From b7b793d1e7b1ec8104eef2da450ff47c02c9c365 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?=C3=86var=20Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0=20Bjarmason?= Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 16:43:22 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] read-cache.c: don't guard calls to progress.c API MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Don't guard the calls to the progress.c API with "if (progress)". The API itself will check this. This doesn't change any behavior, but makes this code consistent with the rest of the codebase. See ae9af12287b (status: show progress bar if refreshing the index takes too long, 2018-09-15) for the commit that added the pattern we're changing here. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano --- read-cache.c | 9 +++------ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/read-cache.c b/read-cache.c index 5a907af2fb..8dfdeee93f 100644 --- a/read-cache.c +++ b/read-cache.c @@ -1584,8 +1584,7 @@ int refresh_index(struct index_state *istate, unsigned int flags, t2_sum_scan += t2_did_scan; if (new_entry == ce) continue; - if (progress) - display_progress(progress, i); + display_progress(progress, i); if (!new_entry) { const char *fmt; @@ -1620,10 +1619,8 @@ int refresh_index(struct index_state *istate, unsigned int flags, trace2_data_intmax("index", NULL, "refresh/sum_lstat", t2_sum_lstat); trace2_data_intmax("index", NULL, "refresh/sum_scan", t2_sum_scan); trace2_region_leave("index", "refresh", NULL); - if (progress) { - display_progress(progress, istate->cache_nr); - stop_progress(&progress); - } + display_progress(progress, istate->cache_nr); + stop_progress(&progress); trace_performance_leave("refresh index"); return has_errors; }