Merge branch 'en/disable-dir-rename-in-recursive-merge'

"merge-recursive" hit a BUG() when building a virtual merge base
detected a directory rename.

* en/disable-dir-rename-in-recursive-merge:
  merge-recursive: avoid directory rename detection in recursive case
This commit is contained in:
Junio C Hamano 2019-08-08 14:26:10 -07:00
Родитель c0a6c6614d ff6d54771a
Коммит 0bdaec1d3d
2 изменённых файлов: 113 добавлений и 1 удалений

Просмотреть файл

@ -2863,7 +2863,8 @@ static int detect_and_process_renames(struct merge_options *opt,
head_pairs = get_diffpairs(opt, common, head);
merge_pairs = get_diffpairs(opt, common, merge);
if (opt->detect_directory_renames) {
if ((opt->detect_directory_renames == 2) ||
(opt->detect_directory_renames == 1 && !opt->call_depth)) {
dir_re_head = get_directory_renames(head_pairs);
dir_re_merge = get_directory_renames(merge_pairs);

Просмотреть файл

@ -4403,4 +4403,115 @@ test_expect_success '13d-check(info): messages for rename/rename(1to1) via dual
)
'
# Testcase 13e, directory rename in virtual merge base
#
# This testcase has a slightly different setup than all the above cases, in
# order to include a recursive case:
#
# A C
# o - o
# / \ / \
# O o X ?
# \ / \ /
# o o
# B D
#
# Commit O: a/{z,y}
# Commit A: b/{z,y}
# Commit B: a/{z,y,x}
# Commit C: b/{z,y,x}
# Commit D: b/{z,y}, a/x
# Expected: b/{z,y,x} (sort of; see below for why this might not be expected)
#
# NOTES: 'X' represents a virtual merge base. With the default of
# directory rename detection yielding conflicts, merging A and B
# results in a conflict complaining about whether 'x' should be
# under 'a/' or 'b/'. However, when creating the virtual merge
# base 'X', since virtual merge bases need to be written out as a
# tree, we cannot have a conflict, so some resolution has to be
# picked.
#
# In choosing the right resolution, it's worth noting here that
# commits C & D are merges of A & B that choose different
# locations for 'x' (i.e. they resolve the conflict differently),
# and so it would be nice when merging C & D if git could detect
# this difference of opinion and report a conflict. But the only
# way to do so that I can think of would be to have the virtual
# merge base place 'x' in some directory other than either 'a/' or
# 'b/', which seems a little weird -- especially since it'd result
# in a rename/rename(1to2) conflict with a source path that never
# existed in any version.
#
# So, for now, when directory rename detection is set to
# 'conflict' just avoid doing directory rename detection at all in
# the recursive case. This will not allow us to detect a conflict
# in the outer merge for this special kind of setup, but it at
# least avoids hitting a BUG().
#
test_expect_success '13e-setup: directory rename detection in recursive case' '
test_create_repo 13e &&
(
cd 13e &&
mkdir a &&
echo z >a/z &&
echo y >a/y &&
git add a &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "O" &&
git branch O &&
git branch A &&
git branch B &&
git checkout A &&
git mv a/ b/ &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "A" &&
git checkout B &&
echo x >a/x &&
git add a &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "B" &&
git branch C A &&
git branch D B &&
git checkout C &&
test_must_fail git -c merge.directoryRenames=conflict merge B &&
git add b/x &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "C" &&
git checkout D &&
test_must_fail git -c merge.directoryRenames=conflict merge A &&
git add b/x &&
mkdir a &&
git mv b/x a/x &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "D"
)
'
test_expect_success '13e-check: directory rename detection in recursive case' '
(
cd 13e &&
git checkout --quiet D^0 &&
git -c merge.directoryRenames=conflict merge -s recursive C^0 >out 2>err &&
test_i18ngrep ! CONFLICT out &&
test_i18ngrep ! BUG: err &&
test_i18ngrep ! core.dumped err &&
test_must_be_empty err &&
git ls-files >paths &&
! grep a/x paths &&
grep b/x paths
)
'
test_done