Граф коммитов

67 Коммитов

Автор SHA1 Сообщение Дата
Linus Torvalds b3cfd939c3 bisect: limit the searchspace by pathspecs
It was surprisingly easy to do.

	git bisect start <pathspec>

followed by all the normal "git bisect good/bad" stuff.

Almost totally untested, and I guarantee that if your pathnames have
spaces in them (or your GIT_DIR has spaces in it) this won't work. I don't
know how to fix that, my shell programming isn't good enough.

This involves small changes to make "git-rev-list --bisect" work in the
presense of a pathspec limiter, and then truly trivial (and that's the
broken part) changes to make "git bisect" save away and use the pathspec.

I tried one bisection, and a "git bisect visualize", and it all looked
correct. But hey, don't be surprised if it has problems.

		Linus

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-11-28 23:11:38 -08:00
Luben Tuikov 07f9247722 max-count in terms of intersection
When a path designation is given, max-count counts the number
of commits therein (intersection), not globally.

This avoids the case where in case path has been inactive
for the last N commits, --max-count=N and path designation
at git-rev-list is given, would give no commits.

Signed-off-by: Luben Tuikov <ltuikov@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-11-21 21:50:00 -08:00
Junio C Hamano 69e0c25641 Update usage string and documentation for git-rev-list.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-10-30 17:28:02 -08:00
Linus Torvalds 19a7e7151d git-rev-list: do not forget non-commit refs
What happens is that the new logic decides that if it can't look up a
commit reference (ie "get_commit_reference()" returns NULL), the thing
must be a pathname.

Fair enough.

But wrong.

The thing is, it may be a perfectly fine ref that _isn't_ a commit. In
git, you have a tag that points to your PGP key, and in the kernel, I have
a tag that points to a tree (and a direct ref that points to that tree
too, for that matter).

So the rule is (as for all the other programs that mix revs and pathnames)
not that we only accept commit references, but _any_ valid object ref.

If the object then isn't a commit ref, git-rev-list will either ignore it,
or add it to the list of non-commit objects (if using "--objects").

The solution is to move the "get_sha1()" out of get_commit_reference(),
and into the callers. In fact, we already _have_ the SHA1 in the case of
the handle_all() loop, since for_each_ref() will have done it for us, so
this is the correct thing to do anyway.

This patch (on top of the original one) does exactly that.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-10-26 16:49:38 -07:00
Linus Torvalds 7b34c2fae0 git-rev-list: make --dense the default (and introduce "--sparse")
This actually does three things:

 - make "--dense" the default for git-rev-list. Since dense is a no-op if
   no filenames are given, this doesn't actually change any historical
   behaviour, but it's logically the right default (if we want to prune on
   filenames, do it fully. The sparse "merge-only" thing may be useful,
   but it's not what you'd normally expect)

 - make "git-rev-parse" show the default revision control before it shows
   any pathnames.

   This was a real bug, but nobody would ever have noticed, because
   the default thing tends to only make sense for git-rev-list, and
   git-rev-list didn't use to take pathnames.

 - it changes "git-rev-list" to match the other commands that take a mix
   of revisions and filenames - it no longer requires the "--" before
   filenames (although you still need to do it if a filename could be
   confused with a revision name, eg "gitk" in the git archive)

This all just makes for much more pleasant and obvous usage. Just doing a

	gitk t/

does the obvious thing: it will show the history as it concerns the "t/"
subdirectory.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-10-26 16:49:38 -07:00
Linus Torvalds 129adf4d66 git-rev-list: fix "--dense" flag
Right now --dense will _always_ show the root commit. I didn't do the
logic that does the diff against an empty tree. I was lazy.

This patch does that.  The first round was incorrect but 
this patch is even slightly tested, and might do a better job.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-10-25 22:53:24 -07:00
Linus Torvalds 1b9e059d35 git-rev-list: add "--dense" flag
This is what the recent git-rev-list changes have all been gearing up for.

When we use a path filter to git-rev-list, the new "--dense" flag asks
git-rev-list to compress the history so that it _only_ contains commits
that change files in the path filter.  It also rewrites the parent
information so that tools like "gitk" will see the result as a dense
history tree.

For example, on the current kernel archive:

	[torvalds@g5 linux]$ git-rev-list HEAD | wc -l
	9904
	[torvalds@g5 linux]$ git-rev-list HEAD -- kernel | wc -l
	5442
	[torvalds@g5 linux]$ git-rev-list --dense HEAD -- kernel | wc -l
	356

which shows that while we have almost ten thousand commits, we can prune
down the work to slightly more than half by only following the merges
that are interesting. But further, we can then compress the history to
just 356 entries that actually make changes to the kernel subdirectory.

To see this in action, try something like

	gitk --dense -- gitk

to see just the history that affects gitk.  Or, to show that true
parallel development still remains parallel, do

	gitk --dense -- daemon.c

which shows some parallel commits in the current git tree.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-10-22 22:49:52 -07:00
Linus Torvalds cf4845441c Teach git-rev-list to follow just a specified set of files
This is the first cut at a git-rev-list that knows to ignore commits that
don't change a certain file (or set of files).

NOTE! For now it only prunes _merge_ commits, and follows the parent where
there are no differences in the set of files specified. In the long run,
I'd like to make it re-write the straight-line history too, but for now
the merge simplification is much more fundamentally important (the
rewriting of straight-line history is largely a separate simplification
phase, but the merge simplification needs to happen early if we want to
optimize away unnecessary commit parsing).

If all parents of a merge change some of the files, the merge is left as
is, so the end result is in no way guaranteed to be a linear history, but
it will often be a lot /more/ linear than the full tree, since it prunes
out parents that didn't matter for that set of files.

As an example from the current kernel:

	[torvalds@g5 linux]$ git-rev-list HEAD | wc -l
	9885
	[torvalds@g5 linux]$ git-rev-list HEAD -- Makefile | wc -l
	4084
	[torvalds@g5 linux]$ git-rev-list HEAD -- drivers/usb | wc -l
	5206

and you can also use 'gitk' to more visually see the pruning of the
history tree, with something like

	gitk -- drivers/usb

showing a simplified history that tries to follow the first parent in a
merge that is the parent that fully defines drivers/usb/.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-10-22 22:49:52 -07:00
Linus Torvalds fe5f51ce27 Optimize common case of git-rev-list
I took a look at webgit, and it looks like at least for the "projects"
page, the most common operation ends up being basically

	git-rev-list --header --parents --max-count=1 HEAD

Now, the thing is, the way "git-rev-list" works, it always keeps on
popping the parents and parsing them in order to build the list of
parents, and it turns out that even though we just want a single commit,
git-rev-list will invariably look up _three_ generations of commits.

It will parse:
 - the commit we want (it obviously needs this)
 - it's parent(s) as part of the "pop_most_recent_commit()" logic
 - it will then pop one of the parents before it notices that it doesn't
   need any more
 - and as part of popping the parent, it will parse the grandparent (again
   due to "pop_most_recent_commit()".

Now, I've strace'd it, and it really is pretty efficient on the whole, but
if things aren't nicely cached, and with long-latency IO, doing those two
extra objects (at a minimum - if the parent is a merge it will be more) is
just wasted time, and potentially a lot of it.

So here's a quick special-case for the trivial case of "just one commit,
and no date-limits or other special rules".

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-10-18 18:41:28 -07:00
Junio C Hamano e091eb9325 upload-pack: Do not choke on too many heads request.
Cloning from a repository with more than 256 refs (heads and tags
included) will choke, because upload-pack has a built-in limit of
feeding not more than MAX_NEEDS (currently 256) heads to underlying
git-rev-list.  This is a problem when cloning a repository with many
tags, like http://www.linux-mips.org/pub/scm/linux.git, which has 290+
tags.

This commit introduces a new flag, --all, to git-rev-list, to include
all refs in the repository.  Updated upload-pack detects requests that
ask more than MAX_NEEDS refs, and sends everything back instead.

We may probably want to tweak the definitions of MAX_NEEDS and
MAX_HAS, but that is a separate topic.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-10-05 14:49:54 -07:00
Junio C Hamano c807f77194 Fix minor DOS in rev-list.
A carefully crafted pathname can be used to disrupt downstream git-pack-objects
that uses 'git-rev-list --objects' output.  Prevent this.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-10-02 17:29:21 -07:00
Linus Torvalds 27cfe2e2dc Make time-based commit filtering work with topological ordering.
The trick is to consider the time-based filtering a limiter, the same way
we do for release ranges.

That means that the time-based filtering runs _before_ the topological
sorting, which makes it meaningful again. It also simplifies the code
logic.

This makes "gitk" useful with time ranges.

[ Second version: --merge-order now unaffected by the re-org ]

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-09-20 18:11:34 -07:00
Linus Torvalds 2a7055ae98 [PATCH] Fix "git-rev-list" revision range parsing
There were two bugs in there:
 - if the range didn't end up working, we restored the '.' character in
   the wrong place.
 - an empty end-of-range should be interpreted as HEAD.

See rev-parse.c for the reference implementation of this.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-09-17 11:57:50 -07:00
Linus Torvalds 8805ccac40 [PATCH] Avoid building object ref lists when not needed
The object parsing code builds a generic "this object references that
object" because doing a full connectivity check for fsck requires it.

However, nothing else really needs it, and it's quite expensive for
git-rev-list that can have tons of objects in flight.

So, exactly like the commit buffer save thing, add a global flag to
disable it, and use it in git-rev-list.

Before:

	$ /usr/bin/time git-rev-list --objects v2.6.12..HEAD | wc -l
	12.28user 0.29system 0:12.57elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
	0inputs+0outputs (0major+26718minor)pagefaults 0swaps
	59124

After this change:

	$ /usr/bin/time git-rev-list --objects v2.6.12..HEAD | wc -l
	10.33user 0.18system 0:10.54elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
	0inputs+0outputs (0major+18509minor)pagefaults 0swaps
	59124

and note how the number of pages touched by git-rev-list for this
particular object list has shrunk from 26,718 (104 MB) to 18,509 (72 MB).

Calculating the total object difference between two git revisions is still
clearly the most expensive git operation (both in memory and CPU time),
but it's now less than 40% of what it used to be.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-09-16 15:32:23 -07:00
Linus Torvalds b0d8923ec0 [PATCH] Improve git-rev-list memory usage further
This avoids keeping tree entries around, and free's them as it traverses
the list. This avoids building up a huge memory footprint just for these
small but very common allocations.

Before:

	$ /usr/bin/time git-rev-list --objects v2.6.12..HEAD | wc -l
	11.65user 0.38system 0:12.65elapsed 95%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
	0inputs+0outputs (0major+42934minor)pagefaults 0swaps
	59124

After:

	$ /usr/bin/time git-rev-list --objects v2.6.12..HEAD | wc -l
	12.28user 0.29system 0:12.57elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
	0inputs+0outputs (0major+26718minor)pagefaults 0swaps
	59124

Note how the minor fault numbers - which ends up being how many pages we
needed to map - go down from 42934 (167 MB) to 26718 (104 MB).  That is:

Before:
	42934 minor pagefaults

After:

	26718 minor pagefaults

This is all in _addition_ to the previous fixes.  It used to be
~48,000 pagefaults.

That's still a honking big memory footprint, but it's about half of what
it was just a day or two ago (and this is the object list for a pretty big
update - almost 60,000 objects. Smaller updates need less memory).

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-09-16 15:19:07 -07:00
Linus Torvalds 5bdbaaa4e9 [PATCH] Re-organize "git-rev-list --objects" logic
The logic to calculate the full object list used to be very inter-twined
with the logic that looked up the commits.

For no good reason - it's actually a lot simpler to just do that logic
as a separate pass.

This improves performance a bit, and uses slightly less memory in my
tests, but more importantly it makes the code simpler to work with and
follow what it does.

The performance win is less than I had hoped for, but I get:

Before:

	[torvalds@g5 linux]$ /usr/bin/time git-rev-list --objects v2.6.12..HEAD | wc -l
	13.64user 0.42system 0:14.13elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
	0inputs+0outputs (0major+47947minor)pagefaults 0swaps
	58945

After:

	[torvalds@g5 linux]$ /usr/bin/time git-rev-list --objects v2.6.12..HEAD | wc -l
	11.80user 0.36system 0:12.16elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
	0inputs+0outputs (0major+42684minor)pagefaults 0swaps
	58945

ie it improved by 2 seconds, and took a 5000+ fewer pages (hey, that's
20MB out of 174MB to go). And got the same number of objects (in theory,
the more expensive one might find some more shared objects to avoid. In
practice it obviously doesn't).

I know how to make it use _lots_ less memory, which will probably speed it
up. But that's for another time, and I'd prefer to see this go in first.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-09-15 16:19:44 -07:00
Linus Torvalds 60ab26de99 [PATCH] Avoid wasting memory in git-rev-list
As pointed out on the list, git-rev-list can use a lot of memory.

One low-hanging fruit is to free the commit buffer for commits that we
parse. By default, parse_commit() will save away the buffer, since a lot
of cases do want it, and re-reading it continually would be unnecessary.
However, in many cases the buffer isn't actually necessary and saving it
just wastes memory.

We could just free the buffer ourselves, but especially in git-rev-list,
we actually end up using the helper functions that automatically add
parent commits to the commit lists, so we don't actually control the
commit parsing directly.

Instead, just make this behaviour of "parse_commit()" a global flag.
Maybe this is a bit tasteless, but it's very simple, and it makes a
noticable difference in memory usage.

Before the change:

	[torvalds@g5 linux]$ /usr/bin/time git-rev-list v2.6.12..HEAD > /dev/null
	0.26user 0.02system 0:00.28elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
	0inputs+0outputs (0major+3714minor)pagefaults 0swaps

after the change:

	[torvalds@g5 linux]$ /usr/bin/time git-rev-list v2.6.12..HEAD > /dev/null
	0.26user 0.00system 0:00.27elapsed 100%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
	0inputs+0outputs (0major+2433minor)pagefaults 0swaps

note how the minor faults have decreased from 3714 pages to 2433 pages.
That's all due to the fewer anonymous pages allocated to hold the comment
buffers and their metadata.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-09-15 14:57:52 -07:00
Pavel Roskin d998a0895f [PATCH] Fix "prefix" mixup in git-rev-list
Recent changes in git have broken cg-log.  git-rev-list no longer
prints "commit" in front of commit hashes.  It turn out a local
"prefix" variable in main() shadows a file-scoped "prefix" variable.

The patch removed the local "prefix" variable since its value is never
used (in the intended way, that is).  The call to
setup_git_directory() is kept since it has useful side effects.

The file-scoped "prefix" variable is renamed to "commit_prefix" just
in case someone reintroduces "prefix" to hold the return value of
setup_git_directory().

Signed-off-by: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-08-24 16:50:16 -07:00
Linus Torvalds 90e1848113 Make "git-rev-list" work within subdirectories
This trivial patch makes "git-rev-list" able to handle not being in
the top-level directory.  This magically also makes "git-whatchanged"
do the right thing.

Trivial scripting fix to make sure that "git log" also works.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-08-23 12:43:57 -07:00
Sergey Vlasov 7f1335c74c [PATCH] git-rev-list: avoid crash on broken repository
When following tags, check for parse_object() success and error out
properly instead of segfaulting.

Signed-off-by: Sergey Vlasov <vsu@altlinux.ru>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-08-19 13:07:43 -07:00
Junio C Hamano d87449c553 Introduce --pretty=oneline format.
This introduces --pretty=oneline to git-rev-tree and
git-rev-list commands to show only the first line of the commit
message, without frills. 

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-08-09 22:28:23 -07:00
Johannes Schindelin 76cd8eb619 [PATCH] add *--no-merges* flag to suppress display of merge commits
As requested by Junio (who suggested --single-parents-only, but this
could forget a no-parent root).

Also, adds a few missing options to the usage string.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-08-09 22:28:21 -07:00
Junio C Hamano 1215879cdc Teach rev-list since..til notation.
The King Penguin says:

    Now, for extra bonus points, maybe you should make "git-rev-list" also
    understand the "rev..rev" format (which you can't do with just the
    get_sha1() interface, since it expands into more).

The faithful servant makes it so.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-08-05 01:25:31 -07:00
Petr Baudis dd53c7ab29 [PATCH] Support for NO_OPENSSL
Support for completely OpenSSL-less builds. FSF considers distributing GPL
binaries with OpenSSL linked in as a legal problem so this is trouble
e.g. for Debian, or some people might not want to install OpenSSL
anyway. If you

	make NO_OPENSSL=1

you get completely OpenSSL-less build, disabling --merge-order and using
Mozilla's SHA1 implementation.

Ported from Cogito.

Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-07-29 17:21:52 -07:00
Linus Torvalds 6c3b84c81c [PATCH] Fix interesting git-rev-list corner case
This corner-case was triggered by a kernel commit that was not in date
order, due to a misconfigured time zone that made the commit appear three
hours older than it was.

That caused git-rev-list to traverse the commit tree in a non-obvious
order, and made it parse several of the _parents_ of the misplaced commit
before it actually parsed the commit itself. That's fine, but it meant
that the grandparents of the commit didn't get marked uninteresting,
because they had been reached through an "interesting" branch.

The reason was that "mark_parents_uninteresting()" (which is supposed to
mark all existing parents as being uninteresting - duh) didn't actually
traverse more than one level down the parent chain.

NORMALLY this is fine, since with the date-based traversal order,
grandparents won't ever even have been looked at before their parents (so
traversing the chain down isn't needed, because the next time around when
we pick out the parent we'll mark _its_ parents uninteresting), but since
we'd gotten out of order, we'd already seen the parent and thus never got
around to mark the grandparents.

Anyway, the fix is simple. Just traverse parent chains recursively.
Normally the chain won't even exist (since the parent hasn't been parsed
yet), so this is not actually going to trigger except in this strange
corner-case.

Add a comment to the simple one-liner, since this was a bit subtle, and I
had to really think things through to understand how it could happen.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-07-29 17:21:46 -07:00
Junio C Hamano 54c6870ebf Typofix: usage strings fix.
The *_usage strings should not start with "usage: ", since the
usage() function gives its own.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-07-27 11:53:49 -07:00
Linus Torvalds 4311d328fe Be more aggressive about marking trees uninteresting
We'll mark all the trees at the edges (as deep as we had to go to
realize that we have all the commits needed) as uninteresting.
Otherwise we'll occasionally list a lot of objects that were actually
available at the edge in a commit that we just never ended up parsing
because we could determine early that we had all relevant commits.

NOTE! The object listing is still just a _heuristic_.  It's guaranteed
to list a superset of the actual new objects, but there might be the
occasional old object in the list, just because the commit that
referenced it was much further back in the history.

For example, let's say that a recent commit is a revert of part of the
tree to much older state: since we didn't walk _that_ far back in the
commit history tree to list the commits necessary, git-rev-tree will
never have marked the old objects uninteresting, and we'll end up
listing them as "new".

That's ok.
2005-07-23 10:01:49 -07:00
Junio C Hamano 013aab8265 [PATCH] Dereference tag repeatedly until we get a non-tag.
When we allow a tag object in place of a commit object, we only
dereferenced the given tag once, which causes a tag that points at a tag
that points at a commit to be rejected.  Instead, dereference tag
repeatedly until we get a non-tag.

This patch makes change to two functions:

 - commit.c::lookup_commit_reference() is used by merge-base,
   rev-tree and rev-parse to convert user supplied SHA1 to that of
   a commit.
 - rev-list uses its own get_commit_reference() to do the same.

Dereferencing tags this way helps both of these uses.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-11 10:13:09 -07:00
Linus Torvalds 454fbbcde3 git-rev-list: allow missing objects when the parent is marked UNINTERESTING
We still want the "top-most" uninteresting object to exist, so that we
know that we have reached it.
2005-07-10 15:09:46 -07:00
Jon Seymour a7336ae514 [PATCH] Ensure list insertion method does not depend on position of --merge-order argument
This change ensures that git-rev-list --merge-order produces the same result
irrespective of what position the --merge-order argument appears in the argument
list.

Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-06 18:03:53 -07:00
Linus Torvalds 960cea2dd1 git-rev-list: remove the DUPCHECK logic, use SEEN instead
That's what we should have done in the first place, since it not only
avoids another unnecessary flag, it also protects the commits from
showing up as duplicates later when they show up as parents of another
commit (in the pop_most_recent_commit() path).

This will hopefully also fix --topo-sort.
2005-07-06 16:52:49 -07:00
Linus Torvalds e6c3505b44 Make sure we generate the whole commit list before trying to sort it topologically
This was my cherry-pickng merge bug.  But topo-order still shows strange
behaviour with multiple heads, so keep gitk using --merge-order for now.
2005-07-06 10:51:43 -07:00
Jon Seymour d2775a817a [PATCH] Tidy up - slight simplification of rev-list.c
This patch implements a small tidy up of rev-list.c to reduce
(but not eliminate) the amount of ugliness associated
with the merge_order flag.

Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-07-06 10:28:02 -07:00
Linus Torvalds d2d02a4906 Add "--topo-order" flag to use new topological sort 2005-07-06 10:25:04 -07:00
Linus Torvalds bce6286670 Remove insane overlapping bit ranges from epoch.c
..and move the DUPCHECK to rev-list.c since both the merge-order and the
upcoming topo-sort get confused by dups.
2005-07-06 09:56:16 -07:00
Linus Torvalds 7e21c29b56 Clean up commit insertion in git-rev-list
Jon wants the commits in a different order for merge-order.
2005-07-06 09:38:06 -07:00
Linus Torvalds f755494cec Make "insert_by_date()" match "commit_list_insert()"
Same argument order, same return type.  This allows us to use a function
pointer to choose one over the other.
2005-07-06 09:31:17 -07:00
Linus Torvalds 12ba7eaf1d Remove unnecessary usage of strncmp() in git-rev-list arg parsing.
Not only is it unnecessary, it incorrectly allows extraneous characters
at the end of the argument.

Junio noticed the --merge-order thing, and Jon points out that if we fix
that one, we should fix --show-breaks too.
2005-07-05 12:12:50 -07:00
Linus Torvalds 7a662e896b git-rev-list: make sure the output is sorted by recency
We didn't sort the refs by date, so if you had multiple refs, the end
result would not be properly sorted.
2005-07-04 16:49:37 -07:00
Linus Torvalds 7620d39fcb Make rev-list flush the stdio buffers after each rev.
We'd rather get the revisions in a slow but timely manner than
have to wait for them.
2005-07-04 16:36:48 -07:00
Linus Torvalds 12d2a18780 "git rev-list --unpacked" shows only unpacked commits
More infrastructure to do efficient incremental packs.
2005-07-03 13:29:54 -07:00
Linus Torvalds 960bba0d8c Add "--all" flag to rev-parse that shows all refs
And make git-rev-list just silently ignore non-commit refs if we're not
asking for all objects.
2005-07-03 13:07:52 -07:00
Linus Torvalds 6da4016aea Fix sparse warnings.
Mainly making a lot of local functions and variables be marked "static",
but there was a "zero as NULL" warning in there too.
2005-07-03 10:10:45 -07:00
Linus Torvalds 36f8d17445 Teach git-rev-list about non-commit objects
Now you can give git-rev-list tags, trees and blobs, and it will do the
proper reachability for them all. Knock wood.

Of course, you need the "--objects" flag to do anything but plain
commits.
2005-06-29 11:30:24 -07:00
Linus Torvalds 3c90f03d32 Prepare git-rev-list for tracking tag objects too
We want to be able to just say "give a difference between these
objects", rather than limiting it to commits only.  This isn't there
yet, but it sets things up to be a bit easier.
2005-06-29 10:40:14 -07:00
Linus Torvalds 9b66ec0474 Add "--pretty=full" format that also shows committer.
Also move the common implementation of parsing the --pretty argument
format into commit.c rather than having duplicates in diff-tree.c and
rev-list.c.
2005-06-26 17:50:46 -07:00
Linus Torvalds 9ce43d1c90 Ooh. Make git-rev-list --object associate a name with objects.
The name isn't unique, it's just the first name that object is reached
through, so it's really nothing more than a hint.
2005-06-26 15:26:05 -07:00
Linus Torvalds 9de48752fe git-rev-list: add option to list all objects (not just commits)
When you do

	git-rev-list --objects $(git-rev-parse HEAD^..HEAD)

it now lists not only the "commit difference" between the parent of HEAD
and HEAD itself (which is normally just the parent, but in the case of a
merge will be all the newly merged commits), but also all the new tree
and blob objects that weren't in the original.

NOTE! It doesn't walk all the way to the root, so it doesn't do a full
object search in the full old history.  Instead, it will only look as
far back in the history as it needs to resolve the commits.  Thus, if
the commit reverts a blob (or tree) back to a state much further back in
history, we may end up listing some blobs (or trees) as "new" even
though they exist further back.

Regardless, the list of objects will be a superset (usually exact) list
of objects needed to go from the beginning commit to ending commit.

As a particularly obvious special case,

	git-rev-list --objects HEAD

will end up listing every single object that is reachable from the HEAD
commit.

Side note: the objects are sorted by "recency", with commits first.
2005-06-24 22:56:58 -07:00
Jon Seymour 5e749e259b [PATCH] Fix for --merge-order, --max-age interaction issue
This patch fixes a problem reported by Paul Mackerras regarding the interaction
of the --merge-order and --max-age switches of git-rev-list.

This patch applies to the current Linus HEAD. A cleaner fix for the same problem
in my current HEAD will follow later.

With this change, --merge-order produces the same result as no --merge-order
on the linux-2.6 git repository, to wit:

$> git-rev-list --max-age=1116330140 bcfff0b471a60df350338bcd727fc9b8a6aa54b2 | wc -l
655
$> git-rev-list --merge-order --max-age=1116330140 bcfff0b471a60df350338bcd727fc9b8a6aa54b2 | wc -l
655

Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-19 20:13:18 -07:00
Jon Seymour 51b1e1713b [PATCH] Prevent git-rev-list without --merge-order producing duplicates in output
If b is reachable from a, then:

	 git-rev-list a b

argument would print one of the commits twice.

This patch fixes that problem. A previous problem fixed it for the
--merge-order switch.

Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-19 20:13:18 -07:00