зеркало из https://github.com/microsoft/git.git
Merge branch 'dm/maint-docco'
* dm/maint-docco: Documentation: reword example text in git-bisect.txt. Documentation: reworded the "Description" section of git-bisect.txt. Documentation: minor grammatical fixes in git-branch.txt. Documentation: minor grammatical fixes in git-blame.txt. Documentation: reword the "Description" section of git-bisect.txt. Documentation: minor grammatical fixes in git-archive.txt.
This commit is contained in:
Коммит
88f78ce843
|
@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ of lines before or after the line given by <start>.
|
|||
Show raw timestamp (Default: off).
|
||||
|
||||
-S <revs-file>::
|
||||
Use revs from revs-file instead of calling linkgit:git-rev-list[1].
|
||||
Use revisions from revs-file instead of calling linkgit:git-rev-list[1].
|
||||
|
||||
--reverse::
|
||||
Walk history forward instead of backward. Instead of showing
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ prepended to the filenames in the archive.
|
|||
|
||||
'git-archive' behaves differently when given a tree ID versus when
|
||||
given a commit ID or tag ID. In the first case the current time is
|
||||
used as modification time of each file in the archive. In the latter
|
||||
used as the modification time of each file in the archive. In the latter
|
||||
case the commit time as recorded in the referenced commit object is
|
||||
used instead. Additionally the commit ID is stored in a global
|
||||
extended pax header if the tar format is used; it can be extracted
|
||||
|
@ -52,11 +52,11 @@ OPTIONS
|
|||
Write the archive to <file> instead of stdout.
|
||||
|
||||
<extra>::
|
||||
This can be any options that the archiver backend understand.
|
||||
This can be any options that the archiver backend understands.
|
||||
See next section.
|
||||
|
||||
--remote=<repo>::
|
||||
Instead of making a tar archive from local repository,
|
||||
Instead of making a tar archive from the local repository,
|
||||
retrieve a tar archive from a remote repository.
|
||||
|
||||
--exec=<git-upload-archive>::
|
||||
|
@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ EXAMPLES
|
|||
git archive --format=tar --prefix=junk/ HEAD | (cd /var/tmp/ && tar xf -)::
|
||||
|
||||
Create a tar archive that contains the contents of the
|
||||
latest commit on the current branch, and extracts it in
|
||||
latest commit on the current branch, and extract it in the
|
||||
`/var/tmp/junk` directory.
|
||||
|
||||
git archive --format=tar --prefix=git-1.4.0/ v1.4.0 | gzip >git-1.4.0.tar.gz::
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ git-bisect(1)
|
|||
|
||||
NAME
|
||||
----
|
||||
git-bisect - Find the change that introduced a bug by binary search
|
||||
git-bisect - Find by binary search the change that introduced a bug
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
SYNOPSIS
|
||||
|
@ -39,7 +39,8 @@ help" or "git bisect -h" to get a long usage description.
|
|||
Basic bisect commands: start, bad, good
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
The way you use it is:
|
||||
Using the Linux kernel tree as an example, basic use of the bisect
|
||||
command is as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------------------------
|
||||
$ git bisect start
|
||||
|
@ -48,61 +49,63 @@ $ git bisect good v2.6.13-rc2 # v2.6.13-rc2 was the last version
|
|||
# tested that was good
|
||||
------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
When you give at least one bad and one good versions, it will bisect
|
||||
the revision tree and say something like:
|
||||
When you have specified at least one bad and one good version, the
|
||||
command bisects the revision tree and outputs something similar to
|
||||
the following:
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------------------------
|
||||
Bisecting: 675 revisions left to test after this
|
||||
------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
and check out the state in the middle. Now, compile that kernel, and
|
||||
boot it. Now, let's say that this booted kernel works fine, then just
|
||||
do
|
||||
The state in the middle of the set of revisions is then checked out.
|
||||
You would now compile that kernel and boot it. If the booted kernel
|
||||
works correctly, you would then issue the following command:
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------------------------
|
||||
$ git bisect good # this one is good
|
||||
------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
which will now say
|
||||
The output of this command would be something similar to the following:
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------------------------
|
||||
Bisecting: 337 revisions left to test after this
|
||||
------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
and you continue along, compiling that one, testing it, and depending
|
||||
on whether it is good or bad, you say "git bisect good" or "git bisect
|
||||
bad", and ask for the next bisection.
|
||||
You keep repeating this process, compiling the tree, testing it, and
|
||||
depending on whether it is good or bad issuing the command "git bisect good"
|
||||
or "git bisect bad" to ask for the next bisection.
|
||||
|
||||
Until you have no more left, and you'll have been left with the first
|
||||
bad kernel rev in "refs/bisect/bad".
|
||||
Eventually there will be no more revisions left to bisect, and you
|
||||
will have been left with the first bad kernel revision in "refs/bisect/bad".
|
||||
|
||||
Bisect reset
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
Oh, and then after you want to reset to the original head, do a
|
||||
To return to the original head after a bisect session, you issue the
|
||||
following command:
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------------------------
|
||||
$ git bisect reset
|
||||
------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
to get back to the original branch, instead of being on the bisection
|
||||
commit ("git bisect start" will do that for you too, actually: it will
|
||||
reset the bisection state).
|
||||
This resets the tree to the original branch instead of being on the
|
||||
bisection commit ("git bisect start" will also do that, as it resets
|
||||
the bisection state).
|
||||
|
||||
Bisect visualize
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
During the bisection process, you can say
|
||||
To see the currently remaining suspects in 'gitk', the following command
|
||||
is issued during the bisection process:
|
||||
|
||||
------------
|
||||
$ git bisect visualize
|
||||
------------
|
||||
|
||||
to see the currently remaining suspects in 'gitk'. `visualize` is a bit
|
||||
too long to type and `view` is provided as a synonym.
|
||||
`view` may also be used as a synonym for `visualize`.
|
||||
|
||||
If 'DISPLAY' environment variable is not set, 'git log' is used
|
||||
instead. You can even give command line options such as `-p` and
|
||||
If the 'DISPLAY' environment variable is not set, 'git log' is used
|
||||
instead. You can also give command line options such as `-p` and
|
||||
`--stat`.
|
||||
|
||||
------------
|
||||
|
@ -112,57 +115,58 @@ $ git bisect view --stat
|
|||
Bisect log and bisect replay
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
The good/bad input is logged, and
|
||||
After having marked revisions as good or bad, you issue the following
|
||||
command to show what has been done so far:
|
||||
|
||||
------------
|
||||
$ git bisect log
|
||||
------------
|
||||
|
||||
shows what you have done so far. You can truncate its output somewhere
|
||||
and save it in a file, and run
|
||||
If you discover that you made a mistake in specifying the status of a
|
||||
revision, you can save the output of this command to a file, edit it to
|
||||
remove the incorrect entries, and then issue the following commands to
|
||||
return to a corrected state:
|
||||
|
||||
------------
|
||||
$ git bisect reset
|
||||
$ git bisect replay that-file
|
||||
------------
|
||||
|
||||
if you find later you made a mistake telling good/bad about a
|
||||
revision.
|
||||
|
||||
Avoiding to test a commit
|
||||
Avoiding testing a commit
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
If in a middle of bisect session, you know what the bisect suggested
|
||||
to try next is not a good one to test (e.g. the change the commit
|
||||
If in the middle of a bisect session, you know that the next suggested
|
||||
revision is not a good one to test (e.g. the change the commit
|
||||
introduces is known not to work in your environment and you know it
|
||||
does not have anything to do with the bug you are chasing), you may
|
||||
want to find a near-by commit and try that instead.
|
||||
want to find a nearby commit and try that instead.
|
||||
|
||||
It goes something like this:
|
||||
For example:
|
||||
|
||||
------------
|
||||
$ git bisect good/bad # previous round was good/bad.
|
||||
$ git bisect good/bad # previous round was good or bad.
|
||||
Bisecting: 337 revisions left to test after this
|
||||
$ git bisect visualize # oops, that is uninteresting.
|
||||
$ git reset --hard HEAD~3 # try 3 revs before what
|
||||
$ git reset --hard HEAD~3 # try 3 revisions before what
|
||||
# was suggested
|
||||
------------
|
||||
|
||||
Then compile and test the one you chose to try. After that, tell
|
||||
bisect what the result was as usual.
|
||||
Then compile and test the chosen revision. Afterwards the revision
|
||||
is marked as good or bad in the usual manner.
|
||||
|
||||
Bisect skip
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
Instead of choosing by yourself a nearby commit, you may just want git
|
||||
to do it for you using:
|
||||
Instead of choosing by yourself a nearby commit, you can ask git
|
||||
to do it for you by issuing the command:
|
||||
|
||||
------------
|
||||
$ git bisect skip # Current version cannot be tested
|
||||
------------
|
||||
|
||||
But computing the commit to test may be slower afterwards and git may
|
||||
eventually not be able to tell the first bad among a bad and one or
|
||||
more "skip"ped commits.
|
||||
eventually not be able to tell the first bad commit among a bad commit
|
||||
and one or more skipped commits.
|
||||
|
||||
You can even skip a range of commits, instead of just one commit,
|
||||
using the "'<commit1>'..'<commit2>'" notation. For example:
|
||||
|
@ -171,33 +175,34 @@ using the "'<commit1>'..'<commit2>'" notation. For example:
|
|||
$ git bisect skip v2.5..v2.6
|
||||
------------
|
||||
|
||||
would mean that no commit between `v2.5` excluded and `v2.6` included
|
||||
can be tested.
|
||||
The effect of this would be that no commit between `v2.5` excluded and
|
||||
`v2.6` included could be tested.
|
||||
|
||||
Note that if you want to also skip the first commit of a range you can
|
||||
use something like:
|
||||
Note that if you also want to skip the first commit of the range you
|
||||
would issue the command:
|
||||
|
||||
------------
|
||||
$ git bisect skip v2.5 v2.5..v2.6
|
||||
------------
|
||||
|
||||
and the commit pointed to by `v2.5` will be skipped too.
|
||||
This would cause the commits between `v2.5` included and `v2.6` included
|
||||
to be skipped.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Cutting down bisection by giving more parameters to bisect start
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
You can further cut down the number of trials if you know what part of
|
||||
the tree is involved in the problem you are tracking down, by giving
|
||||
paths parameters when you say `bisect start`, like this:
|
||||
You can further cut down the number of trials, if you know what part of
|
||||
the tree is involved in the problem you are tracking down, by specifying
|
||||
path parameters when issuing the `bisect start` command:
|
||||
|
||||
------------
|
||||
$ git bisect start -- arch/i386 include/asm-i386
|
||||
------------
|
||||
|
||||
If you know beforehand more than one good commits, you can narrow the
|
||||
bisect space down without doing the whole tree checkout every time you
|
||||
give good commits. You give the bad revision immediately after `start`
|
||||
and then you give all the good revisions you have:
|
||||
If you know beforehand more than one good commit, you can narrow the
|
||||
bisect space down by specifying all of the good commits immediately after
|
||||
the bad commit when issuing the `bisect start` command:
|
||||
|
||||
------------
|
||||
$ git bisect start v2.6.20-rc6 v2.6.20-rc4 v2.6.20-rc1 --
|
||||
|
@ -209,38 +214,38 @@ Bisect run
|
|||
~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
If you have a script that can tell if the current source code is good
|
||||
or bad, you can automatically bisect using:
|
||||
or bad, you can bisect by issuing the command:
|
||||
|
||||
------------
|
||||
$ git bisect run my_script arguments
|
||||
------------
|
||||
|
||||
Note that the "run" script (`my_script` in the above example) should
|
||||
exit with code 0 in case the current source code is good. Exit with a
|
||||
Note that the script (`my_script` in the above example) should
|
||||
exit with code 0 if the current source code is good, and exit with a
|
||||
code between 1 and 127 (inclusive), except 125, if the current
|
||||
source code is bad.
|
||||
|
||||
Any other exit code will abort the automatic bisect process. (A
|
||||
program that does "exit(-1)" leaves $? = 255, see exit(3) manual page,
|
||||
the value is chopped with "& 0377".)
|
||||
Any other exit code will abort the bisect process. It should be noted
|
||||
that a program that terminates via "exit(-1)" leaves $? = 255, (see the
|
||||
exit(3) manual page), as the value is chopped with "& 0377".
|
||||
|
||||
The special exit code 125 should be used when the current source code
|
||||
cannot be tested. If the "run" script exits with this code, the current
|
||||
revision will be skipped, see `git bisect skip` above.
|
||||
cannot be tested. If the script exits with this code, the current
|
||||
revision will be skipped (see `git bisect skip` above).
|
||||
|
||||
You may often find that during bisect you want to have near-constant
|
||||
tweaks (e.g., s/#define DEBUG 0/#define DEBUG 1/ in a header file, or
|
||||
"revision that does not have this commit needs this patch applied to
|
||||
work around other problem this bisection is not interested in")
|
||||
applied to the revision being tested.
|
||||
You may often find that during a bisect session you want to have
|
||||
temporary modifications (e.g. s/#define DEBUG 0/#define DEBUG 1/ in a
|
||||
header file, or "revision that does not have this commit needs this
|
||||
patch applied to work around another problem this bisection is not
|
||||
interested in") applied to the revision being tested.
|
||||
|
||||
To cope with such a situation, after the inner 'git bisect' finds the
|
||||
next revision to test, with the "run" script, you can apply that tweak
|
||||
before compiling, run the real test, and after the test decides if the
|
||||
revision (possibly with the needed tweaks) passed the test, rewind the
|
||||
tree to the pristine state. Finally the "run" script can exit with
|
||||
the status of the real test to let the "git bisect run" command loop to
|
||||
determine the outcome.
|
||||
next revision to test, the script can apply the patch
|
||||
before compiling, run the real test, and afterwards decide if the
|
||||
revision (possibly with the needed patch) passed the test and then
|
||||
rewind the tree to the pristine state. Finally the script should exit
|
||||
with the status of the real test to let the "git bisect run" command loop
|
||||
determine the eventual outcome of the bisect session.
|
||||
|
||||
EXAMPLES
|
||||
--------
|
||||
|
@ -264,39 +269,39 @@ $ git bisect run make test # "make test" builds and tests
|
|||
------------
|
||||
$ cat ~/test.sh
|
||||
#!/bin/sh
|
||||
make || exit 125 # this "skip"s broken builds
|
||||
make || exit 125 # this skips broken builds
|
||||
make test # "make test" runs the test suite
|
||||
$ git bisect start v1.3 v1.1 -- # v1.3 is bad, v1.1 is good
|
||||
$ git bisect run ~/test.sh
|
||||
------------
|
||||
+
|
||||
Here we use a "test.sh" custom script. In this script, if "make"
|
||||
fails, we "skip" the current commit.
|
||||
fails, we skip the current commit.
|
||||
+
|
||||
It's safer to use a custom script outside the repo to prevent
|
||||
It is safer to use a custom script outside the repository to prevent
|
||||
interactions between the bisect, make and test processes and the
|
||||
script.
|
||||
+
|
||||
And "make test" should "exit 0", if the test suite passes, and
|
||||
"exit 1" (for example) otherwise.
|
||||
"make test" should "exit 0", if the test suite passes, and
|
||||
"exit 1" otherwise.
|
||||
|
||||
* Automatically bisect a broken test case:
|
||||
+
|
||||
------------
|
||||
$ cat ~/test.sh
|
||||
#!/bin/sh
|
||||
make || exit 125 # this "skip"s broken builds
|
||||
make || exit 125 # this skips broken builds
|
||||
~/check_test_case.sh # does the test case passes ?
|
||||
$ git bisect start HEAD HEAD~10 -- # culprit is among the last 10
|
||||
$ git bisect run ~/test.sh
|
||||
------------
|
||||
+
|
||||
Here "check_test_case.sh" should "exit 0", if the test case passes,
|
||||
and "exit 1" (for example) otherwise.
|
||||
Here "check_test_case.sh" should "exit 0" if the test case passes,
|
||||
and "exit 1" otherwise.
|
||||
+
|
||||
It's safer if both "test.sh" and "check_test_case.sh" scripts are
|
||||
outside the repo to prevent interactions between the bisect, make and
|
||||
test processes and the scripts.
|
||||
It is safer if both "test.sh" and "check_test_case.sh" scripts are
|
||||
outside the repository to prevent interactions between the bisect,
|
||||
make and test processes and the scripts.
|
||||
|
||||
* Automatically bisect a broken test suite:
|
||||
+
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -18,9 +18,9 @@ DESCRIPTION
|
|||
Annotates each line in the given file with information from the revision which
|
||||
last modified the line. Optionally, start annotating from the given revision.
|
||||
|
||||
Also it can limit the range of lines annotated.
|
||||
The command can also limit the range of lines annotated.
|
||||
|
||||
This report doesn't tell you anything about lines which have been deleted or
|
||||
The report does not tell you anything about lines which have been deleted or
|
||||
replaced; you need to use a tool such as 'git-diff' or the "pickaxe"
|
||||
interface briefly mentioned in the following paragraph.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -48,26 +48,26 @@ include::blame-options.txt[]
|
|||
lines between files (see `-C`) and lines moved within a
|
||||
file (see `-M`). The first number listed is the score.
|
||||
This is the number of alphanumeric characters detected
|
||||
to be moved between or within files. This must be above
|
||||
as having been moved between or within files. This must be above
|
||||
a certain threshold for 'git-blame' to consider those lines
|
||||
of code to have been moved.
|
||||
|
||||
-f::
|
||||
--show-name::
|
||||
Show filename in the original commit. By default
|
||||
filename is shown if there is any line that came from a
|
||||
file with different name, due to rename detection.
|
||||
Show the filename in the original commit. By default
|
||||
the filename is shown if there is any line that came from a
|
||||
file with a different name, due to rename detection.
|
||||
|
||||
-n::
|
||||
--show-number::
|
||||
Show line number in the original commit (Default: off).
|
||||
Show the line number in the original commit (Default: off).
|
||||
|
||||
-s::
|
||||
Suppress author name and timestamp from the output.
|
||||
Suppress the author name and timestamp from the output.
|
||||
|
||||
-w::
|
||||
Ignore whitespace when comparing parent's version and
|
||||
child's to find where the lines came from.
|
||||
Ignore whitespace when comparing the parent's version and
|
||||
the child's to find where the lines came from.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
THE PORCELAIN FORMAT
|
||||
|
@ -79,17 +79,17 @@ header at the minimum has the first line which has:
|
|||
- 40-byte SHA-1 of the commit the line is attributed to;
|
||||
- the line number of the line in the original file;
|
||||
- the line number of the line in the final file;
|
||||
- on a line that starts a group of line from a different
|
||||
- on a line that starts a group of lines from a different
|
||||
commit than the previous one, the number of lines in this
|
||||
group. On subsequent lines this field is absent.
|
||||
|
||||
This header line is followed by the following information
|
||||
at least once for each commit:
|
||||
|
||||
- author name ("author"), email ("author-mail"), time
|
||||
- the author name ("author"), email ("author-mail"), time
|
||||
("author-time"), and timezone ("author-tz"); similarly
|
||||
for committer.
|
||||
- filename in the commit the line is attributed to.
|
||||
- the filename in the commit that the line is attributed to.
|
||||
- the first line of the commit log message ("summary").
|
||||
|
||||
The contents of the actual line is output after the above
|
||||
|
@ -100,23 +100,23 @@ header elements later.
|
|||
SPECIFYING RANGES
|
||||
-----------------
|
||||
|
||||
Unlike 'git-blame' and 'git-annotate' in older git, the extent
|
||||
of annotation can be limited to both line ranges and revision
|
||||
Unlike 'git-blame' and 'git-annotate' in older versions of git, the extent
|
||||
of the annotation can be limited to both line ranges and revision
|
||||
ranges. When you are interested in finding the origin for
|
||||
ll. 40-60 for file `foo`, you can use `-L` option like these
|
||||
lines 40-60 for file `foo`, you can use the `-L` option like so
|
||||
(they mean the same thing -- both ask for 21 lines starting at
|
||||
line 40):
|
||||
|
||||
git blame -L 40,60 foo
|
||||
git blame -L 40,+21 foo
|
||||
|
||||
Also you can use regular expression to specify the line range.
|
||||
Also you can use a regular expression to specify the line range:
|
||||
|
||||
git blame -L '/^sub hello {/,/^}$/' foo
|
||||
|
||||
would limit the annotation to the body of `hello` subroutine.
|
||||
which limits the annotation to the body of the `hello` subroutine.
|
||||
|
||||
When you are not interested in changes older than the version
|
||||
When you are not interested in changes older than version
|
||||
v2.6.18, or changes older than 3 weeks, you can use revision
|
||||
range specifiers similar to 'git-rev-list':
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ commit v2.6.18 or the most recent commit that is more than 3
|
|||
weeks old in the above example) are blamed for that range
|
||||
boundary commit.
|
||||
|
||||
A particularly useful way is to see if an added file have lines
|
||||
A particularly useful way is to see if an added file has lines
|
||||
created by copy-and-paste from existing files. Sometimes this
|
||||
indicates that the developer was being sloppy and did not
|
||||
refactor the code properly. You can first find the commit that
|
||||
|
@ -162,26 +162,26 @@ annotated.
|
|||
+
|
||||
Line numbers count from 1.
|
||||
|
||||
. The first time that commit shows up in the stream, it has various
|
||||
. The first time that a commit shows up in the stream, it has various
|
||||
other information about it printed out with a one-word tag at the
|
||||
beginning of each line about that "extended commit info" (author,
|
||||
email, committer, dates, summary etc).
|
||||
beginning of each line describing the extra commit information (author,
|
||||
email, committer, dates, summary, etc.).
|
||||
|
||||
. Unlike Porcelain format, the filename information is always
|
||||
. Unlike the Porcelain format, the filename information is always
|
||||
given and terminates the entry:
|
||||
|
||||
"filename" <whitespace-quoted-filename-goes-here>
|
||||
+
|
||||
and thus it's really quite easy to parse for some line- and word-oriented
|
||||
and thus it is really quite easy to parse for some line- and word-oriented
|
||||
parser (which should be quite natural for most scripting languages).
|
||||
+
|
||||
[NOTE]
|
||||
For people who do parsing: to make it more robust, just ignore any
|
||||
lines in between the first and last one ("<sha1>" and "filename" lines)
|
||||
where you don't recognize the tag-words (or care about that particular
|
||||
lines between the first and last one ("<sha1>" and "filename" lines)
|
||||
where you do not recognize the tag words (or care about that particular
|
||||
one) at the beginning of the "extended information" lines. That way, if
|
||||
there is ever added information (like the commit encoding or extended
|
||||
commit commentary), a blame viewer won't ever care.
|
||||
commit commentary), a blame viewer will not care.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
MAPPING AUTHORS
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -18,19 +18,19 @@ SYNOPSIS
|
|||
DESCRIPTION
|
||||
-----------
|
||||
|
||||
With no arguments, existing branches are listed, the current branch will
|
||||
With no arguments, existing branches are listed and the current branch will
|
||||
be highlighted with an asterisk. Option `-r` causes the remote-tracking
|
||||
branches to be listed, and option `-a` shows both.
|
||||
|
||||
With `--contains`, shows only the branches that contains the named commit
|
||||
(in other words, the branches whose tip commits are descendant of the
|
||||
With `--contains`, shows only the branches that contain the named commit
|
||||
(in other words, the branches whose tip commits are descendants of the
|
||||
named commit). With `--merged`, only branches merged into the named
|
||||
commit (i.e. the branches whose tip commits are reachable from the named
|
||||
commit) will be listed. With `--no-merged` only branches not merged into
|
||||
the named commit will be listed. Missing <commit> argument defaults to
|
||||
'HEAD' (i.e. the tip of the current branch).
|
||||
the named commit will be listed. If the <commit> argument is missing it
|
||||
defaults to 'HEAD' (i.e. the tip of the current branch).
|
||||
|
||||
In its second form, a new branch named <branchname> will be created.
|
||||
In the command's second form, a new branch named <branchname> will be created.
|
||||
It will start out with a head equal to the one given as <start-point>.
|
||||
If no <start-point> is given, the branch will be created with a head
|
||||
equal to that of the currently checked out branch.
|
||||
|
@ -57,9 +57,9 @@ has a reflog then the reflog will also be deleted.
|
|||
|
||||
Use -r together with -d to delete remote-tracking branches. Note, that it
|
||||
only makes sense to delete remote-tracking branches if they no longer exist
|
||||
in remote repository or if 'git-fetch' was configured not to fetch
|
||||
them again. See also 'prune' subcommand of linkgit:git-remote[1] for way to
|
||||
clean up all obsolete remote-tracking branches.
|
||||
in the remote repository or if 'git-fetch' was configured not to fetch
|
||||
them again. See also the 'prune' subcommand of linkgit:git-remote[1] for a
|
||||
way to clean up all obsolete remote-tracking branches.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
OPTIONS
|
||||
|
@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ OPTIONS
|
|||
Move/rename a branch and the corresponding reflog.
|
||||
|
||||
-M::
|
||||
Move/rename a branch even if the new branchname already exists.
|
||||
Move/rename a branch even if the new branch name already exists.
|
||||
|
||||
--color::
|
||||
Color branches to highlight current, local, and remote branches.
|
||||
|
@ -103,17 +103,17 @@ OPTIONS
|
|||
Show sha1 and commit subject line for each head.
|
||||
|
||||
--abbrev=<length>::
|
||||
Alter minimum display length for sha1 in output listing,
|
||||
default value is 7.
|
||||
Alter the sha1's minimum display length in the output listing.
|
||||
The default value is 7.
|
||||
|
||||
--no-abbrev::
|
||||
Display the full sha1s in output listing rather than abbreviating them.
|
||||
Display the full sha1s in the output listing rather than abbreviating them.
|
||||
|
||||
--track::
|
||||
When creating a new branch, set up configuration so that 'git-pull'
|
||||
When creating a new branch, set up the configuration so that 'git-pull'
|
||||
will automatically retrieve data from the start point, which must be
|
||||
a branch. Use this if you always pull from the same upstream branch
|
||||
into the new branch, and if you don't want to use "git pull
|
||||
into the new branch, and if you do not want to use "git pull
|
||||
<repository> <refspec>" explicitly. This behavior is the default
|
||||
when the start point is a remote branch. Set the
|
||||
branch.autosetupmerge configuration variable to `false` if you want
|
||||
|
@ -149,13 +149,13 @@ OPTIONS
|
|||
|
||||
<newbranch>::
|
||||
The new name for an existing branch. The same restrictions as for
|
||||
<branchname> applies.
|
||||
<branchname> apply.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Examples
|
||||
--------
|
||||
|
||||
Start development off of a known tag::
|
||||
Start development from a known tag::
|
||||
+
|
||||
------------
|
||||
$ git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/.../linux-2.6 my2.6
|
||||
|
@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ $ git checkout my2.6.14
|
|||
<1> This step and the next one could be combined into a single step with
|
||||
"checkout -b my2.6.14 v2.6.14".
|
||||
|
||||
Delete unneeded branch::
|
||||
Delete an unneeded branch::
|
||||
+
|
||||
------------
|
||||
$ git clone git://git.kernel.org/.../git.git my.git
|
||||
|
@ -176,21 +176,21 @@ $ git branch -d -r origin/todo origin/html origin/man <1>
|
|||
$ git branch -D test <2>
|
||||
------------
|
||||
+
|
||||
<1> Delete remote-tracking branches "todo", "html", "man". Next 'fetch' or
|
||||
'pull' will create them again unless you configure them not to. See
|
||||
linkgit:git-fetch[1].
|
||||
<2> Delete "test" branch even if the "master" branch (or whichever branch is
|
||||
currently checked out) does not have all commits from test branch.
|
||||
<1> Delete the remote-tracking branches "todo", "html" and "man". The next
|
||||
'fetch' or 'pull' will create them again unless you configure them not to.
|
||||
See linkgit:git-fetch[1].
|
||||
<2> Delete the "test" branch even if the "master" branch (or whichever branch
|
||||
is currently checked out) does not have all commits from the test branch.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Notes
|
||||
-----
|
||||
|
||||
If you are creating a branch that you want to immediately checkout, it's
|
||||
If you are creating a branch that you want to checkout immediately, it is
|
||||
easier to use the git checkout command with its `-b` option to create
|
||||
a branch and check it out with a single command.
|
||||
|
||||
The options `--contains`, `--merged` and `--no-merged` serves three related
|
||||
The options `--contains`, `--merged` and `--no-merged` serve three related
|
||||
but different purposes:
|
||||
|
||||
- `--contains <commit>` is used to find all branches which will need
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -5,22 +5,21 @@ canonical real names and email addresses.
|
|||
|
||||
In the simple form, each line in the file consists of the canonical
|
||||
real name of an author, whitespace, and an email address used in the
|
||||
commit (enclosed by '<' and '>') to map to the name. Thus, looks like
|
||||
this
|
||||
commit (enclosed by '<' and '>') to map to the name. For example:
|
||||
--
|
||||
Proper Name <commit@email.xx>
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
The more complex forms are
|
||||
The more complex forms are:
|
||||
--
|
||||
<proper@email.xx> <commit@email.xx>
|
||||
--
|
||||
which allows mailmap to replace only the email part of a commit, and
|
||||
which allows mailmap to replace only the email part of a commit, and:
|
||||
--
|
||||
Proper Name <proper@email.xx> <commit@email.xx>
|
||||
--
|
||||
which allows mailmap to replace both the name and the email of a
|
||||
commit matching the specified commit email address, and
|
||||
commit matching the specified commit email address, and:
|
||||
--
|
||||
Proper Name <proper@email.xx> Commit Name <commit@email.xx>
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
@ -47,8 +46,8 @@ Jane Doe <jane@desktop.(none)>
|
|||
Joe R. Developer <joe@example.com>
|
||||
------------
|
||||
|
||||
Note how we don't need an entry for <jane@laptop.(none)>, because the
|
||||
real name of that author is correct already.
|
||||
Note how there is no need for an entry for <jane@laptop.(none)>, because the
|
||||
real name of that author is already correct.
|
||||
|
||||
Example 2: Your repository contains commits from the following
|
||||
authors:
|
||||
|
@ -62,7 +61,7 @@ claus <me@company.xx>
|
|||
CTO <cto@coompany.xx>
|
||||
------------
|
||||
|
||||
Then, you might want a `.mailmap` file looking like:
|
||||
Then you might want a `.mailmap` file that looks like:
|
||||
------------
|
||||
<cto@company.xx> <cto@coompany.xx>
|
||||
Some Dude <some@dude.xx> nick1 <bugs@company.xx>
|
||||
|
@ -72,4 +71,4 @@ Santa Claus <santa.claus@northpole.xx> <me@company.xx>
|
|||
------------
|
||||
|
||||
Use hash '#' for comments that are either on their own line, or after
|
||||
the email address.
|
||||
the email address.
|
||||
|
|
Загрузка…
Ссылка в новой задаче