.0 <pattern> Only the latter form worked for "tag": git tag --contains v2.8.0 '*rc*' git tag --list --contains v2.8.0 '*rc*' Now "tag", like "branch", will implicitly supply --list when a list-like option is provided, and no other conflicting non-list options (such as -d) are present on the command-line. Spelunking through the history via: git log --reverse -p -G'only allowed with' -- '*builtin*tag*c' Reveals that there was no good reason for not allowing this in the first place. The --contains option added in 32c35cfb1e ("git-tag: Add --contains option", 2009-01-26) made this an error. All the other subsequent list-like options that were added copied its pattern of making this usage an error. The only tests that break as a result of this change are tests that were explicitly checking that this "branch-like" usage wasn't permitted. Change those failing tests to check that this invocation mode is permitted, add extra tests for the list-like options we weren't testing, and tests to ensure that e.g. we don't toggle the list mode in the presence of other conflicting non-list options. With this change errors messages such as "--contains option is only allowed with -l" don't make sense anymore, since options like --contain turn on -l. Instead we error out when list-like options such as --contain are used in conjunction with conflicting options such as -d or -v. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-03-24 21:40:55 +03:00
die(_("--contains option is only allowed in list mode"));
ref-filter: add --no-contains option to tag/branch/for-each-ref Change the tag, branch & for-each-ref commands to have a --no-contains option in addition to their longstanding --contains options. This allows for finding the last-good rollout tag given a known-bad <commit>. Given a hypothetically bad commit cf5c7253e0, the git version to revert to can be found with this hacky two-liner: (git tag -l 'v[0-9]*'; git tag -l --contains cf5c7253e0 'v[0-9]*') | sort | uniq -c | grep -E '^ *1 ' | awk '{print $2}' | tail -n 10 With this new --no-contains option the same can be achieved with: git tag -l --no-contains cf5c7253e0 'v[0-9]*' | sort | tail -n 10 As the filtering machinery is shared between the tag, branch & for-each-ref commands, implement this for those commands too. A practical use for this with "branch" is e.g. finding branches which were branched off between v2.8.0 and v2.10.0: git branch --contains v2.8.0 --no-contains v2.10.0 The "describe" command also has a --contains option, but its semantics are unrelated to what tag/branch/for-each-ref use --contains for. A --no-contains option for "describe" wouldn't make any sense, other than being exactly equivalent to not supplying --contains at all, which would be confusing at best. Add a --without option to "tag" as an alias for --no-contains, for consistency with --with and --contains. The --with option is undocumented, and possibly the only user of it is Junio (<xmqqefy71iej.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>). But it's trivial to support, so let's do that. The additions to the the test suite are inverse copies of the corresponding --contains tests. With this change --no-contains for tag, branch & for-each-ref is just as well tested as the existing --contains option. In addition to those tests, add a test for "tag" which asserts that --no-contains won't find tree/blob tags, which is slightly unintuitive, but consistent with how --contains works & is documented. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-03-24 21:40:57 +03:00
if (filter.no_commit)
die(_("--no-contains option is only allowed in list mode"));
if (filter.points_at.nr)
tag: implicitly supply --list given another list-like option Change the "tag" command to implicitly turn on its --list mode when provided with a list-like option such as --contains, --points-at etc. This is for consistency with how "branch" works. When "branch" is given a list-like option, such as --contains, it implicitly provides --list. Before this change "tag" would error out on those sorts of invocations. I.e. while both of these worked for "branch": git branch --contains v2.8.0 <pattern> git branch --list --contains v2.8.0 <pattern> Only the latter form worked for "tag": git tag --contains v2.8.0 '*rc*' git tag --list --contains v2.8.0 '*rc*' Now "tag", like "branch", will implicitly supply --list when a list-like option is provided, and no other conflicting non-list options (such as -d) are present on the command-line. Spelunking through the history via: git log --reverse -p -G'only allowed with' -- '*builtin*tag*c' Reveals that there was no good reason for not allowing this in the first place. The --contains option added in 32c35cfb1e ("git-tag: Add --contains option", 2009-01-26) made this an error. All the other subsequent list-like options that were added copied its pattern of making this usage an error. The only tests that break as a result of this change are tests that were explicitly checking that this "branch-like" usage wasn't permitted. Change those failing tests to check that this invocation mode is permitted, add extra tests for the list-like options we weren't testing, and tests to ensure that e.g. we don't toggle the list mode in the presence of other conflicting non-list options. With this change errors messages such as "--contains option is only allowed with -l" don't make sense anymore, since options like --contain turn on -l. Instead we error out when list-like options such as --contain are used in conjunction with conflicting options such as -d or -v. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-03-24 21:40:55 +03:00
die(_("--points-at option is only allowed in list mode"));
if (filter.merge_commit)
tag: implicitly supply --list given another list-like option Change the "tag" command to implicitly turn on its --list mode when provided with a list-like option such as --contains, --points-at etc. This is for consistency with how "branch" works. When "branch" is given a list-like option, such as --contains, it implicitly provides --list. Before this change "tag" would error out on those sorts of invocations. I.e. while both of these worked for "branch": git branch --contains v2.8.0 <pattern> git branch --list --contains v2.8.0 <pattern> Only the latter form worked for "tag": git tag --contains v2.8.0 '*rc*' git tag --list --contains v2.8.0 '*rc*' Now "tag", like "branch", will implicitly supply --list when a list-like option is provided, and no other conflicting non-list options (such as -d) are present on the command-line. Spelunking through the history via: git log --reverse -p -G'only allowed with' -- '*builtin*tag*c' Reveals that there was no good reason for not allowing this in the first place. The --contains option added in 32c35cfb1e ("git-tag: Add --contains option", 2009-01-26) made this an error. All the other subsequent list-like options that were added copied its pattern of making this usage an error. The only tests that break as a result of this change are tests that were explicitly checking that this "branch-like" usage wasn't permitted. Change those failing tests to check that this invocation mode is permitted, add extra tests for the list-like options we weren't testing, and tests to ensure that e.g. we don't toggle the list mode in the presence of other conflicting non-list options. With this change errors messages such as "--contains option is only allowed with -l" don't make sense anymore, since options like --contain turn on -l. Instead we error out when list-like options such as --contain are used in conjunction with conflicting options such as -d or -v. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-03-24 21:40:55 +03:00
die(_("--merged and --no-merged options are only allowed in list mode"));
if (cmdmode == 'd')
return for_each_tag_name(argv, delete_tag, NULL);
if (cmdmode == 'v') {
if (format.format && verify_ref_format(&format))
usage_with_options(git_tag_usage, options);
return for_each_tag_name(argv, verify_tag, &format);
}
if (msg.given || msgfile) {
if (msg.given && msgfile)
die(_("only one -F or -m option is allowed."));
if (msg.given)
strbuf_addbuf(&buf, &(msg.buf));
else {
if (!strcmp(msgfile, "-")) {
if (strbuf_read(&buf, 0, 1024) < 0)
die_errno(_("cannot read '%s'"), msgfile);
} else {
if (strbuf_read_file(&buf, msgfile, 1024) < 0)
die_errno(_("could not open or read '%s'"),
msgfile);
}
}
}
tag = argv[0];
object_ref = argc == 2 ? argv[1] : "HEAD";
if (argc > 2)
die(_("too many params"));
if (get_oid(object_ref, &object))
die(_("Failed to resolve '%s' as a valid ref."), object_ref);
if (strbuf_check_tag_ref(&ref, tag))
die(_("'%s' is not a valid tag name."), tag);
if (read_ref(ref.buf, &prev))
oidclr(&prev);
else if (!force)
die(_("tag '%s' already exists"), tag);
opt.message_given = msg.given || msgfile;
opt.use_editor = edit_flag;
if (!cleanup_arg || !strcmp(cleanup_arg, "strip"))
opt.cleanup_mode = CLEANUP_ALL;
else if (!strcmp(cleanup_arg, "verbatim"))
opt.cleanup_mode = CLEANUP_NONE;
else if (!strcmp(cleanup_arg, "whitespace"))
opt.cleanup_mode = CLEANUP_SPACE;
else
die(_("Invalid cleanup mode %s"), cleanup_arg);
create_reflog_msg(&object, &reflog_msg);
if (create_tag_object) {
if (force_sign_annotate && !annotate)
opt.sign = 1;
create_tag(&object, tag, &buf, &opt, &prev, &object);
}
transaction = ref_transaction_begin(&err);
if (!transaction ||
ref_transaction_update(transaction, ref.buf, &object, &prev,
create_reflog ? REF_FORCE_CREATE_REFLOG : 0,
reflog_msg.buf, &err) ||
ref_transaction_commit(transaction, &err))
die("%s", err.buf);
ref_transaction_free(transaction);
if (force && !is_null_oid(&prev) && !oideq(&prev, &object))
printf(_("Updated tag '%s' (was %s)\n"), tag,
find_unique_abbrev(&prev, DEFAULT_ABBREV));
UNLEAK(buf);
UNLEAK(ref);
UNLEAK(reflog_msg);
UNLEAK(msg);
UNLEAK(err);
return 0;
}