merge-ort: expand only for out-of-cone conflicts

Merge conflicts happen often enough to want to avoid expanding a sparse
index when they happen, as long as those conflicts are within the
sparse-checkout cone. If a conflict exists outside of the
sparse-checkout cone, then we still need to expand before iterating over
the index entries. This is critical to do in advance because of how the
original_cache_nr is tracked to allow inserting and replacing cache
entries.

Iterate over the conflicted files and check if any paths are outside of
the sparse-checkout cone. If so, then expand the full index.

Add a test that demonstrates that we do not expand the index, even when
we hit a conflict within the sparse-checkout cone.

Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
This commit is contained in:
Derrick Stolee 2021-07-27 21:32:59 -04:00
Родитель d91a647494
Коммит df49b5f030
2 изменённых файлов: 38 добавлений и 5 удалений

Просмотреть файл

@ -4060,11 +4060,18 @@ static int record_conflicted_index_entries(struct merge_options *opt)
/* /*
* We are in a conflicted state. These conflicts might be inside * We are in a conflicted state. These conflicts might be inside
* sparse-directory entries, so expand the index preemtively. * sparse-directory entries, so check if any entries are outside
* Also, we set original_cache_nr below, but that might change if * of the sparse-checkout cone preemptively.
*
* We set original_cache_nr below, but that might change if
* index_name_pos() calls ask for paths within sparse directories. * index_name_pos() calls ask for paths within sparse directories.
*/ */
ensure_full_index(index); strmap_for_each_entry(&opt->priv->conflicted, &iter, e) {
if (!path_in_sparse_checkout(e->key, index)) {
ensure_full_index(index);
break;
}
}
/* If any entries have skip_worktree set, we'll have to check 'em out */ /* If any entries have skip_worktree set, we'll have to check 'em out */
state.force = 1; state.force = 1;

Просмотреть файл

@ -617,8 +617,17 @@ test_expect_success 'sparse-index is expanded and converted back' '
ensure_not_expanded () { ensure_not_expanded () {
rm -f trace2.txt && rm -f trace2.txt &&
echo >>sparse-index/untracked.txt && echo >>sparse-index/untracked.txt &&
GIT_TRACE2_EVENT="$(pwd)/trace2.txt" GIT_TRACE2_EVENT_NESTING=10 \
git -C sparse-index "$@" && if test "$1" = "!"
then
shift &&
test_must_fail env \
GIT_TRACE2_EVENT="$(pwd)/trace2.txt" GIT_TRACE2_EVENT_NESTING=10 \
git -C sparse-index "$@" || return 1
else
GIT_TRACE2_EVENT="$(pwd)/trace2.txt" GIT_TRACE2_EVENT_NESTING=10 \
git -C sparse-index "$@" || return 1
fi &&
test_region ! index ensure_full_index trace2.txt test_region ! index ensure_full_index trace2.txt
} }
@ -658,6 +667,23 @@ test_expect_success 'sparse-index is not expanded' '
) )
' '
test_expect_success 'sparse-index is not expanded: merge conflict in cone' '
init_repos &&
for side in right left
do
git -C sparse-index checkout -b expand-$side base &&
echo $side >sparse-index/deep/a &&
git -C sparse-index commit -a -m "$side" || return 1
done &&
(
sane_unset GIT_TEST_MERGE_ALGORITHM &&
git -C sparse-index config pull.twohead ort &&
ensure_not_expanded ! merge -m merged expand-right
)
'
# NEEDSWORK: a sparse-checkout behaves differently from a full checkout # NEEDSWORK: a sparse-checkout behaves differently from a full checkout
# in this scenario, but it shouldn't. # in this scenario, but it shouldn't.
test_expect_success 'reset mixed and checkout orphan' ' test_expect_success 'reset mixed and checkout orphan' '