2005-05-14 11:25:06 +04:00
|
|
|
Core GIT Tests
|
|
|
|
==============
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This directory holds many test scripts for core GIT tools. The
|
|
|
|
first part of this short document describes how to run the tests
|
|
|
|
and read their output.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When fixing the tools or adding enhancements, you are strongly
|
|
|
|
encouraged to add tests in this directory to cover what you are
|
|
|
|
trying to fix or enhance. The later part of this short document
|
|
|
|
describes how your test scripts should be organized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Running Tests
|
|
|
|
-------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The easiest way to run tests is to say "make". This runs all
|
|
|
|
the tests.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*** t0000-basic.sh ***
|
test-lib: Adjust output to be valid TAP format
TAP, the Test Anything Protocol, is a simple text-based interface
between testing modules in a test harness. test-lib.sh's output was
already very close to being valid TAP. This change brings it all the
way there. Before:
$ ./t0005-signals.sh
* ok 1: sigchain works
* passed all 1 test(s)
And after:
$ ./t0005-signals.sh
ok 1 - sigchain works
# passed all 1 test(s)
1..1
The advantage of using TAP is that any program that reads the format
(a "test harness") can run the tests. The most popular of these is the
prove(1) utility that comes with Perl. It can run tests in parallel,
display colored output, format the output to console, file, HTML etc.,
and much more. An example:
$ prove ./t0005-signals.sh
./t0005-signals.sh .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.00 sys + 0.01 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.06 CPU)
Result: PASS
prove(1) gives you human readable output without being too
verbose. Running the test suite in parallel with `make test -j15`
produces a flood of text. Running them with `prove -j 15 ./t[0-9]*.sh`
makes it easy to follow what's going on.
All this patch does is re-arrange the output a bit so that it conforms
with the TAP spec, everything that the test suite did before continues
to work. That includes aggregating results in t/test-results/, the
--verbose, --debug and other options for tests, and the test color
output.
TAP harnesses ignore everything that they don't know about, so running
the tests with --verbose works:
$ prove ./t0005-signals.sh :: --verbose --debug
./t0005-signals.sh .. Terminated
./t0005-signals.sh .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 0.01 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.05 CPU)
Result: PASS
Just supply the -v option to prove itself to get all the verbose
output that it suppresses:
$ prove -v ./t0005-signals.sh :: --verbose --debug
./t0005-signals.sh ..
Initialized empty Git repository in /home/avar/g/git/t/trash directory.t0005-signals/.git/
expecting success:
test-sigchain >actual
case "$?" in
143) true ;; # POSIX w/ SIGTERM=15
3) true ;; # Windows
*) false ;;
esac &&
test_cmp expect actual
Terminated
ok 1 - sigchain works
# passed all 1 test(s)
1..1
ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 0.01 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.04 CPU)
Result: PASS
As a further example, consider this test script that uses a lot of
test-lib.sh features by Jakub Narebski:
#!/bin/sh
test_description='this is a sample test.
This test is here to see various test outputs.'
. ./test-lib.sh
say 'diagnostic message'
test_expect_success 'true test' 'true'
test_expect_success 'false test' 'false'
test_expect_failure 'true test (todo)' 'true'
test_expect_failure 'false test (todo)' 'false'
test_debug 'echo "debug message"'
test_done
The output of that was previously:
* diagnostic message # yellow
* ok 1: true test
* FAIL 2: false test # bold red
false
* FIXED 3: true test (todo)
* still broken 4: false test (todo) # bold green
* fixed 1 known breakage(s) # green
* still have 1 known breakage(s) # bold red
* failed 1 among remaining 3 test(s) # bold red
But is now:
diagnostic message # yellow
ok 1 - true test
not ok - 2 false test # bold red
# false
ok 3 - true test (todo) # TODO known breakage
not ok 4 - false test (todo) # TODO known breakage # bold green
# fixed 1 known breakage(s) # green
# still have 1 known breakage(s) # bold red
# failed 1 among remaining 3 test(s) # bold red
1..4
All the coloring is preserved when the test is run manually. Under
prove(1) the test performs as expected, even with --debug and
--verbose options:
$ prove ./example.sh :: --debug --verbose
./example.sh .. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
Failed 1/4 subtests
(1 TODO test unexpectedly succeeded)
Test Summary Report
-------------------
./example.sh (Wstat: 256 Tests: 4 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 2
TODO passed: 3
Non-zero exit status: 1
Files=1, Tests=4, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 0.00 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.03 CPU)
Result: FAIL
The TAP harness itself doesn't get confused by the color output, they
aren't used by test-lib.sh stdout isn't open to a terminal (test -t 1).
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-06-25 01:52:12 +04:00
|
|
|
ok 1 - .git/objects should be empty after git init in an empty repo.
|
|
|
|
ok 2 - .git/objects should have 3 subdirectories.
|
|
|
|
ok 3 - success is reported like this
|
2005-05-14 11:25:06 +04:00
|
|
|
...
|
test-lib: Adjust output to be valid TAP format
TAP, the Test Anything Protocol, is a simple text-based interface
between testing modules in a test harness. test-lib.sh's output was
already very close to being valid TAP. This change brings it all the
way there. Before:
$ ./t0005-signals.sh
* ok 1: sigchain works
* passed all 1 test(s)
And after:
$ ./t0005-signals.sh
ok 1 - sigchain works
# passed all 1 test(s)
1..1
The advantage of using TAP is that any program that reads the format
(a "test harness") can run the tests. The most popular of these is the
prove(1) utility that comes with Perl. It can run tests in parallel,
display colored output, format the output to console, file, HTML etc.,
and much more. An example:
$ prove ./t0005-signals.sh
./t0005-signals.sh .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.00 sys + 0.01 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.06 CPU)
Result: PASS
prove(1) gives you human readable output without being too
verbose. Running the test suite in parallel with `make test -j15`
produces a flood of text. Running them with `prove -j 15 ./t[0-9]*.sh`
makes it easy to follow what's going on.
All this patch does is re-arrange the output a bit so that it conforms
with the TAP spec, everything that the test suite did before continues
to work. That includes aggregating results in t/test-results/, the
--verbose, --debug and other options for tests, and the test color
output.
TAP harnesses ignore everything that they don't know about, so running
the tests with --verbose works:
$ prove ./t0005-signals.sh :: --verbose --debug
./t0005-signals.sh .. Terminated
./t0005-signals.sh .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 0.01 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.05 CPU)
Result: PASS
Just supply the -v option to prove itself to get all the verbose
output that it suppresses:
$ prove -v ./t0005-signals.sh :: --verbose --debug
./t0005-signals.sh ..
Initialized empty Git repository in /home/avar/g/git/t/trash directory.t0005-signals/.git/
expecting success:
test-sigchain >actual
case "$?" in
143) true ;; # POSIX w/ SIGTERM=15
3) true ;; # Windows
*) false ;;
esac &&
test_cmp expect actual
Terminated
ok 1 - sigchain works
# passed all 1 test(s)
1..1
ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 0.01 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.04 CPU)
Result: PASS
As a further example, consider this test script that uses a lot of
test-lib.sh features by Jakub Narebski:
#!/bin/sh
test_description='this is a sample test.
This test is here to see various test outputs.'
. ./test-lib.sh
say 'diagnostic message'
test_expect_success 'true test' 'true'
test_expect_success 'false test' 'false'
test_expect_failure 'true test (todo)' 'true'
test_expect_failure 'false test (todo)' 'false'
test_debug 'echo "debug message"'
test_done
The output of that was previously:
* diagnostic message # yellow
* ok 1: true test
* FAIL 2: false test # bold red
false
* FIXED 3: true test (todo)
* still broken 4: false test (todo) # bold green
* fixed 1 known breakage(s) # green
* still have 1 known breakage(s) # bold red
* failed 1 among remaining 3 test(s) # bold red
But is now:
diagnostic message # yellow
ok 1 - true test
not ok - 2 false test # bold red
# false
ok 3 - true test (todo) # TODO known breakage
not ok 4 - false test (todo) # TODO known breakage # bold green
# fixed 1 known breakage(s) # green
# still have 1 known breakage(s) # bold red
# failed 1 among remaining 3 test(s) # bold red
1..4
All the coloring is preserved when the test is run manually. Under
prove(1) the test performs as expected, even with --debug and
--verbose options:
$ prove ./example.sh :: --debug --verbose
./example.sh .. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
Failed 1/4 subtests
(1 TODO test unexpectedly succeeded)
Test Summary Report
-------------------
./example.sh (Wstat: 256 Tests: 4 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 2
TODO passed: 3
Non-zero exit status: 1
Files=1, Tests=4, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 0.00 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.03 CPU)
Result: FAIL
The TAP harness itself doesn't get confused by the color output, they
aren't used by test-lib.sh stdout isn't open to a terminal (test -t 1).
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-06-25 01:52:12 +04:00
|
|
|
ok 43 - very long name in the index handled sanely
|
|
|
|
# fixed 1 known breakage(s)
|
|
|
|
# still have 1 known breakage(s)
|
|
|
|
# passed all remaining 42 test(s)
|
|
|
|
1..43
|
|
|
|
*** t0001-init.sh ***
|
|
|
|
ok 1 - plain
|
|
|
|
ok 2 - plain with GIT_WORK_TREE
|
|
|
|
ok 3 - plain bare
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since the tests all output TAP (see http://testanything.org) they can
|
2010-07-02 18:59:44 +04:00
|
|
|
be run with any TAP harness. Here's an example of parallel testing
|
test-lib: Adjust output to be valid TAP format
TAP, the Test Anything Protocol, is a simple text-based interface
between testing modules in a test harness. test-lib.sh's output was
already very close to being valid TAP. This change brings it all the
way there. Before:
$ ./t0005-signals.sh
* ok 1: sigchain works
* passed all 1 test(s)
And after:
$ ./t0005-signals.sh
ok 1 - sigchain works
# passed all 1 test(s)
1..1
The advantage of using TAP is that any program that reads the format
(a "test harness") can run the tests. The most popular of these is the
prove(1) utility that comes with Perl. It can run tests in parallel,
display colored output, format the output to console, file, HTML etc.,
and much more. An example:
$ prove ./t0005-signals.sh
./t0005-signals.sh .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.00 sys + 0.01 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.06 CPU)
Result: PASS
prove(1) gives you human readable output without being too
verbose. Running the test suite in parallel with `make test -j15`
produces a flood of text. Running them with `prove -j 15 ./t[0-9]*.sh`
makes it easy to follow what's going on.
All this patch does is re-arrange the output a bit so that it conforms
with the TAP spec, everything that the test suite did before continues
to work. That includes aggregating results in t/test-results/, the
--verbose, --debug and other options for tests, and the test color
output.
TAP harnesses ignore everything that they don't know about, so running
the tests with --verbose works:
$ prove ./t0005-signals.sh :: --verbose --debug
./t0005-signals.sh .. Terminated
./t0005-signals.sh .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 0.01 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.05 CPU)
Result: PASS
Just supply the -v option to prove itself to get all the verbose
output that it suppresses:
$ prove -v ./t0005-signals.sh :: --verbose --debug
./t0005-signals.sh ..
Initialized empty Git repository in /home/avar/g/git/t/trash directory.t0005-signals/.git/
expecting success:
test-sigchain >actual
case "$?" in
143) true ;; # POSIX w/ SIGTERM=15
3) true ;; # Windows
*) false ;;
esac &&
test_cmp expect actual
Terminated
ok 1 - sigchain works
# passed all 1 test(s)
1..1
ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 0.01 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.04 CPU)
Result: PASS
As a further example, consider this test script that uses a lot of
test-lib.sh features by Jakub Narebski:
#!/bin/sh
test_description='this is a sample test.
This test is here to see various test outputs.'
. ./test-lib.sh
say 'diagnostic message'
test_expect_success 'true test' 'true'
test_expect_success 'false test' 'false'
test_expect_failure 'true test (todo)' 'true'
test_expect_failure 'false test (todo)' 'false'
test_debug 'echo "debug message"'
test_done
The output of that was previously:
* diagnostic message # yellow
* ok 1: true test
* FAIL 2: false test # bold red
false
* FIXED 3: true test (todo)
* still broken 4: false test (todo) # bold green
* fixed 1 known breakage(s) # green
* still have 1 known breakage(s) # bold red
* failed 1 among remaining 3 test(s) # bold red
But is now:
diagnostic message # yellow
ok 1 - true test
not ok - 2 false test # bold red
# false
ok 3 - true test (todo) # TODO known breakage
not ok 4 - false test (todo) # TODO known breakage # bold green
# fixed 1 known breakage(s) # green
# still have 1 known breakage(s) # bold red
# failed 1 among remaining 3 test(s) # bold red
1..4
All the coloring is preserved when the test is run manually. Under
prove(1) the test performs as expected, even with --debug and
--verbose options:
$ prove ./example.sh :: --debug --verbose
./example.sh .. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
Failed 1/4 subtests
(1 TODO test unexpectedly succeeded)
Test Summary Report
-------------------
./example.sh (Wstat: 256 Tests: 4 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 2
TODO passed: 3
Non-zero exit status: 1
Files=1, Tests=4, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 0.00 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.03 CPU)
Result: FAIL
The TAP harness itself doesn't get confused by the color output, they
aren't used by test-lib.sh stdout isn't open to a terminal (test -t 1).
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-06-25 01:52:12 +04:00
|
|
|
powered by a recent version of prove(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ prove --timer --jobs 15 ./t[0-9]*.sh
|
|
|
|
[19:17:33] ./t0005-signals.sh ................................... ok 36 ms
|
|
|
|
[19:17:33] ./t0022-crlf-rename.sh ............................... ok 69 ms
|
|
|
|
[19:17:33] ./t0024-crlf-archive.sh .............................. ok 154 ms
|
|
|
|
[19:17:33] ./t0004-unwritable.sh ................................ ok 289 ms
|
|
|
|
[19:17:33] ./t0002-gitfile.sh ................................... ok 480 ms
|
|
|
|
===( 102;0 25/? 6/? 5/? 16/? 1/? 4/? 2/? 1/? 3/? 1... )===
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
prove and other harnesses come with a lot of useful options. The
|
|
|
|
--state option in particular is very useful:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Repeat until no more failures
|
|
|
|
$ prove -j 15 --state=failed,save ./t[0-9]*.sh
|
2005-05-14 11:25:06 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2010-10-14 12:53:36 +04:00
|
|
|
You can give DEFAULT_TEST_TARGET=prove on the make command (or define it
|
|
|
|
in config.mak) to cause "make test" to run tests under prove.
|
|
|
|
GIT_PROVE_OPTS can be used to pass additional options, e.g.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ make DEFAULT_TEST_TARGET=prove GIT_PROVE_OPTS='--timer --jobs 16' test
|
|
|
|
|
test-lib: Adjust output to be valid TAP format
TAP, the Test Anything Protocol, is a simple text-based interface
between testing modules in a test harness. test-lib.sh's output was
already very close to being valid TAP. This change brings it all the
way there. Before:
$ ./t0005-signals.sh
* ok 1: sigchain works
* passed all 1 test(s)
And after:
$ ./t0005-signals.sh
ok 1 - sigchain works
# passed all 1 test(s)
1..1
The advantage of using TAP is that any program that reads the format
(a "test harness") can run the tests. The most popular of these is the
prove(1) utility that comes with Perl. It can run tests in parallel,
display colored output, format the output to console, file, HTML etc.,
and much more. An example:
$ prove ./t0005-signals.sh
./t0005-signals.sh .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.00 sys + 0.01 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.06 CPU)
Result: PASS
prove(1) gives you human readable output without being too
verbose. Running the test suite in parallel with `make test -j15`
produces a flood of text. Running them with `prove -j 15 ./t[0-9]*.sh`
makes it easy to follow what's going on.
All this patch does is re-arrange the output a bit so that it conforms
with the TAP spec, everything that the test suite did before continues
to work. That includes aggregating results in t/test-results/, the
--verbose, --debug and other options for tests, and the test color
output.
TAP harnesses ignore everything that they don't know about, so running
the tests with --verbose works:
$ prove ./t0005-signals.sh :: --verbose --debug
./t0005-signals.sh .. Terminated
./t0005-signals.sh .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 0.01 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.05 CPU)
Result: PASS
Just supply the -v option to prove itself to get all the verbose
output that it suppresses:
$ prove -v ./t0005-signals.sh :: --verbose --debug
./t0005-signals.sh ..
Initialized empty Git repository in /home/avar/g/git/t/trash directory.t0005-signals/.git/
expecting success:
test-sigchain >actual
case "$?" in
143) true ;; # POSIX w/ SIGTERM=15
3) true ;; # Windows
*) false ;;
esac &&
test_cmp expect actual
Terminated
ok 1 - sigchain works
# passed all 1 test(s)
1..1
ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 0.01 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.04 CPU)
Result: PASS
As a further example, consider this test script that uses a lot of
test-lib.sh features by Jakub Narebski:
#!/bin/sh
test_description='this is a sample test.
This test is here to see various test outputs.'
. ./test-lib.sh
say 'diagnostic message'
test_expect_success 'true test' 'true'
test_expect_success 'false test' 'false'
test_expect_failure 'true test (todo)' 'true'
test_expect_failure 'false test (todo)' 'false'
test_debug 'echo "debug message"'
test_done
The output of that was previously:
* diagnostic message # yellow
* ok 1: true test
* FAIL 2: false test # bold red
false
* FIXED 3: true test (todo)
* still broken 4: false test (todo) # bold green
* fixed 1 known breakage(s) # green
* still have 1 known breakage(s) # bold red
* failed 1 among remaining 3 test(s) # bold red
But is now:
diagnostic message # yellow
ok 1 - true test
not ok - 2 false test # bold red
# false
ok 3 - true test (todo) # TODO known breakage
not ok 4 - false test (todo) # TODO known breakage # bold green
# fixed 1 known breakage(s) # green
# still have 1 known breakage(s) # bold red
# failed 1 among remaining 3 test(s) # bold red
1..4
All the coloring is preserved when the test is run manually. Under
prove(1) the test performs as expected, even with --debug and
--verbose options:
$ prove ./example.sh :: --debug --verbose
./example.sh .. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
Failed 1/4 subtests
(1 TODO test unexpectedly succeeded)
Test Summary Report
-------------------
./example.sh (Wstat: 256 Tests: 4 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 2
TODO passed: 3
Non-zero exit status: 1
Files=1, Tests=4, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 0.00 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.03 CPU)
Result: FAIL
The TAP harness itself doesn't get confused by the color output, they
aren't used by test-lib.sh stdout isn't open to a terminal (test -t 1).
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-06-25 01:52:12 +04:00
|
|
|
You can also run each test individually from command line, like this:
|
2005-05-14 11:25:06 +04:00
|
|
|
|
test-lib: Adjust output to be valid TAP format
TAP, the Test Anything Protocol, is a simple text-based interface
between testing modules in a test harness. test-lib.sh's output was
already very close to being valid TAP. This change brings it all the
way there. Before:
$ ./t0005-signals.sh
* ok 1: sigchain works
* passed all 1 test(s)
And after:
$ ./t0005-signals.sh
ok 1 - sigchain works
# passed all 1 test(s)
1..1
The advantage of using TAP is that any program that reads the format
(a "test harness") can run the tests. The most popular of these is the
prove(1) utility that comes with Perl. It can run tests in parallel,
display colored output, format the output to console, file, HTML etc.,
and much more. An example:
$ prove ./t0005-signals.sh
./t0005-signals.sh .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.00 sys + 0.01 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.06 CPU)
Result: PASS
prove(1) gives you human readable output without being too
verbose. Running the test suite in parallel with `make test -j15`
produces a flood of text. Running them with `prove -j 15 ./t[0-9]*.sh`
makes it easy to follow what's going on.
All this patch does is re-arrange the output a bit so that it conforms
with the TAP spec, everything that the test suite did before continues
to work. That includes aggregating results in t/test-results/, the
--verbose, --debug and other options for tests, and the test color
output.
TAP harnesses ignore everything that they don't know about, so running
the tests with --verbose works:
$ prove ./t0005-signals.sh :: --verbose --debug
./t0005-signals.sh .. Terminated
./t0005-signals.sh .. ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 0.01 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.05 CPU)
Result: PASS
Just supply the -v option to prove itself to get all the verbose
output that it suppresses:
$ prove -v ./t0005-signals.sh :: --verbose --debug
./t0005-signals.sh ..
Initialized empty Git repository in /home/avar/g/git/t/trash directory.t0005-signals/.git/
expecting success:
test-sigchain >actual
case "$?" in
143) true ;; # POSIX w/ SIGTERM=15
3) true ;; # Windows
*) false ;;
esac &&
test_cmp expect actual
Terminated
ok 1 - sigchain works
# passed all 1 test(s)
1..1
ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 0.01 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.04 CPU)
Result: PASS
As a further example, consider this test script that uses a lot of
test-lib.sh features by Jakub Narebski:
#!/bin/sh
test_description='this is a sample test.
This test is here to see various test outputs.'
. ./test-lib.sh
say 'diagnostic message'
test_expect_success 'true test' 'true'
test_expect_success 'false test' 'false'
test_expect_failure 'true test (todo)' 'true'
test_expect_failure 'false test (todo)' 'false'
test_debug 'echo "debug message"'
test_done
The output of that was previously:
* diagnostic message # yellow
* ok 1: true test
* FAIL 2: false test # bold red
false
* FIXED 3: true test (todo)
* still broken 4: false test (todo) # bold green
* fixed 1 known breakage(s) # green
* still have 1 known breakage(s) # bold red
* failed 1 among remaining 3 test(s) # bold red
But is now:
diagnostic message # yellow
ok 1 - true test
not ok - 2 false test # bold red
# false
ok 3 - true test (todo) # TODO known breakage
not ok 4 - false test (todo) # TODO known breakage # bold green
# fixed 1 known breakage(s) # green
# still have 1 known breakage(s) # bold red
# failed 1 among remaining 3 test(s) # bold red
1..4
All the coloring is preserved when the test is run manually. Under
prove(1) the test performs as expected, even with --debug and
--verbose options:
$ prove ./example.sh :: --debug --verbose
./example.sh .. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
Failed 1/4 subtests
(1 TODO test unexpectedly succeeded)
Test Summary Report
-------------------
./example.sh (Wstat: 256 Tests: 4 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 2
TODO passed: 3
Non-zero exit status: 1
Files=1, Tests=4, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 0.00 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.03 CPU)
Result: FAIL
The TAP harness itself doesn't get confused by the color output, they
aren't used by test-lib.sh stdout isn't open to a terminal (test -t 1).
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-06-25 01:52:12 +04:00
|
|
|
$ sh ./t3010-ls-files-killed-modified.sh
|
|
|
|
ok 1 - git update-index --add to add various paths.
|
|
|
|
ok 2 - git ls-files -k to show killed files.
|
|
|
|
ok 3 - validate git ls-files -k output.
|
|
|
|
ok 4 - git ls-files -m to show modified files.
|
|
|
|
ok 5 - validate git ls-files -m output.
|
|
|
|
# passed all 5 test(s)
|
|
|
|
1..5
|
2005-05-14 11:25:06 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can pass --verbose (or -v), --debug (or -d), and --immediate
|
2009-02-04 02:25:59 +03:00
|
|
|
(or -i) command line argument to the test, or by setting GIT_TEST_OPTS
|
|
|
|
appropriately before running "make".
|
2005-05-14 11:25:06 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2014-04-30 13:50:42 +04:00
|
|
|
-v::
|
2005-05-14 11:25:06 +04:00
|
|
|
--verbose::
|
|
|
|
This makes the test more verbose. Specifically, the
|
|
|
|
command being run and their output if any are also
|
|
|
|
output.
|
|
|
|
|
2013-06-23 22:12:56 +04:00
|
|
|
--verbose-only=<pattern>::
|
|
|
|
Like --verbose, but the effect is limited to tests with
|
|
|
|
numbers matching <pattern>. The number matched against is
|
|
|
|
simply the running count of the test within the file.
|
|
|
|
|
test-lib.sh: support -x option for shell-tracing
Usually running a test under "-v" makes it clear which
command is failing. However, sometimes it can be useful to
also see a complete trace of the shell commands being run in
the test. You can do so without any support from the test
suite by running "sh -x tXXXX-foo.sh". However, this
produces quite a large bit of output, as we see a trace of
the entire test suite.
This patch instead introduces a "-x" option to the test
scripts (i.e., "./tXXXX-foo.sh -x"). When enabled, this
turns on "set -x" only for the tests themselves. This can
still be a bit verbose, but should keep things to a more
manageable level. You can even use "--verbose-only" to see
the trace only for a specific test.
The implementation is a little invasive. We turn on the "set
-x" inside the "eval" of the test code. This lets the eval
itself avoid being reported in the trace (which would be
long, and redundant with the verbose listing we already
showed). And then after the eval runs, we do some trickery
with stderr to avoid showing the "set +x" to the user.
We also show traces for test_cleanup functions (since they
can impact the test outcome, too). However, we do avoid
running the noop ":" cleanup (the default if the test does
not use test_cleanup at all), as it creates unnecessary
noise in the "set -x" output.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-10-10 10:47:27 +04:00
|
|
|
-x::
|
|
|
|
Turn on shell tracing (i.e., `set -x`) during the tests
|
test-lib: set BASH_XTRACEFD automatically
Passing "-x" to a test script enables the shell's "set -x"
tracing, which can help with tracking down the command that
is causing a failure. Unfortunately, it can also _cause_
failures in some tests that redirect the stderr of a shell
function. Inside the function the shell continues to
respect "set -x", and the trace output is collected along
with whatever stderr is generated normally by the function.
You can see an example of this by running:
./t0040-parse-options.sh -x -i
which will fail immediately in the first test, as it
expects:
test_must_fail some-cmd 2>output.err
to leave output.err empty (but with "-x" it has our trace
output).
Unfortunately there isn't a portable or scalable solution to
this. We could teach test_must_fail to disable "set -x", but
that doesn't help any of the other functions or subshells.
However, we can work around it by pointing the "set -x"
output to our descriptor 4, which always points to the
original stderr of the test script. Unfortunately this only
works for bash, but it's better than nothing (and other
shells will just ignore the BASH_XTRACEFD variable).
The patch itself is a simple one-liner, but note the caveats
in the accompanying comments.
Automatic tests for our "-x" option may be a bit too meta
(and a pain, because they are bash-specific), but I did
confirm that it works correctly both with regular "-x" and
with "--verbose-only=1". This works because the latter flips
"set -x" off and on for particular tests (if it didn't, we
would get tracing for all tests, as going to descriptor 4
effectively circumvents the verbose flag).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-05-11 16:44:04 +03:00
|
|
|
themselves. Implies `--verbose`. Note that in non-bash shells,
|
|
|
|
this can cause failures in some tests which redirect and test
|
|
|
|
the output of shell functions. Use with caution.
|
test-lib.sh: support -x option for shell-tracing
Usually running a test under "-v" makes it clear which
command is failing. However, sometimes it can be useful to
also see a complete trace of the shell commands being run in
the test. You can do so without any support from the test
suite by running "sh -x tXXXX-foo.sh". However, this
produces quite a large bit of output, as we see a trace of
the entire test suite.
This patch instead introduces a "-x" option to the test
scripts (i.e., "./tXXXX-foo.sh -x"). When enabled, this
turns on "set -x" only for the tests themselves. This can
still be a bit verbose, but should keep things to a more
manageable level. You can even use "--verbose-only" to see
the trace only for a specific test.
The implementation is a little invasive. We turn on the "set
-x" inside the "eval" of the test code. This lets the eval
itself avoid being reported in the trace (which would be
long, and redundant with the verbose listing we already
showed). And then after the eval runs, we do some trickery
with stderr to avoid showing the "set +x" to the user.
We also show traces for test_cleanup functions (since they
can impact the test outcome, too). However, we do avoid
running the noop ":" cleanup (the default if the test does
not use test_cleanup at all), as it creates unnecessary
noise in the "set -x" output.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-10-10 10:47:27 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2014-04-30 13:50:42 +04:00
|
|
|
-d::
|
2005-05-14 11:25:06 +04:00
|
|
|
--debug::
|
|
|
|
This may help the person who is developing a new test.
|
|
|
|
It causes the command defined with test_debug to run.
|
2011-03-15 22:58:14 +03:00
|
|
|
The "trash" directory (used to store all temporary data
|
|
|
|
during testing) is not deleted even if there are no
|
|
|
|
failed tests so that you can inspect its contents after
|
|
|
|
the test finished.
|
2005-05-14 11:25:06 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2014-04-30 13:50:42 +04:00
|
|
|
-i::
|
2005-05-14 11:25:06 +04:00
|
|
|
--immediate::
|
|
|
|
This causes the test to immediately exit upon the first
|
2013-04-10 01:48:36 +04:00
|
|
|
failed test. Cleanup commands requested with
|
|
|
|
test_when_finished are not executed if the test failed,
|
|
|
|
in order to keep the state for inspection by the tester
|
|
|
|
to diagnose the bug.
|
2005-05-14 11:25:06 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2014-04-30 13:50:42 +04:00
|
|
|
-l::
|
2008-06-17 05:29:02 +04:00
|
|
|
--long-tests::
|
|
|
|
This causes additional long-running tests to be run (where
|
|
|
|
available), for more exhaustive testing.
|
|
|
|
|
2014-04-30 13:50:44 +04:00
|
|
|
-r::
|
|
|
|
--run=<test-selector>::
|
|
|
|
Run only the subset of tests indicated by
|
|
|
|
<test-selector>. See section "Skipping Tests" below for
|
|
|
|
<test-selector> syntax.
|
|
|
|
|
2013-03-31 12:00:16 +04:00
|
|
|
--valgrind=<tool>::
|
|
|
|
Execute all Git binaries under valgrind tool <tool> and exit
|
|
|
|
with status 126 on errors (just like regular tests, this will
|
|
|
|
only stop the test script when running under -i).
|
2005-05-14 11:25:06 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2009-02-04 02:26:26 +03:00
|
|
|
Since it makes no sense to run the tests with --valgrind and
|
|
|
|
not see any output, this option implies --verbose. For
|
|
|
|
convenience, it also implies --tee.
|
|
|
|
|
2013-03-31 12:00:16 +04:00
|
|
|
<tool> defaults to 'memcheck', just like valgrind itself.
|
|
|
|
Other particularly useful choices include 'helgrind' and
|
|
|
|
'drd', but you may use any tool recognized by your valgrind
|
|
|
|
installation.
|
|
|
|
|
2013-03-31 12:00:17 +04:00
|
|
|
As a special case, <tool> can be 'memcheck-fast', which uses
|
|
|
|
memcheck but disables --track-origins. Use this if you are
|
|
|
|
running tests in bulk, to see if there are _any_ memory
|
|
|
|
issues.
|
|
|
|
|
2013-03-31 12:00:16 +04:00
|
|
|
Note that memcheck is run with the option --leak-check=no,
|
2011-03-15 12:32:11 +03:00
|
|
|
as the git process is short-lived and some errors are not
|
|
|
|
interesting. In order to run a single command under the same
|
|
|
|
conditions manually, you should set GIT_VALGRIND to point to
|
|
|
|
the 't/valgrind/' directory and use the commands under
|
|
|
|
't/valgrind/bin/'.
|
|
|
|
|
2013-06-23 22:12:57 +04:00
|
|
|
--valgrind-only=<pattern>::
|
|
|
|
Like --valgrind, but the effect is limited to tests with
|
|
|
|
numbers matching <pattern>. The number matched against is
|
|
|
|
simply the running count of the test within the file.
|
|
|
|
|
test-lib.sh: optionally output to test-results/$TEST.out, too
When tests are run in parallel and a few tests fail, it does not help
that the output of the terminal is totally confusing, as you rarely know
which test which line came from.
So introduce the option '--tee' which triggers that the output of the
tests will be written to t/test-results/$TEST.out in addition to the
terminal, where $TEST is the basename of the script.
Unfortunately, there seems to be no way to redirect a given file
descriptor to a specified subprocess in POSIX shell, only redirection
to a file is supported via 'exec > $FILE'.
At least with bash, one might think that 'exec >($COMMAND)' would work
as intended, but it does not.
The common way to work around the lack of proper tools support is to
work with named pipes, alas, one of our most beloved platforms does not
really support named pipes. Besides, we would need a pipe for every
script, as the whole point of this patch is to allow parallel execution.
Therefore, we handle the redirection in the following way: when '--tee'
was passed to the test script, the variable GIT_TEST_TEE_STARTED is set
(to avoid triggering that code path again) and the script is started
_again_, in a subshell, redirected to the command "tee".
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-02-04 02:26:12 +03:00
|
|
|
--tee::
|
|
|
|
In addition to printing the test output to the terminal,
|
|
|
|
write it to files named 't/test-results/$TEST_NAME.out'.
|
|
|
|
As the names depend on the tests' file names, it is safe to
|
|
|
|
run the tests with this option in parallel.
|
|
|
|
|
test-lib: add --verbose-log option
The "--verbose" option redirects output from arbitrary
test commands to stdout. This is useful for examining the
output manually, like:
./t5547-push-quarantine.sh -v | less
But it also means that the output is intermingled with the
TAP directives, which can confuse a TAP parser like "prove".
This has always been a potential problem, but became an
issue recently when one test happened to output the word
"ok" on a line by itself, which prove interprets as a test
success:
$ prove t5547-push-quarantine.sh :: -v
t5547-push-quarantine.sh .. 1/? To dest.git
* [new branch] HEAD -> master
To dest.git
! [remote rejected] reject -> reject (pre-receive hook declined)
error: failed to push some refs to 'dest.git'
fatal: git cat-file d08c8eba97f4e683ece08654c7c8d2ba0c03b129: bad file
t5547-push-quarantine.sh .. Failed -1/4 subtests
Test Summary Report
-------------------
t5547-push-quarantine.sh (Wstat: 0 Tests: 5 Failed: 0)
Parse errors: Tests out of sequence. Found (2) but expected (3)
Tests out of sequence. Found (3) but expected (4)
Tests out of sequence. Found (4) but expected (5)
Bad plan. You planned 4 tests but ran 5.
Files=1, Tests=5, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr + 0.01 sys = 0.02 CPU)
Result: FAIL
One answer is "if it hurts, don't do it", but that's not
quite the whole story. The Travis tests use "--verbose
--tee" so that they can get the benefit of prove's parallel
options, along with a verbose log in case there is a
failure. We just need the verbose output to go to the log,
but keep stdout clean.
Getting this right turns out to be surprisingly difficult.
Here's the progression of alternatives I considered:
1. Add an option to write verbose output to stderr. This is
hard to capture, though, because we want each test to
have its own log (because they're all run in parallel
and the jumbled output would be useless).
2. Add an option to write verbose output to a file in
test-results. This works, but the log is missing all of
the non-verbose output, which gives context.
3. Like (2), but teach say_color() to additionally output
to the log. This mostly works, but misses any output
that happens outside of the say() functions (which isn't
a lot, but is a potential maintenance headache).
4. Like (2), but make the log file the same as the "--tee"
file. That almost works, but now we have two processes
opening the same file. That gives us two separate
descriptors, each with their own idea of the current
position. They'll each start writing at offset 0, and
overwrite each other's data.
5. Like (4), but in each case open the file for appending.
That atomically positions each write at the end of the
file.
It's possible we may still get sheared writes between
the two processes, but this is already the case when
writing to stdout. It's not a problem in practice
because the test harness generally waits for snippets to
finish before writing the TAP output.
We can ignore buffering issues with tee, because POSIX
mandates that it does not buffer. Likewise, POSIX
specifies "tee -a", so it should be available
everywhere.
This patch implements option (5), which seems to work well
in practice.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-10-21 13:48:00 +03:00
|
|
|
--verbose-log::
|
|
|
|
Write verbose output to the same logfile as `--tee`, but do
|
|
|
|
_not_ write it to stdout. Unlike `--tee --verbose`, this option
|
|
|
|
is safe to use when stdout is being consumed by a TAP parser
|
|
|
|
like `prove`. Implies `--tee` and `--verbose`.
|
|
|
|
|
2009-12-03 08:14:06 +03:00
|
|
|
--with-dashes::
|
|
|
|
By default tests are run without dashed forms of
|
|
|
|
commands (like git-commit) in the PATH (it only uses
|
|
|
|
wrappers from ../bin-wrappers). Use this option to include
|
|
|
|
the build directory (..) in the PATH, which contains all
|
|
|
|
the dashed forms of commands. This option is currently
|
|
|
|
implied by other options like --valgrind and
|
|
|
|
GIT_TEST_INSTALLED.
|
|
|
|
|
2010-06-10 22:24:46 +04:00
|
|
|
--root=<directory>::
|
|
|
|
Create "trash" directories used to store all temporary data during
|
|
|
|
testing under <directory>, instead of the t/ directory.
|
|
|
|
Using this option with a RAM-based filesystem (such as tmpfs)
|
|
|
|
can massively speed up the test suite.
|
|
|
|
|
t/test-lib: introduce --chain-lint option
It's easy to miss an "&&"-chain in a test script, like:
test_expect_success 'check something important' '
cmd1 &&
cmd2
cmd3
'
The test harness will notice if cmd3 fails, but a failure of
cmd1 or cmd2 will go unnoticed, as their exit status is lost
after cmd3 runs.
The toy example above is easy to spot because the "cmds" are
all the same length, but real code is much more complicated.
It's also difficult to detect these situations by statically
analyzing the shell code with regexps (like the
check-non-portable-shell script does); there's too much
context required to know whether a &&-chain is appropriate
on a given line or not.
This patch instead lets the shell check each test by
sticking a command with a specific and unusual return code
at the top of each test, like:
(exit 117) &&
cmd1 &&
cmd2
cmd3
In a well-formed test, the non-zero exit from the first
command prevents any of the rest from being run, and the
test's exit code is 117. In a bad test (like the one above),
the 117 is lost, and cmd3 is run.
When we encounter a failure of this check, we abort the test
script entirely. For one thing, we have no clue which subset
of the commands in the test snippet were actually run.
Running further tests would be pointless, because we're now
in an unknown state. And two, this is not a "test failure"
in the traditional sense. The test script is buggy, not the
code it is testing. We should be able to fix these problems
in the script once, and not have them come back later as a
regression in git's code.
After checking a test snippet for --chain-lint, we do still
run the test itself. We could actually have a pure-lint
mode which just checks each test, but there are a few
reasons not to. One, because the tests are executing
arbitrary code, which could impact the later environment
(e.g., that could impact which set of tests we run at all).
And two, because a pure-lint mode would still be expensive
to run, because a significant amount of code runs outside of
the test_expect_* blocks. Instead, this option is designed
to be used as part of a normal test suite run, where it adds
very little overhead.
Turning on this option detects quite a few problems in
existing tests, which will be fixed in subsequent patches.
However, there are a number of places it cannot reach:
- it cannot find a failure to break out of loops on error,
like:
cmd1 &&
for i in a b c; do
cmd2 $i
done &&
cmd3
which will not notice failures of "cmd2 a" or "cmd b"
- it cannot find a missing &&-chain inside a block or
subfunction, like:
foo () {
cmd1
cmd2
}
foo &&
bar
which will not notice a failure of cmd1.
- it only checks tests that you run; every platform will
have some tests skipped due to missing prequisites,
so it's impossible to say from one run that the test
suite is free of broken &&-chains. However, all tests get
run by _somebody_, so eventually we will notice problems.
- it does not operate on test_when_finished or prerequisite
blocks. It could, but these tends to be much shorter and
less of a problem, so I punted on them in this patch.
This patch was inspired by an earlier patch by Jonathan
Nieder:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/235913
This implementation and all bugs are mine.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-20 13:05:48 +03:00
|
|
|
--chain-lint::
|
|
|
|
--no-chain-lint::
|
|
|
|
If --chain-lint is enabled, the test harness will check each
|
|
|
|
test to make sure that it properly "&&-chains" all commands (so
|
|
|
|
that a failure in the middle does not go unnoticed by the final
|
|
|
|
exit code of the test). This check is performed in addition to
|
|
|
|
running the tests themselves. You may also enable or disable
|
|
|
|
this feature by setting the GIT_TEST_CHAIN_LINT environment
|
|
|
|
variable to "1" or "0", respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
2009-11-30 09:19:28 +03:00
|
|
|
You can also set the GIT_TEST_INSTALLED environment variable to
|
|
|
|
the bindir of an existing git installation to test that installation.
|
|
|
|
You still need to have built this git sandbox, from which various
|
|
|
|
test-* support programs, templates, and perl libraries are used.
|
|
|
|
If your installed git is incomplete, it will silently test parts of
|
|
|
|
your built version instead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When using GIT_TEST_INSTALLED, you can also set GIT_TEST_EXEC_PATH to
|
|
|
|
override the location of the dashed-form subcommands (what
|
|
|
|
GIT_EXEC_PATH would be used for during normal operation).
|
|
|
|
GIT_TEST_EXEC_PATH defaults to `$GIT_TEST_INSTALLED/git --exec-path`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-06-21 01:10:50 +04:00
|
|
|
Skipping Tests
|
|
|
|
--------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In some environments, certain tests have no way of succeeding
|
|
|
|
due to platform limitation, such as lack of 'unzip' program, or
|
|
|
|
filesystem that do not allow arbitrary sequence of non-NUL bytes
|
|
|
|
as pathnames.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You should be able to say something like
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ GIT_SKIP_TESTS=t9200.8 sh ./t9200-git-cvsexport-commit.sh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and even:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ GIT_SKIP_TESTS='t[0-4]??? t91?? t9200.8' make
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to omit such tests. The value of the environment variable is a
|
|
|
|
SP separated list of patterns that tells which tests to skip,
|
|
|
|
and either can match the "t[0-9]{4}" part to skip the whole
|
|
|
|
test, or t[0-9]{4} followed by ".$number" to say which
|
|
|
|
particular test to skip.
|
|
|
|
|
2014-04-30 13:50:44 +04:00
|
|
|
For an individual test suite --run could be used to specify that
|
|
|
|
only some tests should be run or that some tests should be
|
|
|
|
excluded from a run.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The argument for --run is a list of individual test numbers or
|
|
|
|
ranges with an optional negation prefix that define what tests in
|
|
|
|
a test suite to include in the run. A range is two numbers
|
|
|
|
separated with a dash and matches a range of tests with both ends
|
|
|
|
been included. You may omit the first or the second number to
|
|
|
|
mean "from the first test" or "up to the very last test"
|
|
|
|
respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Optional prefix of '!' means that the test or a range of tests
|
|
|
|
should be excluded from the run.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If --run starts with an unprefixed number or range the initial
|
|
|
|
set of tests to run is empty. If the first item starts with '!'
|
|
|
|
all the tests are added to the initial set. After initial set is
|
|
|
|
determined every test number or range is added or excluded from
|
|
|
|
the set one by one, from left to right.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual numbers or ranges could be separated either by a space
|
|
|
|
or a comma.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For example, to run only tests up to a specific test (21), one
|
|
|
|
could do this:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ sh ./t9200-git-cvsexport-commit.sh --run='1-21'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or this:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ sh ./t9200-git-cvsexport-commit.sh --run='-21'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common case is to run several setup tests (1, 2, 3) and then a
|
|
|
|
specific test (21) that relies on that setup:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ sh ./t9200-git-cvsexport-commit.sh --run='1 2 3 21'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ sh ./t9200-git-cvsexport-commit.sh --run=1,2,3,21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ sh ./t9200-git-cvsexport-commit.sh --run='-3 21'
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-17 13:18:15 +03:00
|
|
|
As noted above, the test set is built by going through the items
|
|
|
|
from left to right, so this:
|
2014-04-30 13:50:44 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ sh ./t9200-git-cvsexport-commit.sh --run='1-4 !3'
|
|
|
|
|
2017-09-17 13:18:15 +03:00
|
|
|
will run tests 1, 2, and 4. Items that come later have higher
|
2016-08-09 11:53:38 +03:00
|
|
|
precedence. It means that this:
|
2014-04-30 13:50:44 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ sh ./t9200-git-cvsexport-commit.sh --run='!3 1-4'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
would just run tests from 1 to 4, including 3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You may use negation with ranges. The following will run all
|
|
|
|
test in the test suite except from 7 up to 11:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ sh ./t9200-git-cvsexport-commit.sh --run='!7-11'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some tests in a test suite rely on the previous tests performing
|
|
|
|
certain actions, specifically some tests are designated as
|
|
|
|
"setup" test, so you cannot _arbitrarily_ disable one test and
|
|
|
|
expect the rest to function correctly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--run is mostly useful when you want to focus on a specific test
|
|
|
|
and know what setup is needed for it. Or when you want to run
|
|
|
|
everything up to a certain test.
|
2008-06-21 01:10:50 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rename some test scripts and describe the naming convention
First digit: "family", e.g. the absolute basics and global stuff (0),
the basic db-side commands (read-tree, write-tree, commit-tree), the
basic working-tree-side commands (checkout-cache, update-cache), the
other basic commands (ls-files), the diff commands, the pull commands,
exporting commands, revision tree commands...
Second digit: the particular command we are testing
Third digit: (optionally) the particular switch or group of switches
we are testing
Freeform part: commandname-details
Described in the README.
mv t1000-checkout-cache.sh t2000-checkout-cache-clash.sh
mv t1001-checkout-cache.sh t2001-checkout-cache-clash.sh
mv t0200-update-cache.sh t2010-update-cache-badpath.sh
mv t0400-ls-files.sh t3000-ls-files-others.sh
mv t0500-ls-files.sh t3010-ls-files-killed.sh
2005-05-15 03:34:22 +04:00
|
|
|
Naming Tests
|
|
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The test files are named as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tNNNN-commandname-details.sh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where N is a decimal digit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First digit tells the family:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 - the absolute basics and global stuff
|
|
|
|
1 - the basic commands concerning database
|
|
|
|
2 - the basic commands concerning the working tree
|
|
|
|
3 - the other basic commands (e.g. ls-files)
|
|
|
|
4 - the diff commands
|
|
|
|
5 - the pull and exporting commands
|
|
|
|
6 - the revision tree commands (even e.g. merge-base)
|
2006-06-28 22:45:52 +04:00
|
|
|
7 - the porcelainish commands concerning the working tree
|
2006-12-29 16:39:09 +03:00
|
|
|
8 - the porcelainish commands concerning forensics
|
|
|
|
9 - the git tools
|
Rename some test scripts and describe the naming convention
First digit: "family", e.g. the absolute basics and global stuff (0),
the basic db-side commands (read-tree, write-tree, commit-tree), the
basic working-tree-side commands (checkout-cache, update-cache), the
other basic commands (ls-files), the diff commands, the pull commands,
exporting commands, revision tree commands...
Second digit: the particular command we are testing
Third digit: (optionally) the particular switch or group of switches
we are testing
Freeform part: commandname-details
Described in the README.
mv t1000-checkout-cache.sh t2000-checkout-cache-clash.sh
mv t1001-checkout-cache.sh t2001-checkout-cache-clash.sh
mv t0200-update-cache.sh t2010-update-cache-badpath.sh
mv t0400-ls-files.sh t3000-ls-files-others.sh
mv t0500-ls-files.sh t3010-ls-files-killed.sh
2005-05-15 03:34:22 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second digit tells the particular command we are testing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third digit (optionally) tells the particular switch or group of switches
|
|
|
|
we are testing.
|
|
|
|
|
2005-07-07 22:39:10 +04:00
|
|
|
If you create files under t/ directory (i.e. here) that is not
|
|
|
|
the top-level test script, never name the file to match the above
|
|
|
|
pattern. The Makefile here considers all such files as the
|
2011-02-22 20:15:00 +03:00
|
|
|
top-level test script and tries to run all of them. Care is
|
2005-07-07 22:39:10 +04:00
|
|
|
especially needed if you are creating a common test library
|
|
|
|
file, similar to test-lib.sh, because such a library file may
|
|
|
|
not be suitable for standalone execution.
|
|
|
|
|
Rename some test scripts and describe the naming convention
First digit: "family", e.g. the absolute basics and global stuff (0),
the basic db-side commands (read-tree, write-tree, commit-tree), the
basic working-tree-side commands (checkout-cache, update-cache), the
other basic commands (ls-files), the diff commands, the pull commands,
exporting commands, revision tree commands...
Second digit: the particular command we are testing
Third digit: (optionally) the particular switch or group of switches
we are testing
Freeform part: commandname-details
Described in the README.
mv t1000-checkout-cache.sh t2000-checkout-cache-clash.sh
mv t1001-checkout-cache.sh t2001-checkout-cache-clash.sh
mv t0200-update-cache.sh t2010-update-cache-badpath.sh
mv t0400-ls-files.sh t3000-ls-files-others.sh
mv t0500-ls-files.sh t3010-ls-files-killed.sh
2005-05-15 03:34:22 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2005-05-14 11:25:06 +04:00
|
|
|
Writing Tests
|
|
|
|
-------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The test script is written as a shell script. It should start
|
|
|
|
with the standard "#!/bin/sh" with copyright notices, and an
|
|
|
|
assignment to variable 'test_description', like this:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#!/bin/sh
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# Copyright (c) 2005 Junio C Hamano
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
|
2005-05-16 01:21:13 +04:00
|
|
|
test_description='xxx test (option --frotz)
|
2005-05-14 11:25:06 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This test registers the following structure in the cache
|
|
|
|
and tries to run git-ls-files with option --frotz.'
|
|
|
|
|
Rename some test scripts and describe the naming convention
First digit: "family", e.g. the absolute basics and global stuff (0),
the basic db-side commands (read-tree, write-tree, commit-tree), the
basic working-tree-side commands (checkout-cache, update-cache), the
other basic commands (ls-files), the diff commands, the pull commands,
exporting commands, revision tree commands...
Second digit: the particular command we are testing
Third digit: (optionally) the particular switch or group of switches
we are testing
Freeform part: commandname-details
Described in the README.
mv t1000-checkout-cache.sh t2000-checkout-cache-clash.sh
mv t1001-checkout-cache.sh t2001-checkout-cache-clash.sh
mv t0200-update-cache.sh t2010-update-cache-badpath.sh
mv t0400-ls-files.sh t3000-ls-files-others.sh
mv t0500-ls-files.sh t3010-ls-files-killed.sh
2005-05-15 03:34:22 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2005-05-14 11:25:06 +04:00
|
|
|
Source 'test-lib.sh'
|
|
|
|
--------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After assigning test_description, the test script should source
|
|
|
|
test-lib.sh like this:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. ./test-lib.sh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This test harness library does the following things:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- If the script is invoked with command line argument --help
|
|
|
|
(or -h), it shows the test_description and exits.
|
|
|
|
|
2010-07-02 18:59:43 +04:00
|
|
|
- Creates an empty test directory with an empty .git/objects database
|
|
|
|
and chdir(2) into it. This directory is 't/trash
|
|
|
|
directory.$test_name_without_dotsh', with t/ subject to change by
|
|
|
|
the --root option documented above.
|
2005-05-14 11:25:06 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Defines standard test helper functions for your scripts to
|
|
|
|
use. These functions are designed to make all scripts behave
|
|
|
|
consistently when command line arguments --verbose (or -v),
|
|
|
|
--debug (or -d), and --immediate (or -i) is given.
|
|
|
|
|
2010-07-02 18:59:49 +04:00
|
|
|
Do's, don'ts & things to keep in mind
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
2010-07-05 22:37:30 +04:00
|
|
|
Here are a few examples of things you probably should and shouldn't do
|
2010-07-02 18:59:49 +04:00
|
|
|
when writing tests.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do:
|
|
|
|
|
2010-07-05 22:37:30 +04:00
|
|
|
- Put all code inside test_expect_success and other assertions.
|
2010-07-02 18:59:49 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even code that isn't a test per se, but merely some setup code
|
2010-07-05 22:37:30 +04:00
|
|
|
should be inside a test assertion.
|
2010-07-02 18:59:49 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Chain your test assertions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write test code like this:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
git merge foo &&
|
|
|
|
git push bar &&
|
|
|
|
test ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instead of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
git merge hla
|
|
|
|
git push gh
|
|
|
|
test ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That way all of the commands in your tests will succeed or fail. If
|
2010-10-04 00:00:14 +04:00
|
|
|
you must ignore the return value of something, consider using a
|
|
|
|
helper function (e.g. use sane_unset instead of unset, in order
|
|
|
|
to avoid unportable return value for unsetting a variable that was
|
|
|
|
already unset), or prepending the command with test_might_fail or
|
|
|
|
test_must_fail.
|
2010-07-02 18:59:49 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2010-07-25 23:52:44 +04:00
|
|
|
- Check the test coverage for your tests. See the "Test coverage"
|
|
|
|
below.
|
|
|
|
|
2011-02-22 20:15:00 +03:00
|
|
|
Don't blindly follow test coverage metrics; if a new function you added
|
|
|
|
doesn't have any coverage, then you're probably doing something wrong,
|
2010-07-25 23:52:45 +04:00
|
|
|
but having 100% coverage doesn't necessarily mean that you tested
|
|
|
|
everything.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tests that are likely to smoke out future regressions are better
|
|
|
|
than tests that just inflate the coverage metrics.
|
|
|
|
|
2011-01-11 10:44:30 +03:00
|
|
|
- When a test checks for an absolute path that a git command generated,
|
|
|
|
construct the expected value using $(pwd) rather than $PWD,
|
|
|
|
$TEST_DIRECTORY, or $TRASH_DIRECTORY. It makes a difference on
|
|
|
|
Windows, where the shell (MSYS bash) mangles absolute path names.
|
|
|
|
For details, see the commit message of 4114156ae9.
|
|
|
|
|
2010-07-02 18:59:49 +04:00
|
|
|
Don't:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- exit() within a <script> part.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The harness will catch this as a programming error of the test.
|
|
|
|
Use test_done instead if you need to stop the tests early (see
|
|
|
|
"Skipping tests" below).
|
|
|
|
|
2012-06-12 20:44:56 +04:00
|
|
|
- use '! git cmd' when you want to make sure the git command exits
|
|
|
|
with failure in a controlled way by calling "die()". Instead,
|
|
|
|
use 'test_must_fail git cmd'. This will signal a failure if git
|
|
|
|
dies in an unexpected way (e.g. segfault).
|
|
|
|
|
2013-06-04 20:50:12 +04:00
|
|
|
On the other hand, don't use test_must_fail for running regular
|
2014-11-24 20:47:07 +03:00
|
|
|
platform commands; just use '! cmd'. We are not in the business
|
|
|
|
of verifying that the world given to us sanely works.
|
2013-06-04 20:50:12 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2012-06-12 20:44:56 +04:00
|
|
|
- use perl without spelling it as "$PERL_PATH". This is to help our
|
|
|
|
friends on Windows where the platform Perl often adds CR before
|
|
|
|
the end of line, and they bundle Git with a version of Perl that
|
t: provide a perl() function which uses $PERL_PATH
Once upon a time, we assumed that calling a bare "perl" in
the test scripts was OK, because we would find the perl from
the user's PATH, and we were only asking that perl to do
basic operations that work even on old versions of perl.
Later, we found that some systems really prefer to use
$PERL_PATH even for these basic cases, because the system
perl misbehaves in some way (e.g., by handling line endings
differently). We then switched "perl" invocations to
"$PERL_PATH" to respect the user's choice.
Having to use "$PERL_PATH" is ugly and cumbersome, though.
Instead, let's provide a perl() shell function that tests
can use, which will transparently do the right thing.
Unfortunately, test writers still have to use $PERL_PATH in
certain situations, so we still need to keep the advice in
the README.
Note that this may fix test failures in t5004, t5503, t6002,
t6003, t6300, t8001, and t8002, depending on your system's
perl setup. All of these can be detected by running:
ln -s /bin/false bin-wrappers/perl
make test
which fails before this patch, and passes after.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-10-29 05:22:07 +04:00
|
|
|
does not do so, whose path is specified with $PERL_PATH. Note that we
|
|
|
|
provide a "perl" function which uses $PERL_PATH under the hood, so
|
|
|
|
you do not need to worry when simply running perl in the test scripts
|
|
|
|
(but you do, for example, on a shebang line or in a sub script
|
|
|
|
created via "write_script").
|
2012-06-12 20:44:56 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- use sh without spelling it as "$SHELL_PATH", when the script can
|
|
|
|
be misinterpreted by broken platform shell (e.g. Solaris).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- chdir around in tests. It is not sufficient to chdir to
|
|
|
|
somewhere and then chdir back to the original location later in
|
|
|
|
the test, as any intermediate step can fail and abort the test,
|
|
|
|
causing the next test to start in an unexpected directory. Do so
|
|
|
|
inside a subshell if necessary.
|
|
|
|
|
2010-07-02 18:59:49 +04:00
|
|
|
- Break the TAP output
|
|
|
|
|
2010-07-05 22:37:30 +04:00
|
|
|
The raw output from your test may be interpreted by a TAP harness. TAP
|
|
|
|
harnesses will ignore everything they don't know about, but don't step
|
|
|
|
on their toes in these areas:
|
2010-07-02 18:59:49 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Don't print lines like "$x..$y" where $x and $y are integers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Don't print lines that begin with "ok" or "not ok".
|
|
|
|
|
2010-07-05 22:37:30 +04:00
|
|
|
TAP harnesses expect a line that begins with either "ok" and "not
|
2010-07-02 18:59:49 +04:00
|
|
|
ok" to signal a test passed or failed (and our harness already
|
|
|
|
produces such lines), so your script shouldn't emit such lines to
|
|
|
|
their output.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can glean some further possible issues from the TAP grammar
|
2017-03-23 01:18:52 +03:00
|
|
|
(see https://metacpan.org/pod/TAP::Parser::Grammar#TAP-GRAMMAR)
|
2010-07-02 18:59:49 +04:00
|
|
|
but the best indication is to just run the tests with prove(1),
|
|
|
|
it'll complain if anything is amiss.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Keep in mind:
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-23 01:18:53 +03:00
|
|
|
- Inside the <script> part, the standard output and standard error
|
2010-07-02 18:59:49 +04:00
|
|
|
streams are discarded, and the test harness only reports "ok" or
|
|
|
|
"not ok" to the end user running the tests. Under --verbose, they
|
|
|
|
are shown to help debugging the tests.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-07-02 18:59:48 +04:00
|
|
|
Skipping tests
|
|
|
|
--------------
|
|
|
|
|
2011-03-09 23:25:09 +03:00
|
|
|
If you need to skip tests you should do so by using the three-arg form
|
2010-07-28 14:34:59 +04:00
|
|
|
of the test_* functions (see the "Test harness library" section
|
|
|
|
below), e.g.:
|
|
|
|
|
2012-06-12 20:44:56 +04:00
|
|
|
test_expect_success PERL 'I need Perl' '
|
t: provide a perl() function which uses $PERL_PATH
Once upon a time, we assumed that calling a bare "perl" in
the test scripts was OK, because we would find the perl from
the user's PATH, and we were only asking that perl to do
basic operations that work even on old versions of perl.
Later, we found that some systems really prefer to use
$PERL_PATH even for these basic cases, because the system
perl misbehaves in some way (e.g., by handling line endings
differently). We then switched "perl" invocations to
"$PERL_PATH" to respect the user's choice.
Having to use "$PERL_PATH" is ugly and cumbersome, though.
Instead, let's provide a perl() shell function that tests
can use, which will transparently do the right thing.
Unfortunately, test writers still have to use $PERL_PATH in
certain situations, so we still need to keep the advice in
the README.
Note that this may fix test failures in t5004, t5503, t6002,
t6003, t6300, t8001, and t8002, depending on your system's
perl setup. All of these can be detected by running:
ln -s /bin/false bin-wrappers/perl
make test
which fails before this patch, and passes after.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-10-29 05:22:07 +04:00
|
|
|
perl -e "hlagh() if unf_unf()"
|
2012-06-12 20:44:56 +04:00
|
|
|
'
|
2010-07-28 14:34:59 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The advantage of skipping tests like this is that platforms that don't
|
|
|
|
have the PERL and other optional dependencies get an indication of how
|
|
|
|
many tests they're missing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the test code is too hairy for that (i.e. does a lot of setup work
|
|
|
|
outside test assertions) you can also skip all remaining tests by
|
|
|
|
setting skip_all and immediately call test_done:
|
2010-07-02 18:59:48 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if ! test_have_prereq PERL
|
|
|
|
then
|
|
|
|
skip_all='skipping perl interface tests, perl not available'
|
|
|
|
test_done
|
|
|
|
fi
|
2005-05-16 01:21:13 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2010-07-28 14:34:59 +04:00
|
|
|
The string you give to skip_all will be used as an explanation for why
|
|
|
|
the test was skipped.
|
|
|
|
|
2005-05-14 11:25:06 +04:00
|
|
|
End with test_done
|
|
|
|
------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your script will be a sequence of tests, using helper functions
|
|
|
|
from the test harness library. At the end of the script, call
|
|
|
|
'test_done'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test harness library
|
|
|
|
--------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are a handful helper functions defined in the test harness
|
|
|
|
library for your script to use.
|
|
|
|
|
2010-07-02 18:59:45 +04:00
|
|
|
- test_expect_success [<prereq>] <message> <script>
|
2005-05-14 11:25:06 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2011-04-26 14:33:26 +04:00
|
|
|
Usually takes two strings as parameters, and evaluates the
|
2005-05-14 11:25:06 +04:00
|
|
|
<script>. If it yields success, test is considered
|
|
|
|
successful. <message> should state what it is testing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Example:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success \
|
|
|
|
'git-write-tree should be able to write an empty tree.' \
|
|
|
|
'tree=$(git-write-tree)'
|
|
|
|
|
2010-07-02 18:59:45 +04:00
|
|
|
If you supply three parameters the first will be taken to be a
|
2011-04-26 14:33:26 +04:00
|
|
|
prerequisite; see the test_set_prereq and test_have_prereq
|
2010-07-02 18:59:45 +04:00
|
|
|
documentation below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success TTY 'git --paginate rev-list uses a pager' \
|
|
|
|
' ... '
|
|
|
|
|
2010-08-07 01:19:23 +04:00
|
|
|
You can also supply a comma-separated list of prerequisites, in the
|
|
|
|
rare case where your test depends on more than one:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success PERL,PYTHON 'yo dawg' \
|
|
|
|
' test $(perl -E 'print eval "1 +" . qx[python -c "print 2"]') == "4" '
|
|
|
|
|
2010-07-02 18:59:45 +04:00
|
|
|
- test_expect_failure [<prereq>] <message> <script>
|
2005-05-14 11:25:06 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2008-02-01 12:50:53 +03:00
|
|
|
This is NOT the opposite of test_expect_success, but is used
|
|
|
|
to mark a test that demonstrates a known breakage. Unlike
|
|
|
|
the usual test_expect_success tests, which say "ok" on
|
|
|
|
success and "FAIL" on failure, this will say "FIXED" on
|
|
|
|
success and "still broken" on failure. Failures from these
|
|
|
|
tests won't cause -i (immediate) to stop.
|
2005-05-14 11:25:06 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2010-07-02 18:59:45 +04:00
|
|
|
Like test_expect_success this function can optionally use a three
|
|
|
|
argument invocation with a prerequisite as the first argument.
|
|
|
|
|
2005-05-14 11:25:06 +04:00
|
|
|
- test_debug <script>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This takes a single argument, <script>, and evaluates it only
|
|
|
|
when the test script is started with --debug command line
|
|
|
|
argument. This is primarily meant for use during the
|
|
|
|
development of a new test script.
|
|
|
|
|
2015-10-30 22:02:56 +03:00
|
|
|
- debug <git-command>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Run a git command inside a debugger. This is primarily meant for
|
|
|
|
use when debugging a failing test script.
|
|
|
|
|
2005-05-14 11:25:06 +04:00
|
|
|
- test_done
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your test script must have test_done at the end. Its purpose
|
|
|
|
is to summarize successes and failures in the test script and
|
|
|
|
exit with an appropriate error code.
|
|
|
|
|
2009-01-28 01:34:48 +03:00
|
|
|
- test_tick
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Make commit and tag names consistent by setting the author and
|
2011-02-22 20:15:00 +03:00
|
|
|
committer times to defined state. Subsequent calls will
|
2009-01-28 01:34:48 +03:00
|
|
|
advance the times by a fixed amount.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- test_commit <message> [<filename> [<contents>]]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Creates a commit with the given message, committing the given
|
|
|
|
file with the given contents (default for both is to reuse the
|
|
|
|
message string), and adds a tag (again reusing the message
|
|
|
|
string as name). Calls test_tick to make the SHA-1s
|
|
|
|
reproducible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- test_merge <message> <commit-or-tag>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merges the given rev using the given message. Like test_commit,
|
|
|
|
creates a tag and calls test_tick before committing.
|
2005-05-14 11:25:06 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2011-04-26 14:33:26 +04:00
|
|
|
- test_set_prereq <prereq>
|
2010-07-02 18:59:45 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Set a test prerequisite to be used later with test_have_prereq. The
|
2010-08-07 01:19:25 +04:00
|
|
|
test-lib will set some prerequisites for you, see the
|
|
|
|
"Prerequisites" section below for a full list of these.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Others you can set yourself and use later with either
|
|
|
|
test_have_prereq directly, or the three argument invocation of
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success and test_expect_failure.
|
2010-07-02 18:59:45 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2011-04-26 14:33:26 +04:00
|
|
|
- test_have_prereq <prereq>
|
2010-07-02 18:59:45 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2017-03-23 01:18:54 +03:00
|
|
|
Check if we have a prerequisite previously set with test_set_prereq.
|
|
|
|
The most common way to use this explicitly (as opposed to the
|
|
|
|
implicit use when an argument is passed to test_expect_*) is to skip
|
|
|
|
all the tests at the start of the test script if we don't have some
|
|
|
|
essential prerequisite:
|
2010-07-02 18:59:45 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if ! test_have_prereq PERL
|
|
|
|
then
|
|
|
|
skip_all='skipping perl interface tests, perl not available'
|
|
|
|
test_done
|
|
|
|
fi
|
|
|
|
|
2010-07-02 18:59:46 +04:00
|
|
|
- test_external [<prereq>] <message> <external> <script>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Execute a <script> with an <external> interpreter (like perl). This
|
|
|
|
was added for tests like t9700-perl-git.sh which do most of their
|
|
|
|
work in an external test script.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_external \
|
|
|
|
'GitwebCache::*FileCache*' \
|
t: provide a perl() function which uses $PERL_PATH
Once upon a time, we assumed that calling a bare "perl" in
the test scripts was OK, because we would find the perl from
the user's PATH, and we were only asking that perl to do
basic operations that work even on old versions of perl.
Later, we found that some systems really prefer to use
$PERL_PATH even for these basic cases, because the system
perl misbehaves in some way (e.g., by handling line endings
differently). We then switched "perl" invocations to
"$PERL_PATH" to respect the user's choice.
Having to use "$PERL_PATH" is ugly and cumbersome, though.
Instead, let's provide a perl() shell function that tests
can use, which will transparently do the right thing.
Unfortunately, test writers still have to use $PERL_PATH in
certain situations, so we still need to keep the advice in
the README.
Note that this may fix test failures in t5004, t5503, t6002,
t6003, t6300, t8001, and t8002, depending on your system's
perl setup. All of these can be detected by running:
ln -s /bin/false bin-wrappers/perl
make test
which fails before this patch, and passes after.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-10-29 05:22:07 +04:00
|
|
|
perl "$TEST_DIRECTORY"/t9503/test_cache_interface.pl
|
2010-07-02 18:59:46 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the test is outputting its own TAP you should set the
|
|
|
|
test_external_has_tap variable somewhere before calling the first
|
|
|
|
test_external* function. See t9700-perl-git.sh for an example.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# The external test will outputs its own plan
|
|
|
|
test_external_has_tap=1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- test_external_without_stderr [<prereq>] <message> <external> <script>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Like test_external but fail if there's any output on stderr,
|
|
|
|
instead of checking the exit code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_external_without_stderr \
|
|
|
|
'Perl API' \
|
t: provide a perl() function which uses $PERL_PATH
Once upon a time, we assumed that calling a bare "perl" in
the test scripts was OK, because we would find the perl from
the user's PATH, and we were only asking that perl to do
basic operations that work even on old versions of perl.
Later, we found that some systems really prefer to use
$PERL_PATH even for these basic cases, because the system
perl misbehaves in some way (e.g., by handling line endings
differently). We then switched "perl" invocations to
"$PERL_PATH" to respect the user's choice.
Having to use "$PERL_PATH" is ugly and cumbersome, though.
Instead, let's provide a perl() shell function that tests
can use, which will transparently do the right thing.
Unfortunately, test writers still have to use $PERL_PATH in
certain situations, so we still need to keep the advice in
the README.
Note that this may fix test failures in t5004, t5503, t6002,
t6003, t6300, t8001, and t8002, depending on your system's
perl setup. All of these can be detected by running:
ln -s /bin/false bin-wrappers/perl
make test
which fails before this patch, and passes after.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-10-29 05:22:07 +04:00
|
|
|
perl "$TEST_DIRECTORY"/t9700/test.pl
|
2010-07-02 18:59:46 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2010-10-03 23:59:59 +04:00
|
|
|
- test_expect_code <exit-code> <command>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Run a command and ensure that it exits with the given exit code.
|
|
|
|
For example:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'Merge with d/f conflicts' '
|
|
|
|
test_expect_code 1 git merge "merge msg" B master
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
|
2010-07-07 00:04:10 +04:00
|
|
|
- test_must_fail <git-command>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Run a git command and ensure it fails in a controlled way. Use
|
2010-07-20 21:17:12 +04:00
|
|
|
this instead of "! <git-command>". When git-command dies due to a
|
|
|
|
segfault, test_must_fail diagnoses it as an error; "! <git-command>"
|
|
|
|
treats it as just another expected failure, which would let such a
|
|
|
|
bug go unnoticed.
|
2010-07-07 00:04:10 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- test_might_fail <git-command>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar to test_must_fail, but tolerate success, too. Use this
|
|
|
|
instead of "<git-command> || :" to catch failures due to segv.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- test_cmp <expected> <actual>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Check whether the content of the <actual> file matches the
|
|
|
|
<expected> file. This behaves like "cmp" but produces more
|
|
|
|
helpful output when the test is run with "-v" option.
|
|
|
|
|
2010-10-31 10:33:50 +03:00
|
|
|
- test_line_count (= | -lt | -ge | ...) <length> <file>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Check whether a file has the length it is expected to.
|
|
|
|
|
2011-04-26 14:33:26 +04:00
|
|
|
- test_path_is_file <path> [<diagnosis>]
|
|
|
|
test_path_is_dir <path> [<diagnosis>]
|
2010-08-10 19:17:52 +04:00
|
|
|
test_path_is_missing <path> [<diagnosis>]
|
|
|
|
|
2011-04-26 14:33:26 +04:00
|
|
|
Check if the named path is a file, if the named path is a
|
|
|
|
directory, or if the named path does not exist, respectively,
|
|
|
|
and fail otherwise, showing the <diagnosis> text.
|
2010-08-10 19:17:52 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2010-07-07 00:04:10 +04:00
|
|
|
- test_when_finished <script>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepend <script> to a list of commands to run to clean up
|
|
|
|
at the end of the current test. If some clean-up command
|
|
|
|
fails, the test will not pass.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Example:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'branch pointing to non-commit' '
|
|
|
|
git rev-parse HEAD^{tree} >.git/refs/heads/invalid &&
|
|
|
|
test_when_finished "git update-ref -d refs/heads/invalid" &&
|
|
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
|
2014-05-06 03:51:43 +04:00
|
|
|
- test_write_lines <lines>
|
2014-04-27 22:15:47 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2014-05-06 03:51:43 +04:00
|
|
|
Write <lines> on standard output, one line per argument.
|
2014-04-27 22:15:47 +04:00
|
|
|
Useful to prepare multi-line files in a compact form.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Example:
|
|
|
|
|
2014-05-06 03:51:43 +04:00
|
|
|
test_write_lines a b c d e f g >foo
|
2014-04-27 22:15:47 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is a more compact equivalent of:
|
|
|
|
cat >foo <<-EOF
|
|
|
|
a
|
|
|
|
b
|
|
|
|
c
|
|
|
|
d
|
|
|
|
e
|
|
|
|
f
|
|
|
|
g
|
|
|
|
EOF
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-01-18 01:04:31 +04:00
|
|
|
- test_pause
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This command is useful for writing and debugging tests and must be
|
|
|
|
removed before submitting. It halts the execution of the test and
|
|
|
|
spawns a shell in the trash directory. Exit the shell to continue
|
|
|
|
the test. Example:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'test' '
|
|
|
|
git do-something >actual &&
|
|
|
|
test_pause &&
|
|
|
|
test_cmp expected actual
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
|
2013-06-08 00:53:27 +04:00
|
|
|
- test_ln_s_add <path1> <path2>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This function helps systems whose filesystem does not support symbolic
|
|
|
|
links. Use it to add a symbolic link entry to the index when it is not
|
|
|
|
important that the file system entry is a symbolic link, i.e., instead
|
|
|
|
of the sequence
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ln -s foo bar &&
|
|
|
|
git add bar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sometimes it is possible to split a test in a part that does not need
|
|
|
|
the symbolic link in the file system and a part that does; then only
|
|
|
|
the latter part need be protected by a SYMLINKS prerequisite (see below).
|
|
|
|
|
2010-08-07 01:19:25 +04:00
|
|
|
Prerequisites
|
|
|
|
-------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These are the prerequisites that the test library predefines with
|
|
|
|
test_have_prereq.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See the prereq argument to the test_* functions in the "Test harness
|
|
|
|
library" section above and the "test_have_prereq" function for how to
|
|
|
|
use these, and "test_set_prereq" for how to define your own.
|
|
|
|
|
2013-10-28 23:22:16 +04:00
|
|
|
- PYTHON
|
2010-08-07 01:19:25 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2013-10-28 23:22:16 +04:00
|
|
|
Git wasn't compiled with NO_PYTHON=YesPlease. Wrap any tests that
|
|
|
|
need Python with this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- PERL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Git wasn't compiled with NO_PERL=YesPlease.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even without the PERL prerequisite, tests can assume there is a
|
|
|
|
usable perl interpreter at $PERL_PATH, though it need not be
|
|
|
|
particularly modern.
|
2010-08-07 01:19:25 +04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- POSIXPERM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The filesystem supports POSIX style permission bits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- BSLASHPSPEC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Backslashes in pathspec are not directory separators. This is not
|
|
|
|
set on Windows. See 6fd1106a for details.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- EXECKEEPSPID
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The process retains the same pid across exec(2). See fb9a2bea for
|
|
|
|
details.
|
|
|
|
|
2013-04-11 06:07:04 +04:00
|
|
|
- PIPE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The filesystem we're on supports creation of FIFOs (named pipes)
|
|
|
|
via mkfifo(1).
|
|
|
|
|
2010-08-07 01:19:25 +04:00
|
|
|
- SYMLINKS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The filesystem we're on supports symbolic links. E.g. a FAT
|
|
|
|
filesystem doesn't support these. See 704a3143 for details.
|
2010-07-02 18:59:46 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2010-08-07 02:09:09 +04:00
|
|
|
- SANITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test is not run by root user, and an attempt to write to an
|
|
|
|
unwritable file is expected to fail correctly.
|
2010-07-02 18:59:46 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2017-05-21 00:42:06 +03:00
|
|
|
- PCRE
|
2011-05-10 01:52:07 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2017-05-21 00:42:06 +03:00
|
|
|
Git was compiled with support for PCRE. Wrap any tests
|
2011-05-10 01:52:07 +04:00
|
|
|
that use git-grep --perl-regexp or git-grep -P in these.
|
|
|
|
|
2012-07-26 17:39:53 +04:00
|
|
|
- CASE_INSENSITIVE_FS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test is run on a case insensitive file system.
|
|
|
|
|
2012-07-26 17:39:56 +04:00
|
|
|
- UTF8_NFD_TO_NFC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test is run on a filesystem which converts decomposed utf-8 (nfd)
|
|
|
|
to precomposed utf-8 (nfc).
|
|
|
|
|
2017-05-25 22:45:31 +03:00
|
|
|
- PTHREADS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Git wasn't compiled with NO_PTHREADS=YesPlease.
|
|
|
|
|
2005-05-14 11:25:06 +04:00
|
|
|
Tips for Writing Tests
|
|
|
|
----------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As with any programming projects, existing programs are the best
|
|
|
|
source of the information. However, do _not_ emulate
|
|
|
|
t0000-basic.sh when writing your tests. The test is special in
|
|
|
|
that it tries to validate the very core of GIT. For example, it
|
|
|
|
knows that there will be 256 subdirectories under .git/objects/,
|
|
|
|
and it knows that the object ID of an empty tree is a certain
|
|
|
|
40-byte string. This is deliberately done so in t0000-basic.sh
|
|
|
|
because the things the very basic core test tries to achieve is
|
|
|
|
to serve as a basis for people who are changing the GIT internal
|
|
|
|
drastically. For these people, after making certain changes,
|
|
|
|
not seeing failures from the basic test _is_ a failure. And
|
|
|
|
such drastic changes to the core GIT that even changes these
|
|
|
|
otherwise supposedly stable object IDs should be accompanied by
|
|
|
|
an update to t0000-basic.sh.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
However, other tests that simply rely on basic parts of the core
|
|
|
|
GIT working properly should not have that level of intimate
|
|
|
|
knowledge of the core GIT internals. If all the test scripts
|
|
|
|
hardcoded the object IDs like t0000-basic.sh does, that defeats
|
|
|
|
the purpose of t0000-basic.sh, which is to isolate that level of
|
|
|
|
validation in one place. Your test also ends up needing
|
|
|
|
updating when such a change to the internal happens, so do _not_
|
|
|
|
do it and leave the low level of validation to t0000-basic.sh.
|
2010-08-08 18:49:25 +04:00
|
|
|
|
2010-07-25 23:52:44 +04:00
|
|
|
Test coverage
|
|
|
|
-------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can use the coverage tests to find code paths that are not being
|
|
|
|
used or properly exercised yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To do that, run the coverage target at the top-level (not in the t/
|
|
|
|
directory):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
make coverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That'll compile Git with GCC's coverage arguments, and generate a test
|
|
|
|
report with gcov after the tests finish. Running the coverage tests
|
|
|
|
can take a while, since running the tests in parallel is incompatible
|
|
|
|
with GCC's coverage mode.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After the tests have run you can generate a list of untested
|
|
|
|
functions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
make coverage-untested-functions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can also generate a detailed per-file HTML report using the
|
|
|
|
Devel::Cover module. To install it do:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# On Debian or Ubuntu:
|
|
|
|
sudo aptitude install libdevel-cover-perl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# From the CPAN with cpanminus
|
|
|
|
curl -L http://cpanmin.us | perl - --sudo --self-upgrade
|
|
|
|
cpanm --sudo Devel::Cover
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Then, at the top-level:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
make cover_db_html
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That'll generate a detailed cover report in the "cover_db_html"
|
|
|
|
directory, which you can then copy to a webserver, or inspect locally
|
|
|
|
in a browser.
|