builtin/fetch.c: comment that branch->remote_name is usable when has_merge

Save future readers the trouble of tracing code to determine that the two
uses of branch->remote_name are safe when has_merge is set, by adding a
comment explaining that it is so.

Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
Brandon Casey 2010-09-09 13:56:36 -05:00 коммит произвёл Junio C Hamano
Родитель a1d558d254
Коммит f31dbdc7da
1 изменённых файлов: 3 добавлений и 0 удалений

Просмотреть файл

@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ static struct ref *get_ref_map(struct transport *transport,
int has_merge = branch_has_merge_config(branch);
if (remote &&
(remote->fetch_refspec_nr ||
/* Note: has_merge implies non-NULL branch->remote_name */
(has_merge && !strcmp(branch->remote_name, remote->name)))) {
for (i = 0; i < remote->fetch_refspec_nr; i++) {
get_fetch_map(remote_refs, &remote->fetch[i], &tail, 0);
@ -162,6 +163,8 @@ static struct ref *get_ref_map(struct transport *transport,
* if the remote we're fetching from is the same
* as given in branch.<name>.remote, we add the
* ref given in branch.<name>.merge, too.
*
* Note: has_merge implies non-NULL branch->remote_name
*/
if (has_merge &&
!strcmp(branch->remote_name, remote->name))