git diff: improve range handling
When git diff is given a symmetric difference A...B, it chooses
some merge base from the two specified commits (as documented).
This fails, however, if there is *no* merge base: instead, you
see the differences between A and B, which is certainly not what
is expected.
Moreover, if additional revisions are specified on the command
line ("git diff A...B C"), the results get a bit weird:
* If there is a symmetric difference merge base, this is used
as the left side of the diff. The last final ref is used as
the right side.
* If there is no merge base, the symmetric status is completely
lost. We will produce a combined diff instead.
Similar weirdness occurs if you use, e.g., "git diff C A...B D".
Likewise, using multiple two-dot ranges, or tossing extra
revision specifiers into the command line with two-dot ranges,
or mixing two and three dot ranges, all produce nonsense.
To avoid all this, add a routine to catch the range cases and
verify that that the arguments make sense. As a side effect,
produce a warning showing *which* merge base is being used when
there are multiple choices; die if there is no merge base.
Signed-off-by: Chris Torek <chris.torek@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-12 19:19:59 +03:00
|
|
|
#!/bin/sh
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-20 14:22:24 +03:00
|
|
|
test_description='behavior of diff with symmetric-diff setups and --merge-base'
|
git diff: improve range handling
When git diff is given a symmetric difference A...B, it chooses
some merge base from the two specified commits (as documented).
This fails, however, if there is *no* merge base: instead, you
see the differences between A and B, which is certainly not what
is expected.
Moreover, if additional revisions are specified on the command
line ("git diff A...B C"), the results get a bit weird:
* If there is a symmetric difference merge base, this is used
as the left side of the diff. The last final ref is used as
the right side.
* If there is no merge base, the symmetric status is completely
lost. We will produce a combined diff instead.
Similar weirdness occurs if you use, e.g., "git diff C A...B D".
Likewise, using multiple two-dot ranges, or tossing extra
revision specifiers into the command line with two-dot ranges,
or mixing two and three dot ranges, all produce nonsense.
To avoid all this, add a routine to catch the range cases and
verify that that the arguments make sense. As a side effect,
produce a warning showing *which* merge base is being used when
there are multiple choices; die if there is no merge base.
Signed-off-by: Chris Torek <chris.torek@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-12 19:19:59 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. ./test-lib.sh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# build these situations:
|
|
|
|
# - normal merge with one merge base (br1...b2r);
|
|
|
|
# - criss-cross merge ie 2 merge bases (br1...master);
|
|
|
|
# - disjoint subgraph (orphan branch, br3...master).
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# B---E <-- master
|
|
|
|
# / \ /
|
|
|
|
# A X
|
|
|
|
# \ / \
|
|
|
|
# C---D--G <-- br1
|
|
|
|
# \ /
|
|
|
|
# ---F <-- br2
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# H <-- br3
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# We put files into a few commits so that we can verify the
|
|
|
|
# output as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success setup '
|
|
|
|
git commit --allow-empty -m A &&
|
|
|
|
echo b >b &&
|
|
|
|
git add b &&
|
|
|
|
git commit -m B &&
|
|
|
|
git checkout -b br1 HEAD^ &&
|
|
|
|
echo c >c &&
|
|
|
|
git add c &&
|
|
|
|
git commit -m C &&
|
|
|
|
git tag commit-C &&
|
|
|
|
git merge -m D master &&
|
|
|
|
git tag commit-D &&
|
|
|
|
git checkout master &&
|
|
|
|
git merge -m E commit-C &&
|
|
|
|
git checkout -b br2 commit-C &&
|
|
|
|
echo f >f &&
|
|
|
|
git add f &&
|
|
|
|
git commit -m F &&
|
|
|
|
git checkout br1 &&
|
|
|
|
git merge -m G br2 &&
|
|
|
|
git checkout --orphan br3 &&
|
|
|
|
git commit -m H
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'diff with one merge base' '
|
|
|
|
git diff commit-D...br1 >tmp &&
|
|
|
|
tail -n 1 tmp >actual &&
|
|
|
|
echo +f >expect &&
|
|
|
|
test_cmp expect actual
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# The output (in tmp) can have +b or +c depending
|
|
|
|
# on which merge base (commit B or C) is picked.
|
|
|
|
# It should have one of those two, which comes out
|
|
|
|
# to seven lines.
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'diff with two merge bases' '
|
|
|
|
git diff br1...master >tmp 2>err &&
|
|
|
|
test_line_count = 7 tmp &&
|
|
|
|
test_line_count = 1 err
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'diff with no merge bases' '
|
2020-09-17 10:44:05 +03:00
|
|
|
test_must_fail git diff br2...br3 2>err &&
|
git diff: improve range handling
When git diff is given a symmetric difference A...B, it chooses
some merge base from the two specified commits (as documented).
This fails, however, if there is *no* merge base: instead, you
see the differences between A and B, which is certainly not what
is expected.
Moreover, if additional revisions are specified on the command
line ("git diff A...B C"), the results get a bit weird:
* If there is a symmetric difference merge base, this is used
as the left side of the diff. The last final ref is used as
the right side.
* If there is no merge base, the symmetric status is completely
lost. We will produce a combined diff instead.
Similar weirdness occurs if you use, e.g., "git diff C A...B D".
Likewise, using multiple two-dot ranges, or tossing extra
revision specifiers into the command line with two-dot ranges,
or mixing two and three dot ranges, all produce nonsense.
To avoid all this, add a routine to catch the range cases and
verify that that the arguments make sense. As a side effect,
produce a warning showing *which* merge base is being used when
there are multiple choices; die if there is no merge base.
Signed-off-by: Chris Torek <chris.torek@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-12 19:19:59 +03:00
|
|
|
test_i18ngrep "fatal: br2...br3: no merge base" err
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'diff with too many symmetric differences' '
|
2020-09-17 10:44:05 +03:00
|
|
|
test_must_fail git diff br1...master br2...br3 2>err &&
|
git diff: improve range handling
When git diff is given a symmetric difference A...B, it chooses
some merge base from the two specified commits (as documented).
This fails, however, if there is *no* merge base: instead, you
see the differences between A and B, which is certainly not what
is expected.
Moreover, if additional revisions are specified on the command
line ("git diff A...B C"), the results get a bit weird:
* If there is a symmetric difference merge base, this is used
as the left side of the diff. The last final ref is used as
the right side.
* If there is no merge base, the symmetric status is completely
lost. We will produce a combined diff instead.
Similar weirdness occurs if you use, e.g., "git diff C A...B D".
Likewise, using multiple two-dot ranges, or tossing extra
revision specifiers into the command line with two-dot ranges,
or mixing two and three dot ranges, all produce nonsense.
To avoid all this, add a routine to catch the range cases and
verify that that the arguments make sense. As a side effect,
produce a warning showing *which* merge base is being used when
there are multiple choices; die if there is no merge base.
Signed-off-by: Chris Torek <chris.torek@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-12 19:19:59 +03:00
|
|
|
test_i18ngrep "usage" err
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'diff with symmetric difference and extraneous arg' '
|
2020-09-17 10:44:05 +03:00
|
|
|
test_must_fail git diff master br1...master 2>err &&
|
git diff: improve range handling
When git diff is given a symmetric difference A...B, it chooses
some merge base from the two specified commits (as documented).
This fails, however, if there is *no* merge base: instead, you
see the differences between A and B, which is certainly not what
is expected.
Moreover, if additional revisions are specified on the command
line ("git diff A...B C"), the results get a bit weird:
* If there is a symmetric difference merge base, this is used
as the left side of the diff. The last final ref is used as
the right side.
* If there is no merge base, the symmetric status is completely
lost. We will produce a combined diff instead.
Similar weirdness occurs if you use, e.g., "git diff C A...B D".
Likewise, using multiple two-dot ranges, or tossing extra
revision specifiers into the command line with two-dot ranges,
or mixing two and three dot ranges, all produce nonsense.
To avoid all this, add a routine to catch the range cases and
verify that that the arguments make sense. As a side effect,
produce a warning showing *which* merge base is being used when
there are multiple choices; die if there is no merge base.
Signed-off-by: Chris Torek <chris.torek@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-12 19:19:59 +03:00
|
|
|
test_i18ngrep "usage" err
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'diff with two ranges' '
|
2020-09-17 10:44:05 +03:00
|
|
|
test_must_fail git diff master br1..master br2..br3 2>err &&
|
git diff: improve range handling
When git diff is given a symmetric difference A...B, it chooses
some merge base from the two specified commits (as documented).
This fails, however, if there is *no* merge base: instead, you
see the differences between A and B, which is certainly not what
is expected.
Moreover, if additional revisions are specified on the command
line ("git diff A...B C"), the results get a bit weird:
* If there is a symmetric difference merge base, this is used
as the left side of the diff. The last final ref is used as
the right side.
* If there is no merge base, the symmetric status is completely
lost. We will produce a combined diff instead.
Similar weirdness occurs if you use, e.g., "git diff C A...B D".
Likewise, using multiple two-dot ranges, or tossing extra
revision specifiers into the command line with two-dot ranges,
or mixing two and three dot ranges, all produce nonsense.
To avoid all this, add a routine to catch the range cases and
verify that that the arguments make sense. As a side effect,
produce a warning showing *which* merge base is being used when
there are multiple choices; die if there is no merge base.
Signed-off-by: Chris Torek <chris.torek@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-12 19:19:59 +03:00
|
|
|
test_i18ngrep "usage" err
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'diff with ranges and extra arg' '
|
2020-09-17 10:44:05 +03:00
|
|
|
test_must_fail git diff master br1..master commit-D 2>err &&
|
git diff: improve range handling
When git diff is given a symmetric difference A...B, it chooses
some merge base from the two specified commits (as documented).
This fails, however, if there is *no* merge base: instead, you
see the differences between A and B, which is certainly not what
is expected.
Moreover, if additional revisions are specified on the command
line ("git diff A...B C"), the results get a bit weird:
* If there is a symmetric difference merge base, this is used
as the left side of the diff. The last final ref is used as
the right side.
* If there is no merge base, the symmetric status is completely
lost. We will produce a combined diff instead.
Similar weirdness occurs if you use, e.g., "git diff C A...B D".
Likewise, using multiple two-dot ranges, or tossing extra
revision specifiers into the command line with two-dot ranges,
or mixing two and three dot ranges, all produce nonsense.
To avoid all this, add a routine to catch the range cases and
verify that that the arguments make sense. As a side effect,
produce a warning showing *which* merge base is being used when
there are multiple choices; die if there is no merge base.
Signed-off-by: Chris Torek <chris.torek@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-12 19:19:59 +03:00
|
|
|
test_i18ngrep "usage" err
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-20 14:22:24 +03:00
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'diff --merge-base with no commits' '
|
|
|
|
test_must_fail git diff --merge-base
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'diff --merge-base with three commits' '
|
|
|
|
test_must_fail git diff --merge-base br1 br2 master 2>err &&
|
|
|
|
test_i18ngrep "usage" err
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-20 14:22:25 +03:00
|
|
|
for cmd in diff-index diff
|
|
|
|
do
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success "$cmd --merge-base with one commit" '
|
|
|
|
git checkout master &&
|
|
|
|
git $cmd commit-C >expect &&
|
|
|
|
git $cmd --merge-base br2 >actual &&
|
|
|
|
test_cmp expect actual
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success "$cmd --merge-base with one commit and unstaged changes" '
|
|
|
|
git checkout master &&
|
|
|
|
test_when_finished git reset --hard &&
|
|
|
|
echo unstaged >>c &&
|
|
|
|
git $cmd commit-C >expect &&
|
|
|
|
git $cmd --merge-base br2 >actual &&
|
|
|
|
test_cmp expect actual
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success "$cmd --merge-base with one commit and staged and unstaged changes" '
|
|
|
|
git checkout master &&
|
|
|
|
test_when_finished git reset --hard &&
|
|
|
|
echo staged >>c &&
|
|
|
|
git add c &&
|
|
|
|
echo unstaged >>c &&
|
|
|
|
git $cmd commit-C >expect &&
|
|
|
|
git $cmd --merge-base br2 >actual &&
|
|
|
|
test_cmp expect actual
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success "$cmd --merge-base --cached with one commit and staged and unstaged changes" '
|
|
|
|
git checkout master &&
|
|
|
|
test_when_finished git reset --hard &&
|
|
|
|
echo staged >>c &&
|
|
|
|
git add c &&
|
|
|
|
echo unstaged >>c &&
|
|
|
|
git $cmd --cached commit-C >expect &&
|
|
|
|
git $cmd --cached --merge-base br2 >actual &&
|
|
|
|
test_cmp expect actual
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success "$cmd --merge-base with non-commit" '
|
|
|
|
git checkout master &&
|
|
|
|
test_must_fail git $cmd --merge-base master^{tree} 2>err &&
|
|
|
|
test_i18ngrep "fatal: --merge-base only works with commits" err
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success "$cmd --merge-base with no merge bases and one commit" '
|
|
|
|
git checkout master &&
|
|
|
|
test_must_fail git $cmd --merge-base br3 2>err &&
|
|
|
|
test_i18ngrep "fatal: no merge base found" err
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success "$cmd --merge-base with multiple merge bases and one commit" '
|
|
|
|
git checkout master &&
|
|
|
|
test_must_fail git $cmd --merge-base br1 2>err &&
|
|
|
|
test_i18ngrep "fatal: multiple merge bases found" err
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
done
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-14 21:36:52 +03:00
|
|
|
for cmd in diff-tree diff
|
|
|
|
do
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success "$cmd --merge-base with two commits" '
|
|
|
|
git $cmd commit-C master >expect &&
|
|
|
|
git $cmd --merge-base br2 master >actual &&
|
|
|
|
test_cmp expect actual
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success "$cmd --merge-base commit and non-commit" '
|
|
|
|
test_must_fail git $cmd --merge-base br2 master^{tree} 2>err &&
|
|
|
|
test_i18ngrep "fatal: --merge-base only works with commits" err
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success "$cmd --merge-base with no merge bases and two commits" '
|
|
|
|
test_must_fail git $cmd --merge-base br2 br3 2>err &&
|
|
|
|
test_i18ngrep "fatal: no merge base found" err
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success "$cmd --merge-base with multiple merge bases and two commits" '
|
|
|
|
test_must_fail git $cmd --merge-base master br1 2>err &&
|
|
|
|
test_i18ngrep "fatal: multiple merge bases found" err
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
done
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'diff-tree --merge-base with one commit' '
|
|
|
|
test_must_fail git diff-tree --merge-base master 2>err &&
|
|
|
|
test_i18ngrep "fatal: --merge-base only works with two commits" err
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'diff --merge-base with range' '
|
|
|
|
test_must_fail git diff --merge-base br2..br3 2>err &&
|
|
|
|
test_i18ngrep "fatal: --merge-base does not work with ranges" err
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
|
git diff: improve range handling
When git diff is given a symmetric difference A...B, it chooses
some merge base from the two specified commits (as documented).
This fails, however, if there is *no* merge base: instead, you
see the differences between A and B, which is certainly not what
is expected.
Moreover, if additional revisions are specified on the command
line ("git diff A...B C"), the results get a bit weird:
* If there is a symmetric difference merge base, this is used
as the left side of the diff. The last final ref is used as
the right side.
* If there is no merge base, the symmetric status is completely
lost. We will produce a combined diff instead.
Similar weirdness occurs if you use, e.g., "git diff C A...B D".
Likewise, using multiple two-dot ranges, or tossing extra
revision specifiers into the command line with two-dot ranges,
or mixing two and three dot ranges, all produce nonsense.
To avoid all this, add a routine to catch the range cases and
verify that that the arguments make sense. As a side effect,
produce a warning showing *which* merge base is being used when
there are multiple choices; die if there is no merge base.
Signed-off-by: Chris Torek <chris.torek@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-12 19:19:59 +03:00
|
|
|
test_done
|