get_max_fd_limit(): fall back to OPEN_MAX upon getrlimit/sysconf failure

On broken systems where RLIMIT_NOFILE is visible by the compliers
but underlying getrlimit() system call does not behave, we used to
simply die() when we are trying to decide how many file descriptors
to allocate for keeping packfiles open.  Instead, allow the fallback
codepath to take over when we get such a failure from getrlimit().

The same issue exists with _SC_OPEN_MAX and sysconf(); restructure
the code in a similar way to prepare for a broken sysconf() as well.

Noticed-by: Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>
Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
Junio C Hamano 2013-12-18 14:59:12 -08:00
Родитель 5512ac5840
Коммит 491a8dec44
1 изменённых файлов: 30 добавлений и 7 удалений

Просмотреть файл

@ -807,15 +807,38 @@ void free_pack_by_name(const char *pack_name)
static unsigned int get_max_fd_limit(void)
{
#ifdef RLIMIT_NOFILE
struct rlimit lim;
{
struct rlimit lim;
if (getrlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE, &lim))
die_errno("cannot get RLIMIT_NOFILE");
if (!getrlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE, &lim))
return lim.rlim_cur;
}
#endif
return lim.rlim_cur;
#elif defined(_SC_OPEN_MAX)
return sysconf(_SC_OPEN_MAX);
#elif defined(OPEN_MAX)
#ifdef _SC_OPEN_MAX
{
long open_max = sysconf(_SC_OPEN_MAX);
if (0 < open_max)
return open_max;
/*
* Otherwise, we got -1 for one of the two
* reasons:
*
* (1) sysconf() did not understand _SC_OPEN_MAX
* and signaled an error with -1; or
* (2) sysconf() said there is no limit.
*
* We _could_ clear errno before calling sysconf() to
* tell these two cases apart and return a huge number
* in the latter case to let the caller cap it to a
* value that is not so selfish, but letting the
* fallback OPEN_MAX codepath take care of these cases
* is a lot simpler.
*/
}
#endif
#ifdef OPEN_MAX
return OPEN_MAX;
#else
return 1; /* see the caller ;-) */