зеркало из https://github.com/microsoft/git.git
xdiff: unignore changes in function context
Changes involving only blank lines are hidden with --ignore-blank-lines, unless they appear in the context lines of other changes. This is handled by xdl_get_hunk() for context added by --inter-hunk-context, -u and -U. Function context for -W and --function-context added by xdl_emit_diff() doesn't pay attention to such ignored changes; it relies fully on xdl_get_hunk() and shows just the post-image of ignored changes appearing in function context. That's inconsistent and confusing. Improve the result of using --ignore-blank-lines and --function-context together by fully showing ignored changes if they happen to fall within function context. Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
Родитель
5fa0f5238b
Коммит
0bb313a552
|
@ -2008,11 +2008,6 @@ test_expect_success 'compare mixed whitespace delta across moved blocks' '
|
|||
test_cmp expected actual
|
||||
'
|
||||
|
||||
# Note that the "6" in the expected hunk header below is funny, since we only
|
||||
# show 5 lines (the missing one was blank and thus ignored). This is how
|
||||
# --ignore-blank-lines behaves even without --function-context, and this test
|
||||
# is just checking the interaction of the two features. Don't take it as an
|
||||
# endorsement of that output.
|
||||
test_expect_success 'combine --ignore-blank-lines with --function-context' '
|
||||
test_write_lines 1 "" 2 3 4 5 >a &&
|
||||
test_write_lines 1 2 3 4 >b &&
|
||||
|
@ -2022,6 +2017,7 @@ test_expect_success 'combine --ignore-blank-lines with --function-context' '
|
|||
cat <<-\EOF >expect &&
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +1,4 @@
|
||||
1
|
||||
-
|
||||
2
|
||||
3
|
||||
4
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -172,10 +172,12 @@ int xdl_emit_diff(xdfenv_t *xe, xdchange_t *xscr, xdemitcb_t *ecb,
|
|||
struct func_line func_line = { 0 };
|
||||
|
||||
for (xch = xscr; xch; xch = xche->next) {
|
||||
xdchange_t *xchp = xch;
|
||||
xche = xdl_get_hunk(&xch, xecfg);
|
||||
if (!xch)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
pre_context_calculation:
|
||||
s1 = XDL_MAX(xch->i1 - xecfg->ctxlen, 0);
|
||||
s2 = XDL_MAX(xch->i2 - xecfg->ctxlen, 0);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -212,6 +214,21 @@ int xdl_emit_diff(xdfenv_t *xe, xdchange_t *xscr, xdemitcb_t *ecb,
|
|||
if (fs1 < s1) {
|
||||
s2 = XDL_MAX(s2 - (s1 - fs1), 0);
|
||||
s1 = fs1;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Did we extend context upwards into an
|
||||
* ignored change?
|
||||
*/
|
||||
while (xchp != xch &&
|
||||
xchp->i1 + xchp->chg1 <= s1 &&
|
||||
xchp->i2 + xchp->chg2 <= s2)
|
||||
xchp = xchp->next;
|
||||
|
||||
/* If so, show it after all. */
|
||||
if (xchp != xch) {
|
||||
xch = xchp;
|
||||
goto pre_context_calculation;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче