doc: revisions - clarify reachability examples

For the r1..r2 case, the exclusion of r1, rather than inclusion of r2,
 would be the unexpected case in natural language for a simple linear
 development, i.e. start..end excludes start.

Signed-off-by: Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>

Documentation/revisions.txt

@@ -253,7 +253,8 @@ Commit Exclusions
 '{caret}<rev>' (caret) Notation::
  To exclude commits reachable from a commit, a prefix '{caret}'
  notation is used.  E.g. '{caret}r1 r2' means commits reachable
- from 'r2' but exclude the ones reachable from 'r1'.
+ from 'r2' but exclude the ones reachable from 'r1' (i.e. 'r1' and
+ its ancestors).
 
 Dotted Range Notations
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
@@ -297,12 +298,12 @@ Revision Range Summary
 ----------------------
 
 '<rev>'::
-	Include commits that are reachable from (i.e. ancestors of)
+	Include commits that are reachable from <rev> (i.e. <rev> and its
-	<rev>.
+	ancestors).
 
 '{caret}<rev>'::
-	Exclude commits that are reachable from (i.e. ancestors of)
+	Exclude commits that are reachable from <rev> (i.e. <rev> and its
-	<rev>.
+	ancestors).
 
 '<rev1>..<rev2>'::
 	Include commits that are reachable from <rev2> but exclude