git/Documentation/git-check-ref-format.txt

72 строки
2.1 KiB
Plaintext
Исходник Обычный вид История

git-check-ref-format(1)
=======================
NAME
----
git-check-ref-format - Make sure ref name is well formed
SYNOPSIS
--------
[verse]
'git check-ref-format' <refname>
'git check-ref-format' [--branch] <branchname-shorthand>
DESCRIPTION
-----------
Checks if a given 'refname' is acceptable, and exits non-zero if
it is not.
A reference is used in git to specify branches and tags. A
branch head is stored under `$GIT_DIR/refs/heads` directory, and
a tag is stored under `$GIT_DIR/refs/tags` directory. git
imposes the following rules on how refs are named:
. It can include slash `/` for hierarchical (directory)
grouping, but no slash-separated component can begin with a
dot `.`;
. It cannot have two consecutive dots `..` anywhere;
. It cannot have ASCII control character (i.e. bytes whose
values are lower than \040, or \177 `DEL`), space, tilde `~`,
caret `{caret}`, colon `:`, question-mark `?`, asterisk `*`,
or open bracket `[` anywhere;
check_ref_format(): tighten refname rules This changes the rules for refnames to forbid: (1) a refname that contains "@{" in it. Some people and foreign SCM converter may have named their branches as frotz@24 and we still want to keep supporting it. However, "git branch frotz@{24}" is a disaster. It cannot even checked out because "git checkout frotz@{24}" will interpret it as "detach the HEAD at twenty-fourth reflog entry of the frotz branch". (2) a refname that ends with a dot. We already reject a path component that begins with a dot, primarily to avoid ambiguous range interpretation. If we allowed ".B" as a valid ref, it is unclear if "A...B" means "in dot-B but not in A" or "either in A or B but not in both". But for this to be complete, we need also to forbid "A." to avoid "in B but not in A-dot". This was not a problem in the original range notation, but we should have added this restriction when three-dot notation was introduced. Unlike "no dot at the beginning of any path component" rule, this rule does not have to be "no dot at the end of any path component", because you cannot abbreviate the tail end away, similar to you can say "dot-B" to mean "refs/heads/dot-B". For these reasons, it is not likely people created branches with these names on purpose, but we have allowed such names to be used for quite some time, and it is possible that people created such branches by mistake or by accident. To help people with branches with such unfortunate names to recover, we still allow "branch -d 'bad.'" to delete such branches, and also allow "branch -m bad. good" to rename them. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-21 23:27:31 +03:00
. They cannot end with a slash `/` nor a dot `.`.
. They cannot contain a sequence `@{`.
These rules makes it easy for shell script based tools to parse
refnames, pathname expansion by the shell when a refname is used
unquoted (by mistake), and also avoids ambiguities in certain
refname expressions (see linkgit:git-rev-parse[1]). Namely:
. double-dot `..` are often used as in `ref1..ref2`, and in some
context this notation means `{caret}ref1 ref2` (i.e. not in
ref1 and in ref2).
. tilde `~` and caret `{caret}` are used to introduce postfix
'nth parent' and 'peel onion' operation.
. colon `:` is used as in `srcref:dstref` to mean "use srcref\'s
value and store it in dstref" in fetch and push operations.
It may also be used to select a specific object such as with
'git-cat-file': "git cat-file blob v1.3.3:refs.c".
check_ref_format(): tighten refname rules This changes the rules for refnames to forbid: (1) a refname that contains "@{" in it. Some people and foreign SCM converter may have named their branches as frotz@24 and we still want to keep supporting it. However, "git branch frotz@{24}" is a disaster. It cannot even checked out because "git checkout frotz@{24}" will interpret it as "detach the HEAD at twenty-fourth reflog entry of the frotz branch". (2) a refname that ends with a dot. We already reject a path component that begins with a dot, primarily to avoid ambiguous range interpretation. If we allowed ".B" as a valid ref, it is unclear if "A...B" means "in dot-B but not in A" or "either in A or B but not in both". But for this to be complete, we need also to forbid "A." to avoid "in B but not in A-dot". This was not a problem in the original range notation, but we should have added this restriction when three-dot notation was introduced. Unlike "no dot at the beginning of any path component" rule, this rule does not have to be "no dot at the end of any path component", because you cannot abbreviate the tail end away, similar to you can say "dot-B" to mean "refs/heads/dot-B". For these reasons, it is not likely people created branches with these names on purpose, but we have allowed such names to be used for quite some time, and it is possible that people created such branches by mistake or by accident. To help people with branches with such unfortunate names to recover, we still allow "branch -d 'bad.'" to delete such branches, and also allow "branch -m bad. good" to rename them. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-21 23:27:31 +03:00
. at-open-brace `@{` is used as a notation to access a reflog entry.
With the `--branch` option, it expands a branch name shorthand and
prints the name of the branch the shorthand refers to.
EXAMPLE
-------
git check-ref-format --branch @{-1}::
Print the name of the previous branch.
GIT
---
Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite