tree-walk: micro-optimization in tree_entry_interesting

In the case of a wide breadth top-level tree (~2400 entries, all trees
in this case), we can see a noticeable cost in the profiler calling
strncmp() here. Most of the time we are at the base level of the
repository, so base is "" and baselen == 0, which means we will always
test true. Break out this one tiny case so we can short circuit the
strncmp() call.

Test cases are as follows. packages.git is the Arch Linux git-svn clone
of the packages repository which has the characteristics above.

Commands:
[1] packages.git, /usr/bin/time git log >/dev/null
[2] packages.git, /usr/bin/time git log -- autogen/trunk pacman/trunk wget/trunk >/dev/null
[3] linux.git, /usr/bin/time git log >/dev/null
[4] linux.git, /usr/bin/time git log -- drivers/ata drivers/uio tools >/dev/null

Results:
     before  after  %faster
[1]   2.56    2.55   0.4%
[2]  51.82   48.66   6.5%
[3]   5.58    5.61  -0.5%
[4]   1.55    1.51   0.2%

The takeaway here is this doesn't matter in many operations, but it does
for a certain style of repository and operation where it nets a 6.5%
measured improvement. The other changes are likely not significant by
reasonable statistics methods.

Note: the measured improvement when originally submitted was ~11% (43 to
38 secs) for operation [2]. At the time, the repository had 117220
commits; it now has 137537 commits.

Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
Dan McGee 2011-09-08 21:02:46 -05:00 коммит произвёл Junio C Hamano
Родитель 6de96915c0
Коммит 1b74092373
1 изменённых файлов: 2 добавлений и 2 удалений

Просмотреть файл

@ -591,8 +591,8 @@ int tree_entry_interesting(const struct name_entry *entry,
ps->max_depth);
}
/* Does the base match? */
if (!strncmp(base_str, match, baselen)) {
/* Either there must be no base, or the base must match. */
if (baselen == 0 || !strncmp(base_str, match, baselen)) {
if (match_entry(entry, pathlen,
match + baselen, matchlen - baselen,
&never_interesting))