Merge branch 'doc-style/for-next' of git://repo.or.cz/git/trast

* 'doc-style/for-next' of git://repo.or.cz/git/trast:
  Documentation: merge: use MERGE_HEAD to refer to the remote branch
  Documentation: simplify How Merge Works
  Documentation: merge: add a section about fast-forward
  Documentation: emphasize when git merge terminates early
  Documentation: merge: add an overview
  Documentation: merge: move merge strategy list to end
  Documentation: suggest `reset --merge` in How Merge Works section
  Documentation: merge: move configuration section to end
  Documentation: emphasise 'git shortlog' in its synopsis
  Documentation: show-files is now called git-ls-files
  Documentation: tiny git config manual tweaks
  Documentation: git gc packs refs by default now

Conflicts:
	Documentation/config.txt

Documentation/git-ls-files.txt

@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ OPTIONS
 
 Output
 ------
-show files just outputs the filename unless '--stage' is specified in
+'git ls-files' just outputs the filenames unless '--stage' is specified in
 which case it outputs:
 
         [<tag> ]<mode> <object> <stage> <file>

Documentation/git-merge.txt

@@ -15,8 +15,32 @@ SYNOPSIS
 
 DESCRIPTION
 -----------
-Merges the history specified by <commit> into HEAD, optionally using a
-specific merge strategy.
+Incorporates changes from the named commits (since the time their
+histories diverged from the current branch) into the current
+branch.  This command is used by 'git pull' to incorporate changes
+from another repository and can be used by hand to merge changes
+from one branch into another.
+
+Assume the following history exists and the current branch is
+"`master`":
+
+------------
+	  A---B---C topic
+	 /
+    D---E---F---G master
+------------
+
+Then "`git merge topic`" will replay the changes made on the
+`topic` branch since it diverged from `master` (i.e., `E`) until
+its current commit (`C`) on top of `master`, and record the result
+in a new commit along with the names of the two parent commits and
+a log message from the user describing the changes.
+
+------------
+	  A---B---C topic
+	 /         \
+    D---E---F---G---H master
+------------
 
 The second syntax (<msg> `HEAD` <commit>...) is supported for
 historical reasons.  Do not use it from the command line or in
@@ -47,88 +71,73 @@ include::merge-options.txt[]
 	You need at least one <commit>.  Specifying more than one
 	<commit> obviously means you are trying an Octopus.
 
-include::merge-strategies.txt[]
 
+PRE-MERGE CHECKS
+----------------
 
-If you tried a merge which resulted in complex conflicts and
-want to start over, you can recover with 'git reset'.
+Before applying outside changes, you should get your own work in
+good shape and committed locally, so it will not be clobbered if
+there are conflicts.  See also linkgit:git-stash[1].
+'git pull' and 'git merge' will stop without doing anything when
+local uncommitted changes overlap with files that 'git pull'/'git
+merge' may need to update.
 
-CONFIGURATION
--------------
-include::merge-config.txt[]
+To avoid recording unrelated changes in the merge commit,
+'git pull' and 'git merge' will also abort if there are any changes
+registered in the index relative to the `HEAD` commit.  (One
+exception is when the changed index entries are in the state that
+would result from the merge already.)
 
-branch.<name>.mergeoptions::
-	Sets default options for merging into branch <name>. The syntax and
-	supported options are the same as those of 'git merge', but option
-	values containing whitespace characters are currently not supported.
+If all named commits are already ancestors of `HEAD`, 'git merge'
+will exit early with the message "Already up-to-date."
 
-HOW MERGE WORKS
----------------
+FAST-FORWARD MERGE
+------------------
 
-A merge is always between the current `HEAD` and one or more
-commits (usually, branch head or tag), and the index file must
-match the tree of `HEAD` commit (i.e. the contents of the last commit)
-when it starts out.  In other words, `git diff --cached HEAD` must
-report no changes.  (One exception is when the changed index
-entries are already in the same state that would result from
-the merge anyway.)
+Often the current branch head is an ancestor of the named commit.
+This is the most common case especially when invoked from 'git
+pull': you are tracking an upstream repository, you have committed
+no local changes, and now you want to update to a newer upstream
+revision.  In this case, a new commit is not needed to store the
+combined history; instead, the `HEAD` (along with the index) is
+updated to point at the named commit, without creating an extra
+merge commit.
 
-Three kinds of merge can happen:
+This behavior can be suppressed with the `--no-ff` option.
 
-* The merged commit is already contained in `HEAD`. This is the
-  simplest case, called "Already up-to-date."
+TRUE MERGE
+----------
 
-* `HEAD` is already contained in the merged commit. This is the
-  most common case especially when invoked from 'git pull':
-  you are tracking an upstream repository, have committed no local
-  changes and now you want to update to a newer upstream revision.
-  Your `HEAD` (and the index) is updated to point at the merged
-  commit, without creating an extra merge commit.  This is
-  called "Fast-forward".
+Except in a fast-forward merge (see above), the branches to be
+merged must be tied together by a merge commit that has both of them
+as its parents.
 
-* Both the merged commit and `HEAD` are independent and must be
-  tied together by a merge commit that has both of them as its parents.
-  The rest of this section describes this "True merge" case.
+A merged version reconciling the changes from all branches to be
+merged is committed, and your `HEAD`, index, and working tree are
+updated to it.  It is possible to have modifications in the working
+tree as long as they do not overlap; the update will preserve them.
 
-The chosen merge strategy merges the two commits into a single
-new source tree.
-When things merge cleanly, this is what happens:
+When it is not obvious how to reconcile the changes, the following
+happens:
 
-1. The results are updated both in the index file and in your
-   working tree;
-2. Index file is written out as a tree;
-3. The tree gets committed; and
-4. The `HEAD` pointer gets advanced.
-
-Because of 2., we require that the original state of the index
-file matches exactly the current `HEAD` commit; otherwise we
-will write out your local changes already registered in your
-index file along with the merge result, which is not good.
-Because 1. involves only those paths differing between your
-branch and the branch you are merging
-(which is typically a fraction of the whole tree), you can
-have local modifications in your working tree as long as they do
-not overlap with what the merge updates.
-
-When there are conflicts, the following happens:
-
-1. `HEAD` stays the same.
-
-2. Cleanly merged paths are updated both in the index file and
+1. The `HEAD` pointer stays the same.
+2. The `MERGE_HEAD` ref is set to point to the other branch head.
+3. Paths that merged cleanly are updated both in the index file and
    in your working tree.
-
-3. For conflicting paths, the index file records up to three
-   versions; stage1 stores the version from the common ancestor,
-   stage2 from `HEAD`, and stage3 from the other branch (you
+4. For conflicting paths, the index file records up to three
+   versions: stage 1 stores the version from the common ancestor,
+   stage 2 from `HEAD`, and stage 3 from `MERGE_HEAD` (you
    can inspect the stages with `git ls-files -u`).  The working
    tree files contain the result of the "merge" program; i.e. 3-way
-   merge results with familiar conflict markers `<<< === >>>`.
-
-4. No other changes are done.  In particular, the local
+   merge results with familiar conflict markers `<<<` `===` `>>>`.
+5. No other changes are made.  In particular, the local
    modifications you had before you started merge will stay the
    same and the index entries for them stay as they were,
    i.e. matching `HEAD`.
 
+If you tried a merge which resulted in complex conflicts and
+want to start over, you can recover with `git reset --merge`.
+
 HOW CONFLICTS ARE PRESENTED
 ---------------------------
 
@@ -211,15 +220,17 @@ You can work through the conflict with a number of tools:
    mergetool which will work you through the merge.
 
  * Look at the diffs.  `git diff` will show a three-way diff,
-   highlighting changes from both the HEAD and their versions.
+   highlighting changes from both the `HEAD` and `MERGE_HEAD`
+   versions.
 
- * Look at the diffs on their own. `git log --merge -p <path>`
-   will show diffs first for the HEAD version and then
-   their version.
+ * Look at the diffs from each branch. `git log --merge -p <path>`
+   will show diffs first for the `HEAD` version and then the
+   `MERGE_HEAD` version.
 
  * Look at the originals.  `git show :1:filename` shows the
-   common ancestor, `git show :2:filename` shows the HEAD
-   version and `git show :3:filename` shows their version.
+   common ancestor, `git show :2:filename` shows the `HEAD`
+   version, and `git show :3:filename` shows the `MERGE_HEAD`
+   version.
 
 
 EXAMPLES
@@ -254,6 +265,17 @@ changes into a merge commit.  Small fixups like bumping
 release/version name would be acceptable.
 
 
+include::merge-strategies.txt[]
+
+CONFIGURATION
+-------------
+include::merge-config.txt[]
+
+branch.<name>.mergeoptions::
+	Sets default options for merging into branch <name>. The syntax and
+	supported options are the same as those of 'git merge', but option
+	values containing whitespace characters are currently not supported.
+
 SEE ALSO
 --------
 linkgit:git-fmt-merge-msg[1], linkgit:git-pull[1],

Documentation/git-shortlog.txt

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ SYNOPSIS
 --------
 [verse]
 git log --pretty=short | 'git shortlog' [-h] [-n] [-s] [-e] [-w]
-git shortlog [-n|--numbered] [-s|--summary] [-e|--email] [-w[<width>[,<indent1>[,<indent2>]]]] [<committish>...]
+'git shortlog' [-n|--numbered] [-s|--summary] [-e|--email] [-w[<width>[,<indent1>[,<indent2>]]]] [<committish>...]
 
 DESCRIPTION
 -----------