git/t/t1508-at-combinations.sh

119 строки
2.8 KiB
Bash
Исходник Обычный вид История

#!/bin/sh
test_description='test various @{X} syntax combinations together'
GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=main
tests: mark tests relying on the current default for `init.defaultBranch` In addition to the manual adjustment to let the `linux-gcc` CI job run the test suite with `master` and then with `main`, this patch makes sure that GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME is set in all test scripts that currently rely on the initial branch name being `master by default. To determine which test scripts to mark up, the first step was to force-set the default branch name to `master` in - all test scripts that contain the keyword `master`, - t4211, which expects `t/t4211/history.export` with a hard-coded ref to initialize the default branch, - t5560 because it sources `t/t556x_common` which uses `master`, - t8002 and t8012 because both source `t/annotate-tests.sh` which also uses `master`) This trick was performed by this command: $ sed -i '/^ *\. \.\/\(test-lib\|lib-\(bash\|cvs\|git-svn\)\|gitweb-lib\)\.sh$/i\ GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=master\ export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME\ ' $(git grep -l master t/t[0-9]*.sh) \ t/t4211*.sh t/t5560*.sh t/t8002*.sh t/t8012*.sh After that, careful, manual inspection revealed that some of the test scripts containing the needle `master` do not actually rely on a specific default branch name: either they mention `master` only in a comment, or they initialize that branch specificially, or they do not actually refer to the current default branch. Therefore, the aforementioned modification was undone in those test scripts thusly: $ git checkout HEAD -- \ t/t0027-auto-crlf.sh t/t0060-path-utils.sh \ t/t1011-read-tree-sparse-checkout.sh \ t/t1305-config-include.sh t/t1309-early-config.sh \ t/t1402-check-ref-format.sh t/t1450-fsck.sh \ t/t2024-checkout-dwim.sh \ t/t2106-update-index-assume-unchanged.sh \ t/t3040-subprojects-basic.sh t/t3301-notes.sh \ t/t3308-notes-merge.sh t/t3423-rebase-reword.sh \ t/t3436-rebase-more-options.sh \ t/t4015-diff-whitespace.sh t/t4257-am-interactive.sh \ t/t5323-pack-redundant.sh t/t5401-update-hooks.sh \ t/t5511-refspec.sh t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh \ t/t5529-push-errors.sh t/t5530-upload-pack-error.sh \ t/t5548-push-porcelain.sh \ t/t5552-skipping-fetch-negotiator.sh \ t/t5572-pull-submodule.sh t/t5608-clone-2gb.sh \ t/t5614-clone-submodules-shallow.sh \ t/t7508-status.sh t/t7606-merge-custom.sh \ t/t9302-fast-import-unpack-limit.sh We excluded one set of test scripts in these commands, though: the range of `git p4` tests. The reason? `git p4` stores the (foreign) remote branch in the branch called `p4/master`, which is obviously not the default branch. Manual analysis revealed that only five of these tests actually require a specific default branch name to pass; They were modified thusly: $ sed -i '/^ *\. \.\/lib-git-p4\.sh$/i\ GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=master\ export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME\ ' t/t980[0167]*.sh t/t9811*.sh Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-19 02:44:19 +03:00
export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME
. ./test-lib.sh
check() {
test_expect_${4:-success} "$1 = $3" "
echo '$3' >expect &&
if test '$2' = 'commit'
then
git log -1 --format=%s '$1' >actual
interpret_branch_name: always respect "namelen" parameter interpret_branch_name gets passed a "name" buffer to parse, along with a "namelen" parameter representing its length. If "namelen" is zero, we fallback to the NUL-terminated string-length of "name". However, it does not necessarily follow that if we have gotten a non-zero "namelen", it is the NUL-terminated string-length of "name". E.g., when get_sha1() is parsing "foo:bar", we will be asked to operate only on the first three characters. Yet in interpret_branch_name and its helpers, we use string functions like strchr() to operate on "name", looking past the length we were given. This can result in us mis-parsing object names. We should instead be limiting our search to "namelen" bytes. There are three distinct types of object names this patch addresses: - The intrepret_empty_at helper uses strchr to find the next @-expression after our potential empty-at. In an expression like "@:foo@bar", it erroneously thinks that the second "@" is relevant, even if we were asked only to look at the first character. This case is easy to trigger (and we test it in this patch). - When finding the initial @-mark for @{upstream}, we use strchr. This means we might treat "foo:@{upstream}" as the upstream for "foo:", even though we were asked only to look at "foo". We cannot test this one in practice, because it is masked by another bug (which is fixed in the next patch). - The interpret_nth_prior_checkout helper did not receive the name length at all. This turns out not to be a problem in practice, though, because its parsing is so limited: it always starts from the far-left of the string, and will not tolerate a colon (which is currently the only way to get a smaller-than-strlen "namelen"). However, it's still worth fixing to make the code more obviously correct, and to future-proof us against callers with more exotic buffers. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-01-15 12:31:57 +04:00
elif test '$2' = 'ref'
then
git rev-parse --symbolic-full-name '$1' >actual
interpret_branch_name: always respect "namelen" parameter interpret_branch_name gets passed a "name" buffer to parse, along with a "namelen" parameter representing its length. If "namelen" is zero, we fallback to the NUL-terminated string-length of "name". However, it does not necessarily follow that if we have gotten a non-zero "namelen", it is the NUL-terminated string-length of "name". E.g., when get_sha1() is parsing "foo:bar", we will be asked to operate only on the first three characters. Yet in interpret_branch_name and its helpers, we use string functions like strchr() to operate on "name", looking past the length we were given. This can result in us mis-parsing object names. We should instead be limiting our search to "namelen" bytes. There are three distinct types of object names this patch addresses: - The intrepret_empty_at helper uses strchr to find the next @-expression after our potential empty-at. In an expression like "@:foo@bar", it erroneously thinks that the second "@" is relevant, even if we were asked only to look at the first character. This case is easy to trigger (and we test it in this patch). - When finding the initial @-mark for @{upstream}, we use strchr. This means we might treat "foo:@{upstream}" as the upstream for "foo:", even though we were asked only to look at "foo". We cannot test this one in practice, because it is masked by another bug (which is fixed in the next patch). - The interpret_nth_prior_checkout helper did not receive the name length at all. This turns out not to be a problem in practice, though, because its parsing is so limited: it always starts from the far-left of the string, and will not tolerate a colon (which is currently the only way to get a smaller-than-strlen "namelen"). However, it's still worth fixing to make the code more obviously correct, and to future-proof us against callers with more exotic buffers. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-01-15 12:31:57 +04:00
else
git cat-file -p '$1' >actual
fi &&
test_cmp expect actual
"
}
nonsense() {
test_expect_${2:-success} "$1 is nonsensical" "
test_must_fail git rev-parse --verify '$1'
"
}
fail() {
"$@" failure
}
test_expect_success 'setup' '
test_commit main-one &&
test_commit main-two &&
git checkout -b upstream-branch &&
test_commit upstream-one &&
test_commit upstream-two &&
if test_have_prereq !MINGW
then
git checkout -b @/at-test
fi &&
git checkout -b @@/at-test &&
git checkout -b @at-test &&
git checkout -b old-branch &&
test_commit old-one &&
test_commit old-two &&
git checkout -b new-branch &&
test_commit new-one &&
test_commit new-two &&
git branch -u main old-branch &&
git branch -u upstream-branch new-branch
'
check HEAD ref refs/heads/new-branch
check "@{1}" commit new-one
check "HEAD@{1}" commit new-one
check "@{now}" commit new-two
check "HEAD@{now}" commit new-two
check "@{-1}" ref refs/heads/old-branch
check "@{-1}@{0}" commit old-two
check "@{-1}@{1}" commit old-one
check "@{u}" ref refs/heads/upstream-branch
check "HEAD@{u}" ref refs/heads/upstream-branch
check "@{u}@{1}" commit upstream-one
check "@{-1}@{u}" ref refs/heads/main
check "@{-1}@{u}@{1}" commit main-one
check "@" commit new-two
check "@@{u}" ref refs/heads/upstream-branch
check "@@/at-test" ref refs/heads/@@/at-test
test_have_prereq MINGW ||
check "@/at-test" ref refs/heads/@/at-test
check "@at-test" ref refs/heads/@at-test
nonsense "@{u}@{-1}"
nonsense "@{0}@{0}"
nonsense "@{1}@{u}"
nonsense "HEAD@{-1}"
nonsense "@{-1}@{-1}"
# @{N} versus HEAD@{N}
check "HEAD@{3}" commit old-two
nonsense "@{3}"
test_expect_success 'switch to old-branch' '
git checkout old-branch
'
check HEAD ref refs/heads/old-branch
check "HEAD@{1}" commit new-two
check "@{1}" commit old-one
interpret_branch_name: always respect "namelen" parameter interpret_branch_name gets passed a "name" buffer to parse, along with a "namelen" parameter representing its length. If "namelen" is zero, we fallback to the NUL-terminated string-length of "name". However, it does not necessarily follow that if we have gotten a non-zero "namelen", it is the NUL-terminated string-length of "name". E.g., when get_sha1() is parsing "foo:bar", we will be asked to operate only on the first three characters. Yet in interpret_branch_name and its helpers, we use string functions like strchr() to operate on "name", looking past the length we were given. This can result in us mis-parsing object names. We should instead be limiting our search to "namelen" bytes. There are three distinct types of object names this patch addresses: - The intrepret_empty_at helper uses strchr to find the next @-expression after our potential empty-at. In an expression like "@:foo@bar", it erroneously thinks that the second "@" is relevant, even if we were asked only to look at the first character. This case is easy to trigger (and we test it in this patch). - When finding the initial @-mark for @{upstream}, we use strchr. This means we might treat "foo:@{upstream}" as the upstream for "foo:", even though we were asked only to look at "foo". We cannot test this one in practice, because it is masked by another bug (which is fixed in the next patch). - The interpret_nth_prior_checkout helper did not receive the name length at all. This turns out not to be a problem in practice, though, because its parsing is so limited: it always starts from the far-left of the string, and will not tolerate a colon (which is currently the only way to get a smaller-than-strlen "namelen"). However, it's still worth fixing to make the code more obviously correct, and to future-proof us against callers with more exotic buffers. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-01-15 12:31:57 +04:00
test_expect_success 'create path with @' '
echo content >normal &&
echo content >fun@ny &&
git add normal fun@ny &&
git commit -m "funny path"
'
check "@:normal" blob content
check "@:fun@ny" blob content
test_expect_success '@{1} works with only one reflog entry' '
2021-01-26 01:19:18 +03:00
git checkout -B newbranch main &&
git reflog expire --expire=now refs/heads/newbranch &&
git commit --allow-empty -m "first after expiration" &&
test_cmp_rev newbranch~ newbranch@{1}
'
test_expect_success '@{0} works with empty reflog' '
2021-01-26 01:19:18 +03:00
git checkout -B newbranch main &&
git reflog expire --expire=now refs/heads/newbranch &&
test_cmp_rev newbranch newbranch@{0}
'
test_done