git/setup.c

505 строки
13 KiB
C
Исходник Обычный вид История

#include "cache.h"
Clean up work-tree handling The old version of work-tree support was an unholy mess, barely readable, and not to the point. For example, why do you have to provide a worktree, when it is not used? As in "git status". Now it works. Another riddle was: if you can have work trees inside the git dir, why are some programs complaining that they need a work tree? IOW it is allowed to call $ git --git-dir=../ --work-tree=. bla when you really want to. In this case, you are both in the git directory and in the working tree. So, programs have to actually test for the right thing, namely if they are inside a working tree, and not if they are inside a git directory. Also, GIT_DIR=../.git should behave the same as if no GIT_DIR was specified, unless there is a repository in the current working directory. It does now. The logic to determine if a repository is bare, or has a work tree (tertium non datur), is this: --work-tree=bla overrides GIT_WORK_TREE, which overrides core.bare = true, which overrides core.worktree, which overrides GIT_DIR/.. when GIT_DIR ends in /.git, which overrides the directory in which .git/ was found. In related news, a long standing bug was fixed: when in .git/bla/x.git/, which is a bare repository, git formerly assumed ../.. to be the appropriate git dir. This problem was reported by Shawn Pearce to have caused much pain, where a colleague mistakenly ran "git init" in "/" a long time ago, and bare repositories just would not work. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-08-01 04:30:14 +04:00
#include "dir.h"
static int inside_git_dir = -1;
static int inside_work_tree = -1;
setup: sanitize absolute and funny paths in get_pathspec() The prefix_path() function called from get_pathspec() is responsible for translating list of user-supplied pathspecs to list of pathspecs that is relative to the root of the work tree. When working inside a subdirectory, the user-supplied pathspecs are taken to be relative to the current subdirectory. Among special path components in pathspecs, we used to accept and interpret only "." ("the directory", meaning a no-op) and ".." ("up one level") at the beginning. Everything else was passed through as-is. For example, if you are in Documentation/ directory of the project, you can name Documentation/howto/maintain-git.txt as: howto/maintain-git.txt ../Documentation/howto/maitain-git.txt ../././Documentation/howto/maitain-git.txt but not as: howto/./maintain-git.txt $(pwd)/howto/maintain-git.txt This patch updates prefix_path() in several ways: - If the pathspec is not absolute, prefix (i.e. the current subdirectory relative to the root of the work tree, with terminating slash, if not empty) and the pathspec is concatenated first and used in the next step. Otherwise, that absolute pathspec is used in the next step. - Then special path components "." (no-op) and ".." (up one level) are interpreted to simplify the path. It is an error to have too many ".." to cause the intermediate result to step outside of the input to this step. - If the original pathspec was not absolute, the result from the previous step is the resulting "sanitized" pathspec. Otherwise, the result from the previous step is still absolute, and it is an error if it does not begin with the directory that corresponds to the root of the work tree. The directory is stripped away from the result and is returned. - In any case, the resulting pathspec in the array get_pathspec() returns omit the ones that caused errors. With this patch, the last two examples also behave as expected. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-01-29 09:44:27 +03:00
const char *prefix_path(const char *prefix, int len, const char *path)
{
const char *orig = path;
char *sanitized = xmalloc(len + strlen(path) + 1);
if (is_absolute_path(orig))
setup: sanitize absolute and funny paths in get_pathspec() The prefix_path() function called from get_pathspec() is responsible for translating list of user-supplied pathspecs to list of pathspecs that is relative to the root of the work tree. When working inside a subdirectory, the user-supplied pathspecs are taken to be relative to the current subdirectory. Among special path components in pathspecs, we used to accept and interpret only "." ("the directory", meaning a no-op) and ".." ("up one level") at the beginning. Everything else was passed through as-is. For example, if you are in Documentation/ directory of the project, you can name Documentation/howto/maintain-git.txt as: howto/maintain-git.txt ../Documentation/howto/maitain-git.txt ../././Documentation/howto/maitain-git.txt but not as: howto/./maintain-git.txt $(pwd)/howto/maintain-git.txt This patch updates prefix_path() in several ways: - If the pathspec is not absolute, prefix (i.e. the current subdirectory relative to the root of the work tree, with terminating slash, if not empty) and the pathspec is concatenated first and used in the next step. Otherwise, that absolute pathspec is used in the next step. - Then special path components "." (no-op) and ".." (up one level) are interpreted to simplify the path. It is an error to have too many ".." to cause the intermediate result to step outside of the input to this step. - If the original pathspec was not absolute, the result from the previous step is the resulting "sanitized" pathspec. Otherwise, the result from the previous step is still absolute, and it is an error if it does not begin with the directory that corresponds to the root of the work tree. The directory is stripped away from the result and is returned. - In any case, the resulting pathspec in the array get_pathspec() returns omit the ones that caused errors. With this patch, the last two examples also behave as expected. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-01-29 09:44:27 +03:00
strcpy(sanitized, path);
else {
if (len)
memcpy(sanitized, prefix, len);
strcpy(sanitized + len, path);
}
if (normalize_path_copy(sanitized, sanitized))
setup: sanitize absolute and funny paths in get_pathspec() The prefix_path() function called from get_pathspec() is responsible for translating list of user-supplied pathspecs to list of pathspecs that is relative to the root of the work tree. When working inside a subdirectory, the user-supplied pathspecs are taken to be relative to the current subdirectory. Among special path components in pathspecs, we used to accept and interpret only "." ("the directory", meaning a no-op) and ".." ("up one level") at the beginning. Everything else was passed through as-is. For example, if you are in Documentation/ directory of the project, you can name Documentation/howto/maintain-git.txt as: howto/maintain-git.txt ../Documentation/howto/maitain-git.txt ../././Documentation/howto/maitain-git.txt but not as: howto/./maintain-git.txt $(pwd)/howto/maintain-git.txt This patch updates prefix_path() in several ways: - If the pathspec is not absolute, prefix (i.e. the current subdirectory relative to the root of the work tree, with terminating slash, if not empty) and the pathspec is concatenated first and used in the next step. Otherwise, that absolute pathspec is used in the next step. - Then special path components "." (no-op) and ".." (up one level) are interpreted to simplify the path. It is an error to have too many ".." to cause the intermediate result to step outside of the input to this step. - If the original pathspec was not absolute, the result from the previous step is the resulting "sanitized" pathspec. Otherwise, the result from the previous step is still absolute, and it is an error if it does not begin with the directory that corresponds to the root of the work tree. The directory is stripped away from the result and is returned. - In any case, the resulting pathspec in the array get_pathspec() returns omit the ones that caused errors. With this patch, the last two examples also behave as expected. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-01-29 09:44:27 +03:00
goto error_out;
if (is_absolute_path(orig)) {
setup: sanitize absolute and funny paths in get_pathspec() The prefix_path() function called from get_pathspec() is responsible for translating list of user-supplied pathspecs to list of pathspecs that is relative to the root of the work tree. When working inside a subdirectory, the user-supplied pathspecs are taken to be relative to the current subdirectory. Among special path components in pathspecs, we used to accept and interpret only "." ("the directory", meaning a no-op) and ".." ("up one level") at the beginning. Everything else was passed through as-is. For example, if you are in Documentation/ directory of the project, you can name Documentation/howto/maintain-git.txt as: howto/maintain-git.txt ../Documentation/howto/maitain-git.txt ../././Documentation/howto/maitain-git.txt but not as: howto/./maintain-git.txt $(pwd)/howto/maintain-git.txt This patch updates prefix_path() in several ways: - If the pathspec is not absolute, prefix (i.e. the current subdirectory relative to the root of the work tree, with terminating slash, if not empty) and the pathspec is concatenated first and used in the next step. Otherwise, that absolute pathspec is used in the next step. - Then special path components "." (no-op) and ".." (up one level) are interpreted to simplify the path. It is an error to have too many ".." to cause the intermediate result to step outside of the input to this step. - If the original pathspec was not absolute, the result from the previous step is the resulting "sanitized" pathspec. Otherwise, the result from the previous step is still absolute, and it is an error if it does not begin with the directory that corresponds to the root of the work tree. The directory is stripped away from the result and is returned. - In any case, the resulting pathspec in the array get_pathspec() returns omit the ones that caused errors. With this patch, the last two examples also behave as expected. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-01-29 09:44:27 +03:00
const char *work_tree = get_git_work_tree();
size_t len = strlen(work_tree);
size_t total = strlen(sanitized) + 1;
if (strncmp(sanitized, work_tree, len) ||
(sanitized[len] != '\0' && sanitized[len] != '/')) {
error_out:
die("'%s' is outside repository", orig);
setup: sanitize absolute and funny paths in get_pathspec() The prefix_path() function called from get_pathspec() is responsible for translating list of user-supplied pathspecs to list of pathspecs that is relative to the root of the work tree. When working inside a subdirectory, the user-supplied pathspecs are taken to be relative to the current subdirectory. Among special path components in pathspecs, we used to accept and interpret only "." ("the directory", meaning a no-op) and ".." ("up one level") at the beginning. Everything else was passed through as-is. For example, if you are in Documentation/ directory of the project, you can name Documentation/howto/maintain-git.txt as: howto/maintain-git.txt ../Documentation/howto/maitain-git.txt ../././Documentation/howto/maitain-git.txt but not as: howto/./maintain-git.txt $(pwd)/howto/maintain-git.txt This patch updates prefix_path() in several ways: - If the pathspec is not absolute, prefix (i.e. the current subdirectory relative to the root of the work tree, with terminating slash, if not empty) and the pathspec is concatenated first and used in the next step. Otherwise, that absolute pathspec is used in the next step. - Then special path components "." (no-op) and ".." (up one level) are interpreted to simplify the path. It is an error to have too many ".." to cause the intermediate result to step outside of the input to this step. - If the original pathspec was not absolute, the result from the previous step is the resulting "sanitized" pathspec. Otherwise, the result from the previous step is still absolute, and it is an error if it does not begin with the directory that corresponds to the root of the work tree. The directory is stripped away from the result and is returned. - In any case, the resulting pathspec in the array get_pathspec() returns omit the ones that caused errors. With this patch, the last two examples also behave as expected. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-01-29 09:44:27 +03:00
}
if (sanitized[len] == '/')
len++;
memmove(sanitized, sanitized + len, total - len);
}
return sanitized;
}
/*
* Unlike prefix_path, this should be used if the named file does
* not have to interact with index entry; i.e. name of a random file
* on the filesystem.
*/
const char *prefix_filename(const char *pfx, int pfx_len, const char *arg)
{
static char path[PATH_MAX];
#ifndef __MINGW32__
if (!pfx || !*pfx || is_absolute_path(arg))
return arg;
memcpy(path, pfx, pfx_len);
strcpy(path + pfx_len, arg);
#else
char *p;
/* don't add prefix to absolute paths, but still replace '\' by '/' */
if (is_absolute_path(arg))
pfx_len = 0;
else
memcpy(path, pfx, pfx_len);
strcpy(path + pfx_len, arg);
for (p = path + pfx_len; *p; p++)
if (*p == '\\')
*p = '/';
#endif
return path;
}
/*
* Verify a filename that we got as an argument for a pathspec
* entry. Note that a filename that begins with "-" never verifies
* as true, because even if such a filename were to exist, we want
* it to be preceded by the "--" marker (or we want the user to
* use a format like "./-filename")
*/
void verify_filename(const char *prefix, const char *arg)
{
const char *name;
struct stat st;
if (*arg == '-')
die("bad flag '%s' used after filename", arg);
name = prefix ? prefix_filename(prefix, strlen(prefix), arg) : arg;
if (!lstat(name, &st))
return;
if (errno == ENOENT)
die("ambiguous argument '%s': unknown revision or path not in the working tree.\n"
"Use '--' to separate paths from revisions", arg);
die("'%s': %s", arg, strerror(errno));
}
/*
* Opposite of the above: the command line did not have -- marker
* and we parsed the arg as a refname. It should not be interpretable
* as a filename.
*/
void verify_non_filename(const char *prefix, const char *arg)
{
const char *name;
struct stat st;
if (!is_inside_work_tree() || is_inside_git_dir())
return;
if (*arg == '-')
return; /* flag */
name = prefix ? prefix_filename(prefix, strlen(prefix), arg) : arg;
if (!lstat(name, &st))
die("ambiguous argument '%s': both revision and filename\n"
"Use '--' to separate filenames from revisions", arg);
if (errno != ENOENT && errno != ENOTDIR)
die("'%s': %s", arg, strerror(errno));
}
const char **get_pathspec(const char *prefix, const char **pathspec)
{
const char *entry = *pathspec;
setup: sanitize absolute and funny paths in get_pathspec() The prefix_path() function called from get_pathspec() is responsible for translating list of user-supplied pathspecs to list of pathspecs that is relative to the root of the work tree. When working inside a subdirectory, the user-supplied pathspecs are taken to be relative to the current subdirectory. Among special path components in pathspecs, we used to accept and interpret only "." ("the directory", meaning a no-op) and ".." ("up one level") at the beginning. Everything else was passed through as-is. For example, if you are in Documentation/ directory of the project, you can name Documentation/howto/maintain-git.txt as: howto/maintain-git.txt ../Documentation/howto/maitain-git.txt ../././Documentation/howto/maitain-git.txt but not as: howto/./maintain-git.txt $(pwd)/howto/maintain-git.txt This patch updates prefix_path() in several ways: - If the pathspec is not absolute, prefix (i.e. the current subdirectory relative to the root of the work tree, with terminating slash, if not empty) and the pathspec is concatenated first and used in the next step. Otherwise, that absolute pathspec is used in the next step. - Then special path components "." (no-op) and ".." (up one level) are interpreted to simplify the path. It is an error to have too many ".." to cause the intermediate result to step outside of the input to this step. - If the original pathspec was not absolute, the result from the previous step is the resulting "sanitized" pathspec. Otherwise, the result from the previous step is still absolute, and it is an error if it does not begin with the directory that corresponds to the root of the work tree. The directory is stripped away from the result and is returned. - In any case, the resulting pathspec in the array get_pathspec() returns omit the ones that caused errors. With this patch, the last two examples also behave as expected. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-01-29 09:44:27 +03:00
const char **src, **dst;
int prefixlen;
if (!prefix && !entry)
return NULL;
if (!entry) {
static const char *spec[2];
spec[0] = prefix;
spec[1] = NULL;
return spec;
}
/* Otherwise we have to re-write the entries.. */
setup: sanitize absolute and funny paths in get_pathspec() The prefix_path() function called from get_pathspec() is responsible for translating list of user-supplied pathspecs to list of pathspecs that is relative to the root of the work tree. When working inside a subdirectory, the user-supplied pathspecs are taken to be relative to the current subdirectory. Among special path components in pathspecs, we used to accept and interpret only "." ("the directory", meaning a no-op) and ".." ("up one level") at the beginning. Everything else was passed through as-is. For example, if you are in Documentation/ directory of the project, you can name Documentation/howto/maintain-git.txt as: howto/maintain-git.txt ../Documentation/howto/maitain-git.txt ../././Documentation/howto/maitain-git.txt but not as: howto/./maintain-git.txt $(pwd)/howto/maintain-git.txt This patch updates prefix_path() in several ways: - If the pathspec is not absolute, prefix (i.e. the current subdirectory relative to the root of the work tree, with terminating slash, if not empty) and the pathspec is concatenated first and used in the next step. Otherwise, that absolute pathspec is used in the next step. - Then special path components "." (no-op) and ".." (up one level) are interpreted to simplify the path. It is an error to have too many ".." to cause the intermediate result to step outside of the input to this step. - If the original pathspec was not absolute, the result from the previous step is the resulting "sanitized" pathspec. Otherwise, the result from the previous step is still absolute, and it is an error if it does not begin with the directory that corresponds to the root of the work tree. The directory is stripped away from the result and is returned. - In any case, the resulting pathspec in the array get_pathspec() returns omit the ones that caused errors. With this patch, the last two examples also behave as expected. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-01-29 09:44:27 +03:00
src = pathspec;
dst = pathspec;
prefixlen = prefix ? strlen(prefix) : 0;
setup: sanitize absolute and funny paths in get_pathspec() The prefix_path() function called from get_pathspec() is responsible for translating list of user-supplied pathspecs to list of pathspecs that is relative to the root of the work tree. When working inside a subdirectory, the user-supplied pathspecs are taken to be relative to the current subdirectory. Among special path components in pathspecs, we used to accept and interpret only "." ("the directory", meaning a no-op) and ".." ("up one level") at the beginning. Everything else was passed through as-is. For example, if you are in Documentation/ directory of the project, you can name Documentation/howto/maintain-git.txt as: howto/maintain-git.txt ../Documentation/howto/maitain-git.txt ../././Documentation/howto/maitain-git.txt but not as: howto/./maintain-git.txt $(pwd)/howto/maintain-git.txt This patch updates prefix_path() in several ways: - If the pathspec is not absolute, prefix (i.e. the current subdirectory relative to the root of the work tree, with terminating slash, if not empty) and the pathspec is concatenated first and used in the next step. Otherwise, that absolute pathspec is used in the next step. - Then special path components "." (no-op) and ".." (up one level) are interpreted to simplify the path. It is an error to have too many ".." to cause the intermediate result to step outside of the input to this step. - If the original pathspec was not absolute, the result from the previous step is the resulting "sanitized" pathspec. Otherwise, the result from the previous step is still absolute, and it is an error if it does not begin with the directory that corresponds to the root of the work tree. The directory is stripped away from the result and is returned. - In any case, the resulting pathspec in the array get_pathspec() returns omit the ones that caused errors. With this patch, the last two examples also behave as expected. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-01-29 09:44:27 +03:00
while (*src) {
const char *p = prefix_path(prefix, prefixlen, *src);
*(dst++) = p;
setup: sanitize absolute and funny paths in get_pathspec() The prefix_path() function called from get_pathspec() is responsible for translating list of user-supplied pathspecs to list of pathspecs that is relative to the root of the work tree. When working inside a subdirectory, the user-supplied pathspecs are taken to be relative to the current subdirectory. Among special path components in pathspecs, we used to accept and interpret only "." ("the directory", meaning a no-op) and ".." ("up one level") at the beginning. Everything else was passed through as-is. For example, if you are in Documentation/ directory of the project, you can name Documentation/howto/maintain-git.txt as: howto/maintain-git.txt ../Documentation/howto/maitain-git.txt ../././Documentation/howto/maitain-git.txt but not as: howto/./maintain-git.txt $(pwd)/howto/maintain-git.txt This patch updates prefix_path() in several ways: - If the pathspec is not absolute, prefix (i.e. the current subdirectory relative to the root of the work tree, with terminating slash, if not empty) and the pathspec is concatenated first and used in the next step. Otherwise, that absolute pathspec is used in the next step. - Then special path components "." (no-op) and ".." (up one level) are interpreted to simplify the path. It is an error to have too many ".." to cause the intermediate result to step outside of the input to this step. - If the original pathspec was not absolute, the result from the previous step is the resulting "sanitized" pathspec. Otherwise, the result from the previous step is still absolute, and it is an error if it does not begin with the directory that corresponds to the root of the work tree. The directory is stripped away from the result and is returned. - In any case, the resulting pathspec in the array get_pathspec() returns omit the ones that caused errors. With this patch, the last two examples also behave as expected. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-01-29 09:44:27 +03:00
src++;
}
*dst = NULL;
if (!*pathspec)
return NULL;
return pathspec;
}
/*
* Test if it looks like we're at a git directory.
* We want to see:
*
* - either an objects/ directory _or_ the proper
* GIT_OBJECT_DIRECTORY environment variable
* - a refs/ directory
* - either a HEAD symlink or a HEAD file that is formatted as
* a proper "ref:", or a regular file HEAD that has a properly
* formatted sha1 object name.
*/
static int is_git_directory(const char *suspect)
{
char path[PATH_MAX];
size_t len = strlen(suspect);
strcpy(path, suspect);
if (getenv(DB_ENVIRONMENT)) {
if (access(getenv(DB_ENVIRONMENT), X_OK))
return 0;
}
else {
strcpy(path + len, "/objects");
if (access(path, X_OK))
return 0;
}
strcpy(path + len, "/refs");
if (access(path, X_OK))
return 0;
strcpy(path + len, "/HEAD");
if (validate_headref(path))
return 0;
return 1;
}
int is_inside_git_dir(void)
{
Clean up work-tree handling The old version of work-tree support was an unholy mess, barely readable, and not to the point. For example, why do you have to provide a worktree, when it is not used? As in "git status". Now it works. Another riddle was: if you can have work trees inside the git dir, why are some programs complaining that they need a work tree? IOW it is allowed to call $ git --git-dir=../ --work-tree=. bla when you really want to. In this case, you are both in the git directory and in the working tree. So, programs have to actually test for the right thing, namely if they are inside a working tree, and not if they are inside a git directory. Also, GIT_DIR=../.git should behave the same as if no GIT_DIR was specified, unless there is a repository in the current working directory. It does now. The logic to determine if a repository is bare, or has a work tree (tertium non datur), is this: --work-tree=bla overrides GIT_WORK_TREE, which overrides core.bare = true, which overrides core.worktree, which overrides GIT_DIR/.. when GIT_DIR ends in /.git, which overrides the directory in which .git/ was found. In related news, a long standing bug was fixed: when in .git/bla/x.git/, which is a bare repository, git formerly assumed ../.. to be the appropriate git dir. This problem was reported by Shawn Pearce to have caused much pain, where a colleague mistakenly ran "git init" in "/" a long time ago, and bare repositories just would not work. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-08-01 04:30:14 +04:00
if (inside_git_dir < 0)
inside_git_dir = is_inside_dir(get_git_dir());
return inside_git_dir;
introduce GIT_WORK_TREE to specify the work tree setup_gdg is used as abbreviation for setup_git_directory_gently. The work tree can be specified using the environment variable GIT_WORK_TREE and the config option core.worktree (the environment variable has precendence over the config option). Additionally there is a command line option --work-tree which sets the environment variable. setup_gdg does the following now: GIT_DIR unspecified repository in .git directory parent directory of the .git directory is used as work tree, GIT_WORK_TREE is ignored GIT_DIR unspecified repository in cwd GIT_DIR is set to cwd see the cases with GIT_DIR specified what happens next and also see the note below GIT_DIR specified GIT_WORK_TREE/core.worktree unspecified cwd is used as work tree GIT_DIR specified GIT_WORK_TREE/core.worktree specified the specified work tree is used Note on the case where GIT_DIR is unspecified and repository is in cwd: GIT_WORK_TREE is used but is_inside_git_dir is always true. I did it this way because setup_gdg might be called multiple times (e.g. when doing alias expansion) and in successive calls setup_gdg should do the same thing every time. Meaning of is_bare/is_inside_work_tree/is_inside_git_dir: (1) is_bare_repository A repository is bare if core.bare is true or core.bare is unspecified and the name suggests it is bare (directory not named .git). The bare option disables a few protective checks which are useful with a working tree. Currently this changes if a repository is bare: updates of HEAD are allowed git gc packs the refs the reflog is disabled by default (2) is_inside_work_tree True if the cwd is inside the associated working tree (if there is one), false otherwise. (3) is_inside_git_dir True if the cwd is inside the git directory, false otherwise. Before this patch is_inside_git_dir was always true for bare repositories. When setup_gdg finds a repository git_config(git_default_config) is always called. This ensure that is_bare_repository makes use of core.bare and does not guess even though core.bare is specified. inside_work_tree and inside_git_dir are set if setup_gdg finds a repository. The is_inside_work_tree and is_inside_git_dir functions will die if they are called before a successful call to setup_gdg. Signed-off-by: Matthias Lederhofer <matled@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-06-06 11:10:42 +04:00
}
int is_inside_work_tree(void)
{
Clean up work-tree handling The old version of work-tree support was an unholy mess, barely readable, and not to the point. For example, why do you have to provide a worktree, when it is not used? As in "git status". Now it works. Another riddle was: if you can have work trees inside the git dir, why are some programs complaining that they need a work tree? IOW it is allowed to call $ git --git-dir=../ --work-tree=. bla when you really want to. In this case, you are both in the git directory and in the working tree. So, programs have to actually test for the right thing, namely if they are inside a working tree, and not if they are inside a git directory. Also, GIT_DIR=../.git should behave the same as if no GIT_DIR was specified, unless there is a repository in the current working directory. It does now. The logic to determine if a repository is bare, or has a work tree (tertium non datur), is this: --work-tree=bla overrides GIT_WORK_TREE, which overrides core.bare = true, which overrides core.worktree, which overrides GIT_DIR/.. when GIT_DIR ends in /.git, which overrides the directory in which .git/ was found. In related news, a long standing bug was fixed: when in .git/bla/x.git/, which is a bare repository, git formerly assumed ../.. to be the appropriate git dir. This problem was reported by Shawn Pearce to have caused much pain, where a colleague mistakenly ran "git init" in "/" a long time ago, and bare repositories just would not work. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-08-01 04:30:14 +04:00
if (inside_work_tree < 0)
inside_work_tree = is_inside_dir(get_git_work_tree());
return inside_work_tree;
introduce GIT_WORK_TREE to specify the work tree setup_gdg is used as abbreviation for setup_git_directory_gently. The work tree can be specified using the environment variable GIT_WORK_TREE and the config option core.worktree (the environment variable has precendence over the config option). Additionally there is a command line option --work-tree which sets the environment variable. setup_gdg does the following now: GIT_DIR unspecified repository in .git directory parent directory of the .git directory is used as work tree, GIT_WORK_TREE is ignored GIT_DIR unspecified repository in cwd GIT_DIR is set to cwd see the cases with GIT_DIR specified what happens next and also see the note below GIT_DIR specified GIT_WORK_TREE/core.worktree unspecified cwd is used as work tree GIT_DIR specified GIT_WORK_TREE/core.worktree specified the specified work tree is used Note on the case where GIT_DIR is unspecified and repository is in cwd: GIT_WORK_TREE is used but is_inside_git_dir is always true. I did it this way because setup_gdg might be called multiple times (e.g. when doing alias expansion) and in successive calls setup_gdg should do the same thing every time. Meaning of is_bare/is_inside_work_tree/is_inside_git_dir: (1) is_bare_repository A repository is bare if core.bare is true or core.bare is unspecified and the name suggests it is bare (directory not named .git). The bare option disables a few protective checks which are useful with a working tree. Currently this changes if a repository is bare: updates of HEAD are allowed git gc packs the refs the reflog is disabled by default (2) is_inside_work_tree True if the cwd is inside the associated working tree (if there is one), false otherwise. (3) is_inside_git_dir True if the cwd is inside the git directory, false otherwise. Before this patch is_inside_git_dir was always true for bare repositories. When setup_gdg finds a repository git_config(git_default_config) is always called. This ensure that is_bare_repository makes use of core.bare and does not guess even though core.bare is specified. inside_work_tree and inside_git_dir are set if setup_gdg finds a repository. The is_inside_work_tree and is_inside_git_dir functions will die if they are called before a successful call to setup_gdg. Signed-off-by: Matthias Lederhofer <matled@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-06-06 11:10:42 +04:00
}
Clean up work-tree handling The old version of work-tree support was an unholy mess, barely readable, and not to the point. For example, why do you have to provide a worktree, when it is not used? As in "git status". Now it works. Another riddle was: if you can have work trees inside the git dir, why are some programs complaining that they need a work tree? IOW it is allowed to call $ git --git-dir=../ --work-tree=. bla when you really want to. In this case, you are both in the git directory and in the working tree. So, programs have to actually test for the right thing, namely if they are inside a working tree, and not if they are inside a git directory. Also, GIT_DIR=../.git should behave the same as if no GIT_DIR was specified, unless there is a repository in the current working directory. It does now. The logic to determine if a repository is bare, or has a work tree (tertium non datur), is this: --work-tree=bla overrides GIT_WORK_TREE, which overrides core.bare = true, which overrides core.worktree, which overrides GIT_DIR/.. when GIT_DIR ends in /.git, which overrides the directory in which .git/ was found. In related news, a long standing bug was fixed: when in .git/bla/x.git/, which is a bare repository, git formerly assumed ../.. to be the appropriate git dir. This problem was reported by Shawn Pearce to have caused much pain, where a colleague mistakenly ran "git init" in "/" a long time ago, and bare repositories just would not work. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-08-01 04:30:14 +04:00
/*
* set_work_tree() is only ever called if you set GIT_DIR explicitely.
* The old behaviour (which we retain here) is to set the work tree root
* to the cwd, unless overridden by the config, the command line, or
* GIT_WORK_TREE.
Clean up work-tree handling The old version of work-tree support was an unholy mess, barely readable, and not to the point. For example, why do you have to provide a worktree, when it is not used? As in "git status". Now it works. Another riddle was: if you can have work trees inside the git dir, why are some programs complaining that they need a work tree? IOW it is allowed to call $ git --git-dir=../ --work-tree=. bla when you really want to. In this case, you are both in the git directory and in the working tree. So, programs have to actually test for the right thing, namely if they are inside a working tree, and not if they are inside a git directory. Also, GIT_DIR=../.git should behave the same as if no GIT_DIR was specified, unless there is a repository in the current working directory. It does now. The logic to determine if a repository is bare, or has a work tree (tertium non datur), is this: --work-tree=bla overrides GIT_WORK_TREE, which overrides core.bare = true, which overrides core.worktree, which overrides GIT_DIR/.. when GIT_DIR ends in /.git, which overrides the directory in which .git/ was found. In related news, a long standing bug was fixed: when in .git/bla/x.git/, which is a bare repository, git formerly assumed ../.. to be the appropriate git dir. This problem was reported by Shawn Pearce to have caused much pain, where a colleague mistakenly ran "git init" in "/" a long time ago, and bare repositories just would not work. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-08-01 04:30:14 +04:00
*/
static const char *set_work_tree(const char *dir)
introduce GIT_WORK_TREE to specify the work tree setup_gdg is used as abbreviation for setup_git_directory_gently. The work tree can be specified using the environment variable GIT_WORK_TREE and the config option core.worktree (the environment variable has precendence over the config option). Additionally there is a command line option --work-tree which sets the environment variable. setup_gdg does the following now: GIT_DIR unspecified repository in .git directory parent directory of the .git directory is used as work tree, GIT_WORK_TREE is ignored GIT_DIR unspecified repository in cwd GIT_DIR is set to cwd see the cases with GIT_DIR specified what happens next and also see the note below GIT_DIR specified GIT_WORK_TREE/core.worktree unspecified cwd is used as work tree GIT_DIR specified GIT_WORK_TREE/core.worktree specified the specified work tree is used Note on the case where GIT_DIR is unspecified and repository is in cwd: GIT_WORK_TREE is used but is_inside_git_dir is always true. I did it this way because setup_gdg might be called multiple times (e.g. when doing alias expansion) and in successive calls setup_gdg should do the same thing every time. Meaning of is_bare/is_inside_work_tree/is_inside_git_dir: (1) is_bare_repository A repository is bare if core.bare is true or core.bare is unspecified and the name suggests it is bare (directory not named .git). The bare option disables a few protective checks which are useful with a working tree. Currently this changes if a repository is bare: updates of HEAD are allowed git gc packs the refs the reflog is disabled by default (2) is_inside_work_tree True if the cwd is inside the associated working tree (if there is one), false otherwise. (3) is_inside_git_dir True if the cwd is inside the git directory, false otherwise. Before this patch is_inside_git_dir was always true for bare repositories. When setup_gdg finds a repository git_config(git_default_config) is always called. This ensure that is_bare_repository makes use of core.bare and does not guess even though core.bare is specified. inside_work_tree and inside_git_dir are set if setup_gdg finds a repository. The is_inside_work_tree and is_inside_git_dir functions will die if they are called before a successful call to setup_gdg. Signed-off-by: Matthias Lederhofer <matled@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-06-06 11:10:42 +04:00
{
char buffer[PATH_MAX + 1];
Clean up work-tree handling The old version of work-tree support was an unholy mess, barely readable, and not to the point. For example, why do you have to provide a worktree, when it is not used? As in "git status". Now it works. Another riddle was: if you can have work trees inside the git dir, why are some programs complaining that they need a work tree? IOW it is allowed to call $ git --git-dir=../ --work-tree=. bla when you really want to. In this case, you are both in the git directory and in the working tree. So, programs have to actually test for the right thing, namely if they are inside a working tree, and not if they are inside a git directory. Also, GIT_DIR=../.git should behave the same as if no GIT_DIR was specified, unless there is a repository in the current working directory. It does now. The logic to determine if a repository is bare, or has a work tree (tertium non datur), is this: --work-tree=bla overrides GIT_WORK_TREE, which overrides core.bare = true, which overrides core.worktree, which overrides GIT_DIR/.. when GIT_DIR ends in /.git, which overrides the directory in which .git/ was found. In related news, a long standing bug was fixed: when in .git/bla/x.git/, which is a bare repository, git formerly assumed ../.. to be the appropriate git dir. This problem was reported by Shawn Pearce to have caused much pain, where a colleague mistakenly ran "git init" in "/" a long time ago, and bare repositories just would not work. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-08-01 04:30:14 +04:00
if (!getcwd(buffer, sizeof(buffer)))
die ("Could not get the current working directory");
git_work_tree_cfg = xstrdup(buffer);
Clean up work-tree handling The old version of work-tree support was an unholy mess, barely readable, and not to the point. For example, why do you have to provide a worktree, when it is not used? As in "git status". Now it works. Another riddle was: if you can have work trees inside the git dir, why are some programs complaining that they need a work tree? IOW it is allowed to call $ git --git-dir=../ --work-tree=. bla when you really want to. In this case, you are both in the git directory and in the working tree. So, programs have to actually test for the right thing, namely if they are inside a working tree, and not if they are inside a git directory. Also, GIT_DIR=../.git should behave the same as if no GIT_DIR was specified, unless there is a repository in the current working directory. It does now. The logic to determine if a repository is bare, or has a work tree (tertium non datur), is this: --work-tree=bla overrides GIT_WORK_TREE, which overrides core.bare = true, which overrides core.worktree, which overrides GIT_DIR/.. when GIT_DIR ends in /.git, which overrides the directory in which .git/ was found. In related news, a long standing bug was fixed: when in .git/bla/x.git/, which is a bare repository, git formerly assumed ../.. to be the appropriate git dir. This problem was reported by Shawn Pearce to have caused much pain, where a colleague mistakenly ran "git init" in "/" a long time ago, and bare repositories just would not work. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-08-01 04:30:14 +04:00
inside_work_tree = 1;
return NULL;
}
void setup_work_tree(void)
{
const char *work_tree, *git_dir;
static int initialized = 0;
if (initialized)
return;
work_tree = get_git_work_tree();
git_dir = get_git_dir();
if (!is_absolute_path(git_dir))
Make git_dir a path relative to work_tree in setup_work_tree() Once we find the absolute paths for git_dir and work_tree, we can make git_dir a relative path since we know pwd will be work_tree. This should save the kernel some time traversing the path to work_tree all the time if git_dir is inside work_tree. Daniel's patch didn't apply for me as-is, so I recreated it with some differences, and here are the numbers from ten runs each. There is some IO for me - probably due to more-or-less random flushing of the journal - so the variation is bigger than I'd like, but whatever: Before: real 0m8.135s real 0m7.933s real 0m8.080s real 0m7.954s real 0m7.949s real 0m8.112s real 0m7.934s real 0m8.059s real 0m7.979s real 0m8.038s After: real 0m7.685s real 0m7.968s real 0m7.703s real 0m7.850s real 0m7.995s real 0m7.817s real 0m7.963s real 0m7.955s real 0m7.848s real 0m7.969s Now, going by "best of ten" (on the assumption that the longer numbers are all due to IO), I'm saying a 7.933s -> 7.685s reduction, and it does seem to be outside of the noise (ie the "after" case never broke 8s, while the "before" case did so half the time). So looks like about 3% to me. Doing it for a slightly smaller test-case (just the "arch" subdirectory) gets more stable numbers probably due to not filling the journal with metadata updates, so we have: Before: real 0m1.633s real 0m1.633s real 0m1.633s real 0m1.632s real 0m1.632s real 0m1.630s real 0m1.634s real 0m1.631s real 0m1.632s real 0m1.632s After: real 0m1.610s real 0m1.609s real 0m1.610s real 0m1.608s real 0m1.607s real 0m1.610s real 0m1.609s real 0m1.611s real 0m1.608s real 0m1.611s where I'ld just take the averages and say 1.632 vs 1.610, which is just over 1% peformance improvement. So it's not in the noise, but it's not as big as I initially thought and measured. (That said, it obviously depends on how deep the working directory path is too, and whether it is behind NFS or something else that might need to cause more work to look up). Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-06-19 23:34:06 +04:00
git_dir = make_absolute_path(git_dir);
if (!work_tree || chdir(work_tree))
die("This operation must be run in a work tree");
Make git_dir a path relative to work_tree in setup_work_tree() Once we find the absolute paths for git_dir and work_tree, we can make git_dir a relative path since we know pwd will be work_tree. This should save the kernel some time traversing the path to work_tree all the time if git_dir is inside work_tree. Daniel's patch didn't apply for me as-is, so I recreated it with some differences, and here are the numbers from ten runs each. There is some IO for me - probably due to more-or-less random flushing of the journal - so the variation is bigger than I'd like, but whatever: Before: real 0m8.135s real 0m7.933s real 0m8.080s real 0m7.954s real 0m7.949s real 0m8.112s real 0m7.934s real 0m8.059s real 0m7.979s real 0m8.038s After: real 0m7.685s real 0m7.968s real 0m7.703s real 0m7.850s real 0m7.995s real 0m7.817s real 0m7.963s real 0m7.955s real 0m7.848s real 0m7.969s Now, going by "best of ten" (on the assumption that the longer numbers are all due to IO), I'm saying a 7.933s -> 7.685s reduction, and it does seem to be outside of the noise (ie the "after" case never broke 8s, while the "before" case did so half the time). So looks like about 3% to me. Doing it for a slightly smaller test-case (just the "arch" subdirectory) gets more stable numbers probably due to not filling the journal with metadata updates, so we have: Before: real 0m1.633s real 0m1.633s real 0m1.633s real 0m1.632s real 0m1.632s real 0m1.630s real 0m1.634s real 0m1.631s real 0m1.632s real 0m1.632s After: real 0m1.610s real 0m1.609s real 0m1.610s real 0m1.608s real 0m1.607s real 0m1.610s real 0m1.609s real 0m1.611s real 0m1.608s real 0m1.611s where I'ld just take the averages and say 1.632 vs 1.610, which is just over 1% peformance improvement. So it's not in the noise, but it's not as big as I initially thought and measured. (That said, it obviously depends on how deep the working directory path is too, and whether it is behind NFS or something else that might need to cause more work to look up). Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-06-19 23:34:06 +04:00
set_git_dir(make_relative_path(git_dir, work_tree));
initialized = 1;
}
static int check_repository_format_gently(int *nongit_ok)
{
git_config(check_repository_format_version, NULL);
if (GIT_REPO_VERSION < repository_format_version) {
if (!nongit_ok)
die ("Expected git repo version <= %d, found %d",
GIT_REPO_VERSION, repository_format_version);
warning("Expected git repo version <= %d, found %d",
GIT_REPO_VERSION, repository_format_version);
warning("Please upgrade Git");
*nongit_ok = -1;
return -1;
}
return 0;
}
/*
* Try to read the location of the git directory from the .git file,
* return path to git directory if found.
*/
const char *read_gitfile_gently(const char *path)
{
char *buf;
struct stat st;
int fd;
size_t len;
if (stat(path, &st))
return NULL;
if (!S_ISREG(st.st_mode))
return NULL;
fd = open(path, O_RDONLY);
if (fd < 0)
die("Error opening %s: %s", path, strerror(errno));
buf = xmalloc(st.st_size + 1);
len = read_in_full(fd, buf, st.st_size);
close(fd);
if (len != st.st_size)
die("Error reading %s", path);
buf[len] = '\0';
if (prefixcmp(buf, "gitdir: "))
die("Invalid gitfile format: %s", path);
while (buf[len - 1] == '\n' || buf[len - 1] == '\r')
len--;
if (len < 9)
die("No path in gitfile: %s", path);
buf[len] = '\0';
if (!is_git_directory(buf + 8))
die("Not a git repository: %s", buf + 8);
path = make_absolute_path(buf + 8);
free(buf);
return path;
}
Clean up work-tree handling The old version of work-tree support was an unholy mess, barely readable, and not to the point. For example, why do you have to provide a worktree, when it is not used? As in "git status". Now it works. Another riddle was: if you can have work trees inside the git dir, why are some programs complaining that they need a work tree? IOW it is allowed to call $ git --git-dir=../ --work-tree=. bla when you really want to. In this case, you are both in the git directory and in the working tree. So, programs have to actually test for the right thing, namely if they are inside a working tree, and not if they are inside a git directory. Also, GIT_DIR=../.git should behave the same as if no GIT_DIR was specified, unless there is a repository in the current working directory. It does now. The logic to determine if a repository is bare, or has a work tree (tertium non datur), is this: --work-tree=bla overrides GIT_WORK_TREE, which overrides core.bare = true, which overrides core.worktree, which overrides GIT_DIR/.. when GIT_DIR ends in /.git, which overrides the directory in which .git/ was found. In related news, a long standing bug was fixed: when in .git/bla/x.git/, which is a bare repository, git formerly assumed ../.. to be the appropriate git dir. This problem was reported by Shawn Pearce to have caused much pain, where a colleague mistakenly ran "git init" in "/" a long time ago, and bare repositories just would not work. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-08-01 04:30:14 +04:00
/*
* We cannot decide in this function whether we are in the work tree or
* not, since the config can only be read _after_ this function was called.
*/
const char *setup_git_directory_gently(int *nongit_ok)
{
Clean up work-tree handling The old version of work-tree support was an unholy mess, barely readable, and not to the point. For example, why do you have to provide a worktree, when it is not used? As in "git status". Now it works. Another riddle was: if you can have work trees inside the git dir, why are some programs complaining that they need a work tree? IOW it is allowed to call $ git --git-dir=../ --work-tree=. bla when you really want to. In this case, you are both in the git directory and in the working tree. So, programs have to actually test for the right thing, namely if they are inside a working tree, and not if they are inside a git directory. Also, GIT_DIR=../.git should behave the same as if no GIT_DIR was specified, unless there is a repository in the current working directory. It does now. The logic to determine if a repository is bare, or has a work tree (tertium non datur), is this: --work-tree=bla overrides GIT_WORK_TREE, which overrides core.bare = true, which overrides core.worktree, which overrides GIT_DIR/.. when GIT_DIR ends in /.git, which overrides the directory in which .git/ was found. In related news, a long standing bug was fixed: when in .git/bla/x.git/, which is a bare repository, git formerly assumed ../.. to be the appropriate git dir. This problem was reported by Shawn Pearce to have caused much pain, where a colleague mistakenly ran "git init" in "/" a long time ago, and bare repositories just would not work. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-08-01 04:30:14 +04:00
const char *work_tree_env = getenv(GIT_WORK_TREE_ENVIRONMENT);
const char *env_ceiling_dirs = getenv(CEILING_DIRECTORIES_ENVIRONMENT);
static char cwd[PATH_MAX+1];
Clean up work-tree handling The old version of work-tree support was an unholy mess, barely readable, and not to the point. For example, why do you have to provide a worktree, when it is not used? As in "git status". Now it works. Another riddle was: if you can have work trees inside the git dir, why are some programs complaining that they need a work tree? IOW it is allowed to call $ git --git-dir=../ --work-tree=. bla when you really want to. In this case, you are both in the git directory and in the working tree. So, programs have to actually test for the right thing, namely if they are inside a working tree, and not if they are inside a git directory. Also, GIT_DIR=../.git should behave the same as if no GIT_DIR was specified, unless there is a repository in the current working directory. It does now. The logic to determine if a repository is bare, or has a work tree (tertium non datur), is this: --work-tree=bla overrides GIT_WORK_TREE, which overrides core.bare = true, which overrides core.worktree, which overrides GIT_DIR/.. when GIT_DIR ends in /.git, which overrides the directory in which .git/ was found. In related news, a long standing bug was fixed: when in .git/bla/x.git/, which is a bare repository, git formerly assumed ../.. to be the appropriate git dir. This problem was reported by Shawn Pearce to have caused much pain, where a colleague mistakenly ran "git init" in "/" a long time ago, and bare repositories just would not work. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-08-01 04:30:14 +04:00
const char *gitdirenv;
const char *gitfile_dir;
int len, offset, ceil_offset;
/*
* Let's assume that we are in a git repository.
* If it turns out later that we are somewhere else, the value will be
* updated accordingly.
*/
if (nongit_ok)
*nongit_ok = 0;
Clean up work-tree handling The old version of work-tree support was an unholy mess, barely readable, and not to the point. For example, why do you have to provide a worktree, when it is not used? As in "git status". Now it works. Another riddle was: if you can have work trees inside the git dir, why are some programs complaining that they need a work tree? IOW it is allowed to call $ git --git-dir=../ --work-tree=. bla when you really want to. In this case, you are both in the git directory and in the working tree. So, programs have to actually test for the right thing, namely if they are inside a working tree, and not if they are inside a git directory. Also, GIT_DIR=../.git should behave the same as if no GIT_DIR was specified, unless there is a repository in the current working directory. It does now. The logic to determine if a repository is bare, or has a work tree (tertium non datur), is this: --work-tree=bla overrides GIT_WORK_TREE, which overrides core.bare = true, which overrides core.worktree, which overrides GIT_DIR/.. when GIT_DIR ends in /.git, which overrides the directory in which .git/ was found. In related news, a long standing bug was fixed: when in .git/bla/x.git/, which is a bare repository, git formerly assumed ../.. to be the appropriate git dir. This problem was reported by Shawn Pearce to have caused much pain, where a colleague mistakenly ran "git init" in "/" a long time ago, and bare repositories just would not work. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-08-01 04:30:14 +04:00
/*
* If GIT_DIR is set explicitly, we're not going
* to do any discovery, but we still do repository
* validation.
*/
gitdirenv = getenv(GIT_DIR_ENVIRONMENT);
Clean up work-tree handling The old version of work-tree support was an unholy mess, barely readable, and not to the point. For example, why do you have to provide a worktree, when it is not used? As in "git status". Now it works. Another riddle was: if you can have work trees inside the git dir, why are some programs complaining that they need a work tree? IOW it is allowed to call $ git --git-dir=../ --work-tree=. bla when you really want to. In this case, you are both in the git directory and in the working tree. So, programs have to actually test for the right thing, namely if they are inside a working tree, and not if they are inside a git directory. Also, GIT_DIR=../.git should behave the same as if no GIT_DIR was specified, unless there is a repository in the current working directory. It does now. The logic to determine if a repository is bare, or has a work tree (tertium non datur), is this: --work-tree=bla overrides GIT_WORK_TREE, which overrides core.bare = true, which overrides core.worktree, which overrides GIT_DIR/.. when GIT_DIR ends in /.git, which overrides the directory in which .git/ was found. In related news, a long standing bug was fixed: when in .git/bla/x.git/, which is a bare repository, git formerly assumed ../.. to be the appropriate git dir. This problem was reported by Shawn Pearce to have caused much pain, where a colleague mistakenly ran "git init" in "/" a long time ago, and bare repositories just would not work. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-08-01 04:30:14 +04:00
if (gitdirenv) {
if (PATH_MAX - 40 < strlen(gitdirenv))
die("'$%s' too big", GIT_DIR_ENVIRONMENT);
if (is_git_directory(gitdirenv)) {
static char buffer[1024 + 1];
const char *retval;
if (!work_tree_env) {
retval = set_work_tree(gitdirenv);
/* config may override worktree */
if (check_repository_format_gently(nongit_ok))
return NULL;
return retval;
}
if (check_repository_format_gently(nongit_ok))
return NULL;
retval = get_relative_cwd(buffer, sizeof(buffer) - 1,
get_git_work_tree());
if (!retval || !*retval)
return NULL;
set_git_dir(make_absolute_path(gitdirenv));
if (chdir(work_tree_env) < 0)
die ("Could not chdir to %s", work_tree_env);
strcat(buffer, "/");
return retval;
introduce GIT_WORK_TREE to specify the work tree setup_gdg is used as abbreviation for setup_git_directory_gently. The work tree can be specified using the environment variable GIT_WORK_TREE and the config option core.worktree (the environment variable has precendence over the config option). Additionally there is a command line option --work-tree which sets the environment variable. setup_gdg does the following now: GIT_DIR unspecified repository in .git directory parent directory of the .git directory is used as work tree, GIT_WORK_TREE is ignored GIT_DIR unspecified repository in cwd GIT_DIR is set to cwd see the cases with GIT_DIR specified what happens next and also see the note below GIT_DIR specified GIT_WORK_TREE/core.worktree unspecified cwd is used as work tree GIT_DIR specified GIT_WORK_TREE/core.worktree specified the specified work tree is used Note on the case where GIT_DIR is unspecified and repository is in cwd: GIT_WORK_TREE is used but is_inside_git_dir is always true. I did it this way because setup_gdg might be called multiple times (e.g. when doing alias expansion) and in successive calls setup_gdg should do the same thing every time. Meaning of is_bare/is_inside_work_tree/is_inside_git_dir: (1) is_bare_repository A repository is bare if core.bare is true or core.bare is unspecified and the name suggests it is bare (directory not named .git). The bare option disables a few protective checks which are useful with a working tree. Currently this changes if a repository is bare: updates of HEAD are allowed git gc packs the refs the reflog is disabled by default (2) is_inside_work_tree True if the cwd is inside the associated working tree (if there is one), false otherwise. (3) is_inside_git_dir True if the cwd is inside the git directory, false otherwise. Before this patch is_inside_git_dir was always true for bare repositories. When setup_gdg finds a repository git_config(git_default_config) is always called. This ensure that is_bare_repository makes use of core.bare and does not guess even though core.bare is specified. inside_work_tree and inside_git_dir are set if setup_gdg finds a repository. The is_inside_work_tree and is_inside_git_dir functions will die if they are called before a successful call to setup_gdg. Signed-off-by: Matthias Lederhofer <matled@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-06-06 11:10:42 +04:00
}
if (nongit_ok) {
*nongit_ok = 1;
return NULL;
}
die("Not a git repository: '%s'", gitdirenv);
}
if (!getcwd(cwd, sizeof(cwd)-1))
die("Unable to read current working directory");
ceil_offset = longest_ancestor_length(cwd, env_ceiling_dirs);
if (ceil_offset < 0 && has_dos_drive_prefix(cwd))
ceil_offset = 1;
introduce GIT_WORK_TREE to specify the work tree setup_gdg is used as abbreviation for setup_git_directory_gently. The work tree can be specified using the environment variable GIT_WORK_TREE and the config option core.worktree (the environment variable has precendence over the config option). Additionally there is a command line option --work-tree which sets the environment variable. setup_gdg does the following now: GIT_DIR unspecified repository in .git directory parent directory of the .git directory is used as work tree, GIT_WORK_TREE is ignored GIT_DIR unspecified repository in cwd GIT_DIR is set to cwd see the cases with GIT_DIR specified what happens next and also see the note below GIT_DIR specified GIT_WORK_TREE/core.worktree unspecified cwd is used as work tree GIT_DIR specified GIT_WORK_TREE/core.worktree specified the specified work tree is used Note on the case where GIT_DIR is unspecified and repository is in cwd: GIT_WORK_TREE is used but is_inside_git_dir is always true. I did it this way because setup_gdg might be called multiple times (e.g. when doing alias expansion) and in successive calls setup_gdg should do the same thing every time. Meaning of is_bare/is_inside_work_tree/is_inside_git_dir: (1) is_bare_repository A repository is bare if core.bare is true or core.bare is unspecified and the name suggests it is bare (directory not named .git). The bare option disables a few protective checks which are useful with a working tree. Currently this changes if a repository is bare: updates of HEAD are allowed git gc packs the refs the reflog is disabled by default (2) is_inside_work_tree True if the cwd is inside the associated working tree (if there is one), false otherwise. (3) is_inside_git_dir True if the cwd is inside the git directory, false otherwise. Before this patch is_inside_git_dir was always true for bare repositories. When setup_gdg finds a repository git_config(git_default_config) is always called. This ensure that is_bare_repository makes use of core.bare and does not guess even though core.bare is specified. inside_work_tree and inside_git_dir are set if setup_gdg finds a repository. The is_inside_work_tree and is_inside_git_dir functions will die if they are called before a successful call to setup_gdg. Signed-off-by: Matthias Lederhofer <matled@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-06-06 11:10:42 +04:00
/*
Clean up work-tree handling The old version of work-tree support was an unholy mess, barely readable, and not to the point. For example, why do you have to provide a worktree, when it is not used? As in "git status". Now it works. Another riddle was: if you can have work trees inside the git dir, why are some programs complaining that they need a work tree? IOW it is allowed to call $ git --git-dir=../ --work-tree=. bla when you really want to. In this case, you are both in the git directory and in the working tree. So, programs have to actually test for the right thing, namely if they are inside a working tree, and not if they are inside a git directory. Also, GIT_DIR=../.git should behave the same as if no GIT_DIR was specified, unless there is a repository in the current working directory. It does now. The logic to determine if a repository is bare, or has a work tree (tertium non datur), is this: --work-tree=bla overrides GIT_WORK_TREE, which overrides core.bare = true, which overrides core.worktree, which overrides GIT_DIR/.. when GIT_DIR ends in /.git, which overrides the directory in which .git/ was found. In related news, a long standing bug was fixed: when in .git/bla/x.git/, which is a bare repository, git formerly assumed ../.. to be the appropriate git dir. This problem was reported by Shawn Pearce to have caused much pain, where a colleague mistakenly ran "git init" in "/" a long time ago, and bare repositories just would not work. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-08-01 04:30:14 +04:00
* Test in the following order (relative to the cwd):
* - .git (file containing "gitdir: <path>")
Clean up work-tree handling The old version of work-tree support was an unholy mess, barely readable, and not to the point. For example, why do you have to provide a worktree, when it is not used? As in "git status". Now it works. Another riddle was: if you can have work trees inside the git dir, why are some programs complaining that they need a work tree? IOW it is allowed to call $ git --git-dir=../ --work-tree=. bla when you really want to. In this case, you are both in the git directory and in the working tree. So, programs have to actually test for the right thing, namely if they are inside a working tree, and not if they are inside a git directory. Also, GIT_DIR=../.git should behave the same as if no GIT_DIR was specified, unless there is a repository in the current working directory. It does now. The logic to determine if a repository is bare, or has a work tree (tertium non datur), is this: --work-tree=bla overrides GIT_WORK_TREE, which overrides core.bare = true, which overrides core.worktree, which overrides GIT_DIR/.. when GIT_DIR ends in /.git, which overrides the directory in which .git/ was found. In related news, a long standing bug was fixed: when in .git/bla/x.git/, which is a bare repository, git formerly assumed ../.. to be the appropriate git dir. This problem was reported by Shawn Pearce to have caused much pain, where a colleague mistakenly ran "git init" in "/" a long time ago, and bare repositories just would not work. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-08-01 04:30:14 +04:00
* - .git/
* - ./ (bare)
* - ../.git
Clean up work-tree handling The old version of work-tree support was an unholy mess, barely readable, and not to the point. For example, why do you have to provide a worktree, when it is not used? As in "git status". Now it works. Another riddle was: if you can have work trees inside the git dir, why are some programs complaining that they need a work tree? IOW it is allowed to call $ git --git-dir=../ --work-tree=. bla when you really want to. In this case, you are both in the git directory and in the working tree. So, programs have to actually test for the right thing, namely if they are inside a working tree, and not if they are inside a git directory. Also, GIT_DIR=../.git should behave the same as if no GIT_DIR was specified, unless there is a repository in the current working directory. It does now. The logic to determine if a repository is bare, or has a work tree (tertium non datur), is this: --work-tree=bla overrides GIT_WORK_TREE, which overrides core.bare = true, which overrides core.worktree, which overrides GIT_DIR/.. when GIT_DIR ends in /.git, which overrides the directory in which .git/ was found. In related news, a long standing bug was fixed: when in .git/bla/x.git/, which is a bare repository, git formerly assumed ../.. to be the appropriate git dir. This problem was reported by Shawn Pearce to have caused much pain, where a colleague mistakenly ran "git init" in "/" a long time ago, and bare repositories just would not work. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-08-01 04:30:14 +04:00
* - ../.git/
* - ../ (bare)
* - ../../.git/
* etc.
introduce GIT_WORK_TREE to specify the work tree setup_gdg is used as abbreviation for setup_git_directory_gently. The work tree can be specified using the environment variable GIT_WORK_TREE and the config option core.worktree (the environment variable has precendence over the config option). Additionally there is a command line option --work-tree which sets the environment variable. setup_gdg does the following now: GIT_DIR unspecified repository in .git directory parent directory of the .git directory is used as work tree, GIT_WORK_TREE is ignored GIT_DIR unspecified repository in cwd GIT_DIR is set to cwd see the cases with GIT_DIR specified what happens next and also see the note below GIT_DIR specified GIT_WORK_TREE/core.worktree unspecified cwd is used as work tree GIT_DIR specified GIT_WORK_TREE/core.worktree specified the specified work tree is used Note on the case where GIT_DIR is unspecified and repository is in cwd: GIT_WORK_TREE is used but is_inside_git_dir is always true. I did it this way because setup_gdg might be called multiple times (e.g. when doing alias expansion) and in successive calls setup_gdg should do the same thing every time. Meaning of is_bare/is_inside_work_tree/is_inside_git_dir: (1) is_bare_repository A repository is bare if core.bare is true or core.bare is unspecified and the name suggests it is bare (directory not named .git). The bare option disables a few protective checks which are useful with a working tree. Currently this changes if a repository is bare: updates of HEAD are allowed git gc packs the refs the reflog is disabled by default (2) is_inside_work_tree True if the cwd is inside the associated working tree (if there is one), false otherwise. (3) is_inside_git_dir True if the cwd is inside the git directory, false otherwise. Before this patch is_inside_git_dir was always true for bare repositories. When setup_gdg finds a repository git_config(git_default_config) is always called. This ensure that is_bare_repository makes use of core.bare and does not guess even though core.bare is specified. inside_work_tree and inside_git_dir are set if setup_gdg finds a repository. The is_inside_work_tree and is_inside_git_dir functions will die if they are called before a successful call to setup_gdg. Signed-off-by: Matthias Lederhofer <matled@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-06-06 11:10:42 +04:00
*/
Clean up work-tree handling The old version of work-tree support was an unholy mess, barely readable, and not to the point. For example, why do you have to provide a worktree, when it is not used? As in "git status". Now it works. Another riddle was: if you can have work trees inside the git dir, why are some programs complaining that they need a work tree? IOW it is allowed to call $ git --git-dir=../ --work-tree=. bla when you really want to. In this case, you are both in the git directory and in the working tree. So, programs have to actually test for the right thing, namely if they are inside a working tree, and not if they are inside a git directory. Also, GIT_DIR=../.git should behave the same as if no GIT_DIR was specified, unless there is a repository in the current working directory. It does now. The logic to determine if a repository is bare, or has a work tree (tertium non datur), is this: --work-tree=bla overrides GIT_WORK_TREE, which overrides core.bare = true, which overrides core.worktree, which overrides GIT_DIR/.. when GIT_DIR ends in /.git, which overrides the directory in which .git/ was found. In related news, a long standing bug was fixed: when in .git/bla/x.git/, which is a bare repository, git formerly assumed ../.. to be the appropriate git dir. This problem was reported by Shawn Pearce to have caused much pain, where a colleague mistakenly ran "git init" in "/" a long time ago, and bare repositories just would not work. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-08-01 04:30:14 +04:00
offset = len = strlen(cwd);
for (;;) {
gitfile_dir = read_gitfile_gently(DEFAULT_GIT_DIR_ENVIRONMENT);
if (gitfile_dir) {
if (set_git_dir(gitfile_dir))
die("Repository setup failed");
break;
}
Clean up work-tree handling The old version of work-tree support was an unholy mess, barely readable, and not to the point. For example, why do you have to provide a worktree, when it is not used? As in "git status". Now it works. Another riddle was: if you can have work trees inside the git dir, why are some programs complaining that they need a work tree? IOW it is allowed to call $ git --git-dir=../ --work-tree=. bla when you really want to. In this case, you are both in the git directory and in the working tree. So, programs have to actually test for the right thing, namely if they are inside a working tree, and not if they are inside a git directory. Also, GIT_DIR=../.git should behave the same as if no GIT_DIR was specified, unless there is a repository in the current working directory. It does now. The logic to determine if a repository is bare, or has a work tree (tertium non datur), is this: --work-tree=bla overrides GIT_WORK_TREE, which overrides core.bare = true, which overrides core.worktree, which overrides GIT_DIR/.. when GIT_DIR ends in /.git, which overrides the directory in which .git/ was found. In related news, a long standing bug was fixed: when in .git/bla/x.git/, which is a bare repository, git formerly assumed ../.. to be the appropriate git dir. This problem was reported by Shawn Pearce to have caused much pain, where a colleague mistakenly ran "git init" in "/" a long time ago, and bare repositories just would not work. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-08-01 04:30:14 +04:00
if (is_git_directory(DEFAULT_GIT_DIR_ENVIRONMENT))
break;
if (is_git_directory(".")) {
inside_git_dir = 1;
if (!work_tree_env)
inside_work_tree = 0;
if (offset != len) {
cwd[offset] = '\0';
setenv(GIT_DIR_ENVIRONMENT, cwd, 1);
} else
setenv(GIT_DIR_ENVIRONMENT, ".", 1);
check_repository_format_gently(nongit_ok);
introduce GIT_WORK_TREE to specify the work tree setup_gdg is used as abbreviation for setup_git_directory_gently. The work tree can be specified using the environment variable GIT_WORK_TREE and the config option core.worktree (the environment variable has precendence over the config option). Additionally there is a command line option --work-tree which sets the environment variable. setup_gdg does the following now: GIT_DIR unspecified repository in .git directory parent directory of the .git directory is used as work tree, GIT_WORK_TREE is ignored GIT_DIR unspecified repository in cwd GIT_DIR is set to cwd see the cases with GIT_DIR specified what happens next and also see the note below GIT_DIR specified GIT_WORK_TREE/core.worktree unspecified cwd is used as work tree GIT_DIR specified GIT_WORK_TREE/core.worktree specified the specified work tree is used Note on the case where GIT_DIR is unspecified and repository is in cwd: GIT_WORK_TREE is used but is_inside_git_dir is always true. I did it this way because setup_gdg might be called multiple times (e.g. when doing alias expansion) and in successive calls setup_gdg should do the same thing every time. Meaning of is_bare/is_inside_work_tree/is_inside_git_dir: (1) is_bare_repository A repository is bare if core.bare is true or core.bare is unspecified and the name suggests it is bare (directory not named .git). The bare option disables a few protective checks which are useful with a working tree. Currently this changes if a repository is bare: updates of HEAD are allowed git gc packs the refs the reflog is disabled by default (2) is_inside_work_tree True if the cwd is inside the associated working tree (if there is one), false otherwise. (3) is_inside_git_dir True if the cwd is inside the git directory, false otherwise. Before this patch is_inside_git_dir was always true for bare repositories. When setup_gdg finds a repository git_config(git_default_config) is always called. This ensure that is_bare_repository makes use of core.bare and does not guess even though core.bare is specified. inside_work_tree and inside_git_dir are set if setup_gdg finds a repository. The is_inside_work_tree and is_inside_git_dir functions will die if they are called before a successful call to setup_gdg. Signed-off-by: Matthias Lederhofer <matled@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-06-06 11:10:42 +04:00
return NULL;
}
while (--offset > ceil_offset && cwd[offset] != '/');
if (offset <= ceil_offset) {
if (nongit_ok) {
if (chdir(cwd))
die("Cannot come back to cwd");
*nongit_ok = 1;
return NULL;
Clean up work-tree handling The old version of work-tree support was an unholy mess, barely readable, and not to the point. For example, why do you have to provide a worktree, when it is not used? As in "git status". Now it works. Another riddle was: if you can have work trees inside the git dir, why are some programs complaining that they need a work tree? IOW it is allowed to call $ git --git-dir=../ --work-tree=. bla when you really want to. In this case, you are both in the git directory and in the working tree. So, programs have to actually test for the right thing, namely if they are inside a working tree, and not if they are inside a git directory. Also, GIT_DIR=../.git should behave the same as if no GIT_DIR was specified, unless there is a repository in the current working directory. It does now. The logic to determine if a repository is bare, or has a work tree (tertium non datur), is this: --work-tree=bla overrides GIT_WORK_TREE, which overrides core.bare = true, which overrides core.worktree, which overrides GIT_DIR/.. when GIT_DIR ends in /.git, which overrides the directory in which .git/ was found. In related news, a long standing bug was fixed: when in .git/bla/x.git/, which is a bare repository, git formerly assumed ../.. to be the appropriate git dir. This problem was reported by Shawn Pearce to have caused much pain, where a colleague mistakenly ran "git init" in "/" a long time ago, and bare repositories just would not work. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-08-01 04:30:14 +04:00
}
die("Not a git repository (or any of the parent directories): %s", DEFAULT_GIT_DIR_ENVIRONMENT);
}
if (chdir(".."))
die("Cannot change to %s/..: %s", cwd, strerror(errno));
introduce GIT_WORK_TREE to specify the work tree setup_gdg is used as abbreviation for setup_git_directory_gently. The work tree can be specified using the environment variable GIT_WORK_TREE and the config option core.worktree (the environment variable has precendence over the config option). Additionally there is a command line option --work-tree which sets the environment variable. setup_gdg does the following now: GIT_DIR unspecified repository in .git directory parent directory of the .git directory is used as work tree, GIT_WORK_TREE is ignored GIT_DIR unspecified repository in cwd GIT_DIR is set to cwd see the cases with GIT_DIR specified what happens next and also see the note below GIT_DIR specified GIT_WORK_TREE/core.worktree unspecified cwd is used as work tree GIT_DIR specified GIT_WORK_TREE/core.worktree specified the specified work tree is used Note on the case where GIT_DIR is unspecified and repository is in cwd: GIT_WORK_TREE is used but is_inside_git_dir is always true. I did it this way because setup_gdg might be called multiple times (e.g. when doing alias expansion) and in successive calls setup_gdg should do the same thing every time. Meaning of is_bare/is_inside_work_tree/is_inside_git_dir: (1) is_bare_repository A repository is bare if core.bare is true or core.bare is unspecified and the name suggests it is bare (directory not named .git). The bare option disables a few protective checks which are useful with a working tree. Currently this changes if a repository is bare: updates of HEAD are allowed git gc packs the refs the reflog is disabled by default (2) is_inside_work_tree True if the cwd is inside the associated working tree (if there is one), false otherwise. (3) is_inside_git_dir True if the cwd is inside the git directory, false otherwise. Before this patch is_inside_git_dir was always true for bare repositories. When setup_gdg finds a repository git_config(git_default_config) is always called. This ensure that is_bare_repository makes use of core.bare and does not guess even though core.bare is specified. inside_work_tree and inside_git_dir are set if setup_gdg finds a repository. The is_inside_work_tree and is_inside_git_dir functions will die if they are called before a successful call to setup_gdg. Signed-off-by: Matthias Lederhofer <matled@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-06-06 11:10:42 +04:00
}
Clean up work-tree handling The old version of work-tree support was an unholy mess, barely readable, and not to the point. For example, why do you have to provide a worktree, when it is not used? As in "git status". Now it works. Another riddle was: if you can have work trees inside the git dir, why are some programs complaining that they need a work tree? IOW it is allowed to call $ git --git-dir=../ --work-tree=. bla when you really want to. In this case, you are both in the git directory and in the working tree. So, programs have to actually test for the right thing, namely if they are inside a working tree, and not if they are inside a git directory. Also, GIT_DIR=../.git should behave the same as if no GIT_DIR was specified, unless there is a repository in the current working directory. It does now. The logic to determine if a repository is bare, or has a work tree (tertium non datur), is this: --work-tree=bla overrides GIT_WORK_TREE, which overrides core.bare = true, which overrides core.worktree, which overrides GIT_DIR/.. when GIT_DIR ends in /.git, which overrides the directory in which .git/ was found. In related news, a long standing bug was fixed: when in .git/bla/x.git/, which is a bare repository, git formerly assumed ../.. to be the appropriate git dir. This problem was reported by Shawn Pearce to have caused much pain, where a colleague mistakenly ran "git init" in "/" a long time ago, and bare repositories just would not work. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-08-01 04:30:14 +04:00
inside_git_dir = 0;
if (!work_tree_env)
inside_work_tree = 1;
git_work_tree_cfg = xstrndup(cwd, offset);
if (check_repository_format_gently(nongit_ok))
return NULL;
Clean up work-tree handling The old version of work-tree support was an unholy mess, barely readable, and not to the point. For example, why do you have to provide a worktree, when it is not used? As in "git status". Now it works. Another riddle was: if you can have work trees inside the git dir, why are some programs complaining that they need a work tree? IOW it is allowed to call $ git --git-dir=../ --work-tree=. bla when you really want to. In this case, you are both in the git directory and in the working tree. So, programs have to actually test for the right thing, namely if they are inside a working tree, and not if they are inside a git directory. Also, GIT_DIR=../.git should behave the same as if no GIT_DIR was specified, unless there is a repository in the current working directory. It does now. The logic to determine if a repository is bare, or has a work tree (tertium non datur), is this: --work-tree=bla overrides GIT_WORK_TREE, which overrides core.bare = true, which overrides core.worktree, which overrides GIT_DIR/.. when GIT_DIR ends in /.git, which overrides the directory in which .git/ was found. In related news, a long standing bug was fixed: when in .git/bla/x.git/, which is a bare repository, git formerly assumed ../.. to be the appropriate git dir. This problem was reported by Shawn Pearce to have caused much pain, where a colleague mistakenly ran "git init" in "/" a long time ago, and bare repositories just would not work. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-08-01 04:30:14 +04:00
if (offset == len)
return NULL;
Clean up work-tree handling The old version of work-tree support was an unholy mess, barely readable, and not to the point. For example, why do you have to provide a worktree, when it is not used? As in "git status". Now it works. Another riddle was: if you can have work trees inside the git dir, why are some programs complaining that they need a work tree? IOW it is allowed to call $ git --git-dir=../ --work-tree=. bla when you really want to. In this case, you are both in the git directory and in the working tree. So, programs have to actually test for the right thing, namely if they are inside a working tree, and not if they are inside a git directory. Also, GIT_DIR=../.git should behave the same as if no GIT_DIR was specified, unless there is a repository in the current working directory. It does now. The logic to determine if a repository is bare, or has a work tree (tertium non datur), is this: --work-tree=bla overrides GIT_WORK_TREE, which overrides core.bare = true, which overrides core.worktree, which overrides GIT_DIR/.. when GIT_DIR ends in /.git, which overrides the directory in which .git/ was found. In related news, a long standing bug was fixed: when in .git/bla/x.git/, which is a bare repository, git formerly assumed ../.. to be the appropriate git dir. This problem was reported by Shawn Pearce to have caused much pain, where a colleague mistakenly ran "git init" in "/" a long time ago, and bare repositories just would not work. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-08-01 04:30:14 +04:00
/* Make "offset" point to past the '/', and add a '/' at the end */
offset++;
cwd[len++] = '/';
cwd[len] = 0;
return cwd + offset;
}
int git_config_perm(const char *var, const char *value)
{
int i;
char *endptr;
if (value == NULL)
return PERM_GROUP;
if (!strcmp(value, "umask"))
return PERM_UMASK;
if (!strcmp(value, "group"))
return PERM_GROUP;
if (!strcmp(value, "all") ||
!strcmp(value, "world") ||
!strcmp(value, "everybody"))
return PERM_EVERYBODY;
/* Parse octal numbers */
i = strtol(value, &endptr, 8);
/* If not an octal number, maybe true/false? */
if (*endptr != 0)
return git_config_bool(var, value) ? PERM_GROUP : PERM_UMASK;
/*
* Treat values 0, 1 and 2 as compatibility cases, otherwise it is
* a chmod value.
*/
switch (i) {
case PERM_UMASK: /* 0 */
return PERM_UMASK;
case OLD_PERM_GROUP: /* 1 */
return PERM_GROUP;
case OLD_PERM_EVERYBODY: /* 2 */
return PERM_EVERYBODY;
}
/* A filemode value was given: 0xxx */
if ((i & 0600) != 0600)
die("Problem with core.sharedRepository filemode value "
"(0%.3o).\nThe owner of files must always have "
"read and write permissions.", i);
/*
* Mask filemode value. Others can not get write permission.
* x flags for directories are handled separately.
*/
return i & 0666;
}
int check_repository_format_version(const char *var, const char *value, void *cb)
{
if (strcmp(var, "core.repositoryformatversion") == 0)
repository_format_version = git_config_int(var, value);
else if (strcmp(var, "core.sharedrepository") == 0)
shared_repository = git_config_perm(var, value);
Clean up work-tree handling The old version of work-tree support was an unholy mess, barely readable, and not to the point. For example, why do you have to provide a worktree, when it is not used? As in "git status". Now it works. Another riddle was: if you can have work trees inside the git dir, why are some programs complaining that they need a work tree? IOW it is allowed to call $ git --git-dir=../ --work-tree=. bla when you really want to. In this case, you are both in the git directory and in the working tree. So, programs have to actually test for the right thing, namely if they are inside a working tree, and not if they are inside a git directory. Also, GIT_DIR=../.git should behave the same as if no GIT_DIR was specified, unless there is a repository in the current working directory. It does now. The logic to determine if a repository is bare, or has a work tree (tertium non datur), is this: --work-tree=bla overrides GIT_WORK_TREE, which overrides core.bare = true, which overrides core.worktree, which overrides GIT_DIR/.. when GIT_DIR ends in /.git, which overrides the directory in which .git/ was found. In related news, a long standing bug was fixed: when in .git/bla/x.git/, which is a bare repository, git formerly assumed ../.. to be the appropriate git dir. This problem was reported by Shawn Pearce to have caused much pain, where a colleague mistakenly ran "git init" in "/" a long time ago, and bare repositories just would not work. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-08-01 04:30:14 +04:00
else if (strcmp(var, "core.bare") == 0) {
is_bare_repository_cfg = git_config_bool(var, value);
if (is_bare_repository_cfg == 1)
inside_work_tree = -1;
} else if (strcmp(var, "core.worktree") == 0) {
if (!value)
return config_error_nonbool(var);
Avoid unnecessary "if-before-free" tests. This change removes all obvious useless if-before-free tests. E.g., it replaces code like this: if (some_expression) free (some_expression); with the now-equivalent: free (some_expression); It is equivalent not just because POSIX has required free(NULL) to work for a long time, but simply because it has worked for so long that no reasonable porting target fails the test. Here's some evidence from nearly 1.5 years ago: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2006-October/031544.html FYI, the change below was prepared by running the following: git ls-files -z | xargs -0 \ perl -0x3b -pi -e \ 's/\bif\s*\(\s*(\S+?)(?:\s*!=\s*NULL)?\s*\)\s+(free\s*\(\s*\1\s*\))/$2/s' Note however, that it doesn't handle brace-enclosed blocks like "if (x) { free (x); }". But that's ok, since there were none like that in git sources. Beware: if you do use the above snippet, note that it can produce syntactically invalid C code. That happens when the affected "if"-statement has a matching "else". E.g., it would transform this if (x) free (x); else foo (); into this: free (x); else foo (); There were none of those here, either. If you're interested in automating detection of the useless tests, you might like the useless-if-before-free script in gnulib: [it *does* detect brace-enclosed free statements, and has a --name=S option to make it detect free-like functions with different names] http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gnulib.git;a=blob;f=build-aux/useless-if-before-free Addendum: Remove one more (in imap-send.c), spotted by Jean-Luc Herren <jlh@gmx.ch>. Signed-off-by: Jim Meyering <meyering@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-01-31 20:26:32 +03:00
free(git_work_tree_cfg);
Clean up work-tree handling The old version of work-tree support was an unholy mess, barely readable, and not to the point. For example, why do you have to provide a worktree, when it is not used? As in "git status". Now it works. Another riddle was: if you can have work trees inside the git dir, why are some programs complaining that they need a work tree? IOW it is allowed to call $ git --git-dir=../ --work-tree=. bla when you really want to. In this case, you are both in the git directory and in the working tree. So, programs have to actually test for the right thing, namely if they are inside a working tree, and not if they are inside a git directory. Also, GIT_DIR=../.git should behave the same as if no GIT_DIR was specified, unless there is a repository in the current working directory. It does now. The logic to determine if a repository is bare, or has a work tree (tertium non datur), is this: --work-tree=bla overrides GIT_WORK_TREE, which overrides core.bare = true, which overrides core.worktree, which overrides GIT_DIR/.. when GIT_DIR ends in /.git, which overrides the directory in which .git/ was found. In related news, a long standing bug was fixed: when in .git/bla/x.git/, which is a bare repository, git formerly assumed ../.. to be the appropriate git dir. This problem was reported by Shawn Pearce to have caused much pain, where a colleague mistakenly ran "git init" in "/" a long time ago, and bare repositories just would not work. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-08-01 04:30:14 +04:00
git_work_tree_cfg = xstrdup(value);
inside_work_tree = -1;
}
return 0;
}
int check_repository_format(void)
{
return check_repository_format_gently(NULL);
}
const char *setup_git_directory(void)
{
const char *retval = setup_git_directory_gently(NULL);
Clean up work-tree handling The old version of work-tree support was an unholy mess, barely readable, and not to the point. For example, why do you have to provide a worktree, when it is not used? As in "git status". Now it works. Another riddle was: if you can have work trees inside the git dir, why are some programs complaining that they need a work tree? IOW it is allowed to call $ git --git-dir=../ --work-tree=. bla when you really want to. In this case, you are both in the git directory and in the working tree. So, programs have to actually test for the right thing, namely if they are inside a working tree, and not if they are inside a git directory. Also, GIT_DIR=../.git should behave the same as if no GIT_DIR was specified, unless there is a repository in the current working directory. It does now. The logic to determine if a repository is bare, or has a work tree (tertium non datur), is this: --work-tree=bla overrides GIT_WORK_TREE, which overrides core.bare = true, which overrides core.worktree, which overrides GIT_DIR/.. when GIT_DIR ends in /.git, which overrides the directory in which .git/ was found. In related news, a long standing bug was fixed: when in .git/bla/x.git/, which is a bare repository, git formerly assumed ../.. to be the appropriate git dir. This problem was reported by Shawn Pearce to have caused much pain, where a colleague mistakenly ran "git init" in "/" a long time ago, and bare repositories just would not work. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-08-01 04:30:14 +04:00
/* If the work tree is not the default one, recompute prefix */
if (inside_work_tree < 0) {
static char buffer[PATH_MAX + 1];
char *rel;
if (retval && chdir(retval))
die ("Could not jump back into original cwd");
rel = get_relative_cwd(buffer, PATH_MAX, get_git_work_tree());
if (rel && *rel && chdir(get_git_work_tree()))
die ("Could not jump to working directory");
Clean up work-tree handling The old version of work-tree support was an unholy mess, barely readable, and not to the point. For example, why do you have to provide a worktree, when it is not used? As in "git status". Now it works. Another riddle was: if you can have work trees inside the git dir, why are some programs complaining that they need a work tree? IOW it is allowed to call $ git --git-dir=../ --work-tree=. bla when you really want to. In this case, you are both in the git directory and in the working tree. So, programs have to actually test for the right thing, namely if they are inside a working tree, and not if they are inside a git directory. Also, GIT_DIR=../.git should behave the same as if no GIT_DIR was specified, unless there is a repository in the current working directory. It does now. The logic to determine if a repository is bare, or has a work tree (tertium non datur), is this: --work-tree=bla overrides GIT_WORK_TREE, which overrides core.bare = true, which overrides core.worktree, which overrides GIT_DIR/.. when GIT_DIR ends in /.git, which overrides the directory in which .git/ was found. In related news, a long standing bug was fixed: when in .git/bla/x.git/, which is a bare repository, git formerly assumed ../.. to be the appropriate git dir. This problem was reported by Shawn Pearce to have caused much pain, where a colleague mistakenly ran "git init" in "/" a long time ago, and bare repositories just would not work. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-08-01 04:30:14 +04:00
return rel && *rel ? strcat(rel, "/") : NULL;
}
return retval;
}