Граф коммитов

25 Коммитов

Автор SHA1 Сообщение Дата
Junio C Hamano 850e925752 Merge branch 'pw/rebase-signoff'
"git rebase" has learned to honor "--signoff" option when using
backends other than "am" (but not "--preserve-merges").

* pw/rebase-signoff:
  rebase --keep-empty: always use interactive rebase
  rebase -p: error out if --signoff is given
  rebase: extend --signoff support
2018-04-25 13:28:51 +09:00
Phillip Wood a852ec7f27 rebase: extend --signoff support
Allow --signoff to be used with --interactive and --merge. In
interactive mode only commits marked to be picked, edited or reworded
will be signed off.

The main motivation for this patch was to allow one to run 'git rebase
--exec "make check" --signoff' which is useful when preparing a patch
series for publication and is more convenient than doing the signoff
with another --exec command.

This change also allows --root without --onto to work with --signoff
as well (--root with --onto was already supported).

Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-03-29 11:09:03 -07:00
Wink Saville 2f5f469bc4 rebase: update invocation of rebase dot-sourced scripts
Due to historical reasons, the backend scriptlets for "git rebase"
are structured a bit unusually. As originally designed,
dot-sourcing them from "git rebase" was sufficient to invoke the
specific backend.

However, it was later discovered that some shell implementations
(e.g. FreeBSD 9.x) misbehaved by continuing to execute statements
following a top-level "return" rather than returning control to
the next statement in "git rebase" after dot-sourcing the
scriptlet. To work around this shortcoming, the whole body of
git-rebase--$backend.sh was made into a shell function
git_rebase__$backend, and then the very last line of the scriptlet
called that function.

A more normal architecture is for a dot-sourced scriptlet merely
to define functions (thus acting as a function library), and for
those functions to be called by the script doing the dot-sourcing.
Migrate to this arrangement by moving the git_rebase__$backend
call from the end of a scriptlet into "git rebase" itself.

While at it, remove the large comment block from each scriptlet
explaining this historic anomaly since it serves no purpose under
the new normalized architecture in which a scriptlet is merely a
function library.

Signed-off-by: Wink Saville <wink@saville.com>
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-03-23 15:08:49 -07:00
Junio C Hamano 9ca488c04b Merge branch 'nd/rebase-show-current-patch'
The new "--show-current-patch" option gives an end-user facing way
to get the diff being applied when "git rebase" (and "git am")
stops with a conflict.

* nd/rebase-show-current-patch:
  rebase: introduce and use pseudo-ref REBASE_HEAD
  rebase: add --show-current-patch
  am: add --show-current-patch
2018-03-06 14:54:02 -08:00
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy fbd7a23237 rebase: introduce and use pseudo-ref REBASE_HEAD
The new command `git rebase --show-current-patch` is useful for seeing
the commit related to the current rebase state. Some however may find
the "git show" command behind it too limiting. You may want to
increase context lines, do a diff that ignores whitespaces...

For these advanced use cases, the user can execute any command they
want with the new pseudo ref REBASE_HEAD.

This also helps show where the stopped commit is from, which is hard
to see from the previous patch which implements --show-current-patch.

Helped-by: Tim Landscheidt <tim@tim-landscheidt.de>
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-02-12 14:07:59 -08:00
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 66335298a4 rebase: add --show-current-patch
It is useful to see the full patch while resolving conflicts in a
rebase. The only way to do it now is

    less .git/rebase-*/patch

which could turn out to be a lot longer to type if you are in a
linked worktree, or not at top-dir. On top of that, an ordinary user
should not need to peek into .git directory. The new option is
provided to examine the patch.

Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-02-12 14:07:59 -08:00
Genki Sky a6c612b528 rebase: add --allow-empty-message option
This option allows commits with empty commit messages to be rebased,
matching the same option in git-commit and git-cherry-pick. While empty
log messages are frowned upon, sometimes one finds them in older
repositories (e.g. translated from another VCS [0]), or have other
reasons for desiring them. The option is available in git-commit and
git-cherry-pick, so it is natural to make other git tools play nicely
with them. Adding this as an option allows the default to be "give the
user a chance to fix", while not interrupting the user's workflow
otherwise [1].

  [0]: https://stackoverflow.com/q/8542304
  [1]: https://public-inbox.org/git/7vd33afqjh.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org/

To implement this, add a new --allow-empty-message flag. Then propagate
it to all calls of 'git commit', 'git cherry-pick', and 'git rebase--helper'
within the rebase scripts.

Signed-off-by: Genki Sky <sky@genki.is>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-02-07 11:26:46 -08:00
Junio C Hamano 3ec9150a8c Merge branch 'em/newer-freebsd-shells-are-fine-with-returns'
Comments about misbehaving FreeBSD shells have been clarified with
the version number (9.x and before are broken, newer ones are OK).

* em/newer-freebsd-shells-are-fine-with-returns:
  rebase: update comment about FreeBSD /bin/sh
2016-06-27 09:56:52 -07:00
Ed Maste 9b35cadc2c rebase: update comment about FreeBSD /bin/sh
Commit 9f50d32 introduced a fix for FreeBSD /bin/sh misbehaviour
when dot-sourcing a file containing "return" statements outside of
any function, from a function in another shell script. That issue
affects FreeBSD 9.x, and is not present in the /bin/sh in FreeBSD
10.3 and later. Update the comment to clarify this.

The example from 9f50d32's commit message produces the expected output
on FreeBSD 10.3 and -CURRENT (the upcoming 11.0):

% sh script1.sh
only this line should show
%

Signed-off-by: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-06-17 11:04:38 -07:00
Ben Woosley 79f43447d2 git-rebase--merge: don't include absent parent as a base
Absent this fix, attempts to rebase an orphan branch using "rebase -m"
fails with:

    $ git rebase -m ORPHAN_TARGET_BASE
    First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it...
    fatal: Could not parse object 'ORPHAN_ROOT_SHA^'
    Unknown exit code (128) from command: git-merge-recursive ORPHAN_ROOT_SHA^ -- HEAD ORPHAN_ROOT_SHA

To fix, this will only include the rebase root's parent as a base if it exists,
so that in cases of rebasing an orphan branch, it is a simple two-way merge.

Note the default rebase behavior does not fail:

    $ git rebase ORPHAN_TARGET_BASE
    First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it...
    Applying: ORPHAN_ROOT_COMMIT_MSG
    Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...

A few tests were expecting the old behaviour to forbid rebasing such
a history with "rebase -m", which now need to expect them to succeed.

Signed-off-by: Ben Woosley <ben.woosley@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-04-24 12:05:08 -07:00
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy b849b954d2 *.sh: avoid hardcoding $GIT_DIR/hooks/...
If $GIT_COMMON_DIR is set, it should be $GIT_COMMON_DIR/hooks/, not
$GIT_DIR/hooks/. Just let rev-parse --git-path handle it.

Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-12-01 11:00:13 -08:00
Junio C Hamano 6293aea559 Merge branch 'bc/fix-rebase-merge-skip'
"git rebase --skip" did not work well when it stopped due to a
conflict twice in a row.

* bc/fix-rebase-merge-skip:
  rebase--merge: fix --skip with two conflicts in a row
2014-07-02 12:53:04 -07:00
brian m. carlson 95104c7e25 rebase--merge: fix --skip with two conflicts in a row
If git rebase --merge encountered a conflict, --skip would not work if the
next commit also conflicted.  The msgnum file would never be updated with
the new patch number, so no patch would actually be skipped, resulting in an
inescapable loop.

Update the msgnum file's value as the first thing in call_merge.  This also
avoids an "Already applied" message when skipping a commit.  There is no
visible change for the other contexts in which call_merge is invoked, as the
msgnum file's value remains unchanged in those situations.

Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-06-16 13:29:16 -07:00
Junio C Hamano 6753d8a85d Merge branch 'ep/shell-command-substitution'
Adjust shell scripts to use $(cmd) instead of `cmd`.

* ep/shell-command-substitution: (41 commits)
  t5000-tar-tree.sh: use the $( ... ) construct for command substitution
  t4204-patch-id.sh: use the $( ... ) construct for command substitution
  t4119-apply-config.sh: use the $( ... ) construct for command substitution
  t4116-apply-reverse.sh: use the $( ... ) construct for command substitution
  t4057-diff-combined-paths.sh: use the $( ... ) construct for command substitution
  t4038-diff-combined.sh: use the $( ... ) construct for command substitution
  t4036-format-patch-signer-mime.sh: use the $( ... ) construct for command substitution
  t4014-format-patch.sh: use the $( ... ) construct for command substitution
  t4013-diff-various.sh: use the $( ... ) construct for command substitution
  t4012-diff-binary.sh: use the $( ... ) construct for command substitution
  t4010-diff-pathspec.sh: use the $( ... ) construct for command substitution
  t4006-diff-mode.sh: use the $( ... ) construct for command substitution
  t3910-mac-os-precompose.sh: use the $( ... ) construct for command substitution
  t3905-stash-include-untracked.sh: use the $( ... ) construct for command substitution
  t1050-large.sh: use the $( ... ) construct for command substitution
  t1020-subdirectory.sh: use the $( ... ) construct for command substitution
  t1004-read-tree-m-u-wf.sh: use the $( ... ) construct for command substitution
  t1003-read-tree-prefix.sh: use the $( ... ) construct for command substitution
  t1002-read-tree-m-u-2way.sh: use the $( ... ) construct for command substitution
  t1001-read-tree-m-2way.sh: use the $( ... ) construct for command substitution
  ...
2014-06-03 12:06:45 -07:00
Elia Pinto f257482c9c git-rebase--merge.sh: use the $( ... ) construct for command substitution
The Git CodingGuidelines prefer the $(...) construct for command
substitution instead of using the backquotes `...`.

The backquoted form is the traditional method for command
substitution, and is supported by POSIX.  However, all but the
simplest uses become complicated quickly.  In particular, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.

The patch was generated by:

for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
   sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f}
done

and then carefully proof-read.

Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto <gitter.spiros@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-04-23 15:17:02 -07:00
Junio C Hamano 0b17b43310 Merge branch 'km/avoid-non-function-return-in-rebase'
Work around /bin/sh that does not like "return" at the top-level
of a file that is dot-sourced from inside a function definition.

* km/avoid-non-function-return-in-rebase:
  Revert "rebase: fix run_specific_rebase's use of "return" on FreeBSD"
  rebase: avoid non-function use of "return" on FreeBSD
2014-04-21 10:42:46 -07:00
Kyle J. McKay 9f50d32b9c rebase: avoid non-function use of "return" on FreeBSD
Since a1549e10, 15d4bf2e and 01a1e646 (first appearing in v1.8.4)
the git-rebase--*.sh scripts have used a "return" to stop execution
of the dot-sourced file and return to the "dot" command that
dot-sourced it.  The /bin/sh utility on FreeBSD however behaves
poorly under some circumstances when such a "return" is executed.

In particular, if the "dot" command is contained within a function,
then when a "return" is executed by the script it runs (that is not
itself inside a function), control will return from the function
that contains the "dot" command skipping any statements that might
follow the dot command inside that function.  Commit 99855ddf (first
appearing in v1.8.4.1) addresses this by making the "dot" command
the last line in the function.

Unfortunately the FreeBSD /bin/sh may also execute some statements
in the script run by the "dot" command that appear after the
troublesome "return".  The fix in 99855ddf does not address this
problem.

For example, if you have script1.sh with these contents:

run_script2() {
        . "$(dirname -- "$0")/script2.sh"
        _e=$?
        echo only this line should show
        [ $_e -eq 5 ] || echo expected status 5 got $_e
        return 3
}
run_script2
e=$?
[ $e -eq 3 ] || { echo expected status 3 got $e; exit 1; }

And script2.sh with these contents:

if [ 5 -gt 3 ]; then
        return 5
fi
case bad in *)
        echo always shows
esac
echo should not get here
! :

When running script1.sh (e.g. '/bin/sh script1.sh' or './script1.sh'
after making it executable), the expected output from a POSIX shell
is simply the single line:

only this line should show

However, when run using FreeBSD's /bin/sh, the following output
appears instead:

should not get here
expected status 3 got 1

Not only did the lines following the "dot" command in the run_script2
function in script1.sh get skipped, but additional lines in script2.sh
following the "return" got executed -- but not all of them (e.g. the
"echo always shows" line did not run).

These issues can be avoided by not using a top-level "return" in
script2.sh.  If script2.sh is changed to this:

main() {
        if [ 5 -gt 3 ]; then
                return 5
        fi
        case bad in *)
                echo always shows
        esac
        echo should not get here
        ! :
}
main

Then it behaves the same when using FreeBSD's /bin/sh as when using
other more POSIX compliant /bin/sh implementations.

We fix the git-rebase--*.sh scripts in a similar fashion by moving
the top-level code that contains "return" statements into its own
function and then calling that as the last line in the script.

Signed-off-by: Kyle J. McKay <mackyle@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-04-17 10:13:29 -07:00
Nicolas Vigier 3ee5e54038 rebase: add the --gpg-sign option
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Vigier <boklm@mars-attacks.org>
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-02-11 14:48:20 -08:00
Jonathan Nieder 11d62145b9 remove #!interpreter line from shell libraries
In a shell snippet meant to be sourced by other shell scripts, an
opening #! line does more harm than good.

The harm:

 - When the shell library is sourced, the interpreter and options from
   the #! line are not used.  Specifying a particular shell can
   confuse the reader into thinking it is safe for the shell library
   to rely on idiosyncrasies of that shell.

 - Using #! instead of a plain comment drops a helpful visual clue
   that this is a shell library and not a self-contained script.

 - Tools such as lintian can use a #! line to tell when an
   installation script has failed by forgetting to set a script
   executable.  This check does not work if shell libraries also start
   with a #! line.

The good:

 - Text editors notice the #! line and use it for syntax highlighting
   if you try to edit the installed scripts (without ".sh" suffix) in
   place.

The use of the #! for file type detection is not needed because Git's
shell libraries are meant to be edited in source form (with ".sh"
suffix).  Replace the opening #! lines with comments.

This involves tweaking the test harness's valgrind support to find
shell libraries by looking for "# " in the first line instead of "#!"
(see v1.7.6-rc3~7, 2011-06-17).

Suggested by Russ Allbery through lintian.  Thanks to Jeff King and
Clemens Buchacher for further analysis.

Tested by searching for non-executable scripts with #! line:

	find . -name .git -prune -o -type f -not -executable |
	while read file
	do
		read line <"$file"
		case $line in
		'#!'*)
			echo "$file"
			;;
		esac
	done

The only remaining scripts found are templates for shell scripts
(unimplemented.sh, wrap-for-bin.sh) and sample input used in tests
(t/t4034/perl/{pre,post}).

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-11-26 14:23:56 -08:00
Ramkumar Ramachandra 01a1e6465f rebase --merge: return control to caller, for housekeeping
Return control to the caller git-rebase.sh to get these two tasks

    rm -fr "$dotest"
    git gc --auto

done by it.

Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-05-12 23:20:08 -07:00
Martin von Zweigbergk 572a7c52bb rebase: don't source git-sh-setup twice
The git-sh-setup script is already sourced in git-rebase.sh before
calling into git-rebase--(am|interactive|merge).sh. There are no other
callers of these scripts. It is therefore unnecessary to source
git-sh-setup again in them.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-06-26 13:17:50 -07:00
Andrew Wong ad687b447a rebase -m: only call "notes copy" when rewritten exists and is non-empty
This prevents a shell error complaining rebase-merge/rewritten doesn't exist.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Wong <andrew.kw.w@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-26 16:32:37 -08:00
Martin von Zweigbergk b325680930 rebase -m: don't print exit code 2 when merge fails
When the merge strategy fails, a message suggesting the user to try
another strategy is displayed. Remove the "$rv" (which is always equal
to "2" in this case) from that message.

Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-02-10 14:08:09 -08:00
Martin von Zweigbergk 84df4560ed rebase: extract code for writing basic state
Extract the code for writing the state to rebase-apply/ or
rebase-merge/ when a rebase is initiated. This will make it easier to
later make both interactive and non-interactive rebase remember the
options used.

Note that non-interactive rebase stores the sha1 of the original head
in a file called orig-head, while interactive rebase stores it in a
file called head. Change this by writing to orig-head in both
cases. When reading, try to read from orig-head. If that fails, read
from head instead. This protects users who upgraded git while they had
an ongoing interactive rebase, while still making it possible to
remove the code that reads from head at some point in the future.

Helped-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-02-10 14:08:09 -08:00
Martin von Zweigbergk fa99c1e1e1 rebase: extract merge code to new source file
Extract the code for merge-based rebase to git-rebase--merge.sh.

Suggested-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-02-10 14:08:09 -08:00