Fix a memory leak in code added in bf0231c661 (rev-parse: add
--show-superproject-working-tree, 2017-03-08), we should never have
made the result of xgetcwd() a "const char *", as we return a
strbuf_detach()'d value. Let's fix that and free() it when we're done
with it.
We can't mark any tests passing passing with SANITIZE=leak using
"TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true" as a result of this change, but
e.g. "t/t1500-rev-parse.sh" now gets closer to passing.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Rename the "absorb-git-dirs" subcommand to "absorbgitdirs", which is
what the "git submodule" command itself has called it since the
subcommand was implemented in f6f8586140 (submodule: add
absorb-git-dir function, 2016-12-12).
Having these two be different will make it more tedious to dispatch to
eventually dispatch "git submodule--helper" directly, as we'd need to
retain this name mapping. So let's get rid of this needless
inconsistency.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Rename .env_array member to .env in the child_process structure.
* ab/env-array:
run-command API users: use "env" not "env_array" in comments & names
run-command API: rename "env_array" to "env"
Plug the memory leaks from the trickiest API of all, the revision
walker.
* ab/plug-leak-in-revisions: (27 commits)
revisions API: add a TODO for diff_free(&revs->diffopt)
revisions API: have release_revisions() release "topo_walk_info"
revisions API: have release_revisions() release "date_mode"
revisions API: call diff_free(&revs->pruning) in revisions_release()
revisions API: release "reflog_info" in release revisions()
revisions API: clear "boundary_commits" in release_revisions()
revisions API: have release_revisions() release "prune_data"
revisions API: have release_revisions() release "grep_filter"
revisions API: have release_revisions() release "filter"
revisions API: have release_revisions() release "cmdline"
revisions API: have release_revisions() release "mailmap"
revisions API: have release_revisions() release "commits"
revisions API users: use release_revisions() for "prune_data" users
revisions API users: use release_revisions() with UNLEAK()
revisions API users: use release_revisions() in builtin/log.c
revisions API users: use release_revisions() in http-push.c
revisions API users: add "goto cleanup" for release_revisions()
stash: always have the owner of "stash_info" free it
revisions API users: use release_revisions() needing REV_INFO_INIT
revision.[ch]: document and move code declared around "init"
...
Start following-up on the rename mentioned in c7c4bdeccf (run-command
API: remove "env" member, always use "env_array", 2021-11-25) of
"env_array" to "env".
The "env_array" name was picked in 19a583dc39 (run-command: add
env_array, an optional argv_array for env, 2014-10-19) because "env"
was taken. Let's not forever keep the oddity of "*_array" for this
"struct strvec", but not for its "args" sibling.
This commit is almost entirely made with a coccinelle rule[1]. The
only manual change here is in run-command.h to rename the struct
member itself and to change "env_array" to "env" in the
CHILD_PROCESS_INIT initializer.
The rest of this is all a result of applying [1]:
* make contrib/coccinelle/run_command.cocci.patch
* patch -p1 <contrib/coccinelle/run_command.cocci.patch
* git add -u
1. cat contrib/coccinelle/run_command.pending.cocci
@@
struct child_process E;
@@
- E.env_array
+ E.env
@@
struct child_process *E;
@@
- E->env_array
+ E->env
I've avoided changing any comments and derived variable names here,
that will all be done in the next commit.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Use release_revisions() to various users of "struct rev_list" which
need to have their "struct rev_info" zero-initialized before we can
start using it.
For the bundle.c code see the early exit case added in
3bbbe467f2 (bundle verify: error out if called without an object
database, 2019-05-27).
For the relevant bisect.c code see 45b6370812 (bisect: libify
`check_good_are_ancestors_of_bad` and its dependents, 2020-02-17).
For the submodule.c code see the "goto" on "(!left || !right || !sub)"
added in 8e6df65015 (submodule: refactor show_submodule_summary with
helper function, 2016-08-31).
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a release_revisions() to various users of "struct rev_list" in
those straightforward cases where we only need to add the
release_revisions() call to the end of a block, and don't need to
e.g. refactor anything to use a "goto cleanup" pattern.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add and apply coccinelle rules to remove "if (E)" before
"free_commit_list(E)", the function can accept NULL, and further
change cases where "E = NULL" followed to also be unconditionally.
The code changes in this commit were entirely made by the coccinelle
rule being added here, and applied with:
make contrib/coccinelle/free.cocci.patch
patch -p1 <contrib/coccinelle/free.cocci.patch
The only manual intervention here is that the the relevant code in
commit.c has been manually re-indented.
Suggested-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When "shallow" information is updated, we forgot to update the
in-core equivalent, which has been corrected.
* jt/reset-grafts-when-resetting-shallow:
shallow: reset commit grafts when shallow is reset
When reset_repository_shallow() is called, Git clears its cache of
shallow information, so that if shallow information is re-requested, Git
will read fresh data from disk instead of reusing its stale cached data.
However, the cache of commit grafts is not likewise cleared, even though
there are commit grafts created from shallow information.
This means that if on-disk shallow information were to be updated and
then a commit-graft-using codepath were run (for example, a revision
walk), Git would be using stale commit graft information. This can be
seen from the test in this patch, in which Git performs a revision walk
(to check for changed submodules) after a fetch with --update-shallow.
Therefore, clear the cache of commit grafts whenever
reset_repository_shallow() is called.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When check_has_commit() is called on a missing submodule, initialization
of the struct repository fails, but it attempts to clear the struct
anyway (which is a fatal error). This bug is masked by its only caller,
submodule_has_commits(), first calling add_submodule_odb(). The latter
fails if the submodule does not exist, making submodule_has_commits()
exit early and not invoke check_has_commit().
Fix this bug, and because calling add_submodule_odb() is no longer
necessary as of 13a2f620b2 (submodule: pass repo to
check_has_commit(), 2021-10-08), remove that call too.
This is the last caller of add_submodule_odb(), so remove that
function. (Submodule ODBs are still added as alternates via
add_submodule_odb_by_path().)
Signed-off-by: Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git fetch --recurse-submodules" only considers populated
submodules (i.e. submodules that can be found by iterating the index),
which makes "git fetch" behave differently based on which commit is
checked out. As a result, even if the user has initialized all submodules
correctly, they may not fetch the necessary submodule commits, and
commands like "git checkout --recurse-submodules" might fail.
Teach "git fetch" to fetch cloned, changed submodules regardless of
whether they are populated. This is in addition to the current behavior
of fetching populated submodules (which is always attempted regardless
of what was fetched in the superproject, or even if nothing was fetched
in the superproject).
A submodule may be encountered multiple times (via the list of
populated submodules or via the list of changed submodules). When this
happens, "git fetch" only reads the 'populated copy' and ignores the
'changed copy'. Amend the verify_fetch_result() test helper so that we
can assert on which 'copy' is being read.
Signed-off-by: Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
get_fetch_task() gets a fetch task by iterating the index; a future
commit will introduce a similar function, get_fetch_task_from_changed(),
that gets a fetch task from the list of changed submodules. Both
functions are similar in that they need to:
* create a fetch task
* initialize the submodule repo for the fetch task
* determine the default recursion mode
Move all of this logic into fetch_task_create() so that it is no longer
split between fetch_task_create() and get_fetch_task(). This will make
it easier to share code with get_fetch_task_from_changed().
Signed-off-by: Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
get_next_submodule() configures the parallel submodule fetch by
performing two functions:
* iterate the index to find submodules
* configure the child processes to fetch the submodules found in the
previous step
Extract the index iterating code into an iterator function,
get_fetch_task(), so that get_next_submodule() is agnostic of how
to find submodules. This prepares for a subsequent commit will teach the
fetch machinery to also iterate through the list of changed
submodules (in addition to the index).
Signed-off-by: Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit prepares for a future commit that will teach `git fetch
--recurse-submodules` how to fetch submodules that are present in
<gitdir>/modules, but are not populated. To do this, we need to store
more information about the changed submodule so that we can read the
submodule configuration from the superproject commit instead of the
filesystem.
Refactor the changed submodules string_list.util to hold a struct
instead of an oid_array. This struct only holds the new_commits
oid_array for now; more information will be added later.
Signed-off-by: Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When collecting the string_list of changed submodule names, the new
submodules commits are stored in the string_list_item.util as an
oid_array. A subsequent commit will replace the oid_array with a struct
that has more information.
Prepare for this change by inlining submodule_commits() (which inserts
into the string_list and initializes the string_list_item.util) into its
only caller so that the code is easier to refactor later.
Signed-off-by: Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A future commit will teach "fetch --recurse-submodules" to fetch
unpopulated submodules. To prepare for this, teach the necessary static
functions how to read submodules from superproject commits using a
"treeish_name" argument (instead of always reading from the index and
filesystem) but do not actually change where submodules are read from.
Submodules will be read from commits when we fetch unpopulated
submodules.
Signed-off-by: Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To improve the submodules UX, we would like to teach Git to handle
branches in submodules. Start this process by teaching "git branch" the
--recurse-submodules option so that "git branch --recurse-submodules
topic" will create the `topic` branch in the superproject and its
submodules.
Although this commit does not introduce breaking changes, it does not
work well with existing --recurse-submodules commands because "git
branch --recurse-submodules" writes to the submodule ref store, but most
commands only consider the superproject gitlink and ignore the submodule
ref store. For example, "git checkout --recurse-submodules" will check
out the commits in the superproject gitlinks (and put the submodules in
detached HEAD) instead of checking out the submodule branches.
Because of this, this commit introduces a new configuration value,
`submodule.propagateBranches`. The plan is for Git commands to
prioritize submodule ref store information over superproject gitlinks if
this value is true. Because "git branch --recurse-submodules" writes to
submodule ref stores, for the sake of clarity, it will not function
unless this configuration value is set.
This commit also includes changes that support working with submodules
from a superproject commit because "branch --recurse-submodules" (and
future commands) need to read .gitmodules and gitlinks from the
superproject commit, but submodules are typically read from the
filesystem's .gitmodules and the index's gitlinks. These changes are:
* add a submodules_of_tree() helper that gives the relevant
information of an in-tree submodule (e.g. path and oid) and
initializes the repository
* add is_tree_submodule_active() by adding a treeish_name parameter to
is_submodule_active()
* add the "submoduleNotUpdated" advice to advise users to update the
submodules in their trees
Incidentally, fix an incorrect usage string that combined the 'list'
usage of git branch (-l) with the 'create' usage; this string has been
incorrect since its inception, a8dfd5eac4 (Make builtin-branch.c use
parse_options., 2007-10-07).
Helped-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Follow through the work to use the repo interface to access
submodule objects in-process, instead of abusing the alternate
object database interface.
* jt/no-abuse-alternate-odb-for-submodules:
submodule: trace adding submodule ODB as alternate
submodule: pass repo to check_has_commit()
object-file: only register submodule ODB if needed
merge-{ort,recursive}: remove add_submodule_odb()
refs: peeling non-the_repository iterators is BUG
refs: teach arbitrary repo support to iterators
refs: plumb repo into ref stores
Various fixes in code paths that move untracked files away to make room.
* en/removing-untracked-fixes:
Documentation: call out commands that nuke untracked files/directories
Comment important codepaths regarding nuking untracked files/dirs
unpack-trees: avoid nuking untracked dir in way of locally deleted file
unpack-trees: avoid nuking untracked dir in way of unmerged file
Change unpack_trees' 'reset' flag into an enum
Remove ignored files by default when they are in the way
unpack-trees: make dir an internal-only struct
unpack-trees: introduce preserve_ignored to unpack_trees_options
read-tree, merge-recursive: overwrite ignored files by default
checkout, read-tree: fix leak of unpack_trees_options.dir
t2500: add various tests for nuking untracked files
Submodule ODBs are never added as alternates during the execution of the
test suite, but there may be a rare interaction that the test suite does
not have coverage of. Add a trace message when this happens, so that
users who trace their commands can notice such occurrences.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Pass the repo explicitly when calling check_has_commit() to avoid
relying on add_submodule_odb(). With this commit and the parent commit,
the last remaining tests no longer rely on add_submodule_odb(), so mark
these tests accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
More code paths that use the hack to add submodule's object
database to the set of alternate object store have been cleaned up.
* jt/add-submodule-odb-clean-up:
revision: remove "submodule" from opt struct
repository: support unabsorbed in repo_submodule_init
submodule: remove unnecessary unabsorbed fallback
* jk/ref-paranoia: (71 commits)
refs: drop "broken" flag from for_each_fullref_in()
ref-filter: drop broken-ref code entirely
ref-filter: stop setting FILTER_REFS_INCLUDE_BROKEN
repack, prune: drop GIT_REF_PARANOIA settings
refs: turn on GIT_REF_PARANOIA by default
refs: omit dangling symrefs when using GIT_REF_PARANOIA
refs: add DO_FOR_EACH_OMIT_DANGLING_SYMREFS flag
refs-internal.h: reorganize DO_FOR_EACH_* flag documentation
refs-internal.h: move DO_FOR_EACH_* flags next to each other
t5312: be more assertive about command failure
t5312: test non-destructive repack
t5312: create bogus ref as necessary
t5312: drop "verbose" helper
t5600: provide detached HEAD for corruption failures
t5516: don't use HEAD ref for invalid ref-deletion tests
t7900: clean up some more broken refs
The eighth batch
t0000: avoid masking git exit value through pipes
tree-diff: fix leak when not HAVE_ALLOCA_H
pack-revindex.h: correct the time complexity descriptions
...
Move various *_INIT macros to use designated initializers. This helps
readability. I've only picked those leftover macros that were not
touched by another in-flight series of mine which changed others, but
also how initialization was done.
In the case of SUBMODULE_ALTERNATE_SETUP_INIT I've left an explicit
initialization of "error_mode", even though
SUBMODULE_ALTERNATE_ERROR_IGNORE itself is defined as "0". Let's not
peek under the hood and assume that enum fields we know the value of
will stay at "0".
The change to "TESTSUITE_INIT" in "t/helper/test-run-command.c" was
part of an earlier on-list version[1] of c90be786da (test-tool
run-command: fix flip-flop init pattern, 2021-09-11).
1. https://lore.kernel.org/git/patch-1.1-0aa4523ab6e-20210909T130849Z-avarab@gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In the last few commits we focused on code in unpack-trees.c that
mistakenly removed untracked files or directories. There may be more of
those, but in this commit we change our focus: callers of toplevel
commands that are expected to remove untracked files or directories.
As noted previously, we have toplevel commands that are expected to
delete untracked files such as 'read-tree --reset', 'reset --hard', and
'checkout --force'. However, that does not mean that other highlevel
commands that happen to call these other commands thought about or
conveyed to users the possibility that untracked files could be removed.
Audit the code for such callsites, and add comments near existing
callsites to mention whether these are safe or not.
My auditing is somewhat incomplete, though; it skipped several cases:
* git-rebase--preserve-merges.sh: is in the process of being
deprecated/removed, so I won't leave a note that there are
likely more bugs in that script.
* contrib/git-new-workdir: why is the -f flag being used in a new
empty directory?? It shouldn't hurt, but it seems useless.
* git-p4.py: Don't see why -f is needed for a new dir (maybe it's
not and is just superfluous), but I'm not at all familiar with
the p4 stuff
* git-archimport.perl: Don't care; arch is long since dead
* git-cvs*.perl: Don't care; cvs is long since dead
Also, the reset --hard in builtin/worktree.c looks safe, due to only
running in an empty directory.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git diff --submodule=diff" showed failure from run_command() when
trying to run diff inside a submodule, when the user manually
removes the submodule directory.
* dt/submodule-diff-fixes:
diff --submodule=diff: don't print failure message twice
diff --submodule=diff: do not fail on ever-initialied deleted submodules
t4060: remove unused variable
We currently store each submodule gitdir in ".git/modules/<name>", but
this has problems with some submodule naming schemes, as described in a
comment in submodule_name_to_gitdir() in this patch.
Extract the determination of the location of a submodule's gitdir into
its own function submodule_name_to_gitdir(). For now, the problem
remains unsolved, but this puts us in a better position for finding a
solution.
This was motivated, at $DAYJOB, by a part of Android's repo hierarchy
[1]. In particular, there is a repo "build", and several repos of the
form "build/<name>".
This is based on earlier work by Brandon Williams [2].
[1] https://android.googlesource.com/platform/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/git/20180808223323.79989-2-bmwill@google.com/
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In preparation for a subsequent commit that migrates code using
add_submodule_odb() to repo_submodule_init(), teach
repo_submodule_init() to support submodules with unabsorbed gitdirs.
(See the documentation for "git submodule absorbgitdirs" for more
information about absorbed and unabsorbed gitdirs.)
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In get_submodule_repo_for(), there is a fallback code path for the case
in which a submodule has an unabsorbed gitdir. (See the documentation
for "git submodule absorbgitdirs" for more information about absorbed
and unabsorbed gitdirs.) However, this code path is unnecessary, because
such submodules are already handled: when the fetch_task is created in
fetch_task_create(), it will create its own struct submodule with a path
and name, and repo_submodule_init() can handle such a struct.
This fallback was introduced in 26f80ccfc1 ("submodule: migrate
get_next_submodule to use repository structs", 2018-12-05). It was
unnecessary even then, but perhaps it escaped notice because its parent
commit d5498e0871 ("repository: repo_submodule_init to take a submodule
struct", 2018-12-05) was the one that taught repo_submodule_init() to
handle such created structs. Before, it took a path and always checked
.gitmodules, so it truly would have failed if there were no entry in
.gitmodules.
(Note to reviewers: in 26f80ccfc1, the "own struct submodule" I
mentioned is in get_next_submodule(), not fetch_task_create().)
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In the parent commit, Git was taught to add submodule ODBs as alternates
lazily, but grep does not use this because it computes the path to add
directly, not going through add_submodule_odb(). Add an equivalent to
add_submodule_odb() that takes the exact ODB path and teach grep to use
it.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matheus Tavares <matheus.bernardino@usp.br>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Teach Git to add submodule ODBs as alternates to the object store of
the_repository only upon the first access of an object not in
the_repository, and not when add_submodule_odb() is called.
This provides a means of gradually migrating from accessing a
submodule's object through alternates to accessing a submodule's object
by explicitly passing its repository object. Any Git command can declare
that it might access submodule objects by calling add_submodule_odb()
(as they do now), but the submodule ODBs themselves will not be added
until needed, so individual commands and/or combinations of arguments
can be migrated one by one.
[The advantage of explicit repository-object passing is code clarity (it
is clear which repository an object read is from), performance (there is
no need to linearly search through all submodule ODBs whenever an object
is accessed from any repository, whether superproject or submodule), and
the possibility of future features like partial clone submodules (which
right now is not possible because if an object is missing, we do not
know which repository to lazy-fetch into).]
This commit also introduces an environment variable that a test may set
to make the actual registration of alternates fatal, in order to
demonstrate that its codepaths do not need this registration.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matheus Tavares <matheus.bernardino@usp.br>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we fail to start a diff command inside a submodule, immediately
exit the routine rather than trying to finish the command and printing
a second message.
Signed-off-by: David Turner <dturner@twosigma.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If you have ever initialized a submodule, open_submodule will open it.
If you then delete the submodule's worktree directory (but don't
remove it from .gitmodules), git diff --submodule=diff would error out
as it attempted to chdir into the now-deleted working tree directory.
This only matters if the submodules git dir is absorbed. If not, then
we no longer have anywhere to run the diff. But that case does not
trigger this error, because in that case, open_submodule fails, so we
don't resolve a left commit, so we exit early, which is the only thing
we could do.
If absorbed, then we can run the diff from the submodule's absorbed
git dir (.git/modules/sm2). In practice, that's a bit more
complicated, because `git diff` expects to be run from inside a
working directory, not a git dir. So it looks in the config for
core.worktree, and does chdir("../../../sm2"), which is the very dir
that we're trying to avoid visiting because it's been deleted. We
work around this by setting GIT_WORK_TREE (and GIT_DIR) to ".". It is
little weird to set GIT_WORK_TREE to something that is not a working
tree just to avoid an unnecessary chdir, but it works.
Signed-off-by: David Turner <dturner@twosigma.com
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a new "add-config" subcommand to `git submodule--helper` with the
goal of converting part of the shell code in git-submodule.sh related to
`git submodule add` into C code. This new subcommand sets the
configuration variables of a newly added submodule, by registering the
url in local git config, as well as the submodule name and path in the
.gitmodules file. It also sets 'submodule.<name>.active' to "true" if
the submodule path has not already been covered by any pathspec
specified in 'submodule.active'.
This is meant to be a faithful conversion from shell to C, although we
add comments to areas that could be improved in future patches, after
the conversion has settled.
Signed-off-by: Atharva Raykar <raykar.ath@gmail.com>
Mentored-by: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
Mentored-by: Shourya Shukla <periperidip@gmail.com>
Based-on-patch-by: Shourya Shukla <periperidip@gmail.com>
Based-on-patch-by: Prathamesh Chavan <pc44800@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
submodule.c has functionality that prepares the environment for running
a subprocess in a new repo. The lazy-fetching code (used in partial
clones) will need this in a subsequent commit, so move it to a more
central location.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
14111fc492 ("git: submodule honor -c credential.* from command line",
2016-03-01) taught Git to pass through the GIT_CONFIG_PARAMETERS
environment variable when invoking a subprocess on behalf of a
submodule. But when d8d77153ea ("config: allow specifying config entries
via envvar pairs", 2021-01-15) introduced support for GIT_CONFIG_COUNT
(and its associated GIT_CONFIG_KEY_? and GIT_CONFIG_VALUE_?), the
subprocess mechanism wasn't updated to also pass through these
variables.
Since they are conceptually the same (d8d77153ea was written to address
a shortcoming of GIT_CONFIG_PARAMETERS), update the submodule subprocess
mechanism to also pass through GIT_CONFIG_COUNT.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
SHA-256 transition.
* bc/hash-transition-interop-part-1:
hex: print objects using the hash algorithm member
hex: default to the_hash_algo on zero algorithm value
builtin/pack-objects: avoid using struct object_id for pack hash
commit-graph: don't store file hashes as struct object_id
builtin/show-index: set the algorithm for object IDs
hash: provide per-algorithm null OIDs
hash: set, copy, and use algo field in struct object_id
builtin/pack-redundant: avoid casting buffers to struct object_id
Use the final_oid_fn to finalize hashing of object IDs
hash: add a function to finalize object IDs
http-push: set algorithm when reading object ID
Always use oidread to read into struct object_id
hash: add an algo member to struct object_id
Up until recently, object IDs did not have an algorithm member, only a
hash. Consequently, it was possible to share one null (all-zeros)
object ID among all hash algorithms. Now that we're going to be
handling objects from multiple hash algorithms, it's important to make
sure that all object IDs have a correct algorithm field.
Introduce a per-algorithm null OID, and add it to struct hash_algo.
Introduce a wrapper function as well, and use it everywhere we used to
use the null_oid constant.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Several methods specify that they take a 'struct index_state' pointer
with the 'const' qualifier because they intend to only query the data,
not change it. However, we will be introducing a step very low in the
method stack that might modify a sparse-index to become a full index in
the case that our queries venture inside a sparse-directory entry.
This change only removes the 'const' qualifiers that are necessary for
the following change which will actually modify the implementation of
index_name_stage_pos().
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git diff" showed a submodule working tree with untracked cruft as
"Submodule commit <objectname>-dirty", but a natural expectation is
that the "-dirty" indicator would align with "git describe --dirty",
which does not consider having untracked files in the working tree
as source of dirtiness. The inconsistency has been fixed.
* sj/untracked-files-in-submodule-directory-is-not-dirty:
diff: do not show submodule with untracked files as "-dirty"
A regression has been introduced by a62387b (submodule.c: fetch in
submodules git directory instead of in worktree, 2018-11-28).
The scenario in which it triggers is when one has a repository with a
submodule inside a submodule like this:
superproject/middle_repo/inner_repo
Person A and B have both a clone of it, while Person B is not working
with the inner_repo and thus does not have it initialized in his working
copy.
Now person A introduces a change to the inner_repo and propagates it
through the middle_repo and the superproject.
Once person A pushed the changes and person B wants to fetch them using
"git fetch" at the superproject level, B's git call will return with
error saying:
Could not access submodule 'inner_repo'
Errors during submodule fetch:
middle_repo
Expectation is that in this case the inner submodule will be recognized
as uninitialized submodule and skipped by the git fetch command.
This used to work correctly before 'a62387b (submodule.c: fetch in
submodules git directory instead of in worktree, 2018-11-28)'.
Starting with a62387b the code wants to evaluate "is_empty_dir()" inside
.git/modules for a directory only existing in the worktree, delivering
then of course wrong return value.
This patch ensures is_empty_dir() is getting the correct path of the
uninitialized submodule by concatenation of the actual worktree and the
name of the uninitialized submodule.
The first attempt to fix this regression, in 1b7ac4e6d4 (submodules:
fix of regression on fetching of non-init subsub-repo, 2020-11-12), by
simply reverting a62387b, resulted in an infinite loop of submodule
fetches in the simpler case of a recursive fetch of a superproject with
uninitialized submodules, and so this commit was reverted in 7091499bc0
(Revert "submodules: fix of regression on fetching of non-init
subsub-repo", 2020-12-02).
To prevent future breakages, also add a regression test for this
scenario.
Signed-off-by: Peter Kaestle <peter.kaestle@nokia.com>
CC: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
CC: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
CC: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
CC: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.us>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Git diff reports a submodule directory as -dirty even when there are
only untracked files in the submodule directory. This is inconsistent
with what `git describe --dirty` says when run in the submodule
directory in that state.
Make `--ignore-submodules=untracked` the default for `git diff` when
there is no configuration variable or command line option, so that the
command would not give '-dirty' suffix to a submodule whose working
tree has untracked files, to make it consistent with `git
describe --dirty` that is run in the submodule working tree.
And also make `--ignore-submodules=none` the default for `git status`
so that the user doesn't end up deleting a submodule that has
uncommitted (untracked) files.
Signed-off-by: Sangeeta Jain <sangunb09@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Get rid of 'dense' argument that is redundant for every function that has
'struct rev_info *rev' argument as well, as the value of 'dense' passed is
always taken from 'rev->dense_combined_merges' field.
The only place where this was not the case is in 'submodule.c' where
'diff_tree_combined_merge()' was called with '1' for 'dense' argument. However,
at that call the 'revs' instance used is local to the function, and we now just
set 'revs->dense_combined_merges' to 1 in this local instance.
Signed-off-by: Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Junio C Hamano
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Jonathan Tan
Glen Choo
Elijah Newren
David Turner
Atharva Raykar
brian m. carlson
Derrick Stolee
Peter Kaestle
Sangeeta Jain
Sergey Organov