From 621b0599fda143aff7fbf2bca7479997a06a5d11 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Junio C Hamano Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 15:04:17 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] send-pack: move REF_STATUS_REJECT_NODELETE logic a bit higher 20e8b465 (refactor ref status logic for pushing, 2010-01-08) restructured the code to set status for each ref to be pushed, but did not quite go far enough. We inspect the status set earlier by set_refs_status_for_push() and then perform yet another update to the status of a ref with an otherwise OK status to be deleted to mark it with REF_STATUS_REJECT_NODELETE when the protocol tells us never to delete. Split the latter into a separate loop that comes before we enter the per-ref loop. This way we would have one less condition to check in the main loop. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano --- send-pack.c | 15 ++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/send-pack.c b/send-pack.c index 6129b0fd8e..22a1709f62 100644 --- a/send-pack.c +++ b/send-pack.c @@ -231,6 +231,15 @@ int send_pack(struct send_pack_args *args, return 0; } + /* + * NEEDSWORK: why does delete-refs have to be so specific to + * send-pack machinery that set_ref_status_for_push() cannot + * set this bit for us??? + */ + for (ref = remote_refs; ref; ref = ref->next) + if (ref->deletion && !allow_deleting_refs) + ref->status = REF_STATUS_REJECT_NODELETE; + if (!args->dry_run) advertise_shallow_grafts_buf(&req_buf); @@ -249,17 +258,13 @@ int send_pack(struct send_pack_args *args, case REF_STATUS_REJECT_FETCH_FIRST: case REF_STATUS_REJECT_NEEDS_FORCE: case REF_STATUS_REJECT_STALE: + case REF_STATUS_REJECT_NODELETE: case REF_STATUS_UPTODATE: continue; default: ; /* do nothing */ } - if (ref->deletion && !allow_deleting_refs) { - ref->status = REF_STATUS_REJECT_NODELETE; - continue; - } - if (!ref->deletion) new_refs++;