git/t/t2203-add-intent.sh

155 строки
3.3 KiB
Bash
Исходник Обычный вид История

#!/bin/sh
test_description='Intent to add'
. ./test-lib.sh
test_expect_success 'intent to add' '
test_commit 1 &&
git rm 1.t &&
echo hello >1.t &&
echo hello >file &&
echo hello >elif &&
git add -N file &&
git add elif &&
git add -N 1.t
'
test_expect_success 'git status' '
git status --porcelain | grep -v actual >actual &&
cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
DA 1.t
A elif
A file
EOF
test_cmp expect actual
'
test_expect_success 'check result of "add -N"' '
git ls-files -s file >actual &&
empty=$(git hash-object --stdin </dev/null) &&
echo "100644 $empty 0 file" >expect &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
test_expect_success 'intent to add is just an ordinary empty blob' '
git add -u &&
git ls-files -s file >actual &&
git ls-files -s elif | sed -e "s/elif/file/" >expect &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
test_expect_success 'intent to add does not clobber existing paths' '
git add -N file elif &&
empty=$(git hash-object --stdin </dev/null) &&
git ls-files -s >actual &&
! grep "$empty" actual
'
commit: ignore intent-to-add entries instead of refusing Originally, "git add -N" was introduced to help users from forgetting to add new files to the index before they ran "git commit -a". As an attempt to help them further so that they do not forget to say "-a", "git commit" to commit the index as-is was taught to error out, reminding the user that they may have forgotten to add the final contents of the paths before running the command. This turned out to be a false "safety" that is useless. If the user made changes to already tracked paths and paths added with "git add -N", and then ran "git add" to register the final contents of the paths added with "git add -N", "git commit" will happily create a commit out of the index, without including the local changes made to the already tracked paths. It was not a useful "safety" measure to prevent "forgetful" mistakes from happening. It turns out that this behaviour is not just a useless false "safety", but actively hurts use cases of "git add -N" that were discovered later and have become popular, namely, to tell Git to be aware of these paths added by "git add -N", so that commands like "git status" and "git diff" would include them in their output, even though the user is not interested in including them in the next commit they are going to make. Fix this ancient UI mistake, and instead make a commit from the index ignoring the paths added by "git add -N" without adding real contents. Based on the work by Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy, and helped by injection of sanity from Jonathan Nieder and others on the Git mailing list. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-07 23:55:48 +04:00
test_expect_success 'i-t-a entry is simply ignored' '
test_tick &&
git commit -a -m initial &&
git reset --hard &&
echo xyzzy >rezrov &&
echo frotz >nitfol &&
git add rezrov &&
git add -N nitfol &&
commit: ignore intent-to-add entries instead of refusing Originally, "git add -N" was introduced to help users from forgetting to add new files to the index before they ran "git commit -a". As an attempt to help them further so that they do not forget to say "-a", "git commit" to commit the index as-is was taught to error out, reminding the user that they may have forgotten to add the final contents of the paths before running the command. This turned out to be a false "safety" that is useless. If the user made changes to already tracked paths and paths added with "git add -N", and then ran "git add" to register the final contents of the paths added with "git add -N", "git commit" will happily create a commit out of the index, without including the local changes made to the already tracked paths. It was not a useful "safety" measure to prevent "forgetful" mistakes from happening. It turns out that this behaviour is not just a useless false "safety", but actively hurts use cases of "git add -N" that were discovered later and have become popular, namely, to tell Git to be aware of these paths added by "git add -N", so that commands like "git status" and "git diff" would include them in their output, even though the user is not interested in including them in the next commit they are going to make. Fix this ancient UI mistake, and instead make a commit from the index ignoring the paths added by "git add -N" without adding real contents. Based on the work by Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy, and helped by injection of sanity from Jonathan Nieder and others on the Git mailing list. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-07 23:55:48 +04:00
git commit -m second &&
test $(git ls-tree HEAD -- nitfol | wc -l) = 0 &&
test $(git diff --name-only HEAD -- nitfol | wc -l) = 1 &&
test $(git diff --name-only --ita-invisible-in-index HEAD -- nitfol | wc -l) = 0 &&
test $(git diff --name-only --ita-invisible-in-index -- nitfol | wc -l) = 1
'
test_expect_success 'can commit with an unrelated i-t-a entry in index' '
git reset --hard &&
commit: ignore intent-to-add entries instead of refusing Originally, "git add -N" was introduced to help users from forgetting to add new files to the index before they ran "git commit -a". As an attempt to help them further so that they do not forget to say "-a", "git commit" to commit the index as-is was taught to error out, reminding the user that they may have forgotten to add the final contents of the paths before running the command. This turned out to be a false "safety" that is useless. If the user made changes to already tracked paths and paths added with "git add -N", and then ran "git add" to register the final contents of the paths added with "git add -N", "git commit" will happily create a commit out of the index, without including the local changes made to the already tracked paths. It was not a useful "safety" measure to prevent "forgetful" mistakes from happening. It turns out that this behaviour is not just a useless false "safety", but actively hurts use cases of "git add -N" that were discovered later and have become popular, namely, to tell Git to be aware of these paths added by "git add -N", so that commands like "git status" and "git diff" would include them in their output, even though the user is not interested in including them in the next commit they are going to make. Fix this ancient UI mistake, and instead make a commit from the index ignoring the paths added by "git add -N" without adding real contents. Based on the work by Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy, and helped by injection of sanity from Jonathan Nieder and others on the Git mailing list. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-07 23:55:48 +04:00
echo bozbar >rezrov &&
echo frotz >nitfol &&
git add rezrov &&
git add -N nitfol &&
git commit -m partial rezrov
'
test_expect_success 'can "commit -a" with an i-t-a entry' '
git reset --hard &&
: >nitfol &&
git add -N nitfol &&
git commit -a -m all
'
test_expect_success 'cache-tree invalidates i-t-a paths' '
git reset --hard &&
mkdir dir &&
: >dir/foo &&
git add dir/foo &&
git commit -m foo &&
: >dir/bar &&
git add -N dir/bar &&
git diff --cached --name-only >actual &&
echo dir/bar >expect &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
git write-tree >/dev/null &&
git diff --cached --name-only >actual &&
echo dir/bar >expect &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
cache-tree.c: fix i-t-a entry skipping directory updates sometimes Commit 3cf773e (cache-tree: fix writing cache-tree when CE_REMOVE is present - 2012-12-16) skips i-t-a entries when building trees objects from the index. Unfortunately it may skip too much. The code in question checks if an entry is an i-t-a one, then no tree entry will be written. But it does not take into account that directories can also be written with the same code. Suppose we have this in the index. a-file subdir/file1 subdir/file2 subdir/file3 the-last-file We write an entry for a-file as normal and move on to subdir/file1, where we realize the entry name for this level is simply just "subdir", write down an entry for "subdir" then jump three items ahead to the-last-file. That is what happens normally when the first file in subdir is not an i-t-a entry. If subdir/file1 is an i-t-a, because of the broken condition in this code, we still think "subdir" is an i-t-a file and not writing "subdir" down and jump to the-last-file. The result tree now only has two items: a-file and the-last-file. subdir should be there too (even though it only records two sub-entries, file2 and file3). If the i-t-a entry is subdir/file2 or subdir/file3, this is not a problem because we jump over them anyway. Which may explain why the bug is hidden for nearly four years. Fix it by making sure we only skip i-t-a entries when the entry in question is actual an index entry, not a directory. Reported-by: Yuri Kanivetsky <yuri.kanivetsky@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-07-16 08:06:26 +03:00
test_expect_success 'cache-tree does not ignore dir that has i-t-a entries' '
git init ita-in-dir &&
(
cd ita-in-dir &&
mkdir 2 &&
for f in 1 2/1 2/2 3
do
echo "$f" >"$f"
done &&
git add 1 2/2 3 &&
git add -N 2/1 &&
git commit -m committed &&
git ls-tree -r HEAD >actual &&
grep 2/2 actual
)
'
test_expect_success 'cache-tree does skip dir that becomes empty' '
rm -fr ita-in-dir &&
git init ita-in-dir &&
(
cd ita-in-dir &&
mkdir -p 1/2/3 &&
echo 4 >1/2/3/4 &&
git add -N 1/2/3/4 &&
git write-tree >actual &&
echo $EMPTY_TREE >expected &&
test_cmp expected actual
)
'
test_expect_success 'commit: ita entries ignored in empty initial commit check' '
git init empty-initial-commit &&
(
cd empty-initial-commit &&
: >one &&
git add -N one &&
test_must_fail git commit -m nothing-new-here
)
'
test_expect_success 'commit: ita entries ignored in empty commit check' '
git init empty-subsequent-commit &&
(
cd empty-subsequent-commit &&
test_commit one &&
: >two &&
git add -N two &&
test_must_fail git commit -m nothing-new-here
)
'
test_done